Tulsatag Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve tulsatag.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 513 Tag & Title Agencies (DMV Agents) In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Tulsatag Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Tulsatag Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Tulsatag Report, November 2024 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Chicago
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Tulsatag Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	9,809	513	9	14.1%	45,463,490	29.0	23,611	28,006	5	28,088	68	801	10,280
California	1,400	185	4	23.1%	9,023,951	19.7	1,021	1,531	2	1,535	0	79	1,127
New York	1,239	159	14	16.5%	3,240,980	24.1	1,366	1,614	2	1,615	13	100	499
Ohio	1,047	146	3	26.0%	3,022,910	23.9	808	985	2	985	0	53	843
Texas	1,288	154	13	10.7%	2,989,821	38.7	996	1,411	2	1,411	2	11	401
New Jersey	706	160	4	29.2%	2,595,976	22.1	470	516	2	516	4	29	395
Pennsylvania	1,046	230	8	15.2%	1,938,314	18.4	1,490	1,649	2	1,649	1	31	1,014
Washington	791	139	7	19.3%	1,405,592	24.0	418	537	1	537	1	11	208
Virginia	917	158	12	15.6%	1,309,376	37.2	567	686	2	686	3	22	248
North Carolina	918	144	11	11.4%	1,162,322	19.0	641	751	2	752	0	1	314
Illinois	1,127	158	16	8.6%	1,105,164	31.3	1,120	1,220	1	1,220	2	21	196
Missouri	928	145	10	17.1%	1,040,164	34.2	711	814	1	814	2	22	289
Oregon	733	136	5	25.1%	1,024,069	24.3	332	379	1	379	4	19	154
Maryland	716	159	7	16.5%	987,822	20.5	348	412	1	412	0	12	233
Arizona	677	130	14	13.8%	956,324	32.0	205	317	1	317	0	10	119
Tennessee	865	146	11	12.0%	799,378	54.3	279	337	2	337	2	16	149
Kentucky	828	144	9	16.7%	740,905	28.4	641	692	1	692	2	16	131
Georgia	888	130	19	6.6%	676,463	22.7	522	659	2	659	0	0	138
Mississippi	719	127	4	22.1%	660,834	25.3	314	342	1	342	0	9	270
South Carolina	711	137	12	13.3%	660,100	31.3	295	345	2	345	0	4	127
Nevada	587	119	6	21.9%	639,137	23.5	86	149	1	149	0	4	83
Minnesota	974	146	11	11.4%	627,551	27.9	719	805	1	805	2	14	149
Alabama	806	147	10	12.6%	612,875	22.8	475	580	1	580	0	3	199
Indiana	947	156	15	8.8%	581,469	26.1	634	734	2	734	1	12	123
West Virginia	744	143	3	29.1%	531,837	24.0	563	580	2	580	0	37	508
Michigan	1,099	156	17	5.1%	503,715	26.2	816	946	1	946	0	9	64
Iowa	948	146	13	16.1%	503,237	27.7	788	828	2	828	7	36	278
Louisiana	738	136	15	10.5%	489,022	24.8	361	435	2	435	0	1	209
Arkansas	736	131	7	15.6%	466,259	48.9	315	332	2	332	0	7	244
Wisconsin	999	148	14	7.5%	434,830	28.7	636	694	2	694	3	37	146
New Mexico	686	127	8	20.1%	419,784	28.5	288	312	1	312	3	26	134
Massachusetts	1,065	141	13	5.6%	385,642	25.9	453	522	1	522	1	3	37
Connecticut	742	129	14	10.3%	368,577	25.5	223	265	1	265	0	3	57
Hawaii	510	110	8	25.2%	358,953	20.9	80	90	1	90	0	6	31
Nebraska	730	138	10	18.7%	356,691	23.2	500	551	1	551	0	13	204
Utah	681	132	12	11.1%	336,476	39.1	192	213	2	213	2	7	69
Kansas	823	130	9	11.0%	320,393	49.5	340	393	4	399	0	5	244
Idaho	628	121	12	14.6%	245,580	25.2	239	259	1	259	0	9	49
Vermont	691	128	3	36.2%	226,444	27.1	205	208	1	208	5	35	150
Montana	678	130	10	19.8%	205,953	27.8	313	323	1	323	3	15	89
North Dakota	628	125	8	23.8%	179,144	24.5	337	350	1	350	2	24	121
Florida	1,013	157	70	0.9%	176,918	31.2	441	960	1	960	0	0	0
Oklahoma	771	134	24	4.4%	171,087	25.0	554	642	3	646	2	5	25
Delaware	458	116	13	16.8%	159,586	28.2	46	57	1	57	0	1	25
Colorado	838	136	40	2.7%	152,027	74.1	110	161	4	227	0	1	43
New Hampshire	659	127	13	10.0%	134,558	28.5	226	235	1	235	0	6	11
Rhode Island	486	96	11	11.0%	116,216	27.3	63	73	1	73	0	2	9
Maine	778	136	15	8.7%	116,068	25.9	408	412	1	412	0	3	35
South Dakota	630	127	14	12.3%	106,227	31.3	315	323	1	323	0	2	49
Wyoming	554	115	14	14.6%	84,910	35.0	140	141	1	141	1	8	27
Alaska	562	123	17	8.1%	59,433	31.2	199	208	2	208	0	1	10

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Chicago	Illinois	358	78	7	14.7%	397,924	21.6	49	1	49	0	0	26
Portland	Oregon	346	74	4	33.5%	307,926	16.2	30	1	30	0	2	26
Houston	Texas	412	85	11	9.4%	299,347	15.4	93	1	93	0	0	19
Las Vegas	Nevada	427	82	6	18.0%	277,638	32.6	32	1	32	0	0	26
Buffalo	New York	349	77	3	46.8%	263,243	16.7	25	1	25	0	8	22
Columbus	Ohio	359	77	2	30.2%	255,306	14.4	28	1	28	0	0	25
Minneapolis	Minnesota	443	88	6	22.0%	239,940	22.8	45	1	45	0	1	31
Saint Louis	Missouri	425	91	9	23.9%	218,836	40.6	30	1	30	0	0	23
Fresno	California	341	78	3	34.5%	207,973	13.8	17	1	17	0	0	13
Louisville	Kentucky	345	72	5	26.5%	201,539	25.5	26	1	26	0	0	21
Detroit	Michigan	354	73	7	29.1%	186,589	19.0	22	1	22	0	0	18
Albuquerque	New Mexico	328	70	6	27.9%	182,927	34.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Seattle	Washington	331	69	9	19.0%	181,147	17.7	32	1	32	0	0	22
Los Angeles	California	404	92	16	7.3%	179,507	13.2	62	1	62	0	0	9
San Diego	California	336	71	10	13.1%	176,208	12.5	36	1	36	0	0	8
El Paso	Texas	314	63	6	21.8%	171,951	28.6	19	2	19	0	0	16
Indianapolis	Indiana	370	81	8	17.6%	167,188	17.9	34	1	34	0	0	25
San Jose	California	333	74	7	15.6%	163,888	10.5	28	1	28	0	0	12
Bakersfield	California	246	47	4	27.7%	154,957	8.5	11	1	11	0	0	9
Sacramento	California	348	73	7	18.4%	148,016	19.0	25	1	25	0	0	18
Omaha	Nebraska	368	83	5	25.0%	138,290	17.8	28	1	28	0	1	21
Brooklyn	New York	323	75	18	5.3%	137,711	14.9	37	1	37	0	0	0
San Francisco	California	337	72	10	15.6%	136,066	17.1	26	1	26	0	0	12
Reno	Nevada	265	53	5	45.5%	135,085	6.8	12	1	12	0	0	11
Honolulu	Hawaii	254	43	4	31.8%	132,329	15.6	10	1	10	0	1	10
San Antonio	Texas	396	83	12	7.4%	131,732	19.8	54	1	54	0	0	10
Tulsa	Oklahoma	298	81	6	30.0%	126,599	8.0	28	2	32	2	5	24
Lexington	Kentucky	323	65	4	38.1%	121,764	13.4	14	1	14	0	2	12
Cincinnati	Ohio	385	86	7	14.6%	117,191	16.1	42	1	42	0	0	27
Virginia Beach	Virginia	239	48	7	25.5%	114,609	16.7	11	1	11	0	1	7
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	369	81	7	13.8%	112,123	47.9	17	1	17	0	0	12
Vancouver	Washington	254	54	5	33.7%	109,896	32.8	8	1	8	0	0	7
New York City	New York	398	81	15	6.7%	109,255	13.6	47	1	47	0	0	3
Memphis	Tennessee	312	67	7	14.9%	103,481	54.8	13	1	13	0	0	10
Stockton	California	284	55	7	27.6%	103,167	22.8	10	1	10	0	0	10
Dayton	Ohio	340	76	8	21.3%	101,786	42.6	17	2	17	0	1	16
Bronx	New York	303	63	15	6.8%	98,683	13.2	25	1	25	0	0	1
Alexandria	Virginia	276	65	5	27.8%	98,467	21.1	12	1	12	0	0	11
Hayward	California	183	34	2	50.7%	97,348	29.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Beaverton	Oregon	184	28	5	46.3%	93,263	29.5	3	1	3	0	1	3
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	348	80	12	13.7%	93,248	20.4	35	1	35	0	0	15
Salem	Oregon	225	48	4	35.0%	93,204	20.6	6	1	6	0	0	6
Laredo	Texas	236	42	6	33.6%	91,090	52.2	3	1	3	0	1	3
Ballwin	Missouri	130	29	1	95.9%	90,825	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Santa Ana	California	197	38	3	24.9%	88,739	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	5
Richmond	Virginia	288	62	9	21.4%	83,817	56.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Kansas City	Missouri	364	80	10	14.4%	82,300	13.5	48	1	48	0	0	17
Henrico	Virginia	213	44	3	42.3%	81,497	32.3	5	1	5	0	1	5
Phoenix	Arizona	359	84	13	5.6%	80,837	22.1	38	1	38	0	0	1
Chula Vista	California	194	39	4	30.9%	80,580	44.2	3	1	3	0	0	3
Palmdale	California	134	28	3	45.8%	80,120	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Manchester	New Hampshire	222	40	2	68.7%	79,781	4.4	5	1	5	0	3	5
Mcallen	Texas	168	30	3	55.8%	79,035	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Modesto	California	241	51	4	29.6%	78,259	20.6	6	1	6	0	0	6
Oxnard	California	193	33	7	35.1%	77,374	30.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pittsburg	California	97	21	3	80.0%	76,865	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Tracy	California	140	31	3	65.5%	76,773	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Dallas	Texas	382	88	10	5.5%	76,630	33.0	37	1	37	0	0	2
Boise	Idaho	224	44	6	29.4%	75,321	19.0	8	1	8	0	0	6
Trenton	New Jersey	242	62	4	35.5%	73,850	7.7	11	1	11	0	0	9
Tucson	Arizona	309	68	12	8.0%	72,764	17.8	30	1	30	0	0	6
Oceanside	California	171	34	3	35.3%	70,631	30.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cleveland	Ohio	349	76	12	9.4%	70,582	18.3	28	1	28	0	0	3
Bothell	Washington	163	34	3	54.8%	70,235	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Lincoln	Nebraska	321	76	6	24.2%	69,952	19.4	20	1	20	0	0	13
Anaheim	California	192	30	7	18.8%	69,203	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Irvine	California	222	44	7	25.6%	68,378	18.3	8	1	8	0	0	7
Ventura	California	162	33	2	58.8%	68,203	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Akron	Ohio	332	64	5	25.2%	68,022	30.0	13	1	13	0	0	12
San Bernardino	California	241	43	6	27.2%	67,911	21.4	6	1	6	0	1	6
Sugar Land	Texas	171	29	5	40.0%	67,506	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Arlington	Texas	286	58	7	16.9%	67,059	25.3	10	1	10	0	0	6
Surprise	Arizona	160	27	4	49.3%	66,858	52.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Visalia	California	171	31	6	43.9%	66,810	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Toledo	Ohio	276	54	7	21.4%	65,942	15.9	14	1	14	0	0	9
Mesquite	Texas	151	27	5	43.4%	63,466	37.3	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Barbara	California	212	45	5	46.7%	63,446	6.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Santa Clara	California	186	31	4	50.3%	63,170	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Salinas	California	216	39	4	33.5%	63,136	44.6	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chico	California	148	33	2	56.2%	62,965	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	181	39	5	33.6%	62,664	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fort Worth	Texas	339	72	15	6.9%	62,531	13.6	32	1	32	0	0	6
Nashville	Tennessee	311	62	6	13.6%	62,334	27.2	18	1	18	0	1	8
Sparks	Nevada	168	27	3	52.1%	62,178	5.3	4	1	4	0	2	3
Birmingham	Alabama	333	67	8	12.2%	61,257	22.2	27	1	27	0	0	10
Lancaster	California	154	34	7	32.3%	59,644	37.3	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hemet	California	162	28	3	46.2%	59,501	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Boston	Massachusetts	276	51	5	39.0%	59,249	14.7	13	1	13	0	0	11
Vallejo	California	185	31	5	46.5%	57,933	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rochester	New York	327	73	11	12.3%	57,775	34.9	20	1	20	0	1	4
Providence	Rhode Island	231	48	6	28.0%	57,401	33.4	6	1	6	0	1	4
Saint Paul	Minnesota	368	81	20	7.1%	56,521	29.7	27	1	27	0	0	5
Peoria	Arizona	176	35	5	32.7%	56,209	30.5	3	1	3	0	0	2
Youngstown	Ohio	250	51	3	35.4%	55,625	30.2	9	1	9	0	1	9
Plano	Texas	220	40	10	18.0%	55,092	47.4	4	1	4	0	0	4
Green Bay	Wisconsin	235	45	5	29.7%	54,434	20.9	6	1	6	0	0	6
Roanoke	Virginia	299	66	4	32.1%	54,384	56.1	5	2	5	0	0	3
Menifee	California	192	33	4	48.6%	53,688	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rancho Cucamonga	California	187	32	5	30.2%	53,385	30.8	3	1	3	0	0	3
Murrieta	California	134	26	7	40.3%	53,299	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	California	129	29	5	46.6%	53,195	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Midlothian	Virginia	135	35	5	54.8%	53,052	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Henderson	Nevada	235	44	8	17.5%	52,947	10.0	8	1	8	0	0	5
Tacoma	Washington	320	65	7	15.9%	52,840	23.5	17	1	17	0	0	13
Yonkers	New York	213	42	8	29.2%	52,651	26.2	4	1	4	0	0	4
Salt Lake City	Utah	315	72	13	10.8%	52,488	57.4	9	1	9	0	0	7
Washington DC	District of Columbia	320	71	11	7.7%	52,420	15.9	27	1	27	0	0	3
Charlottesville	Virginia	205	34	5	42.4%	52,098	25.2	4	1	4	0	0	4
Long Beach	California	281	65	14	10.9%	52,026	12.9	12	1	12	0	0	1
New Braunfels	Texas	146	27	4	50.5%	51,920	52.5	1	1	1	0	0	1
Garden Grove	California	194	36	3	29.5%	51,899	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	4
Jersey City	New Jersey	217	46	9	19.7%	51,648	9.7	7	1	7	0	0	6
Irving	Texas	222	44	9	21.5%	51,629	39.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Spring	Texas	257	44	11	13.5%	51,469	11.3	8	1	8	0	0	3
Spokane	Washington	262	51	9	14.3%	51,416	10.8	14	1	14	0	0	6
Bowling Green	Kentucky	165	32	6	44.2%	51,046	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mission	Texas	167	26	5	27.9%	50,440	37.7	2	1	2	0	0	2
Allen	Texas	127	31	6	44.4%	49,418	52.5	1	1	1	0	0	1
Missoula	Montana	197	39	5	50.6%	49,180	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chesapeake	Virginia	204	43	8	20.6%	48,978	38.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Corona	California	177	38	8	19.0%	48,931	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Bellingham	Washington	167	33	6	38.1%	48,159	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Valley City	Utah	153	22	6	36.2%	48,138	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Stamford	Connecticut	209	41	7	37.4%	48,095	22.7	5	1	5	0	0	5
Little Rock	Arkansas	245	46	4	22.0%	47,979	39.6	8	1	8	0	0	6
Sunnyvale	California	188	39	6	31.2%	47,694	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mesa	Arizona	251	44	16	8.9%	47,634	65.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Hamilton	Ohio	158	24	4	34.6%	47,470	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Temecula	California	164	30	4	36.2%	46,977	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Napa	California	132	22	5	48.5%	46,923	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Eugene	Oregon	214	40	6	23.1%	46,838	39.7	4	1	4	0	0	3
Whittier	California	192	41	5	23.8%	46,773	25.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Bend	Oregon	161	34	7	38.0%	46,410	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Ogden	Utah	201	39	5	23.0%	46,394	44.2	3	1	3	0	0	3
Concord	California	172	30	5	35.5%	46,284	7.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Chino	California	125	24	5	48.8%	46,069	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Falls Church	Virginia	207	44	4	37.9%	45,642	26.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Edison	New Jersey	167	33	3	43.4%	43,772	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Gilbert	Arizona	183	34	11	18.3%	43,595	39.7	4	1	4	0	0	3
Olympia	Washington	222	48	9	23.7%	43,405	42.8	4	1	4	0	1	2
Mckinney	Texas	147	25	9	22.8%	43,092	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Huntington Beach	California	195	36	8	21.4%	42,809	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Ontario	California	164	26	5	24.1%	42,659	38.7	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	California	141	29	6	43.3%	42,631	7.0	2	1	2	0	1	1
Flushing	New York	178	36	8	19.6%	42,154	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Schenectady	New York	232	44	7	25.5%	41,403	20.6	7	1	7	0	0	5
San Mateo	California	188	33	6	28.8%	41,070	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Charlotte	North Carolina	296	66	12	4.5%	40,934	16.0	24	1	24	0	0	1
Columbia	South Carolina	284	64	10	11.9%	40,809	36.7	10	1	10	0	0	7
Morgantown	West Virginia	154	32	4	42.8%	40,803	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	California	145	24	9	34.4%	40,412	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Cary	North Carolina	152	26	6	25.8%	40,001	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Flint	Michigan	242	43	8	25.3%	39,356	35.9	5	1	5	0	1	4
Beaumont	Texas	256	50	8	26.8%	38,943	65.1	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rialto	California	143	21	5	36.3%	38,722	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Paterson	New Jersey	233	52	6	26.5%	38,662	28.1	7	1	7	0	0	6
Redding	California	193	30	4	33.9%	38,334	6.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Independence	Missouri	231	36	8	30.8%	38,212	30.6	6	1	6	0	0	5
Raleigh	North Carolina	296	65	17	7.0%	38,003	25.1	13	1	13	0	0	1
Las Cruces	New Mexico	225	51	8	25.5%	37,982	35.3	5	1	5	0	0	4
Rapid City	South Dakota	154	36	5	39.1%	37,840	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Meridian	Idaho	140	25	8	35.9%	37,440	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kennewick	Washington	151	27	6	37.9%	37,433	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Erie	Pennsylvania	249	62	8	20.3%	37,301	29.8	10	1	10	0	0	9
Toms River	New Jersey	154	30	6	30.2%	37,156	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Austin	Texas	322	73	15	3.4%	37,115	17.2	44	1	44	0	0	0
Des Moines	Iowa	236	50	6	16.5%	36,800	17.4	10	1	10	0	0	8
Greensboro	North Carolina	225	47	9	11.2%	36,697	11.8	9	1	9	0	0	3
Summerville	South Carolina	140	22	9	26.4%	36,694	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Richardson	Texas	162	31	7	31.9%	36,529	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Corpus Christi	Texas	271	56	10	11.2%	36,460	11.2	18	1	18	0	0	7
Redwood City	California	183	38	6	31.8%	36,414	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pearland	Texas	134	27	8	26.4%	36,318	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Cambridge	Massachusetts	220	39	6	31.3%	36,257	24.6	4	1	4	0	1	4
Conroe	Texas	226	48	6	22.5%	36,149	34.4	5	1	5	0	1	3
Fredericksburg	Virginia	224	49	8	20.4%	35,461	63.4	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vacaville	California	147	26	7	33.5%	35,227	7.5	2	1	2	0	1	1
Escondido	California	191	40	9	19.5%	34,945	76.8	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hesperia	California	126	24	7	33.3%	34,564	6.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Bellevue	Washington	196	35	9	23.3%	34,014	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Pasadena	California	193	35	7	21.5%	33,861	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Staten Island	New York	276	65	16	7.1%	33,733	13.2	12	1	12	0	0	2
Chattanooga	Tennessee	274	60	5	16.2%	33,599	31.3	12	2	12	0	0	4
Lansing	Michigan	229	50	12	20.3%	33,301	31.1	6	1	6	0	1	2
Compton	California	164	23	7	24.0%	33,283	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fargo	North Dakota	179	32	8	27.0%	33,110	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Roseville	California	157	34	6	23.5%	32,835	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Elk Grove	California	182	29	10	18.1%	32,501	39.3	2	1	2	0	0	2
Atlanta	Georgia	387	86	21	3.2%	32,111	28.8	34	1	34	0	0	3
New Haven	Connecticut	178	35	7	24.5%	31,883	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	4
Newark	New Jersey	232	47	9	11.4%	31,853	29.9	7	1	7	0	0	6
Springfield	Missouri	227	41	10	13.8%	31,800	48.6	4	1	4	0	0	2
Edinburg	Texas	162	27	11	20.4%	31,789	68.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
North Las Vegas	Nevada	238	49	12	13.5%	31,646	35.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Fayetteville	North Carolina	248	52	9	12.8%	31,310	32.5	6	1	6	0	0	4
Merced	California	169	34	5	30.2%	31,098	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Wilmington	Delaware	238	61	13	14.1%	30,948	19.0	9	1	9	0	0	7
Fullerton	California	199	35	8	22.0%	30,577	31.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	California	168	29	5	27.3%	30,351	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Norfolk	Virginia	297	62	13	12.3%	30,242	41.5	9	1	9	0	0	8
Palo Alto	California	172	40	6	31.0%	29,973	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Bryan	Texas	191	42	5	30.8%	29,688	8.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Denver	Colorado	387	86	24	2.7%	29,604	30.9	32	3	52	0	0	1
Torrance	California	201	34	8	16.6%	29,311	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	112	21	8	30.0%	29,220	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Olathe	Kansas	140	25	8	19.8%	28,619	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Madera	California	138	26	7	27.2%	27,971	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	California	142	25	10	24.4%	27,805	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greenville	South Carolina	215	40	9	12.6%	27,676	52.0	5	1	5	0	1	1
Santa Rosa	California	201	39	14	12.8%	27,659	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	2
Colorado Springs	Colorado	334	71	17	4.7%	27,416	68.1	11	2	11	0	0	7
Vista	California	163	25	6	22.8%	27,379	38.3	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hartford	Connecticut	208	52	11	22.2%	27,373	20.8	6	1	6	0	0	1
Fontana	California	151	26	9	11.5%	27,089	39.7	2	1	2	0	0	2
Katy	Texas	177	29	10	7.9%	27,073	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Berkeley	California	236	52	10	21.2%	26,978	9.3	9	1	9	0	0	7
Overland Park	Kansas	259	50	7	14.7%	26,960	20.4	8	1	8	0	0	4
Victorville	California	150	30	7	19.7%	26,818	39.3	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clarksville	Tennessee	155	27	8	15.2%	26,747	39.3	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	California	159	32	9	23.9%	26,143	39.3	2	2	3	0	0	1
Elkhart	Indiana	157	30	8	26.2%	26,056	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Inglewood	California	208	39	6	19.4%	25,980	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Riverside	California	244	47	14	7.0%	25,889	50.1	4	1	4	0	0	2
Oakland	California	240	54	20	6.3%	25,814	13.9	14	1	14	0	0	0
Jamaica	New York	190	37	10	10.6%	25,796	11.3	6	1	6	0	0	2
Scottsdale	Arizona	283	60	17	8.6%	25,636	28.1	9	1	9	0	0	2
Annapolis	Maryland	198	42	9	26.8%	25,482	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Santa Maria	California	161	25	9	17.7%	25,384	40.7	2	1	2	0	0	1
Garland	Texas	188	37	14	10.6%	25,119	64.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	221	39	13	18.0%	25,032	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	5
Knoxville	Tennessee	297	63	17	6.5%	25,021	79.9	4	2	4	0	0	2
Canton	Ohio	229	44	4	17.0%	24,958	9.8	12	1	12	0	0	6
Tempe	Arizona	170	32	12	13.1%	24,943	32.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Huntsville	Alabama	252	54	8	12.7%	24,839	11.2	11	1	11	0	0	5
Amarillo	Texas	290	65	9	10.8%	24,623	61.8	6	2	6	0	0	4
Kent	Washington	178	31	10	15.3%	24,539	32.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fairfax	Virginia	186	44	13	15.0%	24,471	39.8	3	1	3	0	0	1
Jackson	Mississippi	217	42	10	14.3%	24,421	10.8	11	1	11	0	0	5
Clovis	California	155	21	9	19.8%	24,076	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Glendale	Arizona	234	38	13	7.9%	23,990	50.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Billings	Montana	147	39	12	17.4%	23,853	59.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Newport News	Virginia	219	43	12	13.3%	23,436	9.7	7	1	7	0	0	4
Renton	Washington	207	35	11	15.1%	23,332	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
West Jordan	Utah	169	38	12	18.9%	23,293	16.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Racine	Wisconsin	232	50	9	18.5%	23,292	47.6	3	1	3	0	1	2
Downey	California	144	36	8	20.1%	22,739	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fremont	California	177	34	13	9.6%	22,406	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Savannah	Georgia	261	63	12	9.3%	22,332	13.1	10	1	10	0	0	2
Moreno Valley	California	166	37	15	10.5%	21,659	11.3	4	2	6	0	0	2
Burbank	California	203	40	6	19.5%	21,025	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	164	32	10	21.1%	20,658	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Frederick	Maryland	150	39	9	15.6%	20,588	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Hagerstown	Maryland	160	32	8	21.0%	20,564	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Bell Gardens	California	98	21	8	20.0%	20,487	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Brownsville	Texas	170	37	12	10.0%	20,044	18.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Silver Spring	Maryland	223	49	21	6.6%	19,870	25.0	6	1	6	0	0	1
Dearborn	Michigan	186	39	13	20.7%	19,692	19.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Nampa	Idaho	164	36	13	17.0%	19,679	20.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Lynchburg	Virginia	205	44	7	18.9%	19,373	57.8	2	1	2	0	0	1
Rockville	Maryland	178	40	15	13.3%	19,257	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Charleston	South Carolina	243	49	9	9.7%	19,196	46.8	6	1	6	0	0	4
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	263	61	16	10.4%	18,838	48.4	6	1	6	0	0	1
Killeen	Texas	187	32	8	12.4%	18,597	54.8	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waukesha	Wisconsin	167	36	9	19.3%	18,458	19.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Yuma	Arizona	156	27	10	12.4%	18,341	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Livermore	California	137	30	10	19.0%	18,271	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Auburn	Washington	165	29	14	15.8%	17,812	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chandler	Arizona	197	38	13	6.4%	17,205	70.3	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	169	44	9	13.5%	16,956	14.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Lithonia	Georgia	123	25	10	17.5%	16,920	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Muncie	Indiana	209	48	11	18.0%	16,704	22.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
San Angelo	Texas	181	43	13	14.7%	16,293	38.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Wichita	Kansas	297	66	14	3.9%	16,205	25.7	23	2	23	0	0	7
Santa Cruz	California	179	32	11	15.3%	15,905	31.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Orleans	Louisiana	288	67	15	3.7%	15,740	16.4	19	1	19	0	0	0
Albany	New York	249	50	11	10.3%	15,614	11.4	11	1	11	0	0	6
Ann Arbor	Michigan	195	39	15	9.4%	15,603	19.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Bridgeport	Connecticut	211	45	14	10.5%	15,430	10.3	6	1	6	0	0	3
Baltimore	Maryland	285	76	26	2.4%	15,362	18.2	22	1	22	0	0	1
Laurel	Maryland	180	42	11	13.5%	15,202	33.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Davenport	Iowa	188	36	11	14.5%	15,170	11.0	6	1	6	0	0	2
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	277	62	21	4.0%	15,072	17.1	18	1	18	0	0	1
Belleville	Illinois	169	41	11	15.9%	14,803	32.8	3	1	3	0	0	2
Lafayette	Louisiana	180	35	8	9.2%	14,699	29.4	4	1	4	0	0	1
Cypress	Texas	131	32	10	8.4%	14,410	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Durham	North Carolina	215	40	15	5.0%	14,410	15.3	8	1	8	0	0	0
Federal Way	Washington	142	33	11	14.0%	14,045	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Midland	Texas	186	36	11	8.7%	13,933	46.8	3	1	3	0	0	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	223	50	9	14.0%	13,872	32.6	6	1	6	0	0	4
Sterling Heights	Michigan	188	41	14	10.5%	13,865	21.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Miami	Florida	356	91	36	0.7%	13,773	43.5	53	1	53	0	0	0
High Point	North Carolina	187	32	10	11.2%	13,728	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Covington	Georgia	136	24	14	14.6%	13,540	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Gastonia	North Carolina	139	24	12	12.5%	13,418	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Baytown	Texas	175	35	11	11.3%	13,261	69.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Puyallup	Washington	207	42	13	9.3%	13,212	10.8	5	1	5	0	0	2
Anchorage	Alaska	259	57	16	5.4%	13,083	65.6	5	2	5	0	0	2
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	298	88	45	0.8%	12,970	33.8	46	1	46	0	0	0
Syracuse	New York	274	66	22	5.7%	12,963	36.7	12	1	12	0	0	3
Humble	Texas	161	25	12	7.7%	12,813	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bowie	Maryland	196	44	13	12.5%	12,794	33.5	3	1	3	0	0	1
La Puente	California	146	26	11	10.8%	12,702	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Pomona	California	154	28	11	7.9%	12,530	41.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Springdale	Arkansas	106	23	7	13.0%	12,508	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Macon	Georgia	263	55	16	7.6%	12,375	12.3	9	1	9	0	0	2
Gaithersburg	Maryland	183	42	12	8.5%	12,353	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Denton	Texas	191	36	10	7.8%	12,329	12.3	6	1	6	0	0	1
Augusta	Georgia	214	41	15	6.0%	12,299	17.3	8	1	8	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	146	27	11	9.7%	11,994	55.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Stone Mountain	Georgia	164	30	13	9.3%	11,979	13.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Shreveport	Louisiana	247	54	18	5.3%	11,765	15.0	12	1	12	0	0	2
Montgomery	Alabama	240	44	9	5.6%	11,647	15.3	13	1	13	0	0	2
Missouri City	Texas	152	22	14	10.8%	11,482	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Abilene	Texas	201	39	12	8.8%	11,471	40.7	4	1	4	0	0	2
York	Pennsylvania	211	56	11	6.3%	11,356	26.3	6	1	6	0	0	2
Marietta	Georgia	206	38	16	3.5%	11,291	29.6	6	1	6	0	0	0
Allentown	Pennsylvania	187	51	16	6.6%	11,138	13.7	7	1	7	0	0	1
Gulfport	Mississippi	150	29	11	11.6%	10,999	70.3	1	1	1	0	0	1
Saint Charles	Missouri	175	33	17	7.9%	10,984	19.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Reading	Pennsylvania	228	58	14	5.1%	10,929	23.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	209	43	8	10.4%	10,918	64.2	2	1	2	0	0	2
Alpharetta	Georgia	186	37	18	5.8%	10,907	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Rockford	Illinois	255	49	21	5.9%	10,835	80.3	2	1	2	0	0	2
Tyler	Texas	256	47	16	6.8%	10,665	90.7	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lake Charles	Louisiana	205	41	14	8.1%	10,636	12.4	5	1	5	0	0	2
Lubbock	Texas	280	57	18	3.7%	10,279	74.9	4	1	4	0	0	2
San Marcos	California	143	23	12	10.0%	10,048	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Topeka	Kansas	298	54	14	6.1%	9,946	75.9	5	1	5	0	0	2
Hawthorne	California	99	21	10	10.0%	9,684	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Van Nuys	California	168	30	17	5.4%	9,681	14.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Hyattsville	Maryland	188	44	14	6.0%	9,491	31.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Grand Prairie	Texas	186	38	15	4.9%	9,416	18.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
El Cajon	California	171	35	13	5.4%	9,248	14.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Indio	California	143	28	11	9.6%	9,223	54.5	1	1	1	0	0	1
Cumming	Georgia	161	34	11	5.6%	9,133	16.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Woodstock	Georgia	106	24	10	8.8%	8,909	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Carlsbad	California	189	41	13	7.8%	8,891	34.5	3	1	3	0	0	1
Medford	Oregon	120	14	11	9.5%	8,849	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Antioch	California	128	17	12	7.9%	8,758	55.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Rock Hill	South Carolina	151	24	11	7.5%	8,749	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Orlando	Florida	297	65	23	0.9%	8,570	32.4	32	1	32	0	0	0
Norwalk	California	98	19	8	8.0%	8,471	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Mobile	Alabama	290	67	15	3.1%	8,468	21.7	17	1	17	0	0	1
North Hollywood	California	161	25	14	5.3%	8,105	14.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Franklin	Tennessee	153	32	11	7.6%	8,095	69.7	1	1	1	0	0	1
Jacksonville	Florida	309	78	23	0.9%	7,801	29.1	31	1	31	0	0	0
Idaho Falls	Idaho	185	38	16	7.1%	7,736	22.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Sylmar	California	99	21	10	8.0%	7,719	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Douglasville	Georgia	128	28	11	7.0%	7,717	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
South Gate	California	98	17	8	8.0%	7,608	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Portsmouth	Virginia	208	51	20	7.9%	7,542	44.9	5	1	5	0	0	1
Astoria	New York	187	31	16	5.3%	7,528	14.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	100	17	10	7.0%	7,470	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	196	38	10	7.9%	7,463	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Fort Collins	Colorado	167	38	13	3.8%	7,415	82.6	1	1	1	0	0	1
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	192	34	16	5.1%	7,412	14.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Elgin	Illinois	141	30	15	5.8%	7,103	40.7	2	1	2	0	0	1
Metairie	Louisiana	184	37	14	4.9%	6,988	14.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Waco	Texas	223	39	16	4.4%	6,887	61.1	4	1	4	0	0	1
Appleton	Wisconsin	185	38	18	5.6%	6,868	40.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Orange	California	151	31	12	4.5%	6,530	15.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Odessa	Texas	218	43	15	4.1%	6,506	85.5	1	1	1	0	0	1
Daly City	California	151	29	13	5.7%	6,489	55.5	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lawrence	Kansas	187	33	10	6.3%	6,399	29.4	4	1	4	0	0	1
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	213	60	15	3.7%	6,222	16.4	9	1	9	0	0	0
Duluth	Minnesota	264	58	25	5.2%	6,102	44.5	8	1	8	0	0	1
Wichita Falls	Texas	230	45	10	6.1%	6,032	37.9	5	1	5	0	0	0
Tampa	Florida	267	64	33	0.8%	6,023	42.0	26	1	26	0	0	0
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	297	86	38	0.7%	5,884	44.5	25	1	25	0	0	0
Champaign	Illinois	165	31	17	6.1%	5,812	19.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Decatur	Georgia	192	41	17	3.2%	5,724	17.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Spartanburg	South Carolina	183	34	19	5.1%	5,673	65.2	2	1	2	0	0	1
Simi Valley	California	127	29	14	4.4%	5,665	55.5	1	1	1	0	0	1
Elmhurst	New York	98	24	11	6.0%	5,638	14.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Fort Mill	South Carolina	162	28	16	5.8%	5,544	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Winston Salem	North Carolina	248	54	25	2.0%	5,317	53.9	5	1	5	0	0	2
Pacoima	California	97	21	12	5.0%	5,290	15.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	337	80	32	0.8%	5,126	43.0	42	1	42	0	0	0
Newnan	Georgia	138	21	14	5.4%	5,040	16.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hampton	Virginia	223	44	23	3.6%	4,908	34.7	5	1	5	0	0	1
Boulder	Colorado	195	32	14	3.7%	4,899	56.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Florissant	Missouri	169	38	21	4.1%	4,430	19.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Lawrenceville	Georgia	163	28	20	1.7%	4,242	22.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Everett	Washington	199	43	28	2.5%	4,210	52.8	3	1	3	0	0	0
Round Rock	Texas	169	28	26	2.4%	3,987	71.7	1	1	1	0	0	0
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	151	38	15	3.0%	3,971	16.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hollywood	Florida	203	62	34	0.8%	3,617	41.9	9	1	9	0	0	0
Athens	Georgia	221	42	16	2.9%	3,578	30.5	5	1	5	0	0	0
Grand Rapids	Michigan	240	54	33	0.9%	3,375	27.2	12	1	12	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	140	27	16	3.5%	3,364	55.5	1	1	1	0	0	1
Littleton	Colorado	273	57	35	1.0%	3,353	51.4	6	2	11	0	0	0
West Palm Beach	Florida	267	61	23	0.9%	3,246	32.8	12	1	12	0	0	0
Saint Petersburg	Florida	276	62	22	0.9%	3,230	28.8	16	1	16	0	0	0
Mcdonough	Georgia	145	25	17	3.1%	3,194	20.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Keller	Texas	130	27	22	2.6%	3,075	58.5	1	1	1	0	0	0
Pompano Beach	Florida	238	70	32	0.8%	3,065	36.5	10	1	10	0	0	0
Valdosta	Georgia	191	38	17	3.1%	2,958	18.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Hialeah	Florida	181	53	28	0.8%	2,937	38.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Naples	Florida	258	65	21	0.9%	2,924	25.5	14	1	14	0	0	0
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	159	28	17	2.3%	2,797	19.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Muskegon	Michigan	192	39	27	2.2%	2,791	52.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Madison	Wisconsin	249	67	33	0.9%	2,742	26.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Fort Wayne	Indiana	259	64	31	0.9%	2,739	31.3	15	1	15	0	0	0
Acworth	Georgia	139	25	21	2.7%	2,738	17.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Kennesaw	Georgia	121	24	13	2.6%	2,599	57.5	1	1	1	0	0	0
Kissimmee	Florida	230	54	26	0.9%	2,591	29.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Pensacola	Florida	236	57	22	1.0%	2,573	23.9	13	1	13	0	0	0
Tallahassee	Florida	226	53	23	0.9%	2,517	31.3	10	1	10	0	0	0
Hillsboro	Oregon	136	27	21	2.4%	2,427	23.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
El Monte	California	134	27	16	2.6%	2,411	56.5	1	1	1	0	0	0
Sarasota	Florida	243	51	23	0.9%	2,359	24.5	13	1	13	0	0	0
Lakeland	Florida	221	46	25	0.9%	2,279	30.3	9	1	9	0	0	0
Bradenton	Florida	247	58	23	0.9%	2,241	29.1	10	1	10	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	137	48	18	2.0%	2,166	19.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lees Summit	Missouri	220	49	26	2.0%	2,063	33.3	5	1	5	0	0	1
Ocala	Florida	223	50	26	0.9%	2,034	28.7	11	1	11	0	0	0
Woodbridge	Virginia	157	33	22	0.9%	1,992	25.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
New Port Richey	Florida	184	36	21	1.6%	1,966	21.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Boca Raton	Florida	215	59	28	0.9%	1,929	32.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Lake Worth	Florida	213	51	22	0.9%	1,879	29.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Gainesville	Florida	207	50	22	0.9%	1,878	29.9	10	1	10	0	0	0
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	180	39	22	0.9%	1,871	26.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Worcester	Massachusetts	239	57	27	0.9%	1,741	25.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Evansville	Indiana	225	49	29	0.9%	1,693	27.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Cape Coral	Florida	208	46	19	0.9%	1,679	26.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Fort Myers	Florida	195	44	24	0.6%	1,629	43.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Clearwater	Florida	219	60	24	0.9%	1,609	31.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Homestead	Florida	169	46	29	0.8%	1,593	33.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Naperville	Illinois	181	47	26	0.9%	1,533	26.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Boynton Beach	Florida	191	54	25	0.9%	1,519	32.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Melbourne	Florida	170	41	24	0.9%	1,387	29.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Edmond	Oklahoma	180	39	30	0.8%	1,363	39.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Asheville	North Carolina	176	39	17	1.0%	1,300	20.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lewisville	Texas	162	26	24	1.1%	1,270	71.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Warren	Michigan	188	48	29	0.9%	1,263	25.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Saint Augustine	Florida	189	41	23	0.9%	1,216	26.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Saginaw	Michigan	225	55	29	0.9%	1,215	26.1	7	1	7	0	0	0
Yakima	Washington	168	39	29	0.9%	1,194	27.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Panama City	Florida	179	42	24	0.9%	1,181	25.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
South Bend	Indiana	261	58	44	0.8%	1,168	32.8	9	1	9	0	0	0
Manassas	Virginia	170	42	43	0.7%	1,122	42.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Santa Fe	New Mexico	172	42	32	0.8%	1,078	33.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Ashburn	Virginia	131	42	26	0.9%	1,059	24.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Kenosha	Wisconsin	197	54	28	0.9%	1,059	25.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Norman	Oklahoma	160	36	26	0.8%	1,051	34.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Vero Beach	Florida	197	49	21	0.9%	1,045	28.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Delray Beach	Florida	169	39	23	0.9%	1,041	31.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lowell	Massachusetts	184	38	24	0.9%	1,029	26.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Kalamazoo	Michigan	235	56	55	0.6%	1,019	46.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Ypsilanti	Michigan	142	31	23	1.0%	1,018	24.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Palm Bay	Florida	176	41	20	0.9%	1,001	28.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Waterbury	Connecticut	203	45	33	0.9%	994	27.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	152	34	25	1.0%	974	22.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Riverview	Florida	144	36	25	0.9%	957	31.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Buford	Georgia	112	16	22	1.0%	955	22.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	126	17	21	1.0%	953	23.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Winter Haven	Florida	156	33	25	0.9%	943	30.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bloomington	Indiana	213	45	47	0.7%	940	37.7	5	1	5	0	0	0
Clinton Township	Michigan	163	35	29	0.9%	929	26.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Clermont	Florida	156	33	24	0.9%	928	27.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lehigh Acres	Florida	180	47	25	0.8%	924	40.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lakewood	New Jersey	101	18	27	0.9%	917	28.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Daytona Beach	Florida	190	40	22	0.9%	913	30.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Largo	Florida	167	39	29	0.8%	912	34.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Plainfield	Illinois	159	36	24	0.9%	911	27.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Miami Beach	Florida	172	53	32	0.8%	905	40.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Milton	Florida	152	34	23	0.9%	900	24.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Apopka	Florida	125	32	24	0.9%	893	27.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Jupiter	Florida	159	41	21	0.9%	888	28.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
New Bedford	Massachusetts	179	42	26	0.9%	885	26.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Terre Haute	Indiana	209	54	30	0.9%	884	25.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Fort Pierce	Florida	213	48	21	0.9%	881	26.8	8	1	8	0	0	0
Englewood	Colorado	193	34	35	0.8%	878	60.3	2	1	2	0	0	0
Holland	Michigan	130	33	23	0.9%	878	25.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Livonia	Michigan	158	32	28	0.9%	875	26.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Spring Hill	Florida	151	32	30	0.7%	872	44.6	4	1	4	0	0	0
Deltona	Florida	103	23	24	0.9%	869	26.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Herndon	Virginia	136	30	28	0.9%	865	26.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	154	41	28	0.9%	860	26.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lynn	Massachusetts	169	40	25	0.9%	856	27.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Coral Springs	Florida	126	32	29	0.8%	770	39.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Joliet	Illinois	213	45	52	0.6%	732	41.4	4	1	4	0	0	0
Provo	Utah	168	38	50	0.6%	673	49.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lynnwood	Washington	169	34	53	0.6%	628	52.3	2	1	2	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	153	32	47	0.6%	592	63.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Johnson City	Tennessee	180	48	56	0.6%	562	43.5	3	1	3	0	0	0
O Fallon	Missouri	151	30	58	0.5%	461	63.5	1	1	1	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	163	36	66	0.4%	405	80.8	1	1	1	0	0	0
Pueblo	Colorado	231	56	107	0.2%	293	90.4	1	1	1	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Fresno	341	78	3	34.5%	207,973	13.8	17	1	17	0	13
Los Angeles	404	92	16	7.3%	179,507	13.2	62	1	62	0	9
San Diego	336	71	10	13.1%	176,208	12.5	36	1	36	0	8
San Jose	333	74	7	15.6%	163,888	10.5	28	1	28	0	12
Bakersfield	246	47	4	27.7%	154,957	8.5	11	1	11	0	9
Sacramento	348	73	7	18.4%	148,016	19.0	25	1	25	0	18
San Francisco	337	72	10	15.6%	136,066	17.1	26	1	26	0	12
Stockton	284	55	7	27.6%	103,167	22.8	10	1	10	0	10
Hayward	183	34	2	50.7%	97,348	29.0	3	1	3	1	3
Santa Ana	197	38	3	24.9%	88,739	8.8	6	1	6	0	5
Chula Vista	194	39	4	30.9%	80,580	44.2	3	1	3	0	3
Palmdale	134	28	3	45.8%	80,120	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
Modesto	241	51	4	29.6%	78,259	20.6	6	1	6	0	6
Oxnard	193	33	7	35.1%	77,374	30.0	3	1	3	0	3
Pittsburg	97	21	3	80.0%	76,865	3.0	1	1	1	1	1
Tracy	140	31	3	65.5%	76,773	5.5	4	1	4	1	4
Oceanside	171	34	3	35.3%	70,631	30.0	3	1	3	0	3
Anaheim	192	30	7	18.8%	69,203	9.0	7	1	7	0	7
Irvine	222	44	7	25.6%	68,378	18.3	8	1	8	0	7
Ventura	162	33	2	58.8%	68,203	5.0	3	1	3	1	3
San Bernardino	241	43	6	27.2%	67,911	21.4	6	1	6	1	6
Visalia	171	31	6	43.9%	66,810	6.7	3	1	3	0	3
Santa Barbara	212	45	5	46.7%	63,446	6.3	7	1	7	0	7
Santa Clara	186	31	4	50.3%	63,170	7.8	4	1	4	0	3
Salinas	216	39	4	33.5%	63,136	44.6	3	1	3	0	3
Chico	148	33	2	56.2%	62,965	5.3	3	1	3	1	3
Lancaster	154	34	7	32.3%	59,644	37.3	2	1	2	0	2
Hemet	162	28	3	46.2%	59,501	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
Vallejo	185	31	5	46.5%	57,933	6.5	4	1	4	0	4
Menifee	192	33	4	48.6%	53,688	6.3	4	1	4	0	4
Rancho Cucamonga	187	32	5	30.2%	53,385	30.8	3	1	3	0	3
Murrieta	134	26	7	40.3%	53,299	7.0	2	1	2	0	2
Fairfield	129	29	5	46.6%	53,195	6.5	2	1	2	0	2
Long Beach	281	65	14	10.9%	52,026	12.9	12	1	12	0	1
Garden Grove	194	36	3	29.5%	51,899	8.0	5	1	5	0	4
Corona	177	38	8	19.0%	48,931	9.8	5	1	5	0	4
Sunnyvale	188	39	6	31.2%	47,694	7.8	4	1	4	0	4
Temecula	164	30	4	36.2%	46,977	8.0	3	1	3	0	3
Napa	132	22	5	48.5%	46,923	5.5	2	1	2	0	2
Whittier	192	41	5	23.8%	46,773	25.2	5	1	5	0	3
Concord	172	30	5	35.5%	46,284	7.0	4	1	4	1	4
Chino	125	24	5	48.8%	46,069	7.5	2	1	2	0	2
Huntington Beach	195	36	8	21.4%	42,809	9.0	4	1	4	0	3
Ontario	164	26	5	24.1%	42,659	38.7	2	1	2	0	2
Mission Viejo	141	29	6	43.3%	42,631	7.0	2	1	2	1	1
San Mateo	188	33	6	28.8%	41,070	9.0	4	1	4	0	3
Perris	145	24	9	34.4%	40,412	7.5	2	1	2	0	2
Rialto	143	21	5	36.3%	38,722	8.0	2	1	2	0	2
Redding	193	30	4	33.9%	38,334	6.5	4	1	4	1	4
Redwood City	183	38	6	31.8%	36,414	7.3	4	1	4	0	4
Vacaville	147	26	7	33.5%	35,227	7.5	2	1	2	1	1
Escondido	191	40	9	19.5%	34,945	76.8	1	1	1	0	1
Hesperia	126	24	7	33.3%	34,564	6.0	2	1	2	1	2
Pasadena	193	35	7	21.5%	33,861	8.8	6	1	6	0	6
Compton	164	23	7	24.0%	33,283	8.7	3	1	3	0	3
Roseville	157	34	6	23.5%	32,835	9.7	3	1	3	0	1
Elk Grove	182	29	10	18.1%	32,501	39.3	2	1	2	0	2
Merced	169	34	5	30.2%	31,098	8.0	3	1	3	0	3
Fullerton	199	35	8	22.0%	30,577	31.3	3	1	3	0	3
San Leandro	168	29	5	27.3%	30,351	7.7	3	1	3	0	3
Palo Alto	172	40	6	31.0%	29,973	7.3	4	1	4	0	3
Torrance	201	34	8	16.6%	29,311	10.6	5	1	5	0	3
Madera	138	26	7	27.2%	27,971	9.7	3	1	3	0	2
Costa Mesa	142	25	10	24.4%	27,805	8.5	2	1	2	0	2
Santa Rosa	201	39	14	12.8%	27,659	10.8	6	1	6	0	2
Vista	163	25	6	22.8%	27,379	38.3	2	1	2	0	2
Fontana	151	26	9	11.5%	27,089	39.7	2	1	2	0	2
Berkeley	236	52	10	21.2%	26,978	9.3	9	1	9	0	7
Victorville	150	30	7	19.7%	26,818	39.3	2	1	2	0	2
West Covina	159	32	9	23.9%	26,143	39.3	2	2	3	0	1
Inglewood	208	39	6	19.4%	25,980	9.6	5	1	5	0	3
Riverside	244	47	14	7.0%	25,889	50.1	4	1	4	0	2
Oakland	240	54	20	6.3%	25,814	13.9	14	1	14	0	0
Santa Maria	161	25	9	17.7%	25,384	40.7	2	1	2	0	1
Clovis	155	21	9	19.8%	24,076	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Downey	144	36	8	20.1%	22,739	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Fremont	177	34	13	9.6%	22,406	11.5	4	1	4	0	2
Moreno Valley	166	37	15	10.5%	21,659	11.3	4	2	6	0	2
Burbank	203	40	6	19.5%	21,025	9.4	5	1	5	0	4
Bell Gardens	98	21	8	20.0%	20,487	9.0	1	1	1	0	1
Livermore	137	30	10	19.0%	18,271	9.5	2	1	2	0	1
Santa Cruz	179	32	11	15.3%	15,905	31.3	3	1	3	0	3
La Puente	146	26	11	10.8%	12,702	12.0	2	1	2	0	1
Pomona	154	28	11	7.9%	12,530	41.0	2	1	2	0	1
San Marcos	143	23	12	10.0%	10,048	10.0	2	1	2	0	2
Hawthorne	99	21	10	10.0%	9,684	10.0	1	1	1	0	1
Van Nuys	168	30	17	5.4%	9,681	14.3	4	1	4	0	0
El Cajon	171	35	13	5.4%	9,248	14.7	3	1	3	0	0
Indio	143	28	11	9.6%	9,223	54.5	1	1	1	0	1
Carlsbad	189	41	13	7.8%	8,891	34.5	3	1	3	0	1
Antioch	128	17	12	7.9%	8,758	55.0	1	1	1	0	1
Norwalk	98	19	8	8.0%	8,471	12.0	1	1	1	0	0
North Hollywood	161	25	14	5.3%	8,105	14.8	4	1	4	0	0
Sylmar	99	21	10	8.0%	7,719	12.0	1	1	1	0	0
South Gate	98	17	8	8.0%	7,608	12.0	1	1	1	0	0
Santa Monica	196	38	10	7.9%	7,463	11.8	5	1	5	0	0
Orange	151	31	12	4.5%	6,530	15.2	5	1	5	0	0
Daly City	151	29	13	5.7%	6,489	55.5	1	1	1	0	1
Simi Valley	127	29	14	4.4%	5,665	55.5	1	1	1	0	1
Pacoima	97	21	12	5.0%	5,290	15.0	1	1	1	0	0
El Monte	134	27	16	2.6%	2,411	56.5	1	1	1	0	0

Chicago

ZIP	tulsatag.com	yellowpages.com	kedzie52.com	cyberdriveillinois.com	oktagagent.com	facebook.com
60638	9	1		3	8	14
60628	11	4	1	6	7	15
60649	11	4	2	6	10	7
60619	12	4	1	6	8	17
60639	8	1		3	7	4
60629	11	4	1	6	8	14
60659	10	4	2	6	8	7
60657	10	4	2	6	8	7
60616	10	1		3	9	4
60606	6	1		3	9	4
60618	10	1		3	9	4
60608		4	2	6	11	7
60647	12	4	2	6	11	7
60617	8	1		3	5	12
60607	14	4	2	7	8	6
60637	12	4	1	6	8	16
60636	10	4	1	6	12	16
60605	10	4	3	6	9	28
60634	8	4	2	6	7	11
60624	7	1		3	5	11
60603	12	4	3	6	10	7
60655	9	4	1	6	10	14
60615	7	4	1	6	10	13
60625	12	4	2	6	10	7
60656	11	4	2	6	9	7
60646		4	2	6	11	7
60602	12	4		6	10	19
60642	12	4	3	6	10	7
60633	8	4	2	6	7	12
60660	9	4	2	6	12	7
60611	9	4	3	6	12	7
60620	6	1		3	4	12
60661	12	4	3	7	10	6
60610	8	4	3	6	11	7
60651	7	4	2	6	10	13
60632	14	4	1	6	8	19
60643	11	4	1	6	8	15
60612	8	1		3	6	4
60621	10	4	1	6	7	14
60652	6	1		3	8	21
60601		1		3	7	21
60641	8	4	2	6	11	7
60630		4	2	6	12	26
60604	7	1		3	6	23
60654	11	4	3	6	13	28
60644		4	2	6	10	26
60614	15	4	2	6	17	8
60623	12	4	3	6	13	28
60613	12	4	2	6	15	8
60645	12	4	2	6	11	31
60622	13	4	2	6	11	26
60626		1		3	8	23
60609	15	4	2	6	10	29
60653		4	2	6	10	27
60631	15	4	3	6	17	31
60640	10	4	2	6	14	30

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Tulsatag

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 513 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Tulsatag Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (tag agency near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Tulsatag Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Tulsatag Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Tulsatag Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly