Senioradvice Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve senioradvice.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 7,331 Retirement Homes In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Senioradvice Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Senioradvice Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Senioradvice Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Brooklyn
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Senioradvice Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	23,895	7,331	3	37.3%	120,536,511	16.5	26,641	31,875	6,777	33,177	210	1,678	23,997
California	3,595	1,223	3	31.7%	12,394,996	21.1	1,117	1,678	429	1,743	2	46	1,203
Texas	3,056	1,154	3	33.9%	9,442,975	19.4	1,293	1,847	407	1,907	6	89	1,311
Florida	2,414	824	3	40.6%	8,354,261	9.5	445	970	225	1,059	1	46	920
New York	2,805	836	4	28.2%	5,527,856	19.0	1,469	1,733	311	1,828	11	59	1,048
Georgia	2,062	656	3	44.5%	4,580,491	10.8	573	725	199	756	9	58	612
Illinois	2,697	847	3	34.3%	4,397,668	8.5	1,247	1,382	345	1,463	7	65	1,211
Michigan	2,226	735	3	41.7%	4,154,708	17.0	828	970	292	1,010	6	44	664
Ohio	2,444	801	3	32.4%	3,768,164	18.2	966	1,177	313	1,228	4	39	813
North Carolina	1,949	613	3	36.6%	3,717,815	17.1	680	795	194	827	2	30	520
Pennsylvania	2,720	823	3	26.3%	3,363,336	27.2	1,499	1,672	325	1,716	8	38	905
Virginia	2,029	641	3	38.2%	3,211,316	26.5	645	811	186	837	6	28	599
Massachusetts	1,743	515	3	45.8%	3,130,262	17.0	461	534	197	550	3	33	377
Indiana	2,695	785	2	46.5%	3,083,384	10.0	649	760	159	782	4	45	687
New Jersey	1,696	544	3	34.6%	3,071,803	26.6	492	548	197	570	1	21	339
Tennessee	1,774	613	3	42.7%	2,837,793	11.7	510	618	152	644	3	37	521
Arizona	1,478	533	3	40.3%	2,798,704	10.9	246	395	61	417	3	18	335
Minnesota	2,166	698	3	45.6%	2,522,916	8.9	776	877	239	912	9	62	771
Washington	1,817	591	3	33.8%	2,459,434	27.6	397	531	165	551	1	19	356
Alabama	1,791	559	2	50.1%	2,436,597	8.8	521	636	121	663	6	43	602
Wisconsin	2,117	689	3	41.9%	2,423,091	15.9	688	759	244	779	5	45	565
Louisiana	1,532	543	2	49.6%	2,314,134	9.7	431	510	111	549	6	36	479
Missouri	2,106	689	3	37.0%	2,253,159	15.2	884	1,013	241	1,041	6	50	762
Maryland	1,540	503	3	36.2%	2,172,839	15.2	386	457	108	473	2	14	344
Colorado	1,747	544	3	35.4%	1,958,531	19.0	370	502	95	515	4	15	339
Kentucky	1,831	622	2	41.4%	1,841,223	25.8	628	688	159	695	12	52	470
Oregon	1,895	614	3	44.3%	1,806,260	13.4	344	403	89	413	2	13	349
Oklahoma	1,691	559	3	45.4%	1,777,676	13.5	550	639	132	655	6	43	527
South Carolina	1,441	458	3	33.7%	1,672,455	11.9	346	421	102	439	3	18	271
Mississippi	1,463	493	2	53.2%	1,591,236	7.1	384	418	114	438	11	42	396
Arkansas	1,638	519	2	51.8%	1,548,658	13.9	545	579	126	602	9	48	461
Connecticut	1,300	434	3	42.4%	1,517,687	20.5	214	259	120	275	1	20	218
Kansas	1,728	545	3	44.8%	1,302,969	14.9	605	681	160	705	10	57	562
Iowa	1,960	661	3	39.5%	1,238,901	18.7	862	905	256	936	3	36	683
Utah	1,248	452	3	34.9%	1,063,344	18.9	229	267	62	283	0	5	215
New Mexico	1,251	410	4	50.5%	1,056,173	9.1	327	361	33	371	2	20	321
Nebraska	1,474	501	3	48.6%	926,582	8.1	518	575	94	592	2	50	536
West Virginia	1,524	477	3	42.7%	780,211	12.8	683	703	90	724	3	43	473
Idaho	1,251	427	3	44.6%	752,189	13.8	247	269	52	283	4	19	231
Hawaii	789	271	2	44.7%	635,131	13.9	81	92	16	95	0	5	77
Nevada	948	312	7	19.7%	575,255	9.9	92	168	21	212	0	3	110
Montana	1,341	417	2	49.9%	520,523	12.8	339	352	59	365	3	25	318
New Hampshire	1,334	439	4	35.0%	470,626	26.2	230	240	65	256	0	8	114
South Dakota	1,240	402	2	53.4%	461,304	6.3	359	370	53	380	2	39	356
Rhode Island	730	233	3	43.4%	458,665	23.3	54	67	30	69	1	3	58
Maine	1,714	549	4	32.7%	436,338	18.6	421	425	81	456	2	12	162
Alaska	1,222	405	2	55.0%	405,764	6.0	218	235	17	239	2	94	226
Delaware	779	261	4	40.0%	379,556	14.8	50	64	22	66	0	1	48
North Dakota	1,127	336	2	46.8%	351,434	7.2	367	381	52	386	16	34	322
Wyoming	1,097	367	2	36.5%	212,482	20.5	155	162	42	165	1	5	121
Vermont	1,149	368	4	24.5%	153,409	41.7	218	222	56	228	0	3	60

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Brooklyn	New York	245	73	4	43.4%	1,127,646	6.7	37	1	37	0	0	37
Phoenix	Arizona	363	127	4	39.5%	573,195	7.3	42	2	42	0	0	40
Dallas	Texas	359	120	5	36.7%	511,230	7.8	48	3	50	1	1	49
Indianapolis	Indiana	392	113	3	53.5%	509,409	7.0	37	3	37	0	5	36
Minneapolis	Minnesota	557	172	3	44.1%	479,679	7.5	51	9	53	0	4	49
Austin	Texas	369	119	4	42.2%	458,587	10.2	43	3	44	0	0	40
Fort Worth	Texas	321	109	3	46.8%	426,543	6.3	32	1	32	0	1	32
Jacksonville	Florida	290	91	3	45.0%	390,467	8.2	31	3	31	0	0	29
El Paso	Texas	372	114	3	48.6%	383,803	6.6	24	3	25	0	1	24
Portland	Oregon	368	113	5	41.3%	379,708	8.4	33	2	33	0	0	32
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	423	136	3	54.7%	373,419	5.6	43	4	43	0	6	43
Albuquerque	New Mexico	298	85	4	53.6%	351,297	7.9	17	2	17	0	3	16
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	457	142	4	41.9%	348,324	6.7	27	7	28	0	1	28
Detroit	Michigan	329	103	3	53.8%	344,292	5.5	25	1	25	0	4	25
Saint Paul	Minnesota	501	164	3	41.1%	329,050	8.1	30	11	30	0	0	29
Miami	Florida	545	172	7	17.5%	328,840	12.4	55	13	74	0	1	33
San Francisco	California	400	117	6	36.6%	318,484	7.5	28	2	29	0	0	29
Staten Island	New York	260	81	2	66.7%	316,259	4.5	12	1	12	0	2	12
Orlando	Florida	369	116	6	28.4%	282,471	10.8	32	4	32	0	1	23
Bronx	New York	238	64	6	19.1%	274,666	18.0	25	2	25	0	0	18
Mesa	Arizona	281	92	3	49.6%	265,006	6.1	13	1	13	0	1	13
Tampa	Florida	354	111	4	32.7%	258,911	14.0	26	4	26	0	0	21
Hollywood	Florida	268	82	3	54.6%	255,699	5.8	9	2	9	0	2	9
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	378	101	5	31.4%	254,643	8.6	29	5	30	0	0	28
Sacramento	California	350	109	4	30.7%	247,204	9.8	28	2	28	0	0	27
Omaha	Nebraska	299	94	4	44.7%	246,956	7.1	31	2	31	0	0	30
Denver	Colorado	449	142	7	22.2%	241,236	16.5	38	8	38	0	0	25
Baltimore	Maryland	327	101	4	37.1%	233,901	10.5	22	4	22	0	0	20
Birmingham	Alabama	380	114	3	45.9%	229,812	6.4	30	2	31	0	0	31
Cleveland	Ohio	385	114	6	30.1%	225,639	8.1	29	4	31	0	0	29
Washington DC	District of Columbia	344	82	6	32.8%	224,185	7.6	28	1	28	0	0	28
Los Angeles	California	432	130	11	9.0%	222,345	30.7	60	11	60	0	0	15
Atlanta	Georgia	465	141	7	22.0%	217,275	12.8	39	8	39	0	1	28
Tucson	Arizona	369	107	7	23.8%	215,379	9.6	32	4	35	0	0	24
Honolulu	Hawaii	234	63	3	51.3%	213,585	5.7	11	1	11	0	1	11
Arlington	Texas	266	89	3	52.6%	208,663	5.5	12	1	12	0	3	12
Memphis	Tennessee	319	92	4	29.6%	205,825	7.8	26	3	33	0	0	32
Knoxville	Tennessee	271	83	3	53.0%	204,889	5.7	17	1	17	0	2	17
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	304	100	3	53.5%	202,865	6.8	18	1	18	0	3	17
Chicago	Illinois	383	108	15	7.4%	201,278	12.7	56	1	56	0	0	4
Colorado Springs	Colorado	362	121	5	34.0%	198,536	13.6	29	2	29	0	0	28
Aurora	Colorado	321	103	3	45.5%	197,955	6.3	11	1	11	0	0	11
New Orleans	Louisiana	265	79	3	44.6%	191,036	6.5	19	1	19	0	0	19
San Antonio	Texas	384	112	9	10.7%	190,298	10.9	59	3	59	0	0	8
Corpus Christi	Texas	334	108	3	57.7%	187,956	5.2	18	1	18	0	5	18
Vancouver	Washington	258	81	3	56.9%	185,558	5.2	11	1	11	0	3	11
Seattle	Washington	330	95	6	19.3%	183,862	18.6	34	6	34	0	0	23
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	364	100	6	26.7%	182,201	18.8	36	3	36	0	0	33
Pompano Beach	Florida	303	88	3	48.3%	179,110	6.3	10	5	10	0	0	10
Naples	Florida	335	114	3	57.2%	179,037	5.4	14	1	14	0	1	14
Bakersfield	California	253	72	6	31.7%	177,418	7.9	11	1	11	0	0	11
Fresno	California	307	100	5	29.4%	177,326	8.2	18	1	18	0	0	18
Saint Louis	Missouri	516	158	6	19.0%	173,932	14.2	44	9	46	0	0	21
Mobile	Alabama	334	110	3	60.2%	163,389	5.3	18	1	18	0	5	18
Lexington	Kentucky	282	91	3	50.9%	162,721	5.8	15	1	15	0	2	15
Virginia Beach	Virginia	238	79	5	36.0%	161,918	7.4	12	1	12	0	0	12
Lubbock	Texas	327	101	3	57.0%	157,602	5.4	14	1	14	0	3	14
Louisville	Kentucky	343	96	7	20.6%	156,862	11.1	32	2	32	0	0	31
Wichita	Kansas	298	82	4	36.2%	151,192	7.4	26	1	26	0	0	26
Hialeah	Florida	235	76	4	41.1%	150,753	10.6	7	4	9	0	0	8
San Diego	California	374	130	14	11.1%	149,874	36.9	34	8	34	0	0	15
Lincoln	Nebraska	302	91	3	51.6%	149,285	5.6	22	1	22	0	3	22
Santa Ana	California	236	74	4	41.6%	148,710	6.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Richmond	Virginia	260	75	5	38.0%	148,406	6.9	15	1	15	0	0	15
San Jose	California	386	108	11	14.1%	147,884	10.1	28	1	28	0	0	14
Salt Lake City	Utah	344	109	4	29.7%	144,387	8.9	19	2	19	0	0	15
Anaheim	California	217	60	4	37.9%	139,579	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Grand Rapids	Michigan	230	67	5	37.5%	138,019	7.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Lakeland	Florida	232	71	4	51.8%	133,695	6.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Fort Wayne	Indiana	253	79	5	42.0%	133,680	6.8	16	1	16	0	0	16
Boise	Idaho	201	68	4	52.1%	133,344	5.9	9	1	9	0	1	9
Gilbert	Arizona	232	76	3	55.4%	132,102	5.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Corona	California	215	64	4	51.3%	132,031	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Tulsa	Oklahoma	303	88	4	31.2%	131,734	7.6	28	1	28	0	0	28
Pensacola	Florida	304	93	4	48.8%	130,868	6.1	13	2	14	0	1	14
Alexandria	Virginia	300	91	4	36.8%	130,409	8.1	14	2	15	0	0	13
Bradenton	Florida	278	92	3	51.3%	129,830	33.9	7	1	7	0	2	7
Chula Vista	California	180	50	4	49.4%	128,780	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Yonkers	New York	187	54	2	71.2%	128,462	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Laredo	Texas	212	72	5	47.4%	128,291	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Newark	New Jersey	243	74	3	45.6%	127,848	6.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Las Vegas	Nevada	369	108	15	8.2%	127,115	12.3	43	3	62	0	0	9
Anchorage	Alaska	271	87	4	51.6%	125,981	5.8	12	1	12	0	1	12
Nashville	Tennessee	302	85	5	27.4%	125,799	12.9	22	3	22	0	0	15
Shreveport	Louisiana	222	71	2	56.3%	125,635	5.4	12	1	12	0	0	12
Glendale	Arizona	277	99	4	41.0%	125,068	9.3	9	3	9	0	0	8
Stockton	California	260	77	8	33.4%	124,799	7.6	12	1	12	0	0	12
Modesto	California	252	74	4	46.7%	123,491	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Saint Petersburg	Florida	370	123	3	33.8%	120,421	7.7	16	2	17	0	0	17
Kissimmee	Florida	290	91	5	41.4%	119,613	6.9	7	3	7	0	0	7
Reno	Nevada	225	63	6	40.1%	119,124	6.9	12	1	12	0	0	12
Garland	Texas	201	70	4	50.0%	118,965	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Salem	Oregon	232	71	4	44.6%	118,806	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Boca Raton	Florida	217	64	4	53.3%	118,366	5.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Marietta	Georgia	242	73	5	36.7%	118,289	7.9	7	1	7	0	0	6
Akron	Ohio	274	82	4	43.4%	117,446	6.8	17	1	17	0	0	17
Fayetteville	North Carolina	232	76	5	47.6%	116,141	6.5	8	1	8	0	0	8
Torrance	California	205	73	3	65.4%	115,677	17.4	5	2	5	0	3	4
Tacoma	Washington	356	112	6	34.5%	114,920	9.9	20	3	20	0	0	17
Amarillo	Texas	292	93	5	50.2%	114,865	6.2	14	1	14	0	1	14
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	342	96	18	7.3%	114,830	13.4	47	2	47	0	0	5
Tallahassee	Florida	275	82	5	39.8%	114,674	6.9	10	1	10	0	0	10
Raleigh	North Carolina	280	80	6	20.7%	113,242	23.1	15	5	15	0	0	10
Fort Myers	Florida	256	72	5	45.0%	113,111	6.1	11	2	11	0	1	11
Dayton	Ohio	378	117	4	23.6%	112,953	16.7	26	8	26	0	0	19
Scottsdale	Arizona	278	106	4	37.8%	112,614	7.5	11	2	11	0	0	11
Ocala	Florida	251	82	5	50.0%	112,534	6.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Buffalo	New York	328	88	7	20.0%	112,423	13.8	28	6	29	0	0	21
Greensboro	North Carolina	221	57	4	34.1%	111,551	7.8	9	1	9	0	0	9
Norfolk	Virginia	302	94	5	44.5%	109,319	6.6	14	1	14	0	0	14
West Palm Beach	Florida	291	92	3	29.3%	108,749	8.3	12	4	13	0	0	12
Elk Grove	California	170	56	5	60.0%	107,591	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kalamazoo	Michigan	225	70	2	65.3%	107,204	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Savannah	Georgia	261	68	5	44.4%	107,142	6.7	10	1	10	0	0	10
Escondido	California	155	59	4	59.0%	105,958	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	179	55	2	85.8%	105,219	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Cincinnati	Ohio	350	115	10	13.0%	104,830	16.2	45	5	46	0	0	16
Jersey City	New Jersey	201	56	5	40.0%	104,650	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Green Bay	Wisconsin	241	68	3	56.9%	104,355	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Augusta	Georgia	237	66	3	51.0%	104,216	5.8	8	1	8	0	2	8
Frisco	Texas	128	51	5	60.0%	103,469	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Chattanooga	Tennessee	270	80	4	49.7%	103,302	6.0	15	2	15	0	0	15
Clarksville	Tennessee	152	51	3	58.8%	103,282	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Irvine	California	289	94	5	38.3%	102,491	7.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Littleton	Colorado	337	117	6	31.4%	102,040	16.1	10	6	10	0	0	5
Sarasota	Florida	269	79	4	40.7%	101,752	8.1	13	1	13	0	0	12
Worcester	Massachusetts	221	68	2	54.7%	101,452	5.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Topeka	Kansas	300	80	3	61.9%	101,201	4.7	18	1	18	0	2	18
Clearwater	Florida	276	86	3	54.1%	99,137	5.6	9	2	9	0	1	9
Evansville	Indiana	209	52	4	53.2%	98,254	5.8	9	1	9	0	1	9
Compton	California	170	53	2	70.0%	97,213	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Plano	Texas	193	67	5	31.8%	97,120	7.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Pueblo	Colorado	256	80	4	60.8%	96,175	4.7	7	2	8	0	1	8
Sunnyvale	California	195	57	3	63.0%	96,174	5.0	4	2	4	0	2	4
Brownsville	Texas	165	49	5	47.7%	95,981	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Durham	North Carolina	201	55	7	33.1%	95,970	7.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Fredericksburg	Virginia	224	71	4	54.9%	95,540	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Chesapeake	Virginia	225	61	5	40.0%	95,157	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Jackson	Mississippi	244	67	3	55.5%	94,511	5.7	11	1	11	0	1	11
Fort Collins	Colorado	186	64	5	48.3%	94,043	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Overland Park	Kansas	240	84	3	51.2%	93,929	6.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	228	69	5	51.6%	93,820	5.2	9	1	9	0	2	9
Fremont	California	197	61	6	40.0%	93,262	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	199	59	4	49.7%	92,670	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cumming	Georgia	172	65	4	57.2%	92,614	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Trenton	New Jersey	301	91	5	44.4%	92,275	6.5	11	3	11	0	0	11
Oxnard	California	185	60	5	41.7%	91,822	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chandler	Arizona	201	74	7	34.1%	91,709	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Simi Valley	California	134	53	3	71.2%	91,639	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Ogden	Utah	189	59	4	45.4%	91,446	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Moreno Valley	California	185	61	6	44.3%	90,973	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Las Cruces	New Mexico	232	81	3	61.0%	90,910	5.0	7	2	8	0	2	8
Lafayette	Louisiana	190	67	4	56.6%	90,900	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Waco	Texas	224	69	4	57.3%	90,769	5.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Beaverton	Oregon	156	50	5	44.4%	89,586	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lake Charles	Louisiana	201	74	3	68.3%	89,315	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Wilmington	Delaware	267	87	3	40.6%	89,051	6.4	10	2	10	0	0	9
Tyler	Texas	245	87	5	57.0%	88,928	5.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Hemet	California	152	42	3	68.6%	88,352	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Visalia	California	170	48	4	58.1%	88,316	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Muskegon	Michigan	202	65	2	68.3%	88,246	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Rancho Cucamonga	California	210	72	4	49.9%	88,099	6.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Charlottesville	Virginia	196	55	2	71.1%	87,469	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Little Rock	Arkansas	257	66	5	40.0%	87,226	7.0	12	2	14	0	0	14
Montgomery	Alabama	280	73	6	41.2%	86,532	6.5	13	1	13	0	0	13
Cypress	Texas	121	54	4	50.4%	85,909	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Whittier	California	217	73	4	43.7%	85,678	18.3	6	3	7	0	1	6
Erie	Pennsylvania	239	61	5	46.4%	85,230	6.1	13	1	13	0	1	13
Oceanside	California	170	63	5	42.3%	84,666	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mission	Texas	164	50	5	46.6%	84,342	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Houston	Texas	449	148	39	2.6%	84,322	31.4	95	5	95	0	0	5
Frederick	Maryland	155	43	4	63.8%	84,153	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Springfield	Missouri	255	88	7	36.5%	84,045	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Alpharetta	Georgia	195	75	6	43.9%	82,990	6.8	4	3	4	0	0	3
Naperville	Illinois	184	59	3	50.0%	82,904	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Billings	Montana	179	59	2	60.0%	82,372	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Surprise	Arizona	182	59	3	60.6%	82,130	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
San Bernardino	California	220	70	6	32.9%	82,075	7.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Irving	Texas	193	69	7	33.8%	81,213	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Eugene	Oregon	208	66	4	40.0%	81,196	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Winston Salem	North Carolina	310	107	6	30.6%	80,849	7.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Downey	California	161	53	2	71.3%	80,507	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Huntsville	Alabama	263	78	6	40.9%	80,244	7.2	11	1	11	0	0	11
Metairie	Louisiana	198	67	4	56.2%	80,008	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Huntington Beach	California	180	60	6	40.0%	79,963	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Beaumont	Texas	227	70	4	54.7%	79,619	5.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Roanoke	Virginia	237	66	5	46.8%	79,349	8.2	10	1	10	0	0	9
Murrieta	California	142	47	3	60.0%	79,346	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Panama City	Florida	223	68	3	62.7%	79,256	4.5	6	2	12	0	3	12
Rockford	Illinois	274	85	7	43.4%	79,218	6.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
San Mateo	California	193	54	3	55.6%	79,096	5.5	4	2	4	1	1	4
Paterson	New Jersey	266	90	4	54.2%	79,095	5.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Lansing	Michigan	252	81	3	47.7%	78,341	6.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Bellingham	Washington	164	67	3	61.8%	78,210	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Palmdale	California	190	62	4	44.6%	78,099	7.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Vero Beach	Florida	206	64	3	66.9%	77,069	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Lawrenceville	Georgia	197	56	5	30.0%	76,834	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bloomington	Indiana	201	72	3	57.5%	76,798	5.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Tempe	Arizona	198	61	6	40.3%	76,584	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Grand Prairie	Texas	190	73	5	40.0%	76,218	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	246	75	4	37.5%	76,077	7.0	6	2	7	0	0	7
Coral Springs	Florida	135	49	2	77.7%	75,563	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Kent	Washington	190	61	3	46.9%	75,225	6.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Reading	Pennsylvania	303	97	4	34.6%	74,455	7.6	10	2	10	0	0	10
Garden Grove	California	202	69	5	42.3%	74,264	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Conroe	Texas	248	82	4	46.3%	74,227	6.6	7	2	7	0	0	7
Lake Worth	Florida	233	84	5	35.9%	74,048	7.6	5	4	5	0	0	5
Abilene	Texas	209	71	4	56.8%	73,970	5.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Pomona	California	165	55	5	46.8%	73,966	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mesquite	Texas	146	51	5	50.0%	73,157	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Providence	Rhode Island	223	68	3	35.6%	72,969	8.4	8	3	8	0	0	6
Toledo	Ohio	256	81	8	23.6%	72,468	8.6	15	1	15	0	0	15
Idaho Falls	Idaho	194	67	3	66.4%	72,359	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Gainesville	Florida	252	78	6	34.4%	72,039	13.4	10	2	10	0	0	9
San Leandro	California	164	52	3	64.8%	72,017	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Silver Spring	Maryland	281	86	9	23.6%	71,646	10.9	7	4	7	0	0	6
Fullerton	California	180	60	5	51.4%	71,587	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
South Bend	Indiana	227	76	4	48.8%	71,578	6.3	10	1	10	0	0	10
Stamford	Connecticut	226	66	4	55.5%	71,454	5.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Costa Mesa	California	137	49	4	62.2%	70,786	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
New Braunfels	Texas	137	47	3	68.9%	70,786	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Macon	Georgia	261	73	4	43.2%	70,654	6.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Odessa	Texas	220	77	6	44.1%	70,537	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Richardson	Texas	149	54	3	61.5%	70,454	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Kansas City	Missouri	367	110	11	12.3%	70,326	17.9	49	7	49	0	0	35
Mckinney	Texas	138	46	8	37.2%	70,303	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
York	Pennsylvania	232	62	6	38.9%	69,899	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Bowling Green	Kentucky	171	46	4	60.0%	69,300	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Newport News	Virginia	254	85	6	39.2%	69,285	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Gaithersburg	Maryland	197	62	4	47.8%	69,054	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lawrence	Kansas	208	57	3	68.3%	69,026	4.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Edison	New Jersey	159	49	3	68.5%	69,023	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Killeen	Texas	194	62	6	45.9%	68,896	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hayward	California	188	57	6	35.9%	68,890	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Peoria	Arizona	177	67	3	40.0%	68,840	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rialto	California	147	50	3	64.5%	68,741	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Inglewood	California	210	71	3	51.4%	68,721	6.8	5	1	5	0	2	4
High Point	North Carolina	194	58	4	56.0%	68,467	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Greeley	Colorado	121	38	3	60.0%	68,439	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Cary	North Carolina	162	51	6	44.0%	68,395	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Victorville	California	164	50	6	50.0%	68,155	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	California	206	54	4	50.0%	67,942	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Olympia	Washington	253	91	5	37.1%	67,925	7.3	6	3	6	0	0	6
Manchester	New Hampshire	193	56	3	58.4%	67,810	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Laurel	Maryland	184	58	5	60.0%	67,483	5.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Carrollton	Texas	169	64	7	50.0%	67,406	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Maria	California	184	53	5	46.8%	67,033	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salinas	California	209	63	5	35.6%	66,956	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Joliet	Illinois	204	57	4	51.6%	66,510	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Yuma	Arizona	161	50	6	45.0%	66,361	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	201	57	3	50.0%	66,235	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clermont	Florida	178	60	3	66.0%	66,122	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Flint	Michigan	233	73	5	42.4%	65,944	6.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Stone Mountain	Georgia	180	60	4	51.3%	65,823	6.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Homestead	Florida	242	71	6	34.9%	65,516	12.7	7	3	7	0	0	6
Youngstown	Ohio	259	82	3	41.7%	65,505	6.9	12	3	15	0	0	15
Cape Coral	Florida	223	75	7	36.2%	65,456	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Baytown	Texas	170	65	5	54.9%	64,704	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ontario	California	177	51	5	36.5%	64,547	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Spring Hill	Florida	178	63	3	51.2%	64,202	5.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Santa Fe	New Mexico	196	66	5	50.0%	64,043	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Livonia	Michigan	152	53	2	67.2%	63,519	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Renton	Washington	235	79	5	41.0%	63,509	24.0	5	2	5	0	1	4
Winter Haven	Florida	153	50	3	59.4%	63,478	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Schenectady	New York	241	71	6	39.0%	63,284	7.1	8	1	8	0	0	8
Denton	Texas	225	72	6	40.0%	63,262	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Pasadena	California	180	61	5	40.0%	63,089	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Spring	Texas	228	93	11	16.5%	63,013	20.0	8	3	8	0	1	3
Yakima	Washington	153	43	5	48.5%	62,996	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rapid City	South Dakota	152	48	3	65.1%	62,947	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Apopka	Florida	144	53	4	64.3%	62,826	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Canton	Ohio	273	91	4	42.7%	62,812	6.6	12	2	17	0	0	17
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	213	63	6	44.8%	62,505	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	182	67	6	47.9%	62,452	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bellevue	Washington	216	66	4	42.6%	62,357	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Woodbridge	Virginia	177	56	7	29.4%	62,303	8.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Edinburg	Texas	172	54	5	40.0%	62,228	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Edmond	Oklahoma	190	68	4	36.2%	62,227	19.0	5	3	5	0	0	3
Riverside	California	204	65	12	16.8%	62,183	56.1	6	4	6	0	0	2
Athens	Georgia	213	60	4	49.8%	62,075	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
New Bedford	Massachusetts	195	56	3	65.2%	61,813	4.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Henderson	Nevada	191	68	12	20.4%	61,709	10.6	8	3	12	0	0	4
Rochester	New York	350	101	11	13.1%	61,538	11.0	24	1	24	0	0	11
Madison	Wisconsin	269	87	8	20.9%	61,492	35.1	10	2	10	0	0	9
Anderson	South Carolina	167	54	2	62.5%	61,483	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Fargo	North Dakota	165	47	6	50.0%	61,237	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Belleville	Illinois	191	72	3	65.5%	61,088	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Grand Junction	Colorado	209	63	4	57.6%	60,724	5.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Palm Bay	Florida	188	59	4	54.5%	60,615	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bend	Oregon	171	65	6	49.5%	60,490	6.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Acworth	Georgia	145	53	4	60.0%	59,810	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Saint Augustine	Florida	239	87	3	45.4%	59,475	6.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
Gulfport	Mississippi	166	58	3	62.6%	59,277	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Lynchburg	Virginia	201	63	4	57.5%	58,827	5.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Perris	California	146	40	3	50.0%	58,695	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Midland	Texas	204	69	6	36.5%	58,364	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lowell	Massachusetts	182	54	4	52.3%	58,285	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rock Hill	South Carolina	167	55	5	50.0%	58,180	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Nampa	Idaho	141	41	6	50.0%	57,953	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Olathe	Kansas	134	49	6	40.0%	57,749	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Appleton	Wisconsin	172	48	4	47.5%	57,748	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Longmont	Colorado	169	58	6	44.1%	57,708	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Arvada	Colorado	197	69	6	43.1%	57,482	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Davenport	Iowa	229	87	4	54.5%	57,123	5.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Boston	Massachusetts	278	78	6	37.6%	57,113	7.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
South Gate	California	99	41	4	60.0%	57,062	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Terre Haute	Indiana	185	65	4	60.0%	56,984	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Norman	Oklahoma	184	57	5	45.9%	56,959	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mcallen	Texas	162	47	6	40.0%	56,635	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sugar Land	Texas	171	57	7	33.5%	56,570	19.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Temecula	California	170	53	7	43.5%	56,515	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kenosha	Wisconsin	186	62	4	50.0%	56,440	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chico	California	172	53	4	50.1%	56,073	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Des Moines	Iowa	251	84	6	25.0%	55,937	8.4	11	1	11	0	0	11
Roseville	California	165	59	6	40.0%	55,918	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	California	185	60	3	53.7%	55,830	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Saginaw	Michigan	231	72	6	42.7%	55,698	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Boynton Beach	Florida	203	69	5	31.9%	55,616	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Summerville	South Carolina	139	46	6	40.0%	55,577	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Springdale	Arkansas	126	32	3	57.6%	55,496	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Melbourne	Florida	169	50	4	35.6%	55,404	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cambridge	Massachusetts	186	62	4	47.8%	55,306	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Federal Way	Washington	145	47	5	54.9%	55,015	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hamilton	Ohio	179	64	5	40.0%	54,839	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Independence	Missouri	267	77	6	43.9%	54,466	6.6	8	1	8	0	0	8
Keller	Texas	144	56	6	46.8%	54,378	6.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Fort Pierce	Florida	265	87	3	56.6%	54,185	5.8	8	2	9	0	0	9
Elgin	Illinois	166	47	6	44.3%	54,174	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Warren	Michigan	205	67	4	40.0%	54,077	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Muncie	Indiana	178	62	4	58.3%	54,044	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Burbank	California	206	65	5	50.0%	54,008	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
New York City	New York	293	77	26	3.3%	53,955	19.3	46	4	48	0	0	1
Fairfax	Virginia	209	63	6	33.0%	53,922	8.3	4	3	4	0	0	3
O Fallon	Missouri	146	50	3	55.4%	53,470	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clovis	California	155	46	4	43.8%	53,200	6.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Norwalk	California	99	36	6	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Asheville	North Carolina	152	44	6	40.0%	52,838	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Quincy	Massachusetts	145	47	4	55.8%	52,512	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	136	54	4	51.0%	52,502	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	183	56	5	55.5%	51,912	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Madera	California	166	56	4	50.2%	51,731	6.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	204	65	5	47.1%	51,128	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lees Summit	Missouri	230	77	5	50.0%	51,023	9.3	6	2	6	0	0	5
Scranton	Pennsylvania	249	71	3	50.9%	50,655	6.4	8	2	8	0	0	8
Duluth	Minnesota	255	71	5	43.0%	50,399	6.7	11	1	11	0	0	11
New Haven	Connecticut	200	60	7	38.7%	50,398	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Parker	Colorado	147	52	6	50.0%	50,141	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Everett	Washington	210	70	9	30.0%	50,002	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elkhart	Indiana	167	52	4	50.0%	49,717	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Plainfield	Illinois	171	60	4	50.3%	49,596	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Kennesaw	Georgia	124	39	5	50.0%	49,565	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Woodstock	Georgia	121	49	4	48.6%	49,468	6.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Kennewick	Washington	162	45	4	50.0%	49,405	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oakland	California	259	81	11	12.0%	49,340	39.9	13	8	14	0	0	4
College Station	Texas	139	48	5	40.0%	49,220	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Toms River	New Jersey	151	58	5	40.0%	49,144	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Franklin	Tennessee	146	49	4	45.7%	48,661	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Lehigh Acres	Florida	212	61	4	41.5%	48,468	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Jupiter	Florida	177	67	5	48.6%	47,910	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sandy	Utah	186	66	6	43.4%	47,901	6.5	4	2	5	0	1	5
Waukesha	Wisconsin	165	52	4	50.0%	47,898	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Johnson City	Tennessee	194	65	5	50.0%	47,718	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Morgantown	West Virginia	153	47	6	50.0%	47,643	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allen	Texas	129	51	5	42.7%	47,501	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Valdosta	Georgia	214	61	4	50.0%	47,476	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Henrico	Virginia	257	76	5	24.5%	47,289	25.4	6	2	6	0	0	5
Santa Monica	California	195	67	5	50.0%	47,205	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Waukegan	Illinois	115	37	4	48.2%	47,015	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	131	49	4	50.0%	46,937	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Monte	California	138	46	6	50.0%	46,856	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	140	48	5	50.0%	46,698	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Douglasville	Georgia	136	51	7	42.0%	46,309	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Largo	Florida	187	57	4	42.8%	46,083	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Greenville	South Carolina	203	66	8	20.9%	45,943	16.3	9	2	9	0	0	8
Santa Rosa	California	225	69	10	21.2%	45,845	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fairfield	California	141	46	6	40.0%	45,632	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Manassas	Virginia	195	58	6	30.0%	45,534	13.0	4	2	4	0	0	2
Bryan	Texas	197	68	3	47.3%	45,528	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
New Port Richey	Florida	197	66	6	37.6%	45,457	7.0	4	3	7	0	0	7
Longview	Texas	219	68	5	43.1%	45,340	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Redding	California	195	61	5	40.0%	45,240	6.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Florissant	Missouri	178	61	4	41.7%	45,104	6.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Ashburn	Virginia	129	38	7	40.0%	44,923	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Spartanburg	South Carolina	190	61	6	40.0%	44,783	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Round Rock	Texas	171	65	6	26.7%	44,736	14.0	3	3	4	0	0	2
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	214	59	6	26.3%	44,584	8.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Riverview	Florida	185	53	6	40.0%	44,533	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	126	45	6	45.6%	44,438	6.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Pearland	Texas	151	58	7	32.2%	44,325	29.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Antioch	California	144	50	5	40.0%	44,288	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lancaster	California	166	58	9	23.9%	44,122	8.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Boulder	Colorado	213	49	7	33.5%	44,027	8.0	6	2	6	0	0	5
Sparks	Nevada	182	54	4	36.8%	43,846	7.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Rockville	Maryland	206	63	6	30.2%	43,707	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Bowie	Maryland	200	57	5	42.7%	43,665	12.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Hampton	Virginia	228	73	6	31.7%	43,230	7.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Albany	New York	262	73	9	28.5%	43,157	9.3	11	2	11	0	0	10
Herndon	Virginia	148	52	7	46.2%	43,140	6.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Miami Beach	Florida	189	52	4	37.0%	42,856	8.6	5	3	9	0	0	8
Gastonia	North Carolina	147	44	4	40.0%	42,815	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	206	56	8	29.2%	42,470	7.6	5	2	7	0	0	7
North Las Vegas	Nevada	229	75	8	18.1%	42,357	9.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Daytona Beach	Florida	220	63	5	40.9%	42,128	7.0	5	2	5	0	1	5
Vacaville	California	137	49	5	40.0%	42,118	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Delray Beach	Florida	222	79	5	34.7%	41,322	7.6	5	2	6	0	0	6
Mcdonough	Georgia	143	51	5	40.0%	40,585	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Tracy	California	198	77	4	34.4%	40,355	16.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Lakewood	New Jersey	97	38	6	40.0%	40,305	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Saint Charles	Missouri	186	72	7	28.8%	40,258	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Clinton Township	Michigan	168	58	5	40.0%	40,118	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Valley City	Utah	156	45	5	30.0%	39,860	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lewisville	Texas	150	58	7	33.6%	39,837	7.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Puyallup	Washington	217	73	6	27.9%	39,807	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Broomfield	Colorado	172	61	6	38.0%	39,763	7.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Buford	Georgia	150	54	8	40.0%	39,641	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	California	138	52	6	40.0%	39,343	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bridgeport	Connecticut	233	72	7	26.8%	39,200	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	170	49	6	40.0%	39,179	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Concord	California	175	49	6	30.0%	39,066	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Jordan	Utah	186	64	6	31.6%	39,040	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hawthorne	California	100	27	6	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hartford	Connecticut	170	49	8	31.3%	38,672	8.2	6	2	12	0	0	12
Palo Alto	California	213	69	6	40.0%	38,672	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Columbus	Ohio	357	119	28	4.6%	38,544	20.5	30	5	30	0	0	2
Livermore	California	135	39	6	40.0%	38,501	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	142	40	7	40.0%	38,170	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Portsmouth	Virginia	258	78	5	40.0%	38,124	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Hagerstown	Maryland	169	55	6	38.8%	38,015	20.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Champaign	Illinois	163	49	4	40.0%	37,827	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Deltona	Florida	145	48	6	40.0%	37,556	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vista	California	160	50	7	31.2%	37,389	7.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Medford	Oregon	133	47	5	40.0%	37,301	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Dearborn	Michigan	196	70	6	39.1%	37,194	7.3	4	2	8	0	0	8
Covington	Georgia	150	49	6	40.0%	37,075	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Racine	Wisconsin	226	78	7	29.3%	36,925	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Menifee	California	188	67	8	32.9%	36,396	7.5	4	2	6	0	0	6
Bothell	Washington	186	61	8	27.4%	35,131	24.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
La Puente	California	154	53	4	29.7%	35,019	43.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Ventura	California	160	54	6	30.0%	34,788	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redwood City	California	168	57	8	30.0%	34,339	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Merced	California	175	62	5	33.1%	34,163	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Carlsbad	California	179	50	8	30.0%	34,101	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ann Arbor	Michigan	200	63	9	20.3%	33,898	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
West Covina	California	170	60	6	30.0%	32,822	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orem	Utah	145	52	6	32.6%	32,737	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Indio	California	134	45	6	33.2%	31,902	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Charleston	South Carolina	252	73	12	16.1%	31,650	12.3	10	3	11	0	0	4
Provo	Utah	177	65	8	26.9%	31,383	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Meridian	Idaho	132	50	8	30.0%	31,266	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hesperia	California	132	41	5	30.0%	31,143	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
North Hollywood	California	140	44	10	19.9%	30,468	11.8	4	2	4	0	0	1
Charlotte	North Carolina	294	84	28	3.3%	30,323	47.1	20	8	21	0	0	1
El Cajon	California	178	53	13	17.6%	30,280	29.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
Fontana	California	167	54	8	12.9%	30,253	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
San Marcos	California	143	53	9	30.0%	30,144	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Long Beach	California	251	71	22	6.3%	30,127	42.6	10	5	10	0	0	3
Roswell	Georgia	133	41	7	30.0%	29,931	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	175	56	7	25.9%	28,059	11.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Elizabeth	New Jersey	166	49	7	26.4%	26,541	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Syracuse	New York	310	87	14	11.6%	26,309	15.8	15	3	15	0	0	5
Lithonia	Georgia	135	51	7	26.0%	25,118	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Daly City	California	147	46	7	21.3%	24,418	9.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Milton	Florida	177	64	9	25.0%	23,714	9.0	3	2	4	0	0	3
Orange	California	179	59	10	16.2%	23,467	9.2	5	2	10	0	0	7
Ypsilanti	Michigan	147	46	9	20.0%	21,380	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Annapolis	Maryland	200	70	8	22.1%	21,028	8.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Decatur	Georgia	225	74	14	11.5%	20,711	10.6	5	3	6	0	0	2
Englewood	Colorado	191	73	10	18.4%	20,546	24.3	4	2	4	0	0	1
Columbia	South Carolina	238	75	16	5.8%	19,776	15.4	14	3	14	0	0	1
Napa	California	138	48	9	20.0%	19,333	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Allentown	Pennsylvania	212	68	11	10.0%	17,002	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Midlothian	Virginia	160	46	9	16.3%	15,743	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Falls Church	Virginia	255	70	11	11.9%	14,267	15.6	5	4	5	0	0	2
Missouri City	Texas	145	52	9	13.4%	14,231	20.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Spokane	Washington	258	90	25	3.1%	11,179	22.8	14	4	14	0	0	0
Hyattsville	Maryland	190	45	13	7.0%	11,030	18.6	5	4	6	0	0	1
Chino	California	133	47	8	10.0%	9,447	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	California	99	33	8	9.0%	8,647	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Van Nuys	California	158	46	15	3.4%	6,100	46.8	3	1	3	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	161	54	13	5.3%	5,742	13.0	3	3	3	0	0	1
Astoria	New York	151	53	19	2.3%	3,241	19.8	4	3	4	0	0	0
Auburn	Washington	170	61	14	2.8%	3,142	22.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Katy	Texas	183	73	32	0.9%	3,103	29.3	4	3	4	0	0	0
Wichita Falls	Texas	221	76	17	2.9%	2,911	36.1	7	2	8	0	0	1
Ballwin	Missouri	137	53	16	2.6%	2,479	17.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Jamaica	New York	175	52	25	1.0%	2,328	23.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Santa Clara	California	174	51	21	1.7%	2,160	26.3	4	3	4	0	0	1
Flushing	New York	137	43	22	1.0%	2,074	22.8	4	2	4	0	0	0
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	174	60	21	1.6%	2,029	32.3	4	4	5	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	96	33	13	2.0%	1,879	18.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Humble	Texas	162	64	32	0.9%	1,433	33.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Berkeley	California	233	77	23	1.1%	1,431	67.7	7	3	7	0	0	0
Fort Mill	South Carolina	161	58	25	1.3%	1,278	50.0	3	3	3	0	0	0
Vallejo	California	177	55	18	1.0%	1,223	20.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
San Angelo	Texas	190	71	20	0.9%	1,049	24.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	98	27	20	1.0%	1,035	22.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	134	38	25	0.9%	892	25.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Missoula	Montana	188	54	27	0.9%	880	28.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	98	35	61	0.6%	582	64.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	97	36	71	0.4%	415	76.0	1	2	2	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
San Francisco	400	117	6	36.6%	318,484	7.5	28	2	29	0	0	29
Sacramento	350	109	4	30.7%	247,204	9.8	28	2	28	0	0	27
Los Angeles	432	130	11	9.0%	222,345	30.7	60	11	60	0	0	15
Bakersfield	253	72	6	31.7%	177,418	7.9	11	1	11	0	0	11
Fresno	307	100	5	29.4%	177,326	8.2	18	1	18	0	0	18
San Diego	374	130	14	11.1%	149,874	36.9	34	8	34	0	0	15
Santa Ana	236	74	4	41.6%	148,710	6.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Jose	386	108	11	14.1%	147,884	10.1	28	1	28	0	0	14
Anaheim	217	60	4	37.9%	139,579	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Corona	215	64	4	51.3%	132,031	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chula Vista	180	50	4	49.4%	128,780	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Stockton	260	77	8	33.4%	124,799	7.6	12	1	12	0	0	12
Modesto	252	74	4	46.7%	123,491	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Torrance	205	73	3	65.4%	115,677	17.4	5	2	5	0	3	4
Elk Grove	170	56	5	60.0%	107,591	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Escondido	155	59	4	59.0%	105,958	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Irvine	289	94	5	38.3%	102,491	7.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Compton	170	53	2	70.0%	97,213	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sunnyvale	195	57	3	63.0%	96,174	5.0	4	2	4	0	2	4
Fremont	197	61	6	40.0%	93,262	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Oxnard	185	60	5	41.7%	91,822	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Simi Valley	134	53	3	71.2%	91,639	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Moreno Valley	185	61	6	44.3%	90,973	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hemet	152	42	3	68.6%	88,352	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Visalia	170	48	4	58.1%	88,316	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Rancho Cucamonga	210	72	4	49.9%	88,099	6.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Whittier	217	73	4	43.7%	85,678	18.3	6	3	7	0	1	6
Oceanside	170	63	5	42.3%	84,666	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Bernardino	220	70	6	32.9%	82,075	7.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Downey	161	53	2	71.3%	80,507	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Huntington Beach	180	60	6	40.0%	79,963	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Murrieta	142	47	3	60.0%	79,346	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Mateo	193	54	3	55.6%	79,096	5.5	4	2	4	1	1	4
Palmdale	190	62	4	44.6%	78,099	7.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Garden Grove	202	69	5	42.3%	74,264	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pomona	165	55	5	46.8%	73,966	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	164	52	3	64.8%	72,017	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Fullerton	180	60	5	51.4%	71,587	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Costa Mesa	137	49	4	62.2%	70,786	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Hayward	188	57	6	35.9%	68,890	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rialto	147	50	3	64.5%	68,741	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Inglewood	210	71	3	51.4%	68,721	6.8	5	1	5	0	2	4
Victorville	164	50	6	50.0%	68,155	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	206	54	4	50.0%	67,942	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Santa Maria	184	53	5	46.8%	67,033	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salinas	209	63	5	35.6%	66,956	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ontario	177	51	5	36.5%	64,547	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pasadena	180	61	5	40.0%	63,089	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Riverside	204	65	12	16.8%	62,183	56.1	6	4	6	0	0	2
Perris	146	40	3	50.0%	58,695	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
South Gate	99	41	4	60.0%	57,062	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Temecula	170	53	7	43.5%	56,515	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chico	172	53	4	50.1%	56,073	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Roseville	165	59	6	40.0%	55,918	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	185	60	3	53.7%	55,830	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Burbank	206	65	5	50.0%	54,008	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Clovis	155	46	4	43.8%	53,200	6.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Norwalk	99	36	6	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Madera	166	56	4	50.2%	51,731	6.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Oakland	259	81	11	12.0%	49,340	39.9	13	8	14	0	0	4
Santa Monica	195	67	5	50.0%	47,205	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
El Monte	138	46	6	50.0%	46,856	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Rosa	225	69	10	21.2%	45,845	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fairfield	141	46	6	40.0%	45,632	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redding	195	61	5	40.0%	45,240	6.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Antioch	144	50	5	40.0%	44,288	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lancaster	166	58	9	23.9%	44,122	8.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Vacaville	137	49	5	40.0%	42,118	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Tracy	198	77	4	34.4%	40,355	16.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Mission Viejo	138	52	6	40.0%	39,343	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Concord	175	49	6	30.0%	39,066	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hawthorne	100	27	6	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Palo Alto	213	69	6	40.0%	38,672	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Livermore	135	39	6	40.0%	38,501	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vista	160	50	7	31.2%	37,389	7.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Menifee	188	67	8	32.9%	36,396	7.5	4	2	6	0	0	6
La Puente	154	53	4	29.7%	35,019	43.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Ventura	160	54	6	30.0%	34,788	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redwood City	168	57	8	30.0%	34,339	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Merced	175	62	5	33.1%	34,163	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Carlsbad	179	50	8	30.0%	34,101	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Covina	170	60	6	30.0%	32,822	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Indio	134	45	6	33.2%	31,902	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hesperia	132	41	5	30.0%	31,143	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
North Hollywood	140	44	10	19.9%	30,468	11.8	4	2	4	0	0	1
El Cajon	178	53	13	17.6%	30,280	29.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
Fontana	167	54	8	12.9%	30,253	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
San Marcos	143	53	9	30.0%	30,144	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Long Beach	251	71	22	6.3%	30,127	42.6	10	5	10	0	0	3
Daly City	147	46	7	21.3%	24,418	9.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Orange	179	59	10	16.2%	23,467	9.2	5	2	10	0	0	7
Napa	138	48	9	20.0%	19,333	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chino	133	47	8	10.0%	9,447	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	99	33	8	9.0%	8,647	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Van Nuys	158	46	15	3.4%	6,100	46.8	3	1	3	0	0	0
Santa Clara	174	51	21	1.7%	2,160	26.3	4	3	4	0	0	1
Berkeley	233	77	23	1.1%	1,431	67.7	7	3	7	0	0	0
Vallejo	177	55	18	1.0%	1,223	20.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Pacoima	98	35	61	0.6%	582	64.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Sylmar	97	36	71	0.4%	415	76.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	98	31	82	0.3%	328	87.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

Brooklyn

ZIP	senioradvice.com	caring.com	dibbern.com	aplaceformom.com	yelp.com	nursinghomes.com
11208	4	1	2	3	5	6
11206	7	4	5	6	8	9
11239	7	4	5	6	8	9
11229	7	4	5	6	8	9
11226	7	4	5	6	8	9
11218	4	1	2	3	5	6
11216	7	4	5	6	8	9
11228	7	4	5	6	8	9
11238	7	4	5	6	8	9
11237	7	4	5	6	8	9
11217	7	4	6	5	8	9
11207	7	4	5	6	8	9
11236	7	4	5	6	8	9
11205	7	4	5	6	8	9
11219	7	4	5	6	8	9
11234	7	4	5	6	8	9
11203	7	4	5	6	8	9
11224	7	4	5	6	8	9
11225	7	4	6	5	8	9
11215	5	1	3	2	4	6
11233	7	4	5	6	8	9
11211	7	4	6	5	8	9
11220	7	4	5	6	8	9
11230	7	4	6	5	8	9
11232	7	4	6	5	8	9
11201	7	4	6	5	8	10
11212	7	4	5	6	8	9
11221	4	1	2	3	5	6
11210	7	4	6	5	8	9
11214	7	4	5	6	8	9
11213	7	4	5	6	8	9
11223	7	4	5	6	8	9
11235	7	4	6	5	8	9
11204	7	4	5	6	8	9
11222	7	4	5	6	8	9
11209	7	4	6	5	8	9
11231	8	4	6	7	9	10

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Senioradvice

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 7,331 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Senioradvice Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (nursing home near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Senioradvice Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Senioradvice Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Senioradvice Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly