Wyzant Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve wyzant.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 2,537 Tutoring Services In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Wyzant Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Wyzant Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Wyzant Report, March 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Brooklyn
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Wyzant Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	39,130	2,537	3	50.2%	161,934,904	7.0	27,379	32,654	3,393	39,950	60	2,597	36,773
California	4,920	591	3	53.8%	21,067,338	6.5	1,166	1,740	401	2,239	1	218	2,062
Texas	3,887	359	4	56.6%	15,788,139	6.4	1,360	1,917	188	2,199	0	203	2,068
Florida	2,642	351	3	52.7%	10,854,429	6.2	446	975	233	1,423	7	180	1,310
New York	3,773	509	4	50.9%	9,992,919	7.4	1,491	1,756	148	2,156	3	174	1,914
Illinois	3,300	293	3	52.0%	6,668,174	7.1	1,247	1,382	143	1,623	1	103	1,487
North Carolina	2,364	264	3	57.3%	5,821,853	6.4	683	802	114	1,002	0	126	941
Georgia	2,047	228	3	53.1%	5,471,694	6.5	574	726	146	941	0	112	898
Pennsylvania	3,335	360	4	41.0%	5,248,361	7.5	1,604	1,781	135	2,199	0	44	2,011
Ohio	2,899	223	5	42.6%	4,958,628	7.6	976	1,188	95	1,448	3	46	1,286
Michigan	2,431	211	3	48.3%	4,809,183	6.9	833	976	115	1,237	4	68	1,158
Virginia	2,088	250	3	52.7%	4,430,754	6.9	723	891	115	1,081	1	100	1,013
Washington	2,016	214	4	55.2%	4,021,529	6.9	451	587	73	673	0	61	610
Arizona	1,530	167	4	57.4%	3,990,265	6.1	247	396	61	535	0	40	517
New Jersey	2,072	383	4	43.2%	3,840,604	7.7	537	593	182	749	1	43	660
Maryland	1,596	240	4	54.1%	3,248,520	6.9	392	463	90	560	5	56	520
Tennessee	1,875	190	4	46.9%	3,116,096	7.1	514	622	63	748	0	21	704
Colorado	1,910	207	4	55.4%	3,064,714	6.3	381	514	58	598	0	79	576
Massachusetts	2,203	253	4	42.6%	2,911,832	7.6	461	534	126	650	4	46	556
South Carolina	1,568	180	3	56.2%	2,787,243	6.1	347	422	66	532	0	71	505
Indiana	3,450	374	4	41.6%	2,764,157	7.5	659	770	77	989	0	43	903
Alabama	1,835	175	3	55.9%	2,718,690	6.1	522	637	78	829	0	78	792
Minnesota	1,954	180	4	46.9%	2,592,635	7.3	777	878	50	934	12	63	847
Louisiana	1,579	161	3	54.5%	2,539,876	6.3	431	510	49	650	2	61	620
Wisconsin	2,084	193	4	42.0%	2,429,593	7.6	694	769	56	853	4	20	774
Missouri	2,065	171	6	37.6%	2,291,063	7.3	887	1,017	46	1,163	7	77	1,035
Kentucky	1,758	191	4	47.5%	2,111,882	7.2	698	758	39	882	0	23	838
Oregon	2,090	228	4	47.8%	1,950,555	6.9	355	414	46	539	0	26	506
Oklahoma	1,470	161	4	48.9%	1,917,364	7.0	557	646	26	730	0	34	682
Connecticut	1,481	205	5	43.6%	1,561,605	7.5	234	279	88	344	2	16	304
Iowa	1,947	183	3	49.3%	1,544,139	7.3	890	933	39	1,053	0	45	968
Arkansas	1,670	157	3	51.1%	1,529,202	6.9	553	587	47	749	0	62	703
Mississippi	1,789	166	4	46.7%	1,396,631	7.7	384	418	48	474	0	34	427
Nevada	789	140	4	44.2%	1,292,627	6.9	92	168	17	201	0	8	190
Kansas	1,715	179	4	42.4%	1,234,077	7.5	616	692	40	832	0	1	763
New Mexico	1,070	126	3	53.2%	1,110,691	6.5	327	361	19	378	0	30	363
Utah	1,021	141	4	34.7%	1,057,336	8.0	246	284	43	339	0	8	284
Nebraska	1,564	156	4	52.1%	992,087	6.8	524	581	11	695	0	15	668
Idaho	1,148	141	3	49.5%	835,012	7.2	251	273	25	329	0	11	300
West Virginia	1,531	156	5	45.6%	833,285	7.0	684	704	30	946	0	15	887
Hawaii	586	95	3	45.8%	651,703	6.9	82	93	10	117	0	5	107
Maine	1,752	234	5	48.8%	650,889	6.6	421	425	24	647	2	45	609
New Hampshire	1,188	168	4	44.4%	596,181	7.4	238	248	32	362	0	12	329
Montana	1,126	133	3	48.9%	509,906	6.7	348	361	14	433	1	28	410
Delaware	577	111	3	50.2%	476,928	6.4	52	66	20	105	0	1	100
South Dakota	1,010	108	3	41.2%	356,247	8.0	359	370	11	429	0	7	384
Rhode Island	613	100	6	32.4%	342,032	8.2	64	77	20	95	0	3	81
North Dakota	840	113	4	44.6%	335,236	7.5	367	381	10	464	0	0	403
Wyoming	844	113	5	45.0%	261,937	7.0	164	171	9	186	0	0	180
Vermont	1,016	130	6	35.0%	218,844	8.2	250	254	13	301	0	6	260
Alaska	823	106	8	26.9%	198,480	8.0	218	235	6	268	0	5	219

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Brooklyn	New York	395	162	2	85.4%	2,220,483	2.4	37	1	37	0	32	37
Chicago	Illinois	343	93	2	78.7%	2,126,083	3.2	56	2	57	1	49	57
Houston	Texas	458	113	3	60.8%	1,939,071	4.8	96	1	96	0	1	96
Los Angeles	California	380	129	4	62.3%	1,530,393	4.9	62	6	69	0	3	66
New York City	New York	336	151	3	77.9%	1,263,500	2.9	47	3	72	0	35	72
San Antonio	Texas	342	71	3	64.8%	1,151,518	4.4	59	1	59	0	0	59
Dallas	Texas	357	92	2	70.6%	982,696	4.0	48	2	48	0	29	47
Phoenix	Arizona	335	71	3	62.6%	908,710	4.7	42	5	59	0	4	59
San Diego	California	345	100	3	63.8%	859,159	4.8	36	2	36	0	0	36
Miami	Florida	439	108	4	45.0%	844,807	6.4	55	12	91	1	3	80
San Jose	California	285	84	2	76.8%	806,636	3.3	28	2	29	0	24	29
Minneapolis	Minnesota	403	85	4	67.4%	734,194	4.2	51	11	54	7	26	52
Charlotte	North Carolina	259	66	2	77.1%	698,720	3.3	24	2	25	0	22	25
Denver	Colorado	396	86	3	63.3%	688,470	4.6	38	7	41	0	8	41
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	328	87	6	41.5%	654,390	6.9	47	2	47	0	0	47
Austin	Texas	353	94	3	60.0%	652,973	5.1	44	2	45	0	0	45
Fort Worth	Texas	285	73	3	69.9%	637,744	3.9	32	2	40	0	14	40
Seattle	Washington	341	80	3	65.7%	627,913	4.4	35	2	35	0	0	35
Las Vegas	Nevada	353	84	5	39.7%	613,435	7.1	43	2	45	0	0	45
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	296	97	3	72.0%	598,456	3.7	27	9	45	4	23	44
Atlanta	Georgia	368	102	4	57.0%	563,234	5.7	39	9	40	0	6	37
Columbus	Ohio	310	70	3	64.4%	545,178	4.8	30	3	34	1	3	33
Washington DC	District of Columbia	279	84	2	79.2%	541,623	3.5	28	2	39	0	23	39
Sacramento	California	275	63	3	67.1%	539,807	4.4	28	3	29	0	1	29
El Paso	Texas	287	58	2	67.3%	530,988	4.2	24	4	29	0	13	29
Tucson	Arizona	314	72	4	58.3%	527,888	5.3	32	4	37	0	4	36
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	323	60	3	64.4%	522,742	4.6	29	5	34	3	5	31
Cleveland	Ohio	310	71	3	67.0%	502,904	4.3	29	6	53	1	11	53
Jacksonville	Florida	289	67	4	55.8%	483,503	5.3	31	2	48	0	2	48
Orlando	Florida	301	74	4	47.9%	477,489	6.4	32	4	61	0	1	57
Louisville	Kentucky	270	69	3	60.2%	458,232	5.0	32	3	59	0	1	59
Saint Paul	Minnesota	370	72	4	57.2%	457,549	5.4	30	13	46	3	5	43
Indianapolis	Indiana	312	68	5	47.2%	449,754	6.4	37	6	72	0	2	71
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	305	65	3	64.5%	440,349	4.7	43	5	56	0	10	54
Baltimore	Maryland	279	62	3	69.2%	436,533	4.3	22	3	24	0	4	24
San Francisco	California	248	94	4	50.0%	435,224	6.1	28	2	29	0	0	29
Colorado Springs	Colorado	300	85	2	74.6%	435,142	3.3	30	3	32	0	26	32
Portland	Oregon	308	74	6	46.4%	427,028	6.2	33	4	62	0	0	62
Albuquerque	New Mexico	257	52	3	58.3%	381,983	4.9	17	1	17	0	0	17
Detroit	Michigan	230	56	4	57.7%	369,837	5.2	25	3	50	0	0	50
Kansas City	Missouri	290	66	3	64.3%	367,655	4.6	49	2	50	0	6	50
Birmingham	Alabama	276	66	2	72.3%	361,630	3.8	30	3	31	0	17	31
Staten Island	New York	261	117	2	76.1%	360,869	3.6	12	3	23	0	10	23
Raleigh	North Carolina	216	61	3	65.1%	356,007	4.5	15	3	19	0	6	19
Omaha	Nebraska	283	59	3	63.1%	348,427	4.9	31	3	53	0	0	53
Cincinnati	Ohio	288	60	5	41.9%	336,654	6.7	45	4	89	0	0	86
Fresno	California	244	56	4	55.6%	335,190	6.1	18	3	33	0	0	31
Tampa	Florida	315	80	5	41.2%	326,762	7.0	27	4	46	0	0	42
Memphis	Tennessee	275	60	5	46.9%	326,226	6.2	26	4	51	0	0	51
Bronx	New York	345	133	7	22.0%	317,158	9.1	25	2	30	0	0	22
Dayton	Ohio	300	64	4	65.3%	312,189	4.4	27	8	39	1	8	39
Virginia Beach	Virginia	215	53	3	67.9%	305,374	3.7	12	1	12	0	9	12
Anaheim	California	160	55	2	80.5%	296,806	3.0	7	1	7	0	6	7
Richmond	Virginia	214	59	2	75.9%	296,776	3.4	15	1	15	0	13	15
Buffalo	New York	286	60	5	51.5%	289,997	5.9	28	3	45	0	1	44
Long Beach	California	215	65	3	58.9%	282,341	5.0	12	4	17	0	0	17
Nashville	Tennessee	269	63	3	61.2%	280,358	5.0	22	2	22	0	0	22
Hollywood	Florida	197	64	3	58.9%	276,218	4.9	9	4	15	0	1	15
New Orleans	Louisiana	246	61	5	61.6%	263,650	5.1	19	3	37	1	2	37
Honolulu	Hawaii	193	52	3	63.0%	262,201	4.7	11	2	19	0	0	19
Tacoma	Washington	252	56	2	77.5%	258,525	3.7	20	3	21	0	16	20
West Palm Beach	Florida	202	61	4	68.0%	252,163	3.6	12	4	15	0	9	13
Naples	Florida	227	58	2	78.8%	246,679	3.1	14	5	28	0	12	28
Bakersfield	California	239	52	5	43.9%	245,730	6.6	11	2	20	0	0	20
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	261	56	3	64.0%	242,693	4.7	18	2	19	0	5	19
Mesa	Arizona	205	56	4	45.2%	241,418	6.5	13	2	26	0	0	25
Vancouver	Washington	183	52	2	73.8%	240,675	3.5	11	1	11	0	9	11
Hialeah	Florida	171	55	3	64.7%	237,311	4.4	7	3	12	0	5	12
Durham	North Carolina	184	52	2	80.7%	234,202	2.9	8	1	8	0	8	8
Plano	Texas	167	51	2	76.2%	232,723	3.3	7	2	11	0	7	11
Tulsa	Oklahoma	244	63	4	55.1%	232,519	5.7	28	2	31	0	0	31
Greensboro	North Carolina	190	47	3	70.3%	230,389	4.1	9	2	11	0	1	11
Columbia	South Carolina	196	42	2	67.0%	229,699	4.4	14	1	14	0	8	14
Oakland	California	243	70	3	54.7%	225,140	5.5	14	2	20	0	0	19
Spring	Texas	216	59	3	58.6%	223,373	4.9	8	3	9	0	2	9
Santa Ana	California	169	56	4	61.6%	220,125	4.7	6	2	12	0	2	12
Arlington	Texas	187	53	4	53.3%	211,670	5.7	12	3	20	0	0	20
Irvine	California	192	74	2	78.1%	209,108	3.3	9	1	9	0	6	9
Knoxville	Tennessee	249	55	4	53.9%	208,529	5.4	17	4	25	0	0	24
Modesto	California	162	50	2	78.7%	208,169	3.4	7	2	13	0	6	13
Jersey City	New Jersey	176	69	2	79.6%	208,167	3.4	7	3	9	0	4	9
Lincoln	Nebraska	231	48	2	71.5%	206,724	3.6	22	1	22	0	12	22
Glendale	Arizona	221	53	3	67.6%	205,998	4.2	9	3	11	0	5	11
Stockton	California	211	44	4	53.9%	201,382	5.6	12	2	24	0	0	24
Sarasota	Florida	204	55	2	78.5%	196,362	3.3	13	2	13	0	11	13
Fayetteville	North Carolina	160	42	2	80.0%	195,211	3.0	8	2	16	0	8	16
Toledo	Ohio	173	49	3	62.9%	193,565	4.6	15	2	21	0	0	21
Scottsdale	Arizona	254	70	3	64.8%	193,120	4.2	11	3	12	0	2	12
Kissimmee	Florida	217	50	3	66.5%	192,158	4.4	7	6	13	0	2	13
Reno	Nevada	213	54	3	64.6%	191,848	4.8	12	2	16	0	1	16
Riverside	California	164	49	3	51.3%	189,907	6.0	7	2	12	0	0	12
Jamaica	New York	208	83	3	77.4%	188,859	3.7	6	3	11	0	4	11
Aurora	Colorado	202	60	5	43.3%	188,340	6.5	11	2	13	0	0	13
Wichita	Kansas	244	60	5	45.1%	188,250	6.6	26	5	52	0	0	51
Littleton	Colorado	259	74	4	57.6%	187,593	5.4	10	5	12	0	4	11
Salem	Oregon	145	43	2	69.9%	186,353	4.0	7	2	14	0	4	14
Amarillo	Texas	205	44	2	80.0%	183,178	3.0	14	1	14	0	14	14
Laredo	Texas	159	42	4	67.4%	182,597	4.2	6	2	10	0	0	10
Chandler	Arizona	181	46	3	67.9%	182,373	4.2	6	1	6	0	2	6
Lexington	Kentucky	216	49	4	56.7%	181,409	5.1	15	2	26	0	0	26
Garland	Texas	148	44	2	75.9%	180,666	3.6	5	2	10	0	4	10
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	316	80	7	26.4%	180,251	8.7	39	6	58	0	0	50
Salt Lake City	Utah	258	72	4	36.7%	178,595	7.3	19	6	32	0	0	29
Fort Myers	Florida	189	53	3	70.0%	176,126	4.5	11	2	18	0	7	17
Flushing	New York	181	80	3	80.0%	172,054	3.0	4	2	8	0	4	8
Mobile	Alabama	256	51	4	62.5%	169,732	4.7	18	2	28	0	0	28
Gilbert	Arizona	167	50	3	71.1%	169,696	3.8	6	2	10	0	3	10
Irving	Texas	161	48	3	70.0%	168,390	4.0	6	3	9	0	0	9
Newark	New Jersey	181	68	3	60.0%	168,356	5.0	9	2	18	0	0	18
Shreveport	Louisiana	189	49	2	75.0%	167,351	3.7	12	1	12	0	8	12
Spokane	Washington	235	52	5	46.5%	167,188	6.4	14	3	20	0	0	20
Savannah	Georgia	180	47	3	68.9%	166,223	3.7	10	2	15	0	9	15
Bradenton	Florida	197	61	4	65.6%	166,095	4.1	10	3	16	0	3	16
Corpus Christi	Texas	201	51	5	50.7%	165,083	5.6	18	2	31	0	0	31
Pompano Beach	Florida	226	67	3	44.2%	163,624	6.8	10	8	16	0	0	13
Grand Rapids	Michigan	177	53	6	44.4%	163,434	6.5	12	2	24	0	0	24
Boise	Idaho	175	45	3	63.5%	162,614	4.6	9	2	13	0	1	13
Corona	California	159	52	3	63.2%	162,609	4.8	5	2	6	0	0	6
Montgomery	Alabama	188	49	2	77.1%	161,741	3.1	13	4	23	0	14	23
Pensacola	Florida	196	52	4	60.2%	161,362	5.1	13	3	25	0	0	25
Ocala	Florida	197	49	2	71.6%	161,219	3.9	11	1	11	0	4	11
Fontana	California	128	41	3	68.5%	160,693	4.3	3	2	5	0	1	5
Henderson	Nevada	195	53	4	53.1%	160,661	5.9	8	2	8	0	0	8
Beaverton	Oregon	145	43	2	77.7%	156,647	3.0	4	1	4	0	3	4
Fort Collins	Colorado	154	36	2	80.0%	155,776	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Rochester	New York	251	55	7	32.5%	153,379	7.6	24	2	45	0	0	38
Katy	Texas	157	59	4	44.5%	152,882	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lawrenceville	Georgia	161	52	3	59.7%	152,866	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Silver Spring	Maryland	226	76	4	50.1%	151,864	6.0	7	3	12	0	0	12
Winston Salem	North Carolina	201	49	4	56.5%	149,339	5.7	9	2	18	0	0	18
Des Moines	Iowa	180	48	3	65.9%	147,109	4.5	11	2	20	0	3	20
Chula Vista	California	160	44	4	56.3%	146,977	5.6	5	2	10	0	0	10
Gainesville	Florida	188	51	3	70.0%	146,595	4.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Little Rock	Arkansas	193	49	3	67.1%	146,385	4.7	12	1	12	0	1	12
Lakeland	Florida	170	54	3	56.7%	146,247	5.3	9	2	11	0	0	11
Boynton Beach	Florida	160	54	2	82.4%	143,404	2.5	6	2	12	0	10	12
Syracuse	New York	192	54	4	63.2%	143,306	4.7	15	2	25	0	0	25
Palmdale	California	156	48	2	81.2%	142,117	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Lubbock	Texas	224	55	4	51.1%	141,346	5.9	14	3	17	0	0	16
Kent	Washington	146	43	2	87.0%	139,658	2.3	4	1	4	0	4	4
Frisco	Texas	108	40	2	80.0%	137,958	3.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Yonkers	New York	151	63	2	76.4%	137,869	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Evansville	Indiana	168	42	2	73.7%	136,058	3.6	9	1	9	0	7	9
Saint Louis	Missouri	335	77	8	14.8%	135,960	9.9	45	6	63	0	0	36
San Bernardino	California	186	52	4	54.1%	135,030	5.6	7	2	14	0	0	14
Marietta	Georgia	189	64	5	41.3%	133,296	6.7	7	3	13	0	0	12
Mesquite	Texas	130	43	2	90.0%	131,682	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Paterson	New Jersey	177	81	2	90.0%	131,220	2.0	9	2	16	0	16	16
Alexandria	Virginia	230	72	4	36.9%	130,884	7.2	14	5	16	0	1	15
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	150	39	2	70.1%	130,590	3.8	5	2	6	0	2	6
Woodbridge	Virginia	149	49	3	61.6%	130,449	4.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Sugar Land	Texas	165	53	2	77.0%	129,992	3.3	3	2	3	0	2	3
Cumming	Georgia	139	40	2	80.0%	129,615	3.0	3	2	6	0	3	6
Sterling Heights	Michigan	137	46	1	97.5%	129,109	1.3	4	1	4	3	4	4
Madison	Wisconsin	217	46	6	43.1%	127,085	7.1	14	3	18	0	0	17
Pomona	California	137	41	2	80.0%	126,388	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Elk Grove	California	136	41	3	70.0%	125,523	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
El Cajon	California	172	54	2	72.5%	124,964	3.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Boca Raton	Florida	181	67	3	56.1%	124,681	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Van Nuys	California	148	58	4	70.0%	124,468	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Charleston	South Carolina	214	53	2	63.0%	124,073	4.5	10	2	12	0	6	10
Huntsville	Alabama	188	48	3	63.2%	124,021	4.8	11	1	11	0	0	11
Ontario	California	141	44	3	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fremont	California	144	47	5	53.0%	123,479	5.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Olympia	Washington	186	45	2	67.3%	123,025	4.3	6	6	11	0	5	11
Schenectady	New York	185	51	2	75.5%	122,297	3.1	8	1	8	3	3	8
Newport News	Virginia	171	46	3	69.2%	122,290	4.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Waco	Texas	178	47	3	77.1%	121,996	3.3	9	1	9	0	8	9
Homestead	Florida	188	60	3	65.0%	121,968	4.6	7	3	10	0	0	10
Everett	Washington	146	46	2	73.0%	121,710	3.6	5	1	5	0	3	5
Chattanooga	Tennessee	250	60	4	58.3%	121,204	5.3	15	2	16	0	0	16
South Bend	Indiana	183	51	2	82.3%	120,756	2.7	10	2	20	0	14	20
Brownsville	Texas	141	37	4	59.9%	120,644	5.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Killeen	Texas	146	33	2	80.0%	120,160	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Torrance	California	180	69	3	67.9%	120,118	4.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Springfield	Missouri	172	43	4	52.1%	119,940	6.1	7	3	14	0	0	14
Pasadena	California	178	58	2	75.9%	119,760	3.5	6	1	6	0	5	6
Jackson	Mississippi	190	48	3	69.3%	118,023	4.3	11	2	13	0	0	13
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	148	42	2	80.2%	116,839	3.4	5	3	10	0	5	10
Fort Wayne	Indiana	206	54	6	36.5%	116,244	7.4	16	2	32	0	0	30
Flint	Michigan	194	53	3	74.2%	115,412	3.6	7	3	13	0	5	13
Renton	Washington	198	56	2	74.4%	115,176	3.4	5	3	6	0	4	6
Lake Charles	Louisiana	163	46	2	87.9%	114,908	2.2	5	2	10	0	9	10
Alpharetta	Georgia	161	60	4	60.7%	114,888	5.0	4	5	6	0	2	6
Conroe	Texas	185	62	3	71.6%	114,783	3.9	7	2	7	0	1	7
Boston	Massachusetts	232	69	3	75.3%	114,355	3.9	14	1	14	0	5	14
Grand Prairie	Texas	133	41	4	60.0%	114,328	5.0	4	3	8	0	0	8
Ann Arbor	Michigan	183	52	3	67.5%	112,551	4.2	5	2	10	0	3	10
Edinburg	Texas	151	36	3	72.3%	112,431	3.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Odessa	Texas	174	39	4	70.0%	112,055	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Hayward	California	135	39	4	58.3%	111,967	5.3	4	2	7	0	0	7
York	Pennsylvania	197	42	3	62.1%	111,673	5.0	7	2	14	0	2	14
Lake Worth	Florida	195	64	4	53.2%	109,786	4.8	5	6	8	0	3	8
Rockford	Illinois	181	48	4	60.0%	109,397	5.0	9	2	18	0	0	18
Rockville	Maryland	166	61	2	75.2%	108,833	3.3	4	6	8	2	4	8
Mission	Texas	138	34	4	60.0%	108,655	5.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Las Cruces	New Mexico	175	44	2	72.6%	108,104	3.6	7	1	7	0	5	7
Whittier	California	208	70	4	54.6%	107,042	5.7	6	3	10	0	1	10
Overland Park	Kansas	176	44	3	58.0%	106,430	5.3	9	2	18	0	0	18
Hampton	Virginia	159	41	2	77.8%	106,052	3.5	6	1	6	0	5	6
Lansing	Michigan	161	48	3	64.5%	106,010	4.7	7	2	9	0	0	9
Murrieta	California	124	36	2	80.0%	105,795	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Asheville	North Carolina	147	45	2	80.0%	105,677	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Worcester	Massachusetts	201	52	3	56.9%	105,520	5.0	9	2	10	0	1	10
Melbourne	Florida	168	42	3	67.5%	105,040	4.2	5	2	8	0	0	8
Henrico	Virginia	213	61	4	53.8%	103,737	6.4	7	2	8	0	4	5
Santa Barbara	California	173	52	3	76.1%	103,442	3.3	7	1	7	0	4	7
Huntington Beach	California	153	56	4	51.6%	103,176	5.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Mckinney	Texas	145	44	4	54.4%	102,807	5.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Rosa	California	166	51	5	47.5%	102,525	6.2	6	2	12	0	0	12
Roanoke	Virginia	203	54	4	59.8%	101,366	5.6	10	3	19	0	0	18
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	173	44	3	59.6%	100,903	5.0	9	3	17	0	1	17
Clovis	California	143	40	2	82.9%	100,654	2.7	3	3	6	0	3	6
Canton	Ohio	185	48	3	68.3%	100,336	4.1	12	3	15	0	0	15
Reading	Pennsylvania	254	54	4	46.5%	100,194	6.4	10	5	19	0	0	19
Albany	New York	219	59	3	66.2%	100,140	4.4	11	2	13	0	0	13
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	176	45	3	71.7%	100,017	4.0	6	2	7	0	4	7
Edmond	Oklahoma	184	49	3	58.1%	99,845	5.2	5	2	5	0	1	5
Ogden	Utah	161	38	4	49.0%	98,717	6.2	5	2	7	0	0	7
Wilmington	Delaware	205	64	4	44.8%	98,374	6.9	10	3	18	0	0	17
Toms River	New Jersey	136	42	2	80.0%	98,288	3.0	3	2	6	0	3	6
Hemet	California	139	42	2	76.2%	98,137	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
North Hollywood	California	153	65	4	64.0%	98,001	4.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Palm Bay	Florida	145	39	2	87.9%	97,852	2.5	4	1	4	1	4	4
West Chester	Pennsylvania	126	45	2	90.0%	97,826	2.0	3	2	6	0	6	6
Beaumont	Texas	177	46	4	67.2%	97,809	4.4	8	2	16	0	0	16
Costa Mesa	California	122	46	2	85.6%	97,324	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Keller	Texas	131	44	2	83.4%	96,944	2.5	2	2	2	0	2	2
Chesapeake	Virginia	195	63	6	40.5%	96,416	7.2	6	2	10	0	0	10
Sunnyvale	California	160	58	3	62.9%	96,127	4.5	4	3	7	0	1	7
Peoria	Arizona	153	41	3	55.4%	95,349	5.5	4	2	7	0	0	7
Round Rock	Texas	172	54	4	56.9%	95,329	5.3	3	3	6	0	0	6
Cary	North Carolina	148	51	3	61.3%	95,286	4.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Tempe	Arizona	159	48	4	50.1%	95,258	6.3	4	3	8	0	0	8
Clarksville	Tennessee	143	32	4	54.1%	95,080	5.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Vacaville	California	114	35	2	90.0%	94,766	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Norfolk	Virginia	179	53	4	38.4%	94,309	7.1	14	2	28	0	0	25
Summerville	South Carolina	121	36	2	67.7%	94,054	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Tyler	Texas	182	44	3	60.1%	93,844	5.1	9	2	10	0	0	10
Winter Haven	Florida	129	39	2	87.7%	93,772	2.3	3	2	6	1	4	6
Hyattsville	Maryland	185	56	2	59.4%	93,530	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Augusta	Georgia	183	49	5	45.7%	93,487	6.4	8	2	16	0	0	16
Roseville	California	138	41	3	66.8%	93,415	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Provo	Utah	143	42	2	80.0%	93,218	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Lafayette	Louisiana	144	40	4	58.1%	93,184	5.2	5	2	8	0	0	8
Bend	Oregon	151	37	3	76.2%	93,147	6.3	3	3	4	0	2	2
Allen	Texas	116	41	3	83.7%	93,085	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Midland	Texas	151	34	4	58.1%	92,924	5.2	5	4	10	0	0	10
Cypress	Texas	120	45	5	54.5%	92,918	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Manchester	New Hampshire	154	44	2	80.0%	92,847	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Humble	Texas	146	47	3	55.6%	92,641	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rock Hill	South Carolina	141	41	3	79.5%	92,532	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Vero Beach	Florida	171	46	2	80.0%	92,170	3.0	6	2	10	0	6	10
Fairfax	Virginia	167	63	3	55.7%	91,133	5.8	4	4	5	0	2	5
Manassas	Virginia	161	51	3	59.8%	90,840	5.0	4	3	4	0	1	4
Bowling Green	Kentucky	143	37	2	78.2%	90,351	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Fullerton	California	162	61	3	64.9%	90,333	4.8	4	2	5	0	0	5
Escondido	California	138	45	6	50.0%	89,827	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Oceanside	California	139	42	4	44.8%	89,784	6.5	4	2	8	0	0	8
Tracy	California	147	40	3	75.9%	88,871	3.3	4	4	6	0	4	6
Lancaster	California	135	37	5	48.2%	88,824	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Bellingham	Washington	141	37	2	70.0%	88,546	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allentown	Pennsylvania	163	43	4	52.0%	88,323	7.1	7	3	13	0	0	9
Metairie	Louisiana	149	46	3	61.3%	87,251	4.6	5	2	10	0	0	10
Yakima	Washington	145	36	4	67.2%	87,210	4.5	4	2	7	0	1	7
Palo Alto	California	147	48	2	90.0%	87,013	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	184	49	6	47.9%	86,970	6.1	9	2	18	0	0	18
Gaithersburg	Maryland	150	56	4	60.0%	86,755	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Macon	Georgia	173	43	4	53.0%	86,709	5.4	9	4	18	0	1	18
Moreno Valley	California	127	40	5	42.1%	86,577	6.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Duluth	Minnesota	191	48	4	73.8%	86,477	3.3	11	1	11	0	6	11
Decatur	Georgia	196	67	3	47.5%	85,908	6.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
Mcdonough	Georgia	123	37	2	84.6%	85,798	2.5	2	2	4	0	3	4
Ypsilanti	Michigan	129	45	3	80.0%	85,519	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Ridgewood	New York	97	39	3	80.0%	85,374	3.0	1	2	2	0	1	2
Bloomington	Indiana	163	53	4	63.9%	85,315	5.0	6	2	9	0	0	9
Greenville	South Carolina	176	46	5	38.9%	85,305	7.1	9	5	16	0	0	15
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	144	37	4	65.2%	85,106	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ashburn	Virginia	128	51	2	75.7%	85,035	3.5	2	2	4	0	1	4
North Las Vegas	Nevada	191	52	6	36.2%	84,585	7.1	7	3	13	0	0	13
Bellevue	Washington	150	45	3	57.8%	84,539	5.2	5	2	9	0	0	9
Richardson	Texas	139	48	2	73.5%	84,272	4.0	3	2	6	0	2	6
Saginaw	Michigan	158	44	3	64.4%	83,956	4.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Denton	Texas	163	47	3	53.1%	83,920	5.3	6	2	9	0	0	9
Providence	Rhode Island	181	44	5	40.9%	83,849	6.8	8	5	15	0	0	15
Berkeley	California	214	58	4	65.8%	83,672	4.0	9	5	16	0	3	16
Kalamazoo	Michigan	170	51	4	50.8%	83,425	5.7	7	2	13	0	0	13
Rancho Cucamonga	California	143	49	5	47.1%	83,231	6.5	4	2	8	0	0	8
Merced	California	151	36	2	80.4%	82,841	3.0	3	2	6	0	3	6
Burbank	California	164	66	2	76.5%	82,623	3.2	5	2	10	0	7	10
Chico	California	143	35	2	73.5%	82,312	3.7	3	2	6	0	1	6
Concord	California	134	47	3	63.1%	82,156	4.5	4	2	7	0	1	7
San Mateo	California	156	51	3	57.7%	82,114	5.3	4	3	7	0	0	7
Santa Maria	California	153	41	5	57.2%	81,793	5.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
New Haven	Connecticut	156	49	3	62.8%	81,773	4.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Akron	Ohio	212	56	5	30.2%	81,514	8.4	17	2	30	0	0	22
Yuma	Arizona	129	37	4	55.0%	81,121	5.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	167	57	2	82.6%	80,925	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Muskegon	Michigan	145	41	3	62.6%	80,810	4.2	5	2	10	0	3	10
Newnan	Georgia	131	36	2	86.3%	80,587	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Hartford	Connecticut	151	39	3	65.1%	80,365	4.8	6	2	8	0	0	8
Simi Valley	California	118	46	4	62.4%	80,309	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Stamford	Connecticut	168	59	2	62.2%	80,044	3.8	6	2	9	0	3	9
Fairfield	California	117	35	3	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Frederick	Maryland	148	39	3	60.4%	79,789	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Trenton	New Jersey	209	64	4	38.4%	79,774	7.1	11	4	12	0	0	11
Spartanburg	South Carolina	153	43	2	70.6%	79,096	4.0	5	3	8	0	2	8
Herndon	Virginia	126	52	2	84.6%	79,078	2.5	2	3	3	0	3	3
Meridian	Idaho	119	39	2	75.7%	78,874	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Anderson	South Carolina	137	32	3	80.0%	78,726	3.0	4	2	8	0	4	8
Mission Viejo	California	115	43	3	80.0%	78,686	3.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Warren	Michigan	157	49	3	57.9%	78,225	5.2	5	2	10	0	0	10
Salinas	California	149	36	5	41.5%	78,073	6.2	5	3	10	0	0	10
Miami Beach	Florida	186	59	2	67.4%	78,007	4.0	5	3	6	0	3	6
Lynchburg	Virginia	158	39	2	76.2%	77,996	3.5	4	3	5	0	3	5
Delray Beach	Florida	162	61	4	65.1%	77,508	4.2	5	4	9	0	1	9
Broomfield	Colorado	137	44	3	73.9%	77,413	3.7	3	3	4	0	2	4
Joliet	Illinois	147	46	3	60.0%	77,327	5.0	5	2	8	0	0	8
Edison	New Jersey	136	55	2	76.6%	77,220	3.7	3	2	4	0	2	4
Sylmar	California	99	40	3	80.0%	77,190	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Carlsbad	California	144	48	4	67.9%	77,188	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Pueblo	Colorado	186	41	4	48.8%	77,186	6.0	7	3	8	0	0	8
Topeka	Kansas	194	51	5	47.1%	76,961	6.5	18	2	27	0	0	26
Lehigh Acres	Florida	164	44	3	65.6%	76,687	4.5	6	2	11	0	0	11
Rapid City	South Dakota	137	36	2	78.9%	76,325	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Visalia	California	140	39	5	50.0%	76,007	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Valdosta	Georgia	165	41	2	80.0%	75,961	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Longmont	Colorado	137	42	5	57.9%	75,696	5.3	3	2	5	0	0	5
Livonia	Michigan	129	41	3	80.0%	75,654	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Puyallup	Washington	166	45	4	52.7%	75,260	5.6	5	3	6	0	0	6
San Marcos	California	121	41	3	74.9%	75,240	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Inglewood	California	177	72	4	56.2%	75,162	5.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Holland	Michigan	109	33	3	80.0%	75,098	3.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Rialto	California	127	38	3	70.0%	74,608	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Clara	California	137	38	5	59.4%	74,575	5.5	4	2	8	0	0	8
Astoria	New York	157	75	3	52.2%	74,538	5.8	4	3	5	0	0	5
Cape Coral	Florida	170	43	6	41.2%	74,490	6.8	6	3	12	0	0	12
Sparks	Nevada	162	40	3	62.4%	74,467	4.8	4	3	5	0	0	5
Menifee	California	146	42	2	67.1%	74,148	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Pacoima	California	95	37	4	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pearland	Texas	144	45	4	53.6%	73,760	5.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Quincy	Massachusetts	128	39	2	78.2%	73,600	3.3	3	2	5	0	3	5
Daytona Beach	Florida	170	45	2	70.6%	72,792	4.0	5	3	6	0	3	6
Falls Church	Virginia	216	61	3	60.1%	72,391	4.8	5	6	7	0	2	7
Olathe	Kansas	121	36	4	50.0%	72,187	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Eugene	Oregon	170	43	6	35.5%	72,136	7.7	6	3	12	0	0	12
New Braunfels	Texas	123	35	3	70.0%	71,954	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Gulfport	Mississippi	138	38	3	75.8%	71,802	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Victorville	California	124	36	4	52.6%	71,692	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Nampa	Idaho	138	38	2	61.8%	71,608	4.7	3	3	4	0	0	4
Cambridge	Massachusetts	154	55	3	61.6%	71,302	4.4	5	1	5	0	2	5
Redwood City	California	134	46	4	62.2%	71,194	4.5	4	2	7	0	1	7
Santa Fe	New Mexico	153	44	3	55.2%	70,680	5.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	120	36	3	72.5%	70,612	4.0	2	2	3	0	1	3
Bothell	Washington	173	56	4	55.0%	70,526	5.3	3	3	5	0	0	5
Perris	California	124	41	3	60.0%	70,434	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Garden Grove	California	150	59	4	40.0%	70,304	7.0	5	2	7	0	0	7
Clinton Township	Michigan	124	43	3	70.0%	70,207	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Naperville	Illinois	144	52	5	42.3%	70,150	6.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Medford	Oregon	118	31	3	75.1%	70,041	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Woodstock	Georgia	104	35	3	68.6%	69,812	4.5	2	2	4	0	1	4
Kennesaw	Georgia	105	37	3	70.0%	69,391	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Saint Augustine	Florida	174	51	3	52.9%	69,295	5.8	5	4	9	0	0	9
Auburn	Washington	135	37	3	61.3%	69,223	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Abilene	Texas	156	35	4	52.5%	68,387	5.5	6	2	7	0	0	7
Oxnard	California	154	46	6	31.0%	68,318	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Erie	Pennsylvania	173	42	5	37.2%	68,217	7.5	13	2	26	0	0	24
Scranton	Pennsylvania	185	45	3	68.6%	68,214	4.8	8	3	10	0	2	8
Racine	Wisconsin	163	39	4	54.1%	68,189	5.6	5	4	10	0	0	10
Mcallen	Texas	130	32	4	48.1%	68,153	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Laurel	Maryland	173	56	4	60.6%	68,148	5.0	4	3	7	0	1	7
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	133	39	5	55.3%	67,864	5.3	4	3	7	0	0	7
Redding	California	177	40	4	60.0%	67,812	5.3	4	4	8	0	0	8
Hawthorne	California	96	44	3	70.0%	67,785	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bryan	Texas	164	44	3	70.2%	67,572	4.2	5	3	7	0	1	7
Spring Hill	Florida	152	46	4	53.9%	67,547	5.2	5	2	10	0	0	10
College Station	Texas	120	43	6	54.9%	67,522	5.5	2	3	4	0	0	4
Carrollton	Texas	133	44	4	50.0%	67,406	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Westerville	Ohio	127	33	3	70.0%	66,646	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fargo	North Dakota	139	40	5	54.0%	66,171	5.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Morgantown	West Virginia	135	38	2	69.4%	66,171	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Green Bay	Wisconsin	189	47	6	36.0%	65,972	7.6	7	3	9	0	0	9
Elmhurst	New York	96	43	3	70.0%	65,777	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Chino	California	111	36	3	69.6%	65,743	4.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
El Monte	California	112	45	3	70.0%	65,598	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Davenport	Iowa	173	36	3	61.8%	64,771	4.2	6	2	12	0	3	12
Baytown	Texas	122	42	4	54.9%	64,704	5.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Bowie	Maryland	189	55	2	63.2%	64,595	4.5	4	3	7	0	2	7
Hesperia	California	104	32	3	62.2%	64,587	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	California	157	40	3	62.6%	64,462	6.0	3	3	6	0	0	5
Longview	Texas	171	43	5	61.2%	64,420	5.0	5	4	6	0	0	6
Idaho Falls	Idaho	151	40	3	58.6%	63,937	5.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Charlottesville	Virginia	164	44	5	51.6%	63,402	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fredericksburg	Virginia	170	45	6	36.4%	63,328	7.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Grand Junction	Colorado	145	46	4	60.0%	63,278	5.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Boulder	Colorado	190	45	5	48.1%	63,163	6.2	6	2	12	0	0	12
Lawrence	Kansas	160	35	4	62.0%	62,625	4.8	5	2	9	0	0	9
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	135	34	5	50.0%	62,612	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hagerstown	Maryland	143	38	4	63.4%	62,080	4.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Plainfield	Illinois	145	41	3	62.9%	61,998	4.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Jupiter	Florida	127	37	2	62.8%	61,857	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Temecula	California	137	45	5	47.3%	61,505	6.3	3	2	5	0	0	5
Athens	Georgia	158	44	5	48.9%	61,037	5.8	6	2	12	0	0	12
Indio	California	122	37	3	63.2%	60,729	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	153	46	3	47.3%	60,656	7.0	3	4	4	0	1	4
Parker	Colorado	120	42	4	60.0%	60,169	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Federal Way	Washington	117	35	4	60.0%	60,086	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Buford	Georgia	105	34	4	60.0%	59,462	5.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Johnson City	Tennessee	148	37	4	62.3%	59,443	4.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Annapolis	Maryland	167	51	3	62.4%	59,306	5.0	5	2	5	0	3	5
Vallejo	California	141	51	4	47.5%	59,166	6.3	4	2	8	0	0	8
Tallahassee	Florida	205	52	8	20.4%	58,895	8.9	10	4	20	0	0	14
Lowell	Massachusetts	146	38	4	52.7%	58,728	5.8	4	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Cruz	California	159	44	4	56.3%	58,624	4.8	4	2	5	0	0	5
Apopka	Florida	124	39	4	60.0%	58,592	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Springdale	Arkansas	113	35	4	60.0%	57,843	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	187	47	6	28.4%	57,611	8.7	6	2	10	0	0	7
New Port Richey	Florida	143	38	5	47.5%	57,449	5.8	4	2	5	0	0	5
Douglasville	Georgia	124	40	4	52.0%	57,326	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Fort Pierce	Florida	188	46	3	59.8%	57,196	4.9	8	3	16	0	0	16
Waterbury	Connecticut	149	42	4	52.6%	57,179	5.7	6	2	12	0	0	12
Surprise	Arizona	153	40	5	42.2%	57,164	6.8	4	2	6	0	0	6
Greeley	Colorado	109	34	4	50.0%	57,033	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
New Bedford	Massachusetts	145	41	5	60.0%	56,888	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
High Point	North Carolina	138	38	4	46.2%	56,471	6.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Deltona	Florida	122	37	4	60.0%	56,333	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Panama City	Florida	162	43	5	44.4%	56,113	6.8	6	4	12	0	0	12
Kenosha	Wisconsin	140	44	4	49.2%	55,503	6.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Antioch	California	124	36	5	50.0%	55,361	6.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Norman	Oklahoma	155	41	3	43.7%	54,287	6.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
West Jordan	Utah	135	42	4	43.8%	54,108	6.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Terre Haute	Indiana	149	35	4	56.5%	53,693	5.3	6	2	12	0	0	12
Englewood	Colorado	194	61	4	47.8%	53,390	7.3	4	3	4	0	0	3
La Puente	California	146	55	4	45.2%	53,321	6.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Elgin	Illinois	144	43	6	43.5%	53,155	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
O Fallon	Missouri	129	39	4	54.9%	52,914	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hillsboro	Oregon	121	36	4	50.5%	51,969	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ventura	California	138	44	5	44.3%	51,343	6.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Bell Gardens	California	97	42	5	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Lewisville	Texas	133	41	5	42.6%	50,512	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clearwater	Florida	236	56	6	27.5%	50,497	9.3	9	5	14	0	0	11
Roswell	Georgia	118	44	4	50.0%	49,885	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Missouri City	Texas	145	47	6	46.9%	49,747	6.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Vista	California	131	41	5	41.4%	49,650	6.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Kennewick	Washington	142	44	4	50.0%	49,405	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Daly City	California	150	56	5	43.0%	49,175	6.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Waukegan	Illinois	121	43	4	50.0%	48,764	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Missoula	Montana	155	44	5	50.0%	48,642	6.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Milton	Florida	145	37	5	51.3%	48,625	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	California	127	41	5	42.7%	47,477	6.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Lynnwood	Washington	173	50	5	43.6%	47,218	6.3	3	2	3	0	1	3
San Angelo	Texas	138	36	3	42.0%	46,519	6.8	4	2	4	0	1	3
Muncie	Indiana	144	38	4	50.1%	46,438	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elizabeth	New Jersey	136	56	5	45.9%	46,110	6.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Youngstown	Ohio	201	51	6	28.8%	45,305	7.4	12	4	18	0	0	16
Appleton	Wisconsin	135	36	6	36.9%	44,907	7.5	4	2	7	0	0	6
Independence	Missouri	175	43	5	36.2%	44,889	7.5	8	2	10	0	0	9
Belleville	Illinois	135	38	4	47.8%	44,584	6.3	4	2	7	0	0	7
Elkhart	Indiana	135	34	5	44.3%	44,048	7.3	3	3	4	0	0	2
Portsmouth	Virginia	163	52	5	46.1%	43,956	6.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Fort Mill	South Carolina	142	46	4	46.2%	43,862	6.3	3	2	5	0	0	4
Wichita Falls	Texas	173	44	5	44.3%	43,790	6.7	7	3	9	0	0	9
Anchorage	Alaska	211	53	8	17.7%	43,187	9.7	12	3	19	0	0	11
Riverview	Florida	150	47	5	38.2%	42,475	7.3	3	3	6	0	0	6
Saint Charles	Missouri	146	38	7	30.4%	42,463	9.3	3	4	5	0	0	3
Dearborn	Michigan	138	38	5	44.6%	42,450	7.0	4	5	8	0	0	8
Champaign	Illinois	138	36	7	44.0%	41,642	6.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Billings	Montana	144	42	8	29.9%	41,069	8.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Franklin	Tennessee	143	40	6	38.1%	40,566	7.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Clermont	Florida	151	42	5	40.3%	40,395	7.7	3	3	5	0	0	5
Lakewood	New Jersey	96	30	6	40.0%	40,305	7.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Midlothian	Virginia	144	44	4	41.5%	40,209	5.3	3	3	4	0	2	4
Arvada	Colorado	154	52	6	30.0%	40,026	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Coral Springs	Florida	111	40	5	40.0%	38,895	7.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Bridgeport	Connecticut	165	49	5	26.5%	38,834	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	5
Pittsburg	California	96	38	5	40.0%	38,432	7.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Waukesha	Wisconsin	141	39	5	40.0%	38,318	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orange	California	159	58	5	26.4%	38,270	8.8	5	2	10	0	0	8
Orem	Utah	145	40	5	37.5%	37,628	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sandy	Utah	135	45	5	33.8%	37,375	9.8	4	2	4	0	0	2
Downey	California	139	53	7	29.0%	32,772	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Saint Petersburg	Florida	179	38	11	9.1%	32,515	11.7	16	3	16	0	0	4
Covington	Georgia	135	31	7	34.9%	32,336	7.0	2	3	3	0	0	2
Lithonia	Georgia	112	38	6	31.9%	30,884	8.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	171	49	7	30.0%	30,617	8.5	6	2	6	0	0	5
West Valley City	Utah	138	47	7	18.9%	25,133	9.3	3	3	3	0	0	1
Acworth	Georgia	129	42	9	24.2%	24,101	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Gastonia	North Carolina	122	38	7	19.9%	21,294	9.0	3	3	6	0	0	4
Santa Monica	California	147	55	6	20.8%	19,681	9.2	5	2	7	0	0	6
West Covina	California	135	49	7	17.9%	19,638	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Largo	Florida	133	34	8	18.0%	19,331	12.8	5	2	5	0	0	1
Brockton	Massachusetts	118	40	8	16.6%	15,836	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ballwin	Missouri	111	38	7	15.9%	15,090	9.5	2	3	3	0	0	2
Napa	California	123	33	9	15.0%	14,480	9.5	2	2	3	0	0	1
Livermore	California	125	42	9	13.8%	13,303	11.0	2	2	3	0	0	1
Hamilton	Ohio	139	38	11	9.0%	12,281	10.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Compton	California	133	55	11	8.0%	11,110	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Florissant	Missouri	139	36	11	7.8%	8,458	11.7	3	3	4	0	0	2
Norwalk	California	95	45	10	7.0%	7,412	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Lynn	Massachusetts	157	46	12	5.4%	5,020	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	380	129	4	62.3%	1,530,393	4.9	62	6	69	3	66
San Diego	345	100	3	63.8%	859,159	4.8	36	2	36	0	36
San Jose	285	84	2	76.8%	806,636	3.3	28	2	29	24	29
Sacramento	275	63	3	67.1%	539,807	4.4	28	3	29	1	29
San Francisco	248	94	4	50.0%	435,224	6.1	28	2	29	0	29
Fresno	244	56	4	55.6%	335,190	6.1	18	3	33	0	31
Anaheim	160	55	2	80.5%	296,806	3.0	7	1	7	6	7
Long Beach	215	65	3	58.9%	282,341	5.0	12	4	17	0	17
Bakersfield	239	52	5	43.9%	245,730	6.6	11	2	20	0	20
Oakland	243	70	3	54.7%	225,140	5.5	14	2	20	0	19
Santa Ana	169	56	4	61.6%	220,125	4.7	6	2	12	2	12
Irvine	192	74	2	78.1%	209,108	3.3	9	1	9	6	9
Modesto	162	50	2	78.7%	208,169	3.4	7	2	13	6	13
Stockton	211	44	4	53.9%	201,382	5.6	12	2	24	0	24
Riverside	164	49	3	51.3%	189,907	6.0	7	2	12	0	12
Corona	159	52	3	63.2%	162,609	4.8	5	2	6	0	6
Fontana	128	41	3	68.5%	160,693	4.3	3	2	5	1	5
Chula Vista	160	44	4	56.3%	146,977	5.6	5	2	10	0	10
Palmdale	156	48	2	81.2%	142,117	2.8	4	1	4	3	4
San Bernardino	186	52	4	54.1%	135,030	5.6	7	2	14	0	14
Pomona	137	41	2	80.0%	126,388	3.0	3	1	3	3	3
Elk Grove	136	41	3	70.0%	125,523	4.0	3	1	3	0	3
El Cajon	172	54	2	72.5%	124,964	3.7	3	2	3	1	3
Van Nuys	148	58	4	70.0%	124,468	4.0	4	1	4	0	4
Ontario	141	44	3	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	3
Fremont	144	47	5	53.0%	123,479	5.8	4	2	7	0	7
Torrance	180	69	3	67.9%	120,118	4.4	5	2	5	0	5
Pasadena	178	58	2	75.9%	119,760	3.5	6	1	6	5	6
Hayward	135	39	4	58.3%	111,967	5.3	4	2	7	0	7
Whittier	208	70	4	54.6%	107,042	5.7	6	3	10	1	10
Murrieta	124	36	2	80.0%	105,795	3.0	2	1	2	2	2
Santa Barbara	173	52	3	76.1%	103,442	3.3	7	1	7	4	7
Huntington Beach	153	56	4	51.6%	103,176	5.8	4	2	8	0	8
Santa Rosa	166	51	5	47.5%	102,525	6.2	6	2	12	0	12
Clovis	143	40	2	82.9%	100,654	2.7	3	3	6	3	6
Hemet	139	42	2	76.2%	98,137	3.3	3	1	3	2	3
North Hollywood	153	65	4	64.0%	98,001	4.5	4	1	4	1	4
Costa Mesa	122	46	2	85.6%	97,324	2.5	2	1	2	2	2
Sunnyvale	160	58	3	62.9%	96,127	4.5	4	3	7	1	7
Vacaville	114	35	2	90.0%	94,766	2.0	2	1	2	2	2
Roseville	138	41	3	66.8%	93,415	4.0	3	1	3	1	3
Fullerton	162	61	3	64.9%	90,333	4.8	4	2	5	0	5
Escondido	138	45	6	50.0%	89,827	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
Oceanside	139	42	4	44.8%	89,784	6.5	4	2	8	0	8
Tracy	147	40	3	75.9%	88,871	3.3	4	4	6	4	6
Lancaster	135	37	5	48.2%	88,824	6.0	3	2	6	0	6
Palo Alto	147	48	2	90.0%	87,013	2.0	4	1	4	4	4
Moreno Valley	127	40	5	42.1%	86,577	6.8	4	2	8	0	8
Berkeley	214	58	4	65.8%	83,672	4.0	9	5	16	3	16
Rancho Cucamonga	143	49	5	47.1%	83,231	6.5	4	2	8	0	8
Merced	151	36	2	80.4%	82,841	3.0	3	2	6	3	6
Burbank	164	66	2	76.5%	82,623	3.2	5	2	10	7	10
Chico	143	35	2	73.5%	82,312	3.7	3	2	6	1	6
Concord	134	47	3	63.1%	82,156	4.5	4	2	7	1	7
San Mateo	156	51	3	57.7%	82,114	5.3	4	3	7	0	7
Santa Maria	153	41	5	57.2%	81,793	5.3	3	2	6	0	6
Simi Valley	118	46	4	62.4%	80,309	5.0	2	1	2	1	2
Fairfield	117	35	3	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	1	2	0	2
Mission Viejo	115	43	3	80.0%	78,686	3.0	2	2	4	2	4
Salinas	149	36	5	41.5%	78,073	6.2	5	3	10	0	10
Sylmar	99	40	3	80.0%	77,190	3.0	1	1	1	1	1
Carlsbad	144	48	4	67.9%	77,188	3.8	4	1	4	3	4
Visalia	140	39	5	50.0%	76,007	6.0	3	2	6	0	6
San Marcos	121	41	3	74.9%	75,240	3.5	2	1	2	1	2
Inglewood	177	72	4	56.2%	75,162	5.4	5	2	5	0	5
Rialto	127	38	3	70.0%	74,608	4.0	2	1	2	0	2
Santa Clara	137	38	5	59.4%	74,575	5.5	4	2	8	0	8
Menifee	146	42	2	67.1%	74,148	4.8	4	1	4	1	4
Pacoima	95	37	4	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	1	1	0	1
Victorville	124	36	4	52.6%	71,692	5.7	3	1	3	0	3
Redwood City	134	46	4	62.2%	71,194	4.5	4	2	7	1	7
Perris	124	41	3	60.0%	70,434	5.0	2	1	2	0	2
Garden Grove	150	59	4	40.0%	70,304	7.0	5	2	7	0	7
Oxnard	154	46	6	31.0%	68,318	8.5	4	1	4	0	3
Redding	177	40	4	60.0%	67,812	5.3	4	4	8	0	8
Hawthorne	96	44	3	70.0%	67,785	4.0	1	1	1	0	1
Chino	111	36	3	69.6%	65,743	4.5	2	2	3	0	3
El Monte	112	45	3	70.0%	65,598	4.0	2	1	2	0	2
Hesperia	104	32	3	62.2%	64,587	4.5	2	1	2	0	2
Madera	157	40	3	62.6%	64,462	6.0	3	3	6	0	5
Temecula	137	45	5	47.3%	61,505	6.3	3	2	5	0	5
Indio	122	37	3	63.2%	60,729	4.5	2	1	2	0	2
Vallejo	141	51	4	47.5%	59,166	6.3	4	2	8	0	8
Santa Cruz	159	44	4	56.3%	58,624	4.8	4	2	5	0	5
Antioch	124	36	5	50.0%	55,361	6.0	2	3	4	0	4
La Puente	146	55	4	45.2%	53,321	6.0	2	3	3	0	3
Ventura	138	44	5	44.3%	51,343	6.7	3	2	6	0	6
Bell Gardens	97	42	5	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	2	2	0	2
Vista	131	41	5	41.4%	49,650	6.7	3	2	4	0	4
Daly City	150	56	5	43.0%	49,175	6.5	2	2	2	0	2
San Leandro	127	41	5	42.7%	47,477	6.3	3	2	6	0	6
Pittsburg	96	38	5	40.0%	38,432	7.0	1	2	2	0	2
Orange	159	58	5	26.4%	38,270	8.8	5	2	10	0	8
Downey	139	53	7	29.0%	32,772	9.0	3	2	3	0	2
Santa Monica	147	55	6	20.8%	19,681	9.2	5	2	7	0	6
West Covina	135	49	7	17.9%	19,638	9.7	3	1	3	0	2
Napa	123	33	9	15.0%	14,480	9.5	2	2	3	0	1
Livermore	125	42	9	13.8%	13,303	11.0	2	2	3	0	1
Compton	133	55	11	8.0%	11,110	12.0	3	1	3	0	0
Norwalk	95	45	10	7.0%	7,412	13.0	1	1	1	0	0
South Gate	97	44	13	4.0%	3,804	16.0	1	1	1	0	0

Brooklyn

ZIP	wyzant.com	care.com	tutors.com	varsitytutors.com	yelp.com	groupon.com
11208	2	1	3	4	5	6
11206	5	4	6	7	8	9
11239	2	1	3	4	5	7
11229	2	1	3	4	5	6
11226	2	1	3	4	5
11218	2	1	3	4	5	6
11216	2	1	3	4	5	6
11228	2	1	3	4	5	6
11238	5	4	6	2	8	9
11237	2	1	3	4	5	6
11217	2	1	3	4	5	6
11207	2	1	3	4	5	7
11236	2	1	3	4	5	6
11205	2	1	3	4	5	6
11219	2	1	3	4	5	6
11234	2	1	3	4	5	6
11203	5	4	6	7	8	33
11224	2	1	3	4	5	6
11225	2	1	3	4	5	6
11215	2	1	3	4	5	6
11233	2	1	3	4	5	7
11211	3	1	4	5	11	13
11220	2	1	3	4	5	6
11230	2	1	3	4	5	6
11232	2	1	3	4	5	6
11201	2	1	3	4	5	6
11212	2	1	3	4	5	6
11221	2	1	3	4	5	6
11210	2	1	3	4	5	6
11214	2	1	3	4	5
11213	5	4	6	1	8	9
11223	5	4	6	7	8	9
11235	2	1	3	4	5	6
11204	2	1	3	4	5	6
11222	2	1	3	4	5	6
11209	2	1	3	4	5	6
11231	2	1	3	4	5	33

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Wyzant

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 2,537 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Wyzant Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (tutor near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Wyzant Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Wyzant Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Wyzant Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly