Rotorooter Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve rotorooter.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 17,289 Plumbing Services In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Rotorooter Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Rotorooter Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Rotorooter Report, November 2024 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Rotorooter Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	27,544	17,289	4	32.1%	103,764,934	21.1	27,373	32,647	3,590	34,222	349	1,682	14,952
California	4,019	2,813	4	26.4%	10,322,032	16.9	1,164	1,737	406	1,808	7	48	908
Texas	3,016	2,105	3	37.0%	10,310,082	19.4	1,360	1,917	212	1,975	19	123	990
Florida	2,255	1,648	3	42.7%	8,788,053	12.6	445	974	203	1,018	18	87	738
New York	2,817	1,912	4	35.6%	6,992,956	22.8	1,491	1,756	256	1,882	14	67	704
Ohio	2,204	1,553	3	41.5%	4,825,592	18.7	976	1,188	213	1,248	18	91	693
Illinois	2,426	1,717	4	35.0%	4,491,533	19.7	1,247	1,382	278	1,449	14	79	686
Pennsylvania	2,504	1,789	4	32.3%	4,137,625	21.2	1,604	1,781	232	1,852	12	77	790
North Carolina	1,734	1,251	4	35.8%	3,632,616	19.9	683	802	131	844	10	52	413
Virginia	1,561	1,130	3	37.4%	3,147,438	22.0	723	891	136	944	9	52	375
Georgia	1,639	1,175	4	30.1%	3,103,202	22.0	574	726	140	745	6	38	371
Michigan	1,749	1,187	4	29.7%	2,961,766	25.4	833	976	160	1,023	7	32	344
New Jersey	1,749	1,262	4	28.8%	2,555,040	19.2	537	593	212	624	8	33	306
Massachusetts	1,879	1,235	4	34.0%	2,319,132	18.5	461	534	159	563	7	32	303
Indiana	2,600	1,961	4	34.7%	2,304,083	18.6	659	770	127	844	16	67	432
Louisiana	1,129	821	3	47.9%	2,235,711	12.9	431	510	89	527	6	49	362
Washington	1,479	1,028	4	29.9%	2,175,195	17.8	451	587	124	615	10	33	308
Maryland	1,250	892	4	36.0%	2,161,923	19.2	392	463	99	485	6	23	249
Tennessee	1,318	918	4	30.1%	1,999,023	18.6	514	622	99	638	6	23	296
Missouri	1,576	1,127	4	31.3%	1,907,560	20.3	887	1,017	152	1,069	12	82	498
Colorado	1,548	1,090	4	31.9%	1,766,185	24.4	379	512	85	533	3	16	258
South Carolina	1,130	801	4	33.9%	1,682,045	17.5	347	422	78	440	13	23	232
Minnesota	1,778	1,200	5	28.0%	1,548,369	29.7	777	878	119	914	1	28	208
Alabama	1,347	960	4	31.4%	1,528,353	17.3	522	637	110	671	10	41	345
Wisconsin	1,699	1,155	4	23.4%	1,350,679	26.4	694	769	125	791	3	19	214
Mississippi	1,094	771	4	40.7%	1,216,269	18.1	384	418	87	471	23	62	246
Oregon	1,690	1,242	4	29.0%	1,183,455	20.2	355	414	71	429	3	20	196
Arizona	1,210	848	6	16.4%	1,141,567	19.8	247	396	59	414	4	16	125
Connecticut	1,122	779	5	29.3%	1,049,526	17.2	234	279	112	288	4	10	165
Iowa	1,573	1,072	4	33.4%	1,047,909	20.2	890	933	107	972	9	50	445
Kentucky	1,249	898	4	21.6%	960,274	27.6	698	758	80	793	2	19	236
New Mexico	970	704	3	44.9%	938,112	18.9	326	360	52	385	9	42	195
Arkansas	1,189	843	4	30.7%	917,580	20.8	553	587	90	600	5	24	245
Kansas	1,351	945	5	26.5%	769,545	24.2	616	692	84	712	2	20	193
Oklahoma	1,230	888	4	19.5%	762,518	26.3	557	646	70	662	0	2	225
Utah	1,011	733	5	22.5%	685,544	24.9	246	284	75	294	0	8	80
Hawaii	531	361	3	39.3%	558,365	22.0	82	93	30	101	4	6	46
West Virginia	1,100	810	4	28.6%	522,499	23.2	684	704	72	744	5	36	307
Idaho	975	697	4	30.1%	508,550	20.2	251	273	60	282	3	8	106
Nebraska	1,150	810	5	26.7%	508,119	26.4	524	581	68	603	1	12	206
Nevada	694	510	7	15.2%	443,748	15.6	92	168	32	183	1	6	39
Rhode Island	505	345	4	37.7%	398,786	14.7	64	77	31	82	1	8	49
Delaware	600	422	5	30.8%	292,413	19.0	52	66	23	73	1	6	42
New Hampshire	979	695	5	19.9%	267,281	28.0	238	248	66	261	3	4	49
Montana	915	632	4	20.9%	217,479	26.0	348	361	53	378	4	12	112
North Dakota	723	487	4	27.2%	203,973	19.5	367	381	41	390	7	15	152
Maine	1,633	1,237	6	12.1%	160,969	27.6	421	425	55	449	1	7	135
Vermont	816	582	4	22.4%	140,074	23.1	250	254	54	268	0	8	84
Wyoming	796	568	4	21.1%	122,745	23.2	164	171	34	183	1	10	71
South Dakota	880	601	10	9.8%	84,466	24.6	359	370	46	382	0	2	92
Alaska	831	574	19	5.8%	42,560	32.6	218	235	35	287	17	49	54

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	317	233	3	58.5%	1,863,300	5.2	96	2	99	2	23	99
Chicago	Illinois	270	193	3	52.2%	1,409,395	5.4	56	2	65	2	11	65
Brooklyn	New York	305	217	3	43.9%	1,142,863	6.7	37	2	39	0	2	39
San Antonio	Texas	247	175	3	53.5%	951,617	5.7	59	3	62	1	9	62
New York City	New York	306	227	2	56.4%	914,159	5.3	47	3	53	2	12	53
Miami	Florida	422	305	3	45.0%	845,834	7.3	55	9	60	2	6	58
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	306	220	4	45.4%	715,991	6.9	47	1	47	0	0	46
Austin	Texas	246	187	3	58.0%	631,387	5.2	44	2	45	0	8	45
El Paso	Texas	279	203	1	76.3%	602,006	5.1	24	3	25	3	4	24
Minneapolis	Minnesota	405	288	3	53.3%	580,532	5.9	51	12	57	1	10	56
Orlando	Florida	279	212	3	57.3%	570,552	5.5	32	3	33	0	6	32
Bronx	New York	250	180	4	38.6%	556,608	7.1	25	3	27	1	2	26
Jacksonville	Florida	268	194	3	60.7%	526,808	5.3	31	3	34	1	7	34
San Jose	California	238	166	3	49.4%	519,294	6.1	28	2	29	0	1	29
Cincinnati	Ohio	260	188	2	63.1%	507,647	4.5	45	4	53	3	12	53
Columbus	Ohio	268	198	3	55.6%	471,118	5.5	30	5	32	0	5	32
Denver	Colorado	306	215	4	42.9%	466,883	6.6	38	6	42	2	4	42
Indianapolis	Indiana	278	201	4	42.9%	408,426	6.5	37	4	41	3	4	41
Memphis	Tennessee	259	181	3	56.2%	390,838	5.4	26	3	28	1	6	28
Atlanta	Georgia	318	243	4	39.5%	390,237	8.4	39	7	40	0	3	36
Washington DC	District of Columbia	255	172	4	54.7%	374,314	5.6	28	3	33	4	5	33
Cleveland	Ohio	295	207	4	48.6%	364,396	6.0	29	6	34	0	3	34
Albuquerque	New Mexico	230	163	4	54.9%	359,782	5.9	17	1	17	0	3	17
Los Angeles	California	349	263	8	14.6%	358,772	10.5	62	5	64	0	0	33
Tampa	Florida	251	184	4	43.7%	346,156	6.9	27	2	28	0	2	26
Raleigh	North Carolina	168	119	3	61.4%	335,657	4.8	15	2	17	1	5	17
Buffalo	New York	279	195	3	56.6%	318,474	5.6	28	6	33	3	8	32
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	304	221	4	46.2%	315,016	6.3	39	5	43	2	5	41
Charlotte	North Carolina	205	147	4	34.6%	313,207	7.4	24	1	24	0	0	24
Hollywood	Florida	195	142	3	66.5%	311,715	4.7	9	3	11	1	4	11
Kansas City	Missouri	252	181	3	53.7%	307,152	5.5	49	2	52	0	11	52
Detroit	Michigan	209	153	4	45.7%	292,412	6.1	25	2	28	2	3	28
Staten Island	New York	205	143	3	57.5%	272,440	6.0	12	2	13	1	1	13
Omaha	Nebraska	228	159	3	48.9%	269,952	6.0	31	1	31	0	1	31
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	258	180	4	32.6%	264,415	7.7	29	4	29	0	1	29
Richmond	Virginia	197	137	2	66.7%	260,912	5.1	15	2	16	1	3	15
Saint Paul	Minnesota	324	230	4	32.1%	256,692	13.3	30	13	33	0	5	16
Rochester	New York	257	186	3	53.8%	253,732	5.7	24	2	24	0	2	24
New Orleans	Louisiana	214	150	3	56.9%	243,694	5.3	19	2	20	1	4	20
Long Beach	California	215	158	4	50.4%	241,268	5.9	12	3	14	1	3	14
Honolulu	Hawaii	195	132	2	57.8%	240,611	5.8	11	2	13	1	2	13
Baltimore	Maryland	241	168	6	37.5%	236,667	7.3	22	2	22	0	0	22
Bakersfield	California	191	128	4	40.9%	228,510	6.6	11	1	12	0	1	12
Birmingham	Alabama	260	183	4	44.7%	223,518	6.0	30	3	35	1	5	35
West Palm Beach	Florida	213	162	2	58.4%	216,600	5.7	12	4	13	0	2	13
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	258	182	2	56.3%	213,194	5.5	18	2	18	0	0	18
Lexington	Kentucky	245	172	2	66.3%	211,979	4.6	15	2	19	0	6	19
Virginia Beach	Virginia	206	151	3	45.9%	206,535	6.5	12	1	12	0	1	11
Saint Petersburg	Florida	237	181	3	57.8%	205,938	5.2	16	2	17	1	3	17
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	341	248	5	24.3%	202,319	13.5	27	9	27	0	0	22
Pensacola	Florida	221	155	1	75.3%	201,940	3.6	13	1	15	2	4	15
Spokane	Washington	229	157	3	54.5%	195,988	5.5	14	3	15	0	2	15
Katy	Texas	137	105	3	56.4%	193,976	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Kissimmee	Florida	219	169	2	66.0%	190,647	4.6	7	4	9	1	2	9
Seattle	Washington	280	207	7	18.7%	178,352	9.7	35	4	37	2	2	19
Nashville	Tennessee	239	165	5	37.3%	171,067	8.4	22	2	23	1	1	22
Dallas	Texas	283	208	10	12.3%	170,769	10.6	48	3	50	1	2	12
Akron	Ohio	222	154	3	62.1%	167,930	4.1	17	2	22	2	9	22
Pompano Beach	Florida	252	193	3	45.3%	167,719	6.4	10	5	10	0	1	10
Aurora	Colorado	190	133	4	38.2%	166,338	7.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Corpus Christi	Texas	228	149	4	51.0%	166,298	5.9	18	1	20	1	2	20
Lakeland	Florida	198	150	2	64.4%	166,108	4.6	9	2	11	1	2	11
Fayetteville	North Carolina	188	132	2	67.7%	165,207	4.3	8	2	9	1	2	9
Las Vegas	Nevada	258	184	11	10.7%	164,766	12.5	43	3	54	0	2	4
Dayton	Ohio	296	217	4	33.7%	160,920	8.6	27	8	28	0	1	27
Shreveport	Louisiana	211	150	2	72.0%	160,757	3.4	12	2	15	2	6	15
Salem	Oregon	160	119	3	59.5%	158,537	5.1	7	1	7	0	2	7
Chesapeake	Virginia	173	122	3	66.1%	157,342	4.2	6	2	7	0	3	7
Alexandria	Virginia	234	177	3	43.8%	155,457	7.2	14	2	15	0	2	12
Columbia	South Carolina	229	171	4	45.0%	154,127	6.6	14	2	15	1	1	15
Garland	Texas	155	112	2	64.0%	152,298	4.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	304	214	6	22.0%	150,320	9.4	43	2	43	0	0	40
Saint Louis	Missouri	334	247	6	16.2%	148,468	20.8	45	12	50	2	5	17
Toledo	Ohio	234	168	4	48.0%	147,503	6.3	15	1	15	0	2	15
Riverside	California	176	129	4	38.8%	143,419	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Littleton	Colorado	232	170	3	43.7%	142,125	6.4	10	5	11	0	1	11
Brownsville	Texas	132	94	1	70.0%	140,925	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Durham	North Carolina	166	119	4	48.4%	140,535	6.1	8	2	9	0	1	9
Spring	Texas	214	169	3	36.5%	138,928	8.5	8	2	8	0	0	6
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	162	123	1	68.2%	138,516	4.2	6	1	6	1	1	6
Hialeah	Florida	205	154	4	37.2%	136,555	9.7	7	3	8	0	1	7
Laredo	Texas	160	110	5	50.0%	135,449	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Providence	Rhode Island	206	151	2	64.2%	131,661	4.1	8	3	11	1	4	11
Jersey City	New Jersey	187	137	4	50.0%	130,933	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Lawrenceville	Georgia	139	101	5	50.9%	130,448	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Colorado Springs	Colorado	276	191	7	22.1%	128,843	9.0	30	2	30	0	0	27
Mission	Texas	141	101	2	70.0%	126,764	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Phoenix	Arizona	237	172	9	8.7%	126,163	12.0	42	1	42	0	0	4
Savannah	Georgia	209	151	4	51.7%	124,801	5.5	10	1	10	0	2	10
Amarillo	Texas	229	158	4	53.9%	123,344	6.0	14	1	16	0	2	16
Santa Ana	California	167	125	6	33.9%	120,927	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	5
Bradenton	Florida	211	164	4	47.7%	120,810	6.3	10	2	10	0	0	10
Boca Raton	Florida	200	153	3	53.4%	118,759	6.0	9	1	9	0	1	9
Little Rock	Arkansas	198	143	4	54.3%	118,458	5.6	12	1	12	0	2	12
Winston Salem	North Carolina	206	149	3	44.5%	117,641	6.8	9	2	14	1	5	8
Yonkers	New York	157	113	2	63.5%	114,676	4.8	5	2	6	0	1	6
Stockton	California	210	148	5	30.6%	114,280	8.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Gainesville	Florida	198	142	4	54.5%	114,230	5.2	10	2	12	2	2	12
Louisville	Kentucky	227	170	7	14.9%	113,450	9.3	32	2	33	0	1	33
Augusta	Georgia	171	120	3	55.0%	112,348	5.3	8	1	9	0	2	9
Portland	Oregon	269	191	7	12.2%	112,099	9.8	33	1	33	0	0	29
Fontana	California	138	93	3	47.3%	111,051	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Eugene	Oregon	183	121	3	54.6%	110,846	5.7	6	2	7	0	1	7
Anaheim	California	188	135	5	30.0%	110,588	8.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Des Moines	Iowa	195	142	4	48.8%	109,057	6.1	11	1	11	0	0	11
Greensboro	North Carolina	188	140	6	33.0%	107,989	7.3	9	2	10	0	1	10
Tucson	Arizona	288	212	9	11.9%	107,643	11.3	32	2	32	0	1	7
Greenville	South Carolina	164	129	5	49.0%	107,515	6.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Fredericksburg	Virginia	169	122	4	60.5%	105,232	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Vancouver	Washington	162	124	5	32.2%	105,065	7.7	11	1	11	0	0	11
Oceanside	California	155	112	5	52.5%	105,064	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Boston	Massachusetts	207	146	2	68.6%	104,068	3.3	14	2	21	3	9	21
Naperville	Illinois	133	99	4	62.6%	103,833	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mcallen	Texas	145	103	2	73.1%	103,518	3.3	3	1	4	0	1	4
Round Rock	Texas	158	116	3	61.1%	102,407	5.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Clearwater	Florida	199	149	3	55.1%	101,088	5.7	9	3	10	0	2	10
Huntsville	Alabama	185	130	4	51.1%	100,233	5.9	11	2	12	1	1	12
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	191	137	3	58.6%	99,237	4.3	9	2	13	0	4	13
Killeen	Texas	149	109	2	66.0%	99,127	4.3	4	2	6	0	2	6
Odessa	Texas	179	120	3	61.7%	98,724	5.0	6	1	6	0	1	6
Ogden	Utah	160	115	4	48.5%	97,618	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Glendale	Arizona	220	170	4	31.8%	96,909	9.9	9	2	9	0	0	7
South Bend	Indiana	195	145	2	65.4%	95,924	4.5	10	1	10	0	3	10
Erie	Pennsylvania	211	149	5	51.8%	95,111	5.9	13	2	15	1	2	15
Tempe	Arizona	145	103	3	50.0%	94,998	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Grand Rapids	Michigan	211	154	7	25.8%	94,941	8.6	12	3	14	1	2	12
Hyattsville	Maryland	163	106	4	60.1%	94,682	5.4	5	2	6	1	1	6
Midland	Texas	160	109	3	59.1%	94,584	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Edinburg	Texas	146	104	3	60.0%	93,392	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Inglewood	California	201	151	2	69.7%	93,265	4.4	5	2	5	0	3	5
Sarasota	Florida	201	159	5	36.8%	92,176	9.8	13	2	14	0	1	13
Plano	Texas	153	120	7	30.1%	91,816	7.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Jackson	Mississippi	212	147	3	53.2%	90,606	5.6	11	2	12	0	2	12
Lafayette	Louisiana	150	102	4	55.8%	89,544	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Norfolk	Virginia	216	149	5	36.4%	89,324	7.6	14	1	14	0	0	14
Reading	Pennsylvania	190	133	5	41.2%	88,649	8.1	10	2	12	1	2	11
Marietta	Georgia	172	123	6	27.5%	88,635	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	6
Escondido	California	146	102	4	49.0%	87,975	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lake Worth	Florida	207	155	4	42.4%	87,543	7.2	5	4	5	0	0	4
Charlottesville	Virginia	157	113	1	70.6%	86,818	4.2	5	2	7	1	2	7
Olathe	Kansas	121	76	2	60.0%	86,624	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Scottsdale	Arizona	232	170	6	28.8%	85,774	8.8	11	3	12	0	1	10
Rockville	Maryland	176	119	2	59.1%	85,595	8.3	4	3	5	0	1	4
Albany	New York	209	148	3	56.5%	85,500	5.5	11	1	11	0	2	11
Overland Park	Kansas	196	142	4	46.5%	85,354	6.7	9	2	10	0	1	10
Bloomington	Indiana	168	132	2	63.8%	85,178	3.5	6	2	10	1	4	10
Hampton	Virginia	179	122	2	62.1%	84,566	4.5	6	2	7	0	2	7
Orange	California	146	114	3	58.2%	84,384	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Manassas	Virginia	182	140	3	55.4%	84,187	7.8	4	2	4	0	1	3
Las Cruces	New Mexico	196	130	3	56.1%	83,609	11.7	7	2	7	0	1	6
Yakima	Washington	151	99	3	64.3%	83,533	4.0	4	2	6	0	2	6
Compton	California	139	102	2	60.0%	83,325	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Humble	Texas	122	95	3	50.0%	83,265	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Newport News	Virginia	188	130	4	47.1%	83,140	6.0	7	1	7	0	1	7
Visalia	California	139	96	4	54.6%	83,015	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Newark	New Jersey	192	135	7	29.4%	82,477	8.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Cary	North Carolina	141	109	4	52.9%	82,205	5.3	4	2	5	0	1	5
Manchester	New Hampshire	162	114	1	70.8%	82,125	4.0	5	2	7	2	2	7
Lansing	Michigan	178	127	4	49.9%	81,933	6.1	7	1	7	0	1	7
Longmont	Colorado	135	94	3	62.4%	81,589	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Melbourne	Florida	145	106	4	52.1%	81,119	5.6	5	2	6	0	1	6
Decatur	Georgia	173	135	3	44.6%	80,654	6.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Irving	Texas	143	107	8	33.3%	80,206	7.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Worcester	Massachusetts	175	119	4	42.9%	79,658	6.8	9	2	10	0	1	10
San Mateo	California	166	118	4	54.9%	78,125	5.5	4	2	4	0	1	4
Roseville	California	132	93	5	55.4%	77,470	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Baytown	Texas	135	97	3	65.6%	77,306	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
York	Pennsylvania	146	105	4	43.0%	77,228	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Hamilton	Ohio	140	99	3	56.1%	76,855	6.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Fresno	California	247	173	10	12.8%	76,848	9.8	18	1	18	0	0	18
Trenton	New Jersey	236	172	4	36.8%	76,572	8.6	11	2	12	0	0	11
Rock Hill	South Carolina	142	103	2	65.4%	76,093	5.3	3	2	4	1	1	4
Valdosta	Georgia	158	112	1	80.1%	76,091	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Tulsa	Oklahoma	252	182	7	17.9%	75,533	9.4	28	1	28	0	0	28
Summerville	South Carolina	127	87	3	54.1%	75,171	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	140	90	3	57.4%	74,938	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Daytona Beach	Florida	157	109	1	72.5%	74,711	3.6	5	3	7	0	3	7
Silver Spring	Maryland	216	148	7	24.5%	74,188	13.9	7	4	7	0	0	5
Springfield	Missouri	170	111	7	32.1%	74,059	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Montgomery	Alabama	239	174	5	35.2%	73,951	7.5	13	1	13	0	0	13
Jamaica	New York	176	130	5	30.0%	73,171	8.0	6	2	9	0	0	9
La Puente	California	161	118	2	61.8%	72,863	6.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Alpharetta	Georgia	174	136	4	38.4%	72,732	6.5	4	4	6	0	1	5
Corona	California	163	120	5	28.1%	72,374	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lubbock	Texas	206	142	7	26.0%	71,980	8.9	14	2	15	0	1	14
Topeka	Kansas	225	163	5	43.8%	71,565	6.6	18	2	20	0	2	20
Palo Alto	California	145	110	2	74.0%	71,543	5.0	4	2	6	0	2	6
Antioch	California	125	87	4	64.0%	70,811	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ashburn	Virginia	123	93	4	62.9%	70,602	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Hartford	Connecticut	167	123	3	57.0%	70,296	5.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Evansville	Indiana	184	141	5	37.9%	69,997	7.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Concord	California	147	106	4	53.6%	69,782	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Boynton Beach	Florida	175	134	4	40.0%	69,635	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Angelo	Texas	155	107	5	61.8%	68,478	5.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Cypress	Texas	124	94	6	40.0%	68,240	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lehigh Acres	Florida	166	124	3	58.2%	68,004	5.0	6	1	6	0	1	6
Charleston	South Carolina	196	137	4	34.5%	67,944	8.4	10	2	11	0	1	8
New Haven	Connecticut	150	106	4	52.0%	67,735	4.8	5	2	7	0	2	7
Victorville	California	135	97	5	49.4%	67,346	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Homestead	Florida	211	157	6	35.7%	67,030	10.1	7	2	7	0	0	5
Miami Beach	Florida	177	130	3	57.5%	66,465	5.8	5	2	5	0	1	5
Muskegon	Michigan	166	117	4	51.3%	66,225	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ypsilanti	Michigan	121	79	2	61.9%	66,121	5.5	2	2	5	0	1	5
Asheville	North Carolina	174	127	3	50.0%	66,048	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Moreno Valley	California	150	109	8	32.1%	66,032	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Gaithersburg	Maryland	164	123	5	45.5%	65,831	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hesperia	California	108	78	4	63.4%	65,767	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Warren	Michigan	170	119	3	48.4%	65,412	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lawrence	Kansas	147	98	4	64.3%	64,974	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Gastonia	North Carolina	147	109	4	60.4%	64,606	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Flushing	New York	148	104	6	30.0%	64,520	8.0	4	2	7	0	0	7
Downey	California	144	105	4	57.0%	64,312	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Ridgewood	New York	99	66	4	60.0%	64,030	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Spartanburg	South Carolina	157	115	3	57.2%	64,021	5.0	5	2	6	1	1	6
Santa Clara	California	136	91	3	50.7%	63,699	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Menifee	California	170	127	3	57.5%	63,521	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kennewick	Washington	143	98	3	64.2%	63,449	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	186	142	3	48.3%	63,331	6.2	5	2	5	0	0	5
Grand Junction	Colorado	169	124	2	60.0%	63,278	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Olympia	Washington	197	141	7	34.3%	62,789	7.5	6	3	6	0	0	6
Saint Charles	Missouri	145	102	5	44.9%	62,781	6.7	3	3	5	0	1	5
Cape Coral	Florida	159	116	4	34.6%	62,499	7.5	6	2	7	0	1	7
Plainfield	Illinois	132	88	3	62.6%	61,680	5.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Gulfport	Mississippi	151	102	2	64.8%	61,411	6.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Edmond	Oklahoma	173	116	5	35.7%	61,314	7.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
Sunnyvale	California	180	120	5	40.0%	61,110	7.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Cruz	California	136	94	3	58.5%	60,913	7.0	4	2	6	2	2	2
Sterling Heights	Michigan	130	93	4	45.8%	60,695	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Bernardino	California	155	113	11	24.1%	60,242	9.1	7	1	7	0	0	6
Davenport	Iowa	184	132	4	57.0%	59,790	5.8	6	2	7	0	1	7
Spring Hill	Florida	175	121	3	47.7%	59,786	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Mesa	Arizona	175	121	14	11.1%	59,584	11.2	13	1	13	0	0	3
Pueblo	Colorado	179	121	6	37.5%	59,239	7.0	7	3	9	0	1	9
Perris	California	128	93	4	50.4%	59,145	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	188	139	5	57.7%	58,861	9.8	6	2	6	0	1	5
Laurel	Maryland	157	113	3	52.2%	58,732	6.0	4	2	4	0	1	4
Vacaville	California	105	75	5	55.3%	58,178	6.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Flint	Michigan	184	134	4	37.4%	58,162	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Muncie	Indiana	142	104	3	62.6%	58,040	6.6	5	2	7	0	2	7
Douglasville	Georgia	127	93	5	52.0%	57,333	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hagerstown	Maryland	145	104	5	58.4%	57,226	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Fairfield	California	117	80	6	50.0%	57,040	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	142	92	4	59.3%	56,507	4.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Portsmouth	Virginia	178	129	3	59.3%	56,491	4.7	7	1	7	0	3	7
Redding	California	167	123	5	50.0%	56,474	15.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Wilmington	Delaware	224	149	7	25.7%	56,421	9.6	10	2	12	1	2	10
Lewisville	Texas	131	99	6	47.1%	55,850	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clovis	California	148	99	6	45.8%	55,594	7.0	3	2	3	0	1	2
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	166	113	5	37.8%	55,056	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Milton	Florida	145	105	4	58.0%	54,910	5.3	3	2	3	0	1	3
Billings	Montana	153	105	7	39.7%	54,526	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Palm Bay	Florida	164	123	5	48.9%	54,396	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Modesto	California	181	125	8	20.5%	54,170	9.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Apopka	Florida	118	82	4	55.2%	53,926	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Tracy	California	157	118	6	45.8%	53,666	6.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
New Bedford	Massachusetts	165	116	3	55.8%	52,921	4.8	4	2	5	0	2	5
Terre Haute	Indiana	175	122	3	55.5%	52,689	5.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Livonia	Michigan	132	100	4	55.6%	52,540	5.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Covington	Georgia	131	95	5	56.6%	52,453	5.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
Henderson	Nevada	157	111	10	17.2%	52,204	13.8	8	3	9	1	1	1
Meridian	Idaho	120	80	4	50.0%	52,111	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Delray Beach	Florida	156	115	5	43.2%	51,431	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Beaverton	Oregon	156	114	8	25.2%	50,873	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Schenectady	New York	176	122	6	31.2%	50,505	7.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Lynn	Massachusetts	156	112	5	53.9%	50,453	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Metairie	Louisiana	164	116	6	35.3%	50,236	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cambridge	Massachusetts	172	126	5	43.3%	50,144	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ann Arbor	Michigan	151	102	8	30.0%	50,016	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Sacramento	California	248	181	17	6.2%	49,789	14.7	28	3	55	0	0	0
Conroe	Texas	190	141	6	30.6%	49,137	8.4	7	2	7	0	0	6
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	131	94	5	50.0%	48,974	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Youngstown	Ohio	213	158	6	31.2%	48,970	8.6	12	4	13	0	2	12
Provo	Utah	144	101	5	42.0%	48,897	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Burbank	California	163	119	4	45.2%	48,779	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	137	90	5	50.0%	48,700	6.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Appleton	Wisconsin	133	94	6	40.0%	48,681	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Coral Springs	Florida	128	95	4	50.0%	48,619	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kenosha	Wisconsin	145	107	6	42.9%	48,474	6.8	4	2	5	0	1	5
Hawthorne	California	100	70	4	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Woodstock	Georgia	111	84	7	47.6%	48,398	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sugar Land	Texas	161	126	6	28.6%	48,249	10.3	3	2	3	0	1	1
Riverview	Florida	161	119	6	43.1%	47,960	6.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	151	105	6	43.9%	47,895	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Nampa	Idaho	131	91	4	41.2%	47,733	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Westerville	Ohio	125	88	6	50.0%	47,604	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
South Gate	California	101	73	6	50.0%	47,552	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Fremont	California	150	100	10	20.0%	46,631	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Medford	Oregon	120	81	5	50.0%	46,626	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hillsboro	Oregon	129	94	6	45.3%	46,559	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	California	146	100	4	44.8%	46,153	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Redwood City	California	147	109	5	40.0%	45,785	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Francisco	California	257	183	21	5.2%	45,611	14.6	28	2	29	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	143	98	4	48.1%	45,244	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vista	California	130	96	6	37.7%	45,211	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Puyallup	Washington	167	126	4	31.4%	44,894	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
San Diego	California	305	212	39	3.3%	44,773	18.8	35	2	35	0	0	2
Henrico	Virginia	185	123	5	23.1%	44,548	13.6	7	2	7	0	0	3
Belleville	Illinois	164	121	4	47.5%	44,259	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bellevue	Washington	169	130	7	30.0%	43,884	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
West Chester	Pennsylvania	147	111	7	40.3%	43,792	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oakland	California	226	164	15	10.6%	43,561	11.7	14	2	15	0	1	2
Lowell	Massachusetts	141	96	5	38.8%	43,163	6.5	4	2	5	0	1	5
Livermore	California	132	96	6	44.8%	43,077	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Springdale	Arkansas	121	80	5	44.1%	42,558	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Norwalk	California	100	69	7	40.0%	42,354	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Longview	Texas	156	119	5	40.0%	42,112	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Largo	Florida	131	95	4	39.0%	41,950	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elkhart	Indiana	121	86	5	42.1%	41,864	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Mill	South Carolina	132	100	5	43.7%	41,532	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Holland	Michigan	116	80	6	44.2%	41,518	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fort Wayne	Indiana	228	163	12	12.9%	41,046	12.3	16	2	17	1	1	1
Lincoln	Nebraska	246	167	11	14.2%	40,956	8.7	22	2	24	1	2	24
Mcdonough	Georgia	126	92	7	40.0%	40,585	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Edison	New Jersey	139	99	5	40.0%	40,331	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Federal Way	Washington	117	82	7	40.0%	40,100	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Murrieta	California	126	94	9	30.3%	40,074	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lake Charles	Louisiana	164	108	6	30.6%	40,032	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Acworth	Georgia	122	88	6	40.0%	39,873	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	122	87	8	34.9%	39,805	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Missoula	Montana	155	107	6	40.8%	39,645	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Clarksville	Tennessee	135	96	11	22.4%	39,293	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Ballwin	Missouri	117	87	4	41.1%	38,948	14.5	2	3	4	1	1	1
Rialto	California	132	95	5	36.3%	38,722	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hemet	California	137	100	7	30.0%	38,636	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pittsburg	California	100	74	6	40.0%	38,432	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hayward	California	157	111	10	20.0%	38,407	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Brockton	Massachusetts	125	92	7	40.2%	38,377	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	163	123	4	38.2%	38,331	9.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Missouri City	Texas	152	117	6	35.9%	38,062	8.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Franklin	Tennessee	134	93	8	35.7%	38,014	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Champaign	Illinois	144	100	4	40.0%	37,827	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Independence	Missouri	187	139	6	30.3%	37,587	8.1	8	2	9	1	1	7
Woodbridge	Virginia	155	118	12	17.3%	36,686	16.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Astoria	New York	167	118	6	25.5%	36,338	8.8	4	3	5	0	0	3
Ocala	Florida	197	142	9	16.0%	36,092	9.4	11	1	11	0	0	11
Clinton Township	Michigan	131	92	5	35.6%	35,705	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Indio	California	125	89	8	36.4%	34,976	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	California	143	102	7	33.3%	34,342	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rockford	Illinois	193	133	9	18.6%	33,977	9.1	9	2	10	1	1	8
Racine	Wisconsin	160	111	8	26.9%	33,957	9.2	5	2	5	0	0	2
Richardson	Texas	121	93	9	29.4%	33,653	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bowie	Maryland	184	131	4	32.9%	33,630	7.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Broomfield	Colorado	146	112	8	32.0%	33,562	7.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Florissant	Missouri	150	109	8	31.0%	33,551	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Parker	Colorado	121	90	7	33.4%	33,445	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Dearborn	Michigan	152	107	6	35.1%	33,337	7.8	4	2	6	0	0	6
North Hollywood	California	141	106	9	21.6%	33,142	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	162	113	6	30.4%	32,961	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Vallejo	California	162	121	9	26.4%	32,860	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Covina	California	146	99	6	30.0%	32,822	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Englewood	Colorado	194	146	4	28.9%	32,299	11.5	4	3	4	0	0	3
Winter Haven	Florida	139	101	8	30.0%	32,063	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bothell	Washington	167	124	8	24.9%	31,987	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Annapolis	Maryland	169	122	6	33.6%	31,894	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pearland	Texas	149	108	10	23.1%	31,845	9.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Boulder	Colorado	165	125	9	23.8%	31,255	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Stamford	Connecticut	147	103	9	24.2%	31,127	7.0	6	2	7	1	1	7
Tacoma	Washington	276	202	16	9.3%	30,931	12.7	20	6	22	2	2	3
Renton	Washington	194	141	10	19.9%	30,753	9.0	5	2	5	0	0	5
Fort Myers	Florida	189	139	12	12.0%	30,155	11.3	11	2	11	0	0	5
North Las Vegas	Nevada	176	129	13	12.9%	30,097	9.9	7	2	8	0	0	3
Buford	Georgia	122	85	10	30.0%	29,731	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Knoxville	Tennessee	228	159	14	7.7%	29,678	12.8	17	2	18	1	1	1
Gilbert	Arizona	156	118	16	12.4%	29,621	9.8	6	1	6	0	0	5
Herndon	Virginia	134	104	9	31.5%	29,483	8.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Waukegan	Illinois	124	92	8	30.0%	29,258	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Joliet	Illinois	149	107	7	22.6%	29,190	11.4	5	2	5	0	0	4
Waterbury	Connecticut	163	117	7	26.8%	29,098	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Canton	Ohio	211	158	8	19.7%	28,943	8.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Salinas	California	162	109	11	15.3%	28,844	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lynchburg	Virginia	166	119	7	28.0%	28,619	9.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Bowling Green	Kentucky	161	117	8	24.7%	28,543	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Arlington	Texas	208	156	22	7.2%	28,512	13.0	12	1	12	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	98	69	5	30.0%	28,190	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Deltona	Florida	122	91	7	30.0%	28,167	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Monte	California	121	87	9	30.0%	28,113	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Naples	Florida	233	171	12	9.0%	28,081	10.9	14	1	14	0	0	11
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	191	132	10	20.0%	27,854	18.5	6	2	6	0	0	4
Everett	Washington	154	112	12	16.4%	27,358	8.4	5	2	6	1	1	2
Falls Church	Virginia	213	156	7	22.6%	27,258	12.2	5	4	5	0	0	4
Lithonia	Georgia	126	95	8	28.1%	27,173	8.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Torrance	California	199	148	11	15.2%	26,920	9.4	5	2	5	0	0	4
Jupiter	Florida	147	112	7	27.1%	26,748	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Valley City	Utah	145	106	9	20.0%	26,574	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Scranton	Pennsylvania	204	145	6	26.5%	26,363	9.6	8	2	9	1	1	8
New Port Richey	Florida	141	108	12	21.5%	25,986	10.8	4	2	4	0	0	2
Irvine	California	164	117	15	9.7%	25,894	10.2	9	1	9	0	0	8
Roanoke	Virginia	216	155	8	15.2%	25,745	12.3	10	1	10	0	0	5
Mobile	Alabama	242	169	14	9.4%	25,580	11.6	18	2	18	0	0	2
Midlothian	Virginia	149	109	7	26.3%	25,480	11.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Peoria	Arizona	145	103	12	14.7%	25,354	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Fort Worth	Texas	245	193	33	2.7%	24,838	17.8	32	1	32	0	0	0
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	184	125	11	13.6%	24,732	11.3	9	1	9	0	0	2
High Point	North Carolina	139	97	8	20.0%	24,461	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fairfax	Virginia	179	132	15	14.8%	24,200	15.5	4	3	4	0	0	1
Chandler	Arizona	170	123	19	8.9%	23,787	11.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Sparks	Nevada	169	123	9	19.9%	23,719	12.0	4	2	4	0	0	1
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	148	112	11	18.4%	23,103	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Whittier	California	223	162	17	11.7%	22,964	11.3	6	2	6	0	0	4
Carlsbad	California	147	108	12	20.0%	22,734	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bellingham	Washington	138	90	12	17.9%	22,625	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allen	Texas	118	92	12	20.0%	22,254	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Salt Lake City	Utah	243	173	24	4.4%	21,242	15.6	19	4	19	0	0	2
Paterson	New Jersey	220	164	10	14.6%	21,236	9.6	9	1	9	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	California	118	86	8	18.3%	20,851	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
New Braunfels	Texas	114	81	10	20.0%	20,558	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bell Gardens	California	100	72	8	20.0%	20,487	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lakewood	New Jersey	99	72	6	20.0%	20,153	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vero Beach	Florida	165	131	12	17.5%	20,151	9.7	6	1	6	0	0	3
Elizabeth	New Jersey	136	97	8	20.0%	20,093	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Toms River	New Jersey	140	100	8	16.3%	20,037	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chula Vista	California	161	112	16	7.6%	19,803	12.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Tallahassee	Florida	200	150	17	6.9%	19,770	12.9	10	1	10	0	0	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	154	110	7	20.0%	19,087	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Panama City	Florida	172	122	12	14.9%	18,799	12.7	6	1	6	0	0	3
Newnan	Georgia	130	94	11	20.0%	18,679	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	159	113	15	9.9%	18,532	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
O Fallon	Missouri	116	87	9	19.2%	18,518	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Madison	Wisconsin	203	145	14	6.2%	18,243	13.5	14	1	14	0	0	1
Wichita	Kansas	237	164	26	4.3%	18,114	15.9	26	1	26	0	0	0
Reno	Nevada	186	131	19	6.1%	18,093	13.8	12	1	12	0	0	0
Sandy	Utah	153	109	13	16.4%	18,092	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Syracuse	New York	247	179	14	7.9%	18,030	12.1	15	1	15	0	0	2
San Leandro	California	138	102	9	16.1%	17,928	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Boise	Idaho	173	118	20	6.9%	17,702	13.4	9	1	9	0	0	0
Fullerton	California	146	107	13	12.6%	17,493	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Van Nuys	California	140	104	12	9.8%	17,459	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Saginaw	Michigan	172	123	9	13.1%	17,086	9.3	7	1	7	0	0	6
Kalamazoo	Michigan	189	137	11	10.4%	17,024	10.6	7	1	7	0	0	2
Lancaster	California	152	106	14	9.2%	16,989	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Fargo	North Dakota	155	110	12	13.7%	16,835	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Fort Pierce	Florida	208	145	7	17.6%	16,811	9.9	8	2	8	0	0	3
Ventura	California	129	94	12	14.2%	16,510	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Keller	Texas	140	107	12	14.2%	16,504	14.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Waukesha	Wisconsin	143	100	12	17.2%	16,491	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Fe	New Mexico	163	117	9	12.8%	16,385	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	2
Santa Monica	California	142	98	11	17.2%	16,273	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pasadena	California	174	123	15	10.0%	15,772	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Ontario	California	150	110	15	8.7%	15,350	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Chattanooga	Tennessee	232	163	18	7.3%	15,232	14.4	15	2	15	0	0	1
Berkeley	California	230	166	12	11.8%	14,978	18.8	9	4	9	0	0	5
Chico	California	143	100	12	13.2%	14,746	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Green Bay	Wisconsin	185	135	13	8.0%	14,635	11.4	7	2	7	0	0	2
Frisco	Texas	115	88	13	8.4%	14,494	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Kent	Washington	147	104	11	9.0%	14,445	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Stone Mountain	Georgia	145	107	11	11.2%	14,391	19.3	3	3	3	0	0	1
Pomona	California	135	101	12	9.0%	14,219	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Garden Grove	California	159	107	16	8.0%	14,061	12.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Huntington Beach	California	135	99	17	7.0%	13,993	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Palmdale	California	157	114	13	7.8%	13,592	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	116	89	9	13.6%	13,555	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Elk Grove	California	137	104	13	7.5%	13,531	12.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Grand Prairie	Texas	141	103	14	7.0%	13,343	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Norman	Oklahoma	138	89	11	10.7%	13,339	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Mckinney	Texas	125	98	15	7.0%	13,304	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Waco	Texas	196	140	15	8.2%	12,971	11.8	9	1	9	0	0	1
Bridgeport	Connecticut	180	126	17	8.8%	12,893	11.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
El Cajon	California	164	106	13	7.5%	12,851	17.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
Mesquite	Texas	167	126	13	8.4%	12,330	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Elgin	Illinois	132	95	14	9.8%	11,998	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Carrollton	Texas	124	93	13	8.8%	11,879	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Beaumont	Texas	184	135	15	8.2%	11,870	11.9	8	1	8	0	0	3
Tyler	Texas	185	139	15	7.4%	11,482	13.3	9	1	9	0	0	1
Rancho Cucamonga	California	142	106	17	6.5%	11,479	13.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Denton	Texas	150	112	18	7.2%	11,369	12.7	6	1	6	0	0	1
West Jordan	Utah	139	99	11	9.0%	11,121	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	160	116	10	9.0%	11,038	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Auburn	Washington	137	101	12	9.6%	10,830	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Santa Maria	California	138	94	10	7.5%	10,783	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Fort Collins	Colorado	145	104	15	5.4%	10,505	14.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	125	89	11	10.0%	10,032	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kennesaw	Georgia	118	92	12	9.0%	8,922	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	148	106	9	9.0%	8,857	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	102	74	11	9.0%	8,684	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Santa Rosa	California	159	110	17	4.0%	8,663	16.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Arvada	Colorado	154	110	14	6.5%	8,633	13.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Oxnard	California	160	111	18	3.9%	8,575	16.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Surprise	Arizona	148	102	15	6.3%	8,534	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Frederick	Maryland	141	100	15	6.1%	8,019	14.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Napa	California	124	86	11	8.0%	7,733	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chino	California	125	93	10	8.0%	7,558	12.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	100	72	10	7.0%	7,406	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Bend	Oregon	155	109	13	5.3%	6,524	24.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	California	127	91	14	6.5%	6,345	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Temecula	California	144	111	17	4.5%	5,909	16.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Simi Valley	California	110	78	15	3.6%	4,582	16.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	California	155	106	20	3.1%	4,223	16.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Anchorage	Alaska	206	135	56	0.5%	1,335	62.2	12	8	13	0	0	0
Yuma	Arizona	134	88	26	0.9%	1,291	31.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	134	89	18	1.3%	1,273	20.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Macon	Georgia	186	135	51	0.6%	1,035	55.8	9	3	10	0	0	0
Allentown	Pennsylvania	187	139	52	0.6%	1,008	59.0	7	5	7	0	0	0
Daly City	California	138	98	30	0.8%	954	34.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Cumming	Georgia	137	99	57	0.6%	896	63.3	3	3	3	0	0	0
Duluth	Minnesota	199	139	40	0.7%	867	45.9	11	4	14	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	126	82	47	0.6%	777	56.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Athens	Georgia	176	132	51	0.6%	765	58.0	6	5	6	0	0	0
Abilene	Texas	190	142	51	0.5%	715	64.0	6	5	6	0	0	0
Wichita Falls	Texas	181	131	44	0.7%	675	53.0	7	5	7	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	122	87	46	0.6%	632	56.0	2	2	2	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
San Jose	238	166	3	49.4%	519,294	6.1	28	2	29	0	1	29
Los Angeles	349	263	8	14.6%	358,772	10.5	62	5	64	0	0	33
Long Beach	215	158	4	50.4%	241,268	5.9	12	3	14	1	3	14
Bakersfield	191	128	4	40.9%	228,510	6.6	11	1	12	0	1	12
Riverside	176	129	4	38.8%	143,419	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Santa Ana	167	125	6	33.9%	120,927	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	5
Stockton	210	148	5	30.6%	114,280	8.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Fontana	138	93	3	47.3%	111,051	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Anaheim	188	135	5	30.0%	110,588	8.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Oceanside	155	112	5	52.5%	105,064	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Inglewood	201	151	2	69.7%	93,265	4.4	5	2	5	0	3	5
Escondido	146	102	4	49.0%	87,975	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Orange	146	114	3	58.2%	84,384	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Compton	139	102	2	60.0%	83,325	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Visalia	139	96	4	54.6%	83,015	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
San Mateo	166	118	4	54.9%	78,125	5.5	4	2	4	0	1	4
Roseville	132	93	5	55.4%	77,470	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fresno	247	173	10	12.8%	76,848	9.8	18	1	18	0	0	18
La Puente	161	118	2	61.8%	72,863	6.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Corona	163	120	5	28.1%	72,374	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Palo Alto	145	110	2	74.0%	71,543	5.0	4	2	6	0	2	6
Antioch	125	87	4	64.0%	70,811	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Concord	147	106	4	53.6%	69,782	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Victorville	135	97	5	49.4%	67,346	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Moreno Valley	150	109	8	32.1%	66,032	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hesperia	108	78	4	63.4%	65,767	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Downey	144	105	4	57.0%	64,312	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Santa Clara	136	91	3	50.7%	63,699	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Menifee	170	127	3	57.5%	63,521	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sunnyvale	180	120	5	40.0%	61,110	7.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Cruz	136	94	3	58.5%	60,913	7.0	4	2	6	2	2	2
San Bernardino	155	113	11	24.1%	60,242	9.1	7	1	7	0	0	6
Perris	128	93	4	50.4%	59,145	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vacaville	105	75	5	55.3%	58,178	6.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Fairfield	117	80	6	50.0%	57,040	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redding	167	123	5	50.0%	56,474	15.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Clovis	148	99	6	45.8%	55,594	7.0	3	2	3	0	1	2
Modesto	181	125	8	20.5%	54,170	9.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Tracy	157	118	6	45.8%	53,666	6.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Sacramento	248	181	17	6.2%	49,789	14.7	28	3	55	0	0	0
Burbank	163	119	4	45.2%	48,779	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hawthorne	100	70	4	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
South Gate	101	73	6	50.0%	47,552	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Fremont	150	100	10	20.0%	46,631	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Madera	146	100	4	44.8%	46,153	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Redwood City	147	109	5	40.0%	45,785	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Francisco	257	183	21	5.2%	45,611	14.6	28	2	29	0	0	0
Vista	130	96	6	37.7%	45,211	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
San Diego	305	212	39	3.3%	44,773	18.8	35	2	35	0	0	2
Oakland	226	164	15	10.6%	43,561	11.7	14	2	15	0	1	2
Livermore	132	96	6	44.8%	43,077	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Norwalk	100	69	7	40.0%	42,354	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Murrieta	126	94	9	30.3%	40,074	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rialto	132	95	5	36.3%	38,722	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hemet	137	100	7	30.0%	38,636	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pittsburg	100	74	6	40.0%	38,432	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hayward	157	111	10	20.0%	38,407	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Indio	125	89	8	36.4%	34,976	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	143	102	7	33.3%	34,342	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
North Hollywood	141	106	9	21.6%	33,142	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Vallejo	162	121	9	26.4%	32,860	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Covina	146	99	6	30.0%	32,822	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salinas	162	109	11	15.3%	28,844	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
El Monte	121	87	9	30.0%	28,113	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Torrance	199	148	11	15.2%	26,920	9.4	5	2	5	0	0	4
Irvine	164	117	15	9.7%	25,894	10.2	9	1	9	0	0	8
Whittier	223	162	17	11.7%	22,964	11.3	6	2	6	0	0	4
Carlsbad	147	108	12	20.0%	22,734	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Costa Mesa	118	86	8	18.3%	20,851	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Bell Gardens	100	72	8	20.0%	20,487	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Chula Vista	161	112	16	7.6%	19,803	12.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
San Leandro	138	102	9	16.1%	17,928	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Fullerton	146	107	13	12.6%	17,493	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Van Nuys	140	104	12	9.8%	17,459	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Lancaster	152	106	14	9.2%	16,989	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Ventura	129	94	12	14.2%	16,510	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Santa Monica	142	98	11	17.2%	16,273	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pasadena	174	123	15	10.0%	15,772	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Ontario	150	110	15	8.7%	15,350	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Berkeley	230	166	12	11.8%	14,978	18.8	9	4	9	0	0	5
Chico	143	100	12	13.2%	14,746	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pomona	135	101	12	9.0%	14,219	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Garden Grove	159	107	16	8.0%	14,061	12.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Huntington Beach	135	99	17	7.0%	13,993	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Palmdale	157	114	13	7.8%	13,592	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Elk Grove	137	104	13	7.5%	13,531	12.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
El Cajon	164	106	13	7.5%	12,851	17.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
Rancho Cucamonga	142	106	17	6.5%	11,479	13.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Santa Maria	138	94	10	7.5%	10,783	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Sylmar	102	74	11	9.0%	8,684	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Santa Rosa	159	110	17	4.0%	8,663	16.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Oxnard	160	111	18	3.9%	8,575	16.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Napa	124	86	11	8.0%	7,733	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chino	125	93	10	8.0%	7,558	12.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Pacoima	100	72	10	7.0%	7,406	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	127	91	14	6.5%	6,345	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Temecula	144	111	17	4.5%	5,909	16.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Simi Valley	110	78	15	3.6%	4,582	16.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	155	106	20	3.1%	4,223	16.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Daly City	138	98	30	0.8%	954	34.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
San Marcos	122	87	46	0.6%	632	56.0	2	2	2	0	0	0

Houston

ZIP	rotorooter.com	yelp.com	angieslist.com	nicksplumbing.com	homeadvisor.com	consumeraffairs.com
77088	6	4	5	7	8	10
77047	3	2	1	4	5	6
77037	6	4	5	7	8	10
77098	6	4	5	7	8	9
77027	6	5	4	7	8	9
77068	3	1	2	4	5	6
77078	6	5	4	7	8	9
77086	2	4	5	7	8	10
77035	6	5	4	7	8	10
77008	6	4	5	1	8	9
77004	6	4	5	7	8	10
77028	6	5	4	7	8	10
77059	3	1	2	4	5	9
77039	3	1	2	4	5	10
77019	6	4	5	7	8	9
77075	6	5	4	8	7	9
77077	6	5	4	7	8	9
77079	3	1	2	4	5	6
77099	6	5	4	7	8	10
77024	3	1	2	4	5	7
77095	3	1	2	4	5	7
77048	6	5	4	7	8	9
77044	6	4	5	7	8	11
77015	3	1	2	4	5	8
77017	6	4	5	7	8	10
77057	6	5	4	7	8	9
77055	6	4	5	7	8	9
77006	6	4	5	7	8	9
77026	6	4	5	3	8	9
77046	6	4	5	7	8	11
77066	6	4	5	7	8	11
77023	6	5	4	8	7	9
77094	3	2	1	4	5	7
77084	6	4	5	7	8	11
77013	6	4	5	9	8	12
77063	6	4	5	7	8	9
77053	6	5	4	12	7	16
77022	6	5	4	7	8	9
77072	6	5	4	7	8	10
77049	6	4	5	7	8	10
77045	3	2	1	4	5	6
77010	6	4	5	7	8	10
77018	6	4	5	7	8	9
77041	6	4	5	8	7	9
77009	7	4	6	3	9	10
77089	6	4	5	7	8	11
77032	6	4	5	7	8	9
77036	6	4	5	9	7	11
77085	6	4	5	7	8	10
77054	3	1	2	4	5	7
77058	6	4	5	7	8	11
77014	3	1	2	5	4	7
77067	1	4	5	8	7	11
77005	6	4	5	7	8	12
77076	6	4	5	7	8	10
77070	6	4	5	7	8	10
77060	3	1	2	5	4	7
77080	6	4	5	7	8	10
77050	6	4	5	7	8	10
77091	6	4	5	7	8	9
77071	6	4	5	8	7	11
77061	3	1	2	5	6	8
77020	3	1	2	4	5	8
77081	6	5	4	7	8	10
77030	6	4	5	7	8	9
77040	3	1	2	5	4	7
77090	6	4	5	7	8	9
77031	6	5	4	7	8	9
77051	6	5	4	7	8	9
77011	6	4	5	7	8	10
77042	6	4	5	7	8	10
77062	6	4	5	8	9	10
77082	6	5	4	7	8	9
77093	6	4	5	7	8	9
77073	6	4	5	7	8	10
77033	3	2	1	4	5	7
77043	6	5	4	7	8	10
77074	6	5	4	7	8	10
77064	3	1	2	4	5	7
77012	6	4	5	7	8	9
77002	6	4	5	7	8	9
77092	6	4	5	7	8	9
77069	6	4	5	7	8	9
77021	6	5	4	7	8	9
77083	3	1	2	5	4	9
77029	6	5	4	7	8	9
77034	3	1	2	4	5	6
77087	6	4	5	7	8	9
77003	6	4	5	7	8	9
77038	1	4	5	7	8	9
77007	4	1	3	5	6	8
77016	6	4	5	7	8	10
77065	6	4	5	7	8	10
77096	6	5	4	7	8	9
77025	6	5	4	7	8	10
77056	6	5	4	7	8	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Rotorooter

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 17,289 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Rotorooter Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (plumber near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Rotorooter Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Rotorooter Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rotorooter Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly