Zocdoc Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve zocdoc.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 2,825 ENT Doctors/Medical Centers In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Zocdoc Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Zocdoc Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Zocdoc Report, March 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Brooklyn
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Zocdoc Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	5,848	2,825	2	39.2%	126,451,211	6.6	27,379	32,654	1,035	40,100	3,499	9,636	32,534
California	1,368	810	3	43.3%	16,960,359	6.3	1,166	1,740	136	2,524	197	532	2,173
New York	1,184	691	1	65.6%	12,878,778	4.8	1,491	1,756	95	2,507	418	909	2,348
Florida	1,096	695	3	33.6%	6,920,188	8.8	446	975	104	1,241	54	154	762
Texas	1,293	774	3	24.1%	6,726,837	9.6	1,360	1,917	89	2,132	49	311	1,324
New Jersey	917	554	1	65.7%	5,834,800	4.4	537	593	102	736	49	246	729
Illinois	1,113	666	2	43.7%	5,599,361	5.6	1,247	1,382	59	1,676	206	409	1,444
Pennsylvania	1,180	691	1	43.1%	5,512,159	6.0	1,604	1,781	38	1,989	33	481	1,762
Michigan	921	558	1	45.1%	4,495,438	5.5	833	976	42	1,109	113	322	955
Georgia	933	578	2	42.9%	4,422,179	7.4	574	726	68	861	50	168	673
Massachusetts	824	482	1	58.0%	3,960,915	4.6	461	534	28	690	86	236	651
Ohio	1,046	614	3	30.3%	3,531,727	7.4	976	1,188	10	1,227	33	213	931
Virginia	952	575	2	41.4%	3,484,014	6.0	723	891	50	1,086	176	325	871
Maryland	944	585	1	50.7%	3,041,712	5.5	392	463	39	570	66	166	509
North Carolina	905	544	2	29.3%	2,979,034	7.2	683	802	33	1,009	80	219	777
Washington	876	529	1	36.6%	2,665,603	6.3	451	587	24	704	65	147	575
Minnesota	898	547	2	47.9%	2,648,314	5.2	777	878	14	915	124	270	843
Missouri	1,019	607	2	41.6%	2,530,887	5.8	887	1,017	28	1,222	174	290	1,036
Wisconsin	924	549	3	38.6%	2,230,797	5.7	694	769	14	1,028	86	285	869
Indiana	1,254	709	4	31.2%	2,072,269	8.1	659	770	16	860	28	159	618
Tennessee	868	515	2	29.0%	1,930,125	7.5	514	622	27	768	82	193	516
Connecticut	735	455	2	46.2%	1,653,846	5.5	234	279	30	323	18	82	296
Alabama	890	549	2	31.4%	1,529,333	8.0	522	637	15	733	68	155	527
Kentucky	911	552	3	32.8%	1,459,922	6.4	698	758	18	844	102	220	706
Arizona	776	499	4	20.4%	1,419,646	9.9	247	396	35	484	4	69	316
South Carolina	825	505	3	28.5%	1,412,491	8.2	347	422	14	488	17	75	338
Oregon	971	590	4	33.4%	1,364,285	6.6	355	414	17	521	65	126	396
Colorado	909	552	8	23.4%	1,296,600	8.0	381	514	20	642	27	124	425
Mississippi	895	549	2	42.2%	1,262,707	6.3	384	418	21	563	10	145	475
Iowa	933	553	2	38.4%	1,203,010	6.0	890	933	13	1,000	119	279	807
Arkansas	853	527	3	40.2%	1,200,890	5.6	553	587	27	806	86	218	686
Kansas	946	574	3	37.1%	1,079,201	5.8	616	692	18	949	74	276	814
Oklahoma	817	511	4	27.5%	1,077,638	8.0	557	646	10	756	77	138	514
Louisiana	839	518	4	22.3%	1,037,945	8.9	431	510	18	571	15	81	346
West Virginia	875	534	3	47.0%	859,350	5.3	684	704	16	804	62	210	710
Utah	740	474	5	26.5%	806,481	7.1	246	284	11	320	0	40	274
New Hampshire	729	443	1	53.0%	712,109	4.1	238	248	14	333	66	122	319
Nevada	641	415	7	24.0%	702,151	8.6	92	168	10	192	12	28	131
New Mexico	744	471	3	30.4%	636,153	6.4	327	361	14	581	53	139	442
Maine	891	534	3	43.9%	584,884	5.8	421	425	17	562	3	83	525
Hawaii	595	377	4	39.7%	563,918	5.6	82	93	9	134	20	39	106
Idaho	734	468	4	29.1%	490,608	6.9	251	273	12	343	20	80	264
Rhode Island	549	359	4	41.2%	435,380	6.6	64	77	4	91	1	21	77
Nebraska	833	514	6	22.1%	421,798	8.7	524	581	6	625	74	115	457
Montana	770	484	2	40.0%	417,198	5.1	348	361	14	550	93	157	495
Vermont	686	420	1	61.1%	381,927	3.9	250	254	10	342	43	125	341
Delaware	563	359	4	34.4%	326,747	7.0	52	66	6	85	2	11	71
South Dakota	722	462	4	37.6%	324,806	6.0	359	370	8	482	61	111	399
North Dakota	685	438	2	35.3%	265,507	6.5	367	381	12	544	50	102	421
Alaska	631	405	5	35.8%	264,519	5.1	218	235	4	298	57	152	250
Wyoming	711	444	2	41.2%	239,670	5.5	164	171	12	251	16	63	211

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Brooklyn	New York	270	172	1	82.2%	2,136,538	2.7	37	2	38	15	17	38
New York City	New York	328	215	1	85.6%	1,388,400	2.5	47	2	94	24	48	94
Los Angeles	California	343	227	4	49.1%	1,207,179	6.1	62	3	65	0	1	62
Bronx	New York	290	186	2	77.4%	1,115,351	3.4	25	1	25	0	14	25
Chicago	Illinois	334	223	6	33.6%	908,370	7.9	56	1	56	0	0	55
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	296	196	4	52.3%	824,588	5.7	47	1	47	0	1	47
San Jose	California	296	197	3	62.0%	650,869	4.9	28	1	28	0	7	28
Washington DC	District of Columbia	267	174	1	86.9%	594,895	2.4	28	1	28	15	15	28
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	367	245	1	70.6%	587,168	3.9	27	7	29	1	13	29
San Francisco	California	283	181	4	56.1%	488,541	5.5	28	1	28	0	5	28
Atlanta	Georgia	349	237	6	41.1%	406,350	7.6	39	6	46	0	3	43
Las Vegas	Nevada	322	216	9	25.7%	397,780	8.5	43	1	43	0	2	35
Dallas	Texas	335	231	7	26.2%	364,426	9.5	48	2	48	0	0	42
Miami	Florida	436	297	8	19.3%	363,228	11.5	55	9	62	1	2	20
Detroit	Michigan	285	188	3	56.4%	361,330	5.4	25	1	25	0	3	25
Seattle	Washington	322	210	6	36.5%	348,340	7.5	35	1	35	0	0	34
Saint Louis	Missouri	397	256	6	36.2%	331,905	7.5	45	2	45	0	1	42
Hollywood	Florida	236	159	2	59.2%	277,445	4.8	9	3	9	1	3	9
Saint Paul	Minnesota	398	256	7	29.5%	235,686	9.0	30	4	40	0	2	19
Alexandria	Virginia	277	187	3	66.3%	235,008	4.3	14	4	16	0	7	16
Minneapolis	Minnesota	431	287	10	21.2%	231,376	13.1	51	5	60	0	1	24
Staten Island	New York	245	167	5	46.9%	222,364	6.4	12	1	12	0	0	12
Denver	Colorado	387	258	9	19.8%	214,995	10.6	38	4	43	0	0	24
Silver Spring	Maryland	226	144	3	70.5%	213,729	4.0	7	3	7	0	3	7
Tampa	Florida	282	195	7	26.8%	212,308	8.6	27	2	28	0	0	27
Pompano Beach	Florida	249	173	2	55.7%	206,449	5.5	10	5	14	1	2	14
Anaheim	California	187	128	3	55.3%	203,683	5.3	7	2	8	0	0	8
Saint Petersburg	Florida	288	201	5	56.3%	200,853	5.8	16	3	20	4	4	15
Hialeah	Florida	210	137	3	53.0%	194,432	5.9	7	3	9	0	0	9
Jamaica	New York	185	119	3	78.1%	190,470	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Oakland	California	266	172	4	45.4%	187,058	6.3	14	3	17	0	0	17
Jersey City	New Jersey	201	128	3	71.4%	186,907	3.4	7	2	8	0	4	8
Sacramento	California	351	230	8	22.2%	178,498	9.8	28	2	29	0	0	16
Baltimore	Maryland	250	162	8	27.3%	172,502	8.3	22	2	22	0	0	19
Garland	Texas	169	118	3	71.0%	169,025	4.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Beaverton	Oregon	206	130	2	77.0%	155,331	3.5	4	2	4	0	2	4
Mckinney	Texas	155	109	3	80.4%	151,960	2.7	3	1	3	1	2	3
Flushing	New York	153	98	2	70.0%	150,547	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lake Worth	Florida	194	134	1	72.1%	148,891	4.6	5	5	7	1	3	7
Trenton	New Jersey	249	171	3	71.3%	148,343	3.8	11	4	12	1	5	12
Newark	New Jersey	220	144	4	51.8%	145,283	5.6	9	1	9	0	1	9
Boca Raton	Florida	227	153	3	65.1%	144,612	4.3	9	1	9	0	3	9
Lakeland	Florida	228	155	5	55.4%	142,906	5.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Long Beach	California	228	157	8	29.6%	141,795	7.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Corona	California	209	142	5	53.6%	137,908	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Woodbridge	Virginia	157	105	4	64.4%	136,266	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Columbia	South Carolina	142	86	6	39.7%	136,041	6.8	14	1	14	0	2	14
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	343	228	9	19.5%	133,015	10.0	39	3	50	0	1	26
Hyattsville	Maryland	166	106	1	84.4%	132,989	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	332	222	7	16.2%	131,463	11.9	29	4	35	0	0	12
Homestead	Florida	238	149	3	68.0%	127,567	4.0	7	2	8	1	4	8
Compton	California	136	93	2	91.5%	127,073	2.0	3	3	6	1	5	6
Plano	Texas	185	133	7	38.5%	117,738	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Paterson	New Jersey	225	145	2	80.1%	116,778	3.1	9	1	9	0	6	9
Moreno Valley	California	206	130	5	56.7%	116,437	5.3	4	2	7	0	1	7
Hayward	California	174	119	3	58.4%	112,068	5.5	4	5	8	0	0	8
Astoria	New York	156	100	2	77.6%	110,782	3.3	4	3	5	1	3	5
Carrollton	Texas	136	95	1	82.2%	110,778	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Winston Salem	North Carolina	240	162	4	41.8%	110,442	6.4	9	3	15	0	0	15
Irving	Texas	189	129	5	45.4%	109,116	6.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Yonkers	New York	182	119	3	60.3%	108,783	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Van Nuys	California	137	89	5	60.7%	107,904	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	California	176	114	3	61.4%	107,834	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
West Palm Beach	Florida	258	175	6	28.8%	106,690	8.2	12	2	14	0	0	14
Sunnyvale	California	191	124	2	69.5%	106,210	4.8	4	3	5	0	2	5
Norwalk	California	98	57	1	100.0%	105,886	1.0	1	2	2	1	2	2
Warren	Michigan	174	111	2	78.2%	105,658	3.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Ontario	California	147	96	3	59.3%	104,772	5.0	3	2	6	0	1	6
Arlington	Texas	250	174	6	26.0%	103,114	8.5	12	1	12	0	0	12
Mesquite	Texas	143	100	4	68.7%	100,557	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Inglewood	California	226	155	2	74.7%	99,883	3.4	5	2	5	1	4	5
Grand Prairie	Texas	162	111	5	52.2%	99,421	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Ana	California	217	146	6	27.7%	98,948	8.2	6	5	11	0	0	9
Fremont	California	191	125	5	42.3%	98,543	6.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Virginia Beach	Virginia	252	172	7	21.8%	98,081	12.4	12	2	13	0	0	6
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	223	159	5	57.4%	97,152	5.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Douglasville	Georgia	139	90	1	88.0%	97,014	2.5	2	2	3	1	2	3
Gaithersburg	Maryland	173	124	4	66.9%	96,777	3.6	5	1	5	1	2	5
Allen	Texas	116	74	2	86.3%	96,077	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Cambridge	Massachusetts	173	109	2	82.4%	95,385	2.6	5	1	5	3	3	5
Elmhurst	New York	99	66	1	100.0%	93,967	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Fontana	California	131	91	5	40.0%	93,891	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Irvine	California	228	154	6	34.9%	93,411	11.3	9	2	9	0	1	4
Portland	Oregon	311	203	10	10.1%	93,099	11.5	33	2	33	0	0	13
Tempe	Arizona	133	96	4	48.7%	92,518	6.0	4	3	6	0	0	6
Fairfax	Virginia	207	136	4	55.7%	91,224	5.0	4	2	4	0	1	4
Elizabeth	New Jersey	163	99	2	90.0%	90,420	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Woodstock	Georgia	129	87	1	88.6%	90,156	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Ashburn	Virginia	130	83	3	80.0%	89,846	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Stamford	Connecticut	185	124	3	68.5%	88,235	3.2	6	1	6	0	4	6
Alpharetta	Georgia	174	120	4	45.3%	85,664	5.8	4	3	4	0	1	4
Kent	Washington	198	130	3	52.1%	83,693	5.8	4	3	6	0	1	6
Rockville	Maryland	170	111	4	57.2%	82,754	5.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Kennesaw	Georgia	140	100	1	83.1%	82,384	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
San Mateo	California	172	104	5	57.8%	82,263	5.3	4	2	7	0	1	7
Memphis	Tennessee	300	188	10	11.7%	81,534	11.7	26	4	27	0	0	8
Rancho Cucamonga	California	173	113	5	46.0%	81,279	7.0	4	2	8	0	0	7
Lakewood	New Jersey	99	62	3	80.0%	80,610	3.0	1	2	2	0	1	2
Cleveland	Ohio	321	213	10	10.7%	80,368	12.7	29	2	31	0	0	5
Peoria	Arizona	171	120	5	46.5%	80,059	6.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Hemet	California	178	119	4	62.1%	79,997	5.0	3	2	5	0	1	5
Boston	Massachusetts	214	129	4	52.7%	79,983	4.9	14	1	14	0	5	14
Falls Church	Virginia	206	134	2	66.3%	79,775	4.6	5	5	6	0	2	6
Pasadena	California	190	134	4	50.5%	79,596	6.2	6	2	8	0	0	8
Marietta	Georgia	200	141	8	24.3%	78,424	8.7	7	5	11	0	0	9
Livermore	California	136	84	3	80.0%	77,002	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	146	97	1	81.8%	76,495	3.0	4	1	4	2	2	4
Lowell	Massachusetts	165	109	4	68.5%	76,312	4.3	4	3	5	0	0	5
La Puente	California	163	99	4	64.4%	75,934	6.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
Roswell	Georgia	127	93	2	76.0%	75,860	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Ridgewood	New York	99	61	4	70.0%	74,702	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Buford	Georgia	115	73	3	75.3%	74,641	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
San Bernardino	California	219	146	7	29.7%	74,131	8.3	7	2	12	0	0	9
Bowie	Maryland	173	110	1	71.9%	73,408	4.0	4	2	4	1	1	4
Kissimmee	Florida	217	151	7	25.4%	73,345	9.7	7	3	11	0	0	4
Murrieta	California	144	91	4	55.5%	73,336	5.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Hesperia	California	128	83	3	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Vallejo	California	194	130	5	57.8%	71,939	4.5	4	2	7	0	2	7
Columbus	Ohio	328	209	11	8.4%	71,449	12.8	30	1	30	0	0	3
San Diego	California	360	241	16	5.3%	71,433	14.8	36	3	39	0	0	6
Cumming	Georgia	149	105	4	43.6%	70,599	6.3	3	2	5	0	0	5
Santa Clara	California	175	113	3	56.1%	70,425	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Roseville	California	163	106	6	50.0%	69,897	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Bedford	Massachusetts	154	105	3	73.7%	69,882	4.3	4	2	8	0	2	8
Acworth	Georgia	130	90	3	70.0%	69,778	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Richardson	Texas	144	101	4	60.0%	68,759	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Laurel	Maryland	176	116	3	60.9%	68,534	4.5	4	2	4	0	2	4
Manassas	Virginia	194	128	4	45.1%	68,481	6.0	4	4	6	1	1	6
Pomona	California	165	109	5	43.3%	68,376	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Downey	California	151	94	3	60.0%	67,741	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	California	144	93	3	71.2%	67,299	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Pittsburg	California	99	61	4	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Daly City	California	146	96	4	58.4%	66,764	5.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
South Gate	California	98	70	2	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Mesa	Arizona	244	165	10	12.3%	65,969	11.5	13	5	18	0	0	6
Riverside	California	191	134	9	17.7%	65,521	10.0	7	2	12	0	0	4
Whittier	California	234	149	4	33.4%	65,487	8.2	6	4	9	0	0	8
Huntington Beach	California	175	110	6	32.7%	65,427	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	168	113	2	50.9%	65,314	5.3	3	4	4	1	1	4
Perris	California	150	99	3	54.8%	64,340	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Charlotte	North Carolina	314	205	11	7.1%	63,984	13.2	24	1	24	0	0	1
Pacoima	California	99	68	5	60.0%	63,479	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Edison	New Jersey	165	115	4	62.9%	63,422	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Apopka	Florida	110	72	2	64.8%	63,259	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	California	176	120	2	66.7%	62,946	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Dayton	Ohio	342	221	10	13.1%	62,665	11.7	27	2	28	0	0	10
O Fallon	Missouri	146	97	5	64.9%	62,560	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rialto	California	135	84	4	58.2%	61,994	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	California	135	89	3	54.4%	61,931	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Houston	Texas	419	284	21	1.9%	61,828	18.6	96	2	96	0	0	1
Palm Bay	Florida	160	108	5	55.2%	61,474	5.3	4	2	4	0	1	4
Bell Gardens	California	98	61	5	60.0%	61,460	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Miami Beach	Florida	191	134	5	53.0%	61,322	7.2	5	3	6	0	2	5
Schenectady	New York	257	169	5	37.8%	61,297	7.6	8	3	13	0	0	11
Menifee	California	203	136	4	54.9%	60,661	5.0	4	2	8	0	1	8
Berkeley	California	261	169	4	47.3%	60,104	6.7	9	3	14	0	0	14
Lithonia	Georgia	128	89	2	61.9%	59,913	5.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Salt Lake City	Utah	289	199	10	12.1%	59,124	14.5	19	2	20	0	0	8
Merced	California	172	111	4	57.2%	58,984	5.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Elk Grove	California	135	89	7	32.8%	58,764	7.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Quincy	Massachusetts	152	95	2	62.0%	58,322	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Napa	California	140	86	5	60.0%	57,999	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Sylmar	California	98	61	5	60.0%	57,892	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Saint Charles	Missouri	158	104	4	41.1%	57,519	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Fredericksburg	Virginia	180	127	5	32.9%	57,259	8.0	5	2	6	0	0	5
North Hollywood	California	124	75	7	37.1%	56,804	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clermont	Florida	152	107	3	56.4%	56,563	5.7	3	3	5	0	0	5
Toms River	New Jersey	132	88	7	45.9%	56,441	6.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Deltona	Florida	108	66	4	60.0%	56,333	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Monte	California	138	87	4	59.6%	55,897	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Covington	Georgia	128	82	2	60.0%	55,612	5.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Antioch	California	124	76	4	50.0%	55,361	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Herndon	Virginia	139	84	4	59.2%	55,352	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	California	152	98	4	50.6%	55,336	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Delray Beach	Florida	195	135	6	46.4%	55,274	6.6	5	2	5	0	1	5
Surprise	Arizona	177	117	6	40.6%	54,980	7.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Clearwater	Florida	214	142	5	29.9%	54,784	8.0	9	2	11	0	0	9
Indio	California	132	88	4	56.8%	54,580	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Bothell	Washington	174	116	4	42.1%	54,047	6.0	3	2	3	0	1	2
Henderson	Nevada	198	135	11	17.6%	53,338	9.4	8	2	8	0	0	5
Chandler	Arizona	207	143	7	19.8%	53,055	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
New Port Richey	Florida	174	118	5	43.6%	52,727	7.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Fort Worth	Texas	265	184	16	5.8%	52,462	14.3	32	3	32	0	0	1
Clinton Township	Michigan	149	98	4	52.0%	52,158	6.3	3	3	4	0	1	4
Hillsboro	Oregon	123	80	3	50.5%	51,969	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Lewisville	Texas	137	89	6	43.6%	51,705	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Modesto	California	202	134	7	19.5%	51,510	9.3	7	2	13	0	0	9
Independence	Missouri	233	152	7	41.4%	51,359	7.5	8	4	13	0	0	13
Decatur	Georgia	182	125	8	28.3%	51,159	8.0	5	2	6	0	0	6
Yuma	Arizona	160	104	5	34.7%	51,154	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mcdonough	Georgia	123	79	4	50.0%	50,731	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Odessa	Texas	203	141	6	31.7%	50,722	7.8	6	2	8	0	0	8
Palmdale	California	170	102	8	28.9%	50,622	8.0	4	2	6	0	0	5
Laredo	Texas	209	140	6	18.3%	49,521	9.8	6	2	9	0	0	4
Conroe	Texas	208	147	5	30.8%	49,306	8.1	7	3	7	0	0	6
Puyallup	Washington	215	142	4	34.5%	49,259	8.4	5	3	9	0	0	5
Escondido	California	146	97	6	27.4%	49,208	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Broomfield	Colorado	166	99	4	46.9%	49,151	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Spokane	Washington	272	174	9	13.6%	48,978	12.5	14	2	15	0	0	4
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	341	231	14	7.1%	48,324	16.8	43	2	46	0	0	3
Naperville	Illinois	120	71	7	29.0%	48,125	9.5	4	1	4	0	1	1
Olathe	Kansas	122	78	5	33.3%	48,040	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Oceanside	California	176	114	7	23.6%	47,205	9.3	4	2	5	0	0	3
Waukegan	Illinois	127	84	4	48.2%	47,015	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Aurora	Colorado	220	150	10	10.7%	46,524	11.6	11	5	18	0	0	3
Reading	Pennsylvania	225	148	6	21.6%	46,428	9.3	10	1	10	0	0	8
Tracy	California	183	123	5	39.4%	46,164	6.5	4	4	7	0	0	7
Torrance	California	195	132	8	26.1%	46,082	8.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Greeley	Colorado	132	86	6	39.8%	45,391	7.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Milton	Florida	148	96	4	47.5%	44,974	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lancaster	California	175	116	8	24.2%	44,701	8.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Victorville	California	151	91	6	32.6%	44,430	7.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Orange	California	168	115	7	30.6%	44,300	10.6	5	2	5	0	0	4
Lynnwood	Washington	189	116	4	40.8%	44,246	7.7	3	3	5	0	0	3
Boynton Beach	Florida	170	117	7	25.4%	44,219	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fresno	California	292	194	12	7.3%	43,924	13.1	18	7	27	0	0	0
Orlando	Florida	336	231	15	4.4%	43,757	17.1	32	2	33	0	0	2
Indianapolis	Indiana	342	214	14	4.6%	43,652	15.1	37	3	43	0	0	2
Plainfield	Illinois	180	118	5	43.7%	43,025	5.7	3	3	4	0	1	3
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	191	124	5	21.2%	42,994	8.5	6	2	8	0	0	7
Topeka	Kansas	292	195	6	26.2%	42,765	8.9	18	3	21	0	0	12
Littleton	Colorado	264	177	13	13.0%	42,324	12.7	10	4	15	0	0	4
Vacaville	California	126	82	7	40.0%	42,118	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
San Antonio	Texas	250	175	17	2.4%	41,981	18.6	59	2	68	0	0	0
Boulder	Colorado	193	126	7	31.8%	41,755	7.8	6	2	7	0	0	7
Coral Springs	Florida	129	87	7	42.3%	41,123	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Olympia	Washington	221	140	5	22.4%	41,034	9.7	6	3	8	0	0	5
Lansing	Michigan	187	126	8	24.9%	40,926	8.9	7	1	7	0	0	4
Youngstown	Ohio	225	153	7	25.6%	40,144	8.8	12	2	13	0	0	10
Tacoma	Washington	320	215	9	12.0%	40,108	11.8	20	6	34	0	0	9
Muncie	Indiana	192	124	4	43.1%	39,948	6.2	5	2	10	0	0	10
Killeen	Texas	179	129	7	26.5%	39,820	8.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
Kansas City	Missouri	344	231	13	6.9%	39,562	13.2	49	8	59	0	0	3
Missouri City	Texas	145	100	7	37.1%	39,330	8.5	2	2	2	1	1	1
Hawthorne	California	102	63	6	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
North Las Vegas	Nevada	193	132	9	16.5%	38,504	10.4	7	1	7	0	0	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	235	160	5	32.8%	38,379	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Buffalo	New York	314	212	15	6.8%	38,374	20.7	28	2	29	0	0	6
Champaign	Illinois	168	112	4	40.5%	38,302	7.0	3	4	6	0	0	6
Redwood City	California	172	115	7	33.5%	38,301	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Albuquerque	New Mexico	281	185	15	5.8%	38,168	14.4	17	4	30	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	180	115	6	40.8%	38,013	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Colorado Springs	Colorado	328	213	9	6.5%	37,772	14.2	30	3	32	0	0	4
Spring Hill	Florida	178	114	5	30.0%	37,636	7.6	5	2	7	0	0	7
Rochester	New York	302	200	8	8.0%	37,548	13.7	24	2	25	0	0	2
Santa Cruz	California	162	108	5	36.1%	37,526	7.5	4	2	8	0	0	8
Round Rock	Texas	162	112	8	22.2%	37,187	11.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Concord	California	188	127	7	28.5%	37,122	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	144	99	7	27.9%	36,933	8.3	4	2	8	0	0	8
Gilbert	Arizona	172	119	7	15.4%	36,750	10.7	6	3	7	0	0	2
Pearland	Texas	144	96	5	26.7%	36,683	12.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Salinas	California	175	113	6	19.4%	36,480	9.0	5	2	9	0	0	7
El Paso	Texas	326	212	12	4.6%	36,238	15.0	24	4	37	0	2	3
Daytona Beach	Florida	223	157	6	34.8%	35,862	8.6	5	2	6	0	1	3
Bakersfield	California	249	167	15	6.4%	35,550	13.6	11	3	20	0	0	0
Santa Maria	California	165	105	6	24.8%	35,513	8.3	3	3	5	0	0	4
Burbank	California	200	135	6	32.5%	35,104	7.4	5	3	6	0	1	4
Wilmington	Delaware	231	164	8	16.0%	35,037	11.5	10	4	15	0	0	5
New Haven	Connecticut	183	122	9	26.9%	35,019	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	127	76	6	35.9%	34,999	10.0	2	2	3	0	0	1
Edinburg	Texas	151	100	8	22.4%	34,786	9.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
Durham	North Carolina	204	138	9	12.0%	34,683	11.8	8	1	8	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	California	131	86	5	35.2%	34,586	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bellingham	Washington	159	104	7	26.5%	33,508	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Angelo	Texas	179	125	8	30.0%	33,230	8.0	4	2	7	0	0	7
Florissant	Missouri	153	98	7	30.3%	32,767	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bridgeport	Connecticut	198	131	10	22.3%	32,609	9.3	6	2	7	0	0	3
Bryan	Texas	197	132	6	33.9%	32,609	7.6	5	2	7	0	0	7
El Cajon	California	169	118	8	18.8%	32,493	13.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
Oxnard	California	174	123	9	14.7%	32,383	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Tucson	Arizona	325	218	13	3.5%	31,942	19.2	32	1	32	0	0	3
Overland Park	Kansas	208	137	10	17.2%	31,554	9.7	9	1	9	0	0	6
Duluth	Minnesota	241	153	6	26.9%	31,510	8.6	11	2	15	0	0	13
Mission	Texas	167	110	9	17.2%	31,169	10.3	3	2	4	0	0	3
Amarillo	Texas	246	165	9	13.4%	30,770	10.9	14	4	18	0	0	5
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	236	162	9	16.9%	30,689	10.0	9	1	9	0	0	5
Everett	Washington	145	92	8	18.3%	30,567	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Stockton	California	261	164	9	8.2%	30,521	11.4	12	3	22	0	0	6
Sugar Land	Texas	166	113	9	18.0%	30,434	12.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
Annapolis	Maryland	205	141	6	31.8%	30,235	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Longmont	Colorado	162	108	7	23.0%	30,052	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Yakima	Washington	184	115	5	22.8%	29,552	8.8	4	2	5	0	0	4
Chula Vista	California	187	124	8	11.2%	29,207	11.6	5	2	7	0	0	2
Englewood	Colorado	201	132	5	25.7%	28,633	12.8	4	3	6	0	0	3
Federal Way	Washington	143	88	6	28.6%	28,632	9.5	2	2	3	0	0	1
Palo Alto	California	167	109	7	29.3%	28,345	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Brownsville	Texas	154	100	8	14.1%	28,290	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Madera	California	159	106	7	27.4%	28,225	9.0	3	2	6	0	0	4
Ballwin	Missouri	138	83	8	29.7%	28,123	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Worcester	Massachusetts	211	140	9	15.1%	28,114	10.1	9	3	14	0	0	6
Provo	Utah	161	105	6	24.0%	28,022	9.0	3	2	4	0	0	3
Honolulu	Hawaii	241	163	12	6.7%	27,974	13.1	11	4	15	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	156	108	7	25.6%	27,791	7.7	3	3	5	0	0	5
Temecula	California	154	108	7	21.4%	27,738	7.7	3	3	6	0	0	6
Baytown	Texas	146	100	4	23.3%	27,425	9.3	3	2	5	0	0	4
Auburn	Washington	158	107	7	23.9%	26,960	8.7	3	2	4	0	0	3
Scottsdale	Arizona	218	144	15	8.8%	26,348	13.4	11	2	11	0	0	1
Canton	Ohio	207	130	8	17.8%	26,143	9.5	12	2	14	0	0	6
Spring	Texas	220	151	16	6.8%	26,001	14.5	8	3	10	0	0	4
Valdosta	Georgia	178	113	6	27.2%	25,853	9.6	5	3	7	0	0	3
Chico	California	160	101	8	23.0%	25,717	9.0	3	3	5	0	0	3
Wichita	Kansas	282	186	12	6.2%	25,714	13.9	26	4	32	0	0	0
Fort Myers	Florida	226	150	10	10.1%	25,528	12.5	11	3	19	0	0	5
Midlothian	Virginia	144	96	6	26.0%	25,125	9.7	3	2	4	0	0	2
San Leandro	California	158	104	7	22.3%	24,842	9.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Santa Fe	New Mexico	203	135	7	19.3%	24,726	9.8	5	2	6	0	0	2
Salem	Oregon	195	126	10	9.3%	24,692	11.9	7	3	9	0	0	2
Kennewick	Washington	167	120	5	24.5%	24,250	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Largo	Florida	161	112	7	22.3%	24,027	9.4	5	2	10	0	0	6
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	300	198	13	6.3%	23,976	15.7	18	2	19	0	0	3
Vancouver	Washington	227	146	11	7.3%	23,962	12.6	11	4	15	0	0	0
Holland	Michigan	132	86	6	25.5%	23,903	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Racine	Wisconsin	181	124	9	18.8%	23,751	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Renton	Washington	183	116	9	15.3%	23,735	9.6	5	3	6	0	0	5
West Valley City	Utah	170	113	7	17.7%	23,548	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Keller	Texas	133	92	10	20.2%	23,532	10.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Madison	Wisconsin	251	166	10	8.0%	23,515	11.9	14	4	19	0	0	1
York	Pennsylvania	181	120	9	12.8%	22,980	11.3	7	2	12	0	0	1
Mobile	Alabama	292	200	12	8.5%	22,974	11.3	18	2	22	0	0	9
Dearborn	Michigan	160	106	8	23.6%	22,441	7.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Naples	Florida	269	185	11	7.1%	22,333	14.2	14	2	15	0	0	3
Lincoln	Nebraska	272	174	10	7.7%	22,319	12.3	22	2	23	0	0	0
Erie	Pennsylvania	239	160	7	11.9%	21,846	10.7	13	2	14	0	0	6
Providence	Rhode Island	219	148	13	10.6%	21,740	16.6	8	2	10	0	0	1
Grand Rapids	Michigan	201	131	12	5.9%	21,539	14.0	12	1	12	0	0	0
Corpus Christi	Texas	296	201	11	6.5%	21,133	12.7	18	3	20	0	0	1
Toledo	Ohio	261	178	11	6.9%	21,126	12.9	15	3	20	0	0	1
Lees Summit	Missouri	206	133	8	20.7%	21,086	7.7	6	1	6	1	1	6
Summerville	South Carolina	144	89	7	15.1%	20,948	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Portsmouth	Virginia	200	132	7	22.0%	20,942	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	5
Lexington	Kentucky	255	170	14	6.5%	20,796	13.7	15	4	24	0	0	1
Ventura	California	164	104	9	17.6%	20,415	9.3	3	3	4	0	0	2
Springfield	Missouri	215	142	10	8.8%	20,362	11.6	7	2	8	0	0	1
Hamilton	Ohio	153	101	9	14.8%	20,275	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chattanooga	Tennessee	277	187	12	9.7%	20,129	13.3	15	7	24	0	0	3
Fayetteville	North Carolina	210	136	10	8.2%	20,092	11.5	8	2	9	0	0	2
Riverview	Florida	159	106	10	18.0%	20,046	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Bradenton	Florida	251	164	11	7.9%	20,001	12.0	10	4	19	0	0	2
Winter Haven	Florida	158	105	9	18.7%	19,993	9.7	3	2	6	0	0	2
Visalia	California	154	96	10	13.1%	19,923	10.0	3	2	4	0	0	2
Panama City	Florida	198	140	8	15.7%	19,829	10.2	6	2	12	0	0	5
Phoenix	Arizona	296	204	23	1.4%	19,718	19.8	42	2	45	0	0	0
Ogden	Utah	186	121	8	9.7%	19,565	11.4	5	1	5	0	0	2
Akron	Ohio	265	175	10	7.2%	19,508	12.9	17	1	17	0	0	0
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	216	137	9	13.9%	19,442	10.5	6	1	6	0	0	3
Muskegon	Michigan	175	118	7	14.8%	19,108	10.4	5	2	7	0	0	2
Ocala	Florida	224	153	9	8.5%	19,074	12.3	11	2	20	0	0	1
Flint	Michigan	183	122	10	12.3%	19,057	10.9	7	3	12	0	0	4
Tulsa	Oklahoma	288	194	14	4.4%	18,721	15.2	28	1	28	0	0	0
Newnan	Georgia	132	88	7	20.0%	18,679	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chesapeake	Virginia	184	127	10	7.7%	18,230	12.8	6	2	10	0	0	0
Fort Mill	South Carolina	170	111	7	19.2%	18,219	10.7	3	2	4	0	0	1
Anderson	South Carolina	169	108	8	18.5%	18,173	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Glendale	Arizona	244	162	13	5.9%	17,996	15.1	9	3	13	0	0	0
Charlottesville	Virginia	187	120	8	14.5%	17,872	10.4	5	2	7	0	0	2
Midland	Texas	171	105	9	11.1%	17,803	11.4	5	2	6	0	0	1
New Orleans	Louisiana	236	164	17	4.1%	17,703	16.0	19	2	30	0	0	0
Greensboro	North Carolina	206	138	13	5.3%	17,452	15.0	9	3	12	0	0	0
Kenosha	Wisconsin	183	121	9	15.5%	17,451	10.0	4	3	8	0	0	4
Nashville	Tennessee	283	181	14	3.8%	17,389	17.1	22	3	25	0	0	2
Cape Coral	Florida	178	115	10	9.6%	17,336	10.5	6	3	10	0	0	5
Denton	Texas	175	120	10	10.9%	17,273	12.0	6	3	9	0	0	1
Santa Rosa	California	169	109	8	8.0%	17,250	12.2	6	3	8	0	0	2
Frisco	Texas	133	89	9	10.0%	17,245	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Knoxville	Tennessee	241	161	14	4.4%	16,996	15.9	17	1	17	0	0	0
Cincinnati	Ohio	321	211	20	2.1%	16,930	18.7	45	1	45	0	0	0
Lawrenceville	Georgia	142	92	10	6.6%	16,915	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
New Braunfels	Texas	152	98	9	16.4%	16,838	11.0	2	2	3	0	0	1
Albany	New York	231	157	9	11.0%	16,657	11.5	11	1	11	0	1	3
Pensacola	Florida	268	178	12	6.2%	16,559	13.5	13	2	21	0	0	1
Savannah	Georgia	218	147	8	6.8%	16,375	12.7	10	1	10	0	0	2
Shreveport	Louisiana	216	143	11	7.2%	16,151	12.8	12	2	13	0	0	0
Arvada	Colorado	185	126	7	11.9%	15,844	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
High Point	North Carolina	173	109	8	12.9%	15,801	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Anchorage	Alaska	249	173	12	6.4%	15,714	13.6	12	1	12	0	0	0
Eugene	Oregon	178	124	10	7.6%	15,425	12.8	6	2	10	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	125	76	7	16.2%	15,413	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Henrico	Virginia	241	159	11	7.9%	15,169	13.7	7	1	7	0	0	1
Norfolk	Virginia	255	180	11	6.1%	15,046	14.1	14	2	17	0	0	0
Rock Hill	South Carolina	144	96	9	12.7%	14,813	12.3	3	2	5	0	0	1
Pueblo	Colorado	218	146	7	9.2%	14,615	12.3	7	2	8	0	0	2
Las Cruces	New Mexico	198	130	9	9.8%	14,564	10.9	7	3	12	0	2	3
Fairfield	California	140	89	7	12.7%	14,496	10.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Orem	Utah	146	98	6	14.3%	14,367	9.3	3	2	5	0	0	4
Green Bay	Wisconsin	240	163	9	7.8%	14,346	11.9	7	4	11	0	0	1
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	184	122	11	7.7%	14,294	12.4	5	2	6	0	0	0
Evansville	Indiana	197	132	10	7.7%	14,258	12.6	9	5	15	0	0	2
Bloomington	Indiana	182	122	10	10.6%	14,112	11.0	6	1	6	0	0	2
Montgomery	Alabama	250	168	11	6.7%	14,076	13.2	13	2	14	0	0	0
Clovis	California	142	98	10	11.6%	14,029	12.3	3	2	5	0	0	1
Edmond	Oklahoma	188	124	11	8.2%	14,009	14.2	5	2	8	0	0	2
Tallahassee	Florida	216	152	12	4.9%	14,005	14.9	10	4	16	0	0	0
Cypress	Texas	110	71	10	8.0%	13,709	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Cary	North Carolina	114	70	10	8.7%	13,532	11.3	4	3	7	0	0	0
Clarksville	Tennessee	161	109	11	7.6%	13,434	12.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Reno	Nevada	251	164	13	4.5%	13,395	15.9	12	2	13	0	0	1
Vista	California	138	94	9	11.2%	13,385	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Austin	Texas	293	197	22	1.2%	13,382	28.5	44	4	46	0	0	0
Richmond	Virginia	234	152	14	3.4%	13,367	20.9	15	2	15	0	0	0
Huntsville	Alabama	229	158	13	6.7%	13,088	13.4	11	2	12	0	0	0
Fullerton	California	157	102	8	9.4%	13,064	10.8	4	2	5	0	0	1
Waco	Texas	210	140	10	8.2%	13,032	12.6	9	3	16	0	0	1
Allentown	Pennsylvania	172	118	10	7.5%	12,714	12.4	7	4	11	0	0	0
Jacksonville	Florida	290	194	21	1.5%	12,698	21.8	31	2	32	0	0	0
Fort Collins	Colorado	192	128	12	6.5%	12,665	13.4	5	2	7	0	0	0
Boise	Idaho	222	155	11	4.9%	12,629	15.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Ann Arbor	Michigan	159	107	9	7.6%	12,591	12.4	5	3	7	0	0	1
Gainesville	Florida	213	146	12	6.0%	12,574	14.3	10	3	12	0	0	0
Wichita Falls	Texas	216	153	8	12.7%	12,548	10.7	7	4	10	0	0	4
Beaumont	Texas	211	135	10	8.6%	12,542	11.9	8	2	9	0	0	1
Ypsilanti	Michigan	121	73	9	11.7%	12,527	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Appleton	Wisconsin	179	111	9	10.2%	12,410	11.0	4	2	5	0	0	2
Carlsbad	California	173	114	11	10.8%	12,228	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Newport News	Virginia	181	120	9	6.9%	12,157	13.6	7	4	12	0	0	1
Sparks	Nevada	173	109	9	10.2%	12,140	13.0	4	2	5	0	0	2
Gastonia	North Carolina	140	95	9	11.2%	11,965	11.7	3	2	4	0	0	1
Davenport	Iowa	195	125	8	11.4%	11,931	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	3
Billings	Montana	173	123	8	8.6%	11,831	11.3	4	3	7	0	0	1
Hampton	Virginia	185	117	10	8.7%	11,820	12.2	6	2	7	0	0	2
Missoula	Montana	203	139	8	11.8%	11,516	9.8	5	2	8	0	0	5
Lynchburg	Virginia	169	111	10	11.1%	11,389	11.5	4	2	5	0	0	2
Macon	Georgia	227	152	11	6.8%	11,181	14.2	9	4	11	0	0	1
Joliet	Illinois	180	124	7	8.5%	11,013	11.0	5	2	6	0	0	3
Simi Valley	California	127	84	9	8.4%	10,863	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	California	222	148	10	7.9%	10,727	12.0	7	5	12	0	0	1
Kalamazoo	Michigan	202	138	11	6.5%	10,586	13.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Roanoke	Virginia	258	173	11	6.2%	10,519	13.5	10	4	13	0	0	1
Greenville	South Carolina	190	125	11	4.8%	10,518	14.8	9	4	13	0	0	0
Rockford	Illinois	207	137	11	5.8%	10,501	14.1	9	2	12	0	0	0
Hagerstown	Maryland	155	102	9	10.5%	10,302	8.3	3	3	5	0	1	2
Waterbury	Connecticut	171	109	9	9.4%	10,217	11.8	6	2	9	0	0	2
Des Moines	Iowa	233	153	15	4.5%	10,091	15.4	11	1	11	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	119	79	9	10.0%	10,048	10.0	2	2	4	0	0	2
Metairie	Louisiana	164	110	12	6.9%	9,851	12.8	5	2	8	0	0	0
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	167	118	12	7.4%	9,722	13.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Saint Augustine	Florida	189	124	13	7.4%	9,699	13.0	5	3	7	0	0	1
Saginaw	Michigan	206	144	9	7.4%	9,698	12.6	7	4	12	0	0	0
Frederick	Maryland	144	91	11	7.3%	9,671	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Hartford	Connecticut	185	118	11	7.8%	9,655	12.3	6	3	7	0	0	0
Sandy	Utah	167	107	9	8.7%	9,614	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
West Jordan	Utah	144	101	9	7.8%	9,605	12.3	3	3	6	0	0	0
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	169	120	10	6.6%	9,579	12.8	5	4	9	0	0	0
Bellevue	Washington	159	104	10	6.5%	9,496	13.6	5	3	8	0	0	1
Abilene	Texas	190	130	8	7.2%	9,374	13.0	6	2	7	0	0	0
Redding	California	181	120	8	8.3%	9,356	9.0	4	3	7	1	2	3
Mcallen	Texas	156	98	13	6.6%	9,345	13.0	3	3	5	0	0	0
Meridian	Idaho	123	86	6	8.9%	9,238	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
South Bend	Indiana	217	136	13	6.3%	9,233	14.6	10	4	14	0	0	0
Lake Charles	Louisiana	159	109	12	7.0%	9,095	12.8	5	2	8	0	0	0
Scranton	Pennsylvania	213	137	8	9.1%	9,060	12.8	8	3	12	0	0	1
Lubbock	Texas	247	164	13	3.3%	9,023	16.8	14	3	17	0	0	1
Parker	Colorado	125	79	10	9.0%	9,020	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	152	100	9	7.1%	8,918	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Elgin	Illinois	144	105	10	7.2%	8,860	13.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Louisville	Kentucky	289	189	18	1.2%	8,823	26.3	32	2	32	0	0	0
Fort Pierce	Florida	233	157	9	9.2%	8,772	11.5	8	3	10	0	0	3
Sarasota	Florida	251	175	14	3.5%	8,697	17.3	13	3	16	0	0	1
Syracuse	New York	226	146	16	3.8%	8,692	16.0	15	2	16	0	0	0
Elkhart	Indiana	154	97	8	8.6%	8,536	11.3	3	2	5	0	0	0
Lawrence	Kansas	181	120	8	8.4%	8,517	11.2	5	3	7	0	0	2
Springdale	Arkansas	120	79	9	8.8%	8,512	11.0	2	3	4	0	0	1
Asheville	North Carolina	181	123	11	6.4%	8,425	13.6	5	3	7	0	0	0
Birmingham	Alabama	260	168	19	1.6%	8,166	23.7	30	2	32	0	0	0
Raleigh	North Carolina	233	149	18	1.5%	8,118	34.7	15	3	15	0	0	0
Franklin	Tennessee	149	93	10	7.6%	8,088	13.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Bend	Oregon	161	103	9	6.6%	8,060	12.7	3	2	4	0	2	2
Jupiter	Florida	153	107	9	8.1%	8,029	11.8	4	2	6	0	0	1
Manchester	New Hampshire	180	127	11	6.9%	7,994	13.0	5	2	6	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	183	121	10	7.5%	7,869	12.4	5	2	6	0	0	0
Augusta	Georgia	193	120	13	3.8%	7,839	21.8	8	2	8	0	0	0
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	166	103	11	7.8%	7,651	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Morgantown	West Virginia	141	93	11	8.0%	7,623	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bowling Green	Kentucky	161	103	10	6.5%	7,477	12.5	4	2	5	0	0	1
College Station	Texas	123	77	10	6.0%	7,383	14.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Tyler	Texas	201	128	13	4.7%	7,383	15.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Grand Junction	Colorado	197	130	11	6.9%	7,301	13.0	6	2	8	0	0	0
Vero Beach	Florida	183	122	13	6.2%	7,108	14.0	6	4	9	0	0	0
Fargo	North Dakota	170	113	10	5.8%	7,060	13.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Waukesha	Wisconsin	170	113	10	7.3%	6,973	12.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Nampa	Idaho	140	93	11	6.0%	6,954	14.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Livonia	Michigan	123	86	11	7.1%	6,760	12.7	3	2	5	0	0	0
Terre Haute	Indiana	176	113	10	7.1%	6,697	13.0	6	4	9	0	0	0
Gulfport	Mississippi	161	112	9	6.9%	6,563	13.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Melbourne	Florida	140	96	15	4.2%	6,480	15.8	5	2	10	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	151	98	11	6.7%	6,458	12.7	3	2	5	0	0	1
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	160	110	11	5.1%	6,283	17.8	4	2	5	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	122	71	8	6.3%	5,992	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Little Rock	Arkansas	238	162	15	2.6%	5,697	17.9	12	1	12	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	112	78	9	6.0%	5,595	14.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Idaho Falls	Idaho	183	126	12	4.9%	5,369	15.5	4	3	6	0	0	0
Spartanburg	South Carolina	155	102	13	4.7%	5,253	15.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Norman	Oklahoma	178	125	12	4.2%	5,150	15.3	4	2	6	0	0	0
Omaha	Nebraska	296	197	23	0.9%	4,943	29.8	31	3	31	0	0	0
Humble	Texas	145	95	14	2.9%	4,764	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Charleston	South Carolina	250	165	14	2.1%	4,163	18.4	10	1	10	0	0	0
Johnson City	Tennessee	141	99	11	4.2%	4,013	15.3	4	3	6	0	0	0
Jackson	Mississippi	233	154	15	2.3%	3,880	17.3	11	3	14	0	0	0
Katy	Texas	163	105	17	1.1%	3,724	19.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Fort Wayne	Indiana	220	138	20	1.1%	3,351	29.9	16	5	17	0	0	0
Lafayette	Louisiana	162	111	17	1.7%	2,735	19.0	5	1	5	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	343	227	4	49.1%	1,207,179	6.1	62	3	65	0	1	62
San Jose	296	197	3	62.0%	650,869	4.9	28	1	28	0	7	28
San Francisco	283	181	4	56.1%	488,541	5.5	28	1	28	0	5	28
Anaheim	187	128	3	55.3%	203,683	5.3	7	2	8	0	0	8
Oakland	266	172	4	45.4%	187,058	6.3	14	3	17	0	0	17
Sacramento	351	230	8	22.2%	178,498	9.8	28	2	29	0	0	16
Long Beach	228	157	8	29.6%	141,795	7.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Corona	209	142	5	53.6%	137,908	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Compton	136	93	2	91.5%	127,073	2.0	3	3	6	1	5	6
Moreno Valley	206	130	5	56.7%	116,437	5.3	4	2	7	0	1	7
Hayward	174	119	3	58.4%	112,068	5.5	4	5	8	0	0	8
Van Nuys	137	89	5	60.7%	107,904	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	176	114	3	61.4%	107,834	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Sunnyvale	191	124	2	69.5%	106,210	4.8	4	3	5	0	2	5
Norwalk	98	57	1	100.0%	105,886	1.0	1	2	2	1	2	2
Ontario	147	96	3	59.3%	104,772	5.0	3	2	6	0	1	6
Inglewood	226	155	2	74.7%	99,883	3.4	5	2	5	1	4	5
Santa Ana	217	146	6	27.7%	98,948	8.2	6	5	11	0	0	9
Fremont	191	125	5	42.3%	98,543	6.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Fontana	131	91	5	40.0%	93,891	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Irvine	228	154	6	34.9%	93,411	11.3	9	2	9	0	1	4
San Mateo	172	104	5	57.8%	82,263	5.3	4	2	7	0	1	7
Rancho Cucamonga	173	113	5	46.0%	81,279	7.0	4	2	8	0	0	7
Hemet	178	119	4	62.1%	79,997	5.0	3	2	5	0	1	5
Pasadena	190	134	4	50.5%	79,596	6.2	6	2	8	0	0	8
Livermore	136	84	3	80.0%	77,002	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
La Puente	163	99	4	64.4%	75,934	6.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
San Bernardino	219	146	7	29.7%	74,131	8.3	7	2	12	0	0	9
Murrieta	144	91	4	55.5%	73,336	5.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Hesperia	128	83	3	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Vallejo	194	130	5	57.8%	71,939	4.5	4	2	7	0	2	7
San Diego	360	241	16	5.3%	71,433	14.8	36	3	39	0	0	6
Santa Clara	175	113	3	56.1%	70,425	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Roseville	163	106	6	50.0%	69,897	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pomona	165	109	5	43.3%	68,376	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Downey	151	94	3	60.0%	67,741	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	144	93	3	71.2%	67,299	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Pittsburg	99	61	4	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Daly City	146	96	4	58.4%	66,764	5.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
South Gate	98	70	2	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Riverside	191	134	9	17.7%	65,521	10.0	7	2	12	0	0	4
Whittier	234	149	4	33.4%	65,487	8.2	6	4	9	0	0	8
Huntington Beach	175	110	6	32.7%	65,427	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Perris	150	99	3	54.8%	64,340	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Pacoima	99	68	5	60.0%	63,479	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Monica	176	120	2	66.7%	62,946	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Rialto	135	84	4	58.2%	61,994	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	135	89	3	54.4%	61,931	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bell Gardens	98	61	5	60.0%	61,460	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Menifee	203	136	4	54.9%	60,661	5.0	4	2	8	0	1	8
Berkeley	261	169	4	47.3%	60,104	6.7	9	3	14	0	0	14
Merced	172	111	4	57.2%	58,984	5.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Elk Grove	135	89	7	32.8%	58,764	7.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Napa	140	86	5	60.0%	57,999	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Sylmar	98	61	5	60.0%	57,892	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
North Hollywood	124	75	7	37.1%	56,804	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Monte	138	87	4	59.6%	55,897	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Antioch	124	76	4	50.0%	55,361	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
West Covina	152	98	4	50.6%	55,336	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Indio	132	88	4	56.8%	54,580	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Modesto	202	134	7	19.5%	51,510	9.3	7	2	13	0	0	9
Palmdale	170	102	8	28.9%	50,622	8.0	4	2	6	0	0	5
Escondido	146	97	6	27.4%	49,208	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Oceanside	176	114	7	23.6%	47,205	9.3	4	2	5	0	0	3
Tracy	183	123	5	39.4%	46,164	6.5	4	4	7	0	0	7
Torrance	195	132	8	26.1%	46,082	8.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Lancaster	175	116	8	24.2%	44,701	8.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Victorville	151	91	6	32.6%	44,430	7.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Orange	168	115	7	30.6%	44,300	10.6	5	2	5	0	0	4
Fresno	292	194	12	7.3%	43,924	13.1	18	7	27	0	0	0
Vacaville	126	82	7	40.0%	42,118	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Hawthorne	102	63	6	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Redwood City	172	115	7	33.5%	38,301	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Cruz	162	108	5	36.1%	37,526	7.5	4	2	8	0	0	8
Concord	188	127	7	28.5%	37,122	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Salinas	175	113	6	19.4%	36,480	9.0	5	2	9	0	0	7
Bakersfield	249	167	15	6.4%	35,550	13.6	11	3	20	0	0	0
Santa Maria	165	105	6	24.8%	35,513	8.3	3	3	5	0	0	4
Burbank	200	135	6	32.5%	35,104	7.4	5	3	6	0	1	4
Mission Viejo	131	86	5	35.2%	34,586	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Cajon	169	118	8	18.8%	32,493	13.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
Oxnard	174	123	9	14.7%	32,383	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Stockton	261	164	9	8.2%	30,521	11.4	12	3	22	0	0	6
Chula Vista	187	124	8	11.2%	29,207	11.6	5	2	7	0	0	2
Palo Alto	167	109	7	29.3%	28,345	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Madera	159	106	7	27.4%	28,225	9.0	3	2	6	0	0	4
Temecula	154	108	7	21.4%	27,738	7.7	3	3	6	0	0	6
Chico	160	101	8	23.0%	25,717	9.0	3	3	5	0	0	3
San Leandro	158	104	7	22.3%	24,842	9.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Ventura	164	104	9	17.6%	20,415	9.3	3	3	4	0	0	2
Visalia	154	96	10	13.1%	19,923	10.0	3	2	4	0	0	2
Santa Rosa	169	109	8	8.0%	17,250	12.2	6	3	8	0	0	2
Fairfield	140	89	7	12.7%	14,496	10.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Clovis	142	98	10	11.6%	14,029	12.3	3	2	5	0	0	1
Vista	138	94	9	11.2%	13,385	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Fullerton	157	102	8	9.4%	13,064	10.8	4	2	5	0	0	1
Carlsbad	173	114	11	10.8%	12,228	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Simi Valley	127	84	9	8.4%	10,863	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	222	148	10	7.9%	10,727	12.0	7	5	12	0	0	1
San Marcos	119	79	9	10.0%	10,048	10.0	2	2	4	0	0	2
Redding	181	120	8	8.3%	9,356	9.0	4	3	7	1	2	3

Brooklyn

ZIP	zocdoc.com	entandallergy.com	upbrooklynent.com	yelp.com	brooklynentandallergy.com	sharecare.com
11208	4	6	5	8	10	9
11206	4	1	3	8	2	9
11239	4	2	5	8	10	9
11229	4	6	5	8	10	9
11226	4	2	3	8	10	9
11218	4	2	3	7	9	8
11216	1	4	2	3	7	6
11228	1	3	2	4	5
11238	1	4	2	3	7	6
11237	4	2	5	8	3	9
11217	4	6	2	8	10	9
11207	4	2	3	8	10	9
11236	4	3	5	7	9	8
11205	1	2	4	5	9	8
11219	1	3	2	4	6	5
11234	1	3	2	5	7	6
11203	1	3	2	5	7	6
11224	1	3	2	4	6	5
11225	4	7	2	6	10	9
11215	1	3	2	4	6	5
11233	1	3	2	5	6	7
11211	1	3	2	5	6	7
11220	1	3	2	4	6	5
11230	1	3	2	4	6	5
11232	1	3	2	5	6
11201	4	2	1	8	10	9
11212	4	2	5	6	10	9
11221	4	1	3	8	2	9
11210	4	3	5	8	10	9
11214	4	2	5	8	10	9
11213	4	3	5	8	10	9
11223	4	6	5	7	10	9
11235	4	6	5	8	10	9
11204	4	2	5	8	11	9
11222	1	3	2	5	6	7
11209	2	1	4	5	8	6
11231	4	2	1	6	10

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Zocdoc

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 2,825 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Zocdoc Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (ent near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Zocdoc Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Zocdoc Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Zocdoc Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly