Roehl Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve roehl.jobs's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 6,679 Trucking Companies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Roehl Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Roehl Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Roehl Report, January 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Saint Louis
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Roehl Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	15,001	6,679	3	37.6%	121,316,029	6.2	27,379	32,654	21	33,579	1,775	2,992	29,210
California	2,163	1,214	3	37.6%	14,717,477	6.7	1,166	1,740	2	1,769	94	149	1,400
Florida	1,581	896	4	37.3%	7,691,225	7.3	446	975	2	1,024	32	69	778
Texas	2,135	1,190	3	27.0%	7,540,325	7.4	1,360	1,917	3	1,998	60	106	1,535
New York	1,512	867	3	33.5%	6,564,004	5.8	1,491	1,756	2	1,770	157	187	1,510
Pennsylvania	1,679	953	3	44.0%	5,631,469	5.3	1,604	1,781	3	1,809	116	205	1,753
New Jersey	1,079	663	1	58.8%	5,220,882	4.6	537	593	2	596	69	84	575
Michigan	1,403	842	2	48.1%	4,792,564	5.2	833	976	2	1,016	102	137	914
Illinois	1,660	977	3	36.8%	4,724,615	5.8	1,247	1,382	4	1,408	77	142	1,299
Ohio	1,561	916	3	38.4%	4,467,609	6.1	976	1,188	5	1,231	63	106	1,044
Virginia	1,229	733	2	46.0%	3,870,108	5.4	723	891	2	908	73	101	837
Massachusetts	1,031	623	1	56.2%	3,838,685	4.9	461	534	2	549	41	61	504
Georgia	1,273	735	3	36.7%	3,776,846	6.8	574	726	5	781	26	50	674
Washington	1,181	704	2	41.0%	2,983,545	6.0	451	587	2	592	42	58	532
Maryland	907	581	1	49.3%	2,961,664	5.2	392	463	2	475	40	61	427
North Carolina	1,329	764	4	27.6%	2,803,681	7.0	683	802	2	834	16	56	691
Minnesota	1,301	774	1	49.5%	2,735,316	5.3	777	878	2	884	49	88	862
Missouri	1,344	807	2	43.9%	2,676,120	6.2	887	1,017	2	1,020	24	82	926
Indiana	1,529	919	3	39.5%	2,624,180	5.9	659	770	5	819	38	77	747
Wisconsin	1,333	789	3	41.9%	2,420,513	5.6	694	769	6	803	56	97	738
Connecticut	749	471	1	62.9%	2,251,676	4.2	234	279	1	279	36	47	274
Colorado	1,144	672	3	37.3%	2,062,290	6.6	381	514	2	526	20	43	462
Tennessee	1,133	675	4	29.4%	1,953,791	7.1	514	622	2	642	26	49	503
Arizona	953	595	3	28.1%	1,950,317	7.7	247	396	2	403	16	22	304
Kentucky	1,106	690	3	34.4%	1,528,947	5.8	698	758	2	790	38	72	696
Louisiana	977	599	3	31.4%	1,464,710	6.9	431	510	2	548	21	32	456
Alabama	1,062	641	4	28.4%	1,381,624	7.5	522	637	2	659	10	40	516
Oregon	1,039	647	2	32.5%	1,328,083	6.8	355	414	2	425	12	28	339
Iowa	1,297	800	2	42.3%	1,325,828	5.6	890	933	3	946	48	93	902
Utah	828	537	1	42.6%	1,295,301	6.0	246	284	1	284	11	25	258
South Carolina	952	565	4	24.8%	1,230,196	8.0	347	422	2	447	3	14	347
Mississippi	985	611	4	36.3%	1,084,183	6.5	384	418	2	424	9	18	388
Oklahoma	1,012	620	6	27.2%	1,066,437	7.8	557	646	2	701	7	32	523
Kansas	1,103	675	3	35.5%	1,033,306	6.1	616	692	2	702	46	58	638
West Virginia	898	572	2	49.2%	899,655	5.2	684	704	2	708	42	77	693
New Hampshire	750	489	1	61.6%	827,680	4.0	238	248	2	249	25	29	248
Arkansas	992	608	4	26.2%	782,258	6.9	553	587	2	595	6	40	525
Maine	957	610	2	43.5%	579,323	5.8	421	425	2	429	6	39	401
Idaho	795	513	3	33.9%	571,829	6.0	251	273	2	276	21	30	248
Rhode Island	534	348	1	50.2%	530,413	5.2	64	77	1	77	4	6	68
Delaware	529	353	2	55.6%	528,305	5.1	52	66	2	67	5	8	67
Hawaii	605	394	2	34.1%	484,707	6.5	82	93	2	95	7	8	70
New Mexico	850	530	6	22.3%	465,121	6.5	327	361	2	424	23	27	348
Nebraska	1,023	630	3	24.3%	462,450	6.7	524	581	2	586	28	46	492
Nevada	730	466	8	13.7%	399,779	9.2	92	168	2	180	3	12	85
Vermont	712	465	1	59.1%	369,621	4.2	250	254	2	255	26	41	254
Montana	878	579	3	35.2%	366,472	5.8	348	361	2	366	27	39	325
South Dakota	775	495	2	33.9%	292,493	5.8	359	370	3	379	20	32	348
Wyoming	752	466	3	38.4%	223,440	5.6	164	171	2	174	9	11	160
Alaska	719	452	4	30.1%	222,330	5.3	218	235	2	237	35	37	199
North Dakota	755	470	4	25.8%	194,089	7.0	367	381	2	388	10	21	309

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Saint Louis	Missouri	373	264	2	53.9%	494,277	5.9	45	1	45	0	4	45
Minneapolis	Minnesota	418	274	1	41.6%	452,412	6.9	51	1	51	0	1	48
Miami	Florida	479	309	8	21.4%	402,998	10.5	55	2	63	1	2	22
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	411	278	2	46.8%	389,303	7.1	27	2	28	0	1	20
Saint Paul	Minnesota	365	241	2	42.6%	340,279	7.1	30	2	31	1	3	29
Hollywood	Florida	239	161	2	67.0%	313,994	4.4	9	1	9	0	4	9
Houston	Texas	426	283	11	9.4%	299,635	12.8	96	3	98	0	0	12
Bronx	New York	318	236	7	17.6%	253,387	9.5	25	1	25	0	0	19
Hialeah	Florida	215	152	1	67.9%	249,237	4.4	7	1	7	0	2	7
Brooklyn	New York	310	223	11	9.3%	242,183	11.8	37	2	39	0	0	6
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	345	223	7	15.4%	242,076	10.3	47	1	47	0	0	25
Denver	Colorado	388	267	8	22.1%	240,637	10.6	38	2	39	1	2	16
Saint Petersburg	Florida	292	197	2	64.0%	228,245	4.6	16	1	16	0	4	16
Dayton	Ohio	372	254	2	47.4%	226,635	7.0	27	3	30	1	3	22
San Jose	California	342	230	7	21.2%	222,325	9.5	28	2	30	0	0	17
Atlanta	Georgia	402	265	6	21.2%	209,924	10.7	39	2	46	0	1	15
Silver Spring	Maryland	233	164	1	69.3%	209,861	4.7	7	1	7	1	2	7
Pompano Beach	Florida	268	178	3	54.4%	201,475	6.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Dallas	Texas	377	254	7	13.8%	192,495	11.0	48	1	48	0	1	15
Alexandria	Virginia	292	202	2	54.2%	192,120	5.3	14	1	14	0	2	14
Los Angeles	California	370	257	12	7.7%	188,548	12.9	62	1	62	0	0	10
San Antonio	Texas	364	227	11	10.4%	184,796	12.0	59	2	73	0	0	11
Santa Ana	California	193	131	3	49.0%	175,103	5.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Irvine	California	241	168	2	63.0%	168,562	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Winston Salem	North Carolina	219	160	2	63.3%	167,066	4.6	9	1	9	1	1	9
Littleton	Colorado	272	183	2	50.1%	163,100	6.3	10	1	10	2	3	8
Colorado Springs	Colorado	330	230	5	27.8%	162,386	7.9	30	1	30	1	1	25
Indianapolis	Indiana	367	240	9	16.8%	159,633	9.9	37	3	44	0	0	19
Lake Worth	Florida	218	147	1	76.2%	157,398	3.2	5	1	5	2	2	5
Chicago	Illinois	331	218	12	5.8%	155,498	14.3	56	1	56	0	0	2
Tucson	Arizona	326	216	8	16.9%	153,186	10.1	32	2	33	0	0	16
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	343	229	6	22.0%	150,194	9.5	39	1	39	0	0	24
Austin	Texas	374	256	9	13.7%	148,888	10.8	44	2	58	0	0	18
Aurora	Colorado	221	154	4	33.1%	144,220	7.7	11	1	11	0	0	11
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	216	146	1	70.0%	142,188	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
New York City	New York	317	221	13	8.6%	139,279	12.5	47	1	47	0	0	8
Fort Worth	Texas	325	212	8	15.1%	137,327	10.3	32	2	36	0	0	18
Columbus	Ohio	331	231	8	16.2%	137,002	10.7	30	3	45	0	0	17
Naples	Florida	307	212	5	43.3%	135,596	6.5	14	1	14	2	3	14
Madison	Wisconsin	240	166	3	45.6%	134,487	6.6	14	1	14	0	1	14
Anaheim	California	187	136	4	35.6%	131,307	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	342	220	8	15.9%	129,321	11.6	29	2	31	0	0	9
San Diego	California	394	254	10	9.4%	126,964	11.7	36	1	36	0	0	10
West Palm Beach	Florida	291	191	4	34.2%	126,732	8.0	12	1	12	0	1	9
Huntington Beach	California	156	113	1	63.1%	126,216	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Oceanside	California	167	124	3	62.9%	126,017	4.8	4	1	4	0	2	4
Mesa	Arizona	243	154	6	23.5%	125,733	8.9	13	1	13	0	0	10
Garland	Texas	182	133	4	52.7%	125,357	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Orlando	Florida	366	228	10	12.6%	125,135	11.0	32	2	35	0	0	7
Escondido	California	175	113	2	69.5%	124,835	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Richmond	Virginia	283	182	5	31.4%	122,811	9.3	15	2	18	0	1	8
Plano	Texas	201	144	5	40.2%	122,766	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Woodbridge	Virginia	153	103	1	56.6%	119,901	5.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Fairfax	Virginia	183	122	1	73.1%	119,597	3.8	4	1	4	0	2	4
Washington DC	District of Columbia	332	232	9	17.3%	118,535	10.0	28	2	31	0	0	18
Garden Grove	California	169	110	1	66.9%	117,514	4.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Tampa	Florida	329	220	10	14.8%	117,012	11.1	27	2	34	0	1	9
Vancouver	Washington	196	141	5	35.5%	115,748	7.5	11	1	11	0	0	10
Chandler	Arizona	172	117	3	42.8%	115,028	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Wilmington	Delaware	240	175	4	51.8%	113,757	6.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	349	231	8	16.6%	113,233	11.3	43	1	43	0	0	12
Virginia Beach	Virginia	239	157	7	24.9%	111,962	9.3	12	1	12	0	0	9
Las Vegas	Nevada	361	239	13	7.2%	111,787	12.8	43	2	44	0	0	6
Jacksonville	Florida	338	218	9	12.8%	111,403	10.4	31	2	36	1	1	10
Trenton	New Jersey	256	180	1	53.5%	111,167	5.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Arlington	Texas	228	157	5	27.8%	110,204	8.5	12	2	13	0	1	10
Tempe	Arizona	151	103	3	57.9%	110,084	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Beaverton	Oregon	156	110	4	54.4%	109,716	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Whittier	California	224	139	2	55.5%	108,869	6.0	6	2	7	1	2	6
Pasadena	California	185	133	2	68.9%	108,665	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Buffalo	New York	373	249	7	19.0%	107,037	11.7	28	2	34	1	1	4
Sunnyvale	California	199	134	1	69.9%	106,729	4.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Peoria	Arizona	170	118	2	61.5%	105,805	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Marietta	Georgia	206	141	6	32.6%	105,264	7.7	7	2	9	0	0	9
Katy	Texas	165	117	5	30.1%	103,555	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Rochester	New York	288	199	6	21.9%	103,052	9.1	24	1	24	0	0	19
Chula Vista	California	184	114	6	39.4%	102,750	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Bradenton	Florida	258	177	5	40.5%	102,589	6.1	10	1	10	1	1	10
Ogden	Utah	180	118	2	50.9%	102,500	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cleveland	Ohio	324	216	9	13.6%	102,194	12.6	29	2	40	0	0	4
Cincinnati	Ohio	302	211	9	12.6%	101,594	10.9	45	1	45	0	0	16
Grand Prairie	Texas	158	109	4	52.4%	99,841	6.0	4	2	5	1	1	5
Santa Clara	California	166	103	3	79.1%	99,310	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Rockville	Maryland	178	115	1	68.5%	99,194	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
San Mateo	California	184	137	2	69.4%	98,796	4.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Olympia	Washington	209	133	2	53.6%	97,936	5.7	6	1	6	1	1	6
Manassas	Virginia	177	117	1	64.2%	97,557	4.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Schenectady	New York	214	145	3	59.5%	96,352	5.3	8	1	8	0	2	8
El Paso	Texas	331	211	9	12.1%	95,484	10.3	24	2	25	0	0	8
Riverside	California	197	133	6	25.6%	94,691	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Memphis	Tennessee	286	186	7	13.5%	94,011	11.2	26	2	29	0	0	7
Bellevue	Washington	187	131	2	62.6%	91,522	4.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Seattle	Washington	338	222	10	9.6%	91,520	12.3	35	1	35	0	0	6
Charlotte	North Carolina	273	185	10	10.1%	91,484	11.2	24	2	26	0	0	3
Redwood City	California	163	113	1	79.0%	90,475	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Fremont	California	154	101	4	38.8%	90,380	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ventura	California	143	94	3	77.6%	89,985	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Phoenix	Arizona	341	221	15	6.2%	89,421	14.0	42	2	43	0	0	2
Scottsdale	Arizona	226	154	5	30.0%	89,369	8.3	11	1	11	0	0	10
Cambridge	Massachusetts	184	126	2	75.6%	87,527	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Palmdale	California	173	122	3	50.0%	87,468	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Falls Church	Virginia	201	143	1	72.1%	86,829	4.2	5	1	5	1	1	5
Sacramento	California	318	208	9	10.7%	86,262	11.6	28	1	28	0	1	5
Kissimmee	Florida	221	150	7	29.8%	86,222	8.1	7	1	7	0	1	6
Yonkers	New York	165	112	4	47.4%	85,527	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Overland Park	Kansas	216	143	3	46.5%	85,281	6.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Boynton Beach	Florida	198	123	5	48.9%	85,185	6.0	6	1	6	0	1	6
Lancaster	California	145	93	6	46.1%	84,971	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vista	California	154	117	2	70.4%	84,405	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Broomfield	Colorado	150	96	1	79.7%	83,443	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Elk Grove	California	140	100	3	46.3%	83,085	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oxnard	California	158	111	5	37.6%	82,933	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Glendale	Arizona	242	162	4	27.2%	82,866	10.2	9	1	9	0	0	7
Boca Raton	Florida	234	152	6	37.1%	82,521	7.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
O Fallon	Missouri	128	94	1	85.4%	82,408	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Reading	Pennsylvania	247	171	3	38.2%	82,342	7.0	10	2	11	0	1	11
Lehigh Acres	Florida	196	134	2	69.1%	80,740	4.2	6	1	6	0	3	6
College Station	Texas	131	93	3	65.4%	80,448	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Annapolis	Maryland	188	125	1	84.1%	79,925	2.8	5	1	5	1	3	5
Gainesville	Florida	223	154	7	38.1%	79,818	7.3	10	1	10	0	0	10
Inglewood	California	197	138	3	59.5%	79,644	5.6	5	1	5	0	2	4
Homestead	Florida	227	154	4	42.4%	79,580	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Murrieta	California	128	88	3	59.7%	78,945	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Arvada	Colorado	173	121	2	59.1%	78,849	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
El Monte	California	112	78	2	83.6%	78,312	3.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Delray Beach	Florida	187	121	3	65.6%	78,116	4.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lees Summit	Missouri	200	141	1	76.1%	77,667	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Hemet	California	155	104	3	59.8%	77,067	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Round Rock	Texas	174	122	3	46.0%	77,011	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ashburn	Virginia	133	96	2	68.6%	77,006	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Rancho Cucamonga	California	161	112	5	42.7%	75,494	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lowell	Massachusetts	155	106	2	66.8%	74,350	4.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Vacaville	California	131	89	2	70.6%	74,346	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Largo	Florida	166	106	2	68.2%	73,385	4.2	5	1	5	0	2	5
Jupiter	Florida	159	109	2	74.4%	73,309	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Carrollton	Texas	149	105	3	54.1%	72,876	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Staten Island	New York	233	168	9	15.4%	72,832	9.8	12	1	12	0	0	9
Waterbury	Connecticut	188	134	2	66.9%	72,641	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Corona	California	195	139	8	28.2%	72,506	8.2	5	2	7	0	0	7
Torrance	California	200	139	5	41.0%	72,443	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Gaithersburg	Maryland	179	130	3	50.0%	72,296	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fullerton	California	152	104	3	51.7%	72,025	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Berkeley	California	255	178	1	56.4%	71,664	5.6	9	1	9	0	0	8
Gilbert	Arizona	190	129	4	30.0%	71,580	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Independence	Missouri	204	147	2	57.5%	71,356	5.6	8	1	8	0	1	8
Edinburg	Texas	143	105	4	45.7%	71,164	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Roseville	California	156	112	3	50.8%	71,078	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bridgeport	Connecticut	195	133	4	48.5%	71,024	5.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Burbank	California	188	132	2	65.6%	70,900	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Lakewood	New Jersey	100	74	2	70.0%	70,534	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Long Beach	California	215	143	8	14.7%	70,411	10.3	12	1	12	0	0	7
San Marcos	California	129	81	2	70.0%	70,337	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Toms River	New Jersey	143	98	2	57.2%	70,316	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	150	109	1	70.0%	70,207	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Concord	California	167	121	3	53.7%	69,965	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Alpharetta	Georgia	185	121	4	36.8%	69,604	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Eugene	Oregon	185	130	5	34.0%	69,059	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Frisco	Texas	118	73	5	40.0%	68,979	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clearwater	Florida	230	154	5	37.6%	68,916	6.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Spokane	Washington	246	161	7	19.2%	68,862	9.8	14	2	15	0	0	6
Mission Viejo	California	123	84	1	70.0%	68,851	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	California	151	110	2	62.7%	68,629	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rockford	Illinois	235	159	5	37.6%	68,600	7.7	9	1	9	0	0	8
Hamilton	Ohio	157	108	3	50.0%	68,549	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	California	133	87	2	60.0%	68,252	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	145	102	3	52.3%	68,239	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Palo Alto	California	164	111	2	70.0%	67,677	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Miami Beach	Florida	208	130	2	58.5%	67,632	6.4	5	1	5	0	1	4
La Puente	California	153	102	3	57.0%	67,210	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Everett	Washington	191	136	4	40.2%	66,998	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Allen	Texas	131	95	3	60.0%	66,763	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	160	111	2	51.7%	66,323	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Herndon	Virginia	130	86	1	70.0%	65,421	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kennewick	Washington	139	85	3	65.8%	65,004	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Saint Charles	Missouri	149	104	3	46.1%	64,476	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cape Coral	Florida	199	129	6	35.6%	64,296	7.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Norwalk	California	100	75	3	60.0%	63,532	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Midlothian	Virginia	152	105	2	65.5%	63,383	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hyattsville	Maryland	165	116	5	40.1%	63,120	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Salt Lake City	Utah	266	179	12	13.0%	63,088	12.2	19	1	19	0	0	4
Mesquite	Texas	144	104	4	42.8%	62,630	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vallejo	California	164	106	3	50.3%	62,559	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Birmingham	Alabama	317	206	8	12.5%	62,483	13.0	30	2	34	0	0	3
Spring	Texas	224	150	9	16.4%	62,470	10.9	8	1	8	0	0	3
Henrico	Virginia	216	150	3	32.3%	62,313	7.7	7	1	7	0	0	5
Renton	Washington	189	119	2	40.0%	61,946	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Puyallup	Washington	194	134	3	43.3%	61,870	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
West Jordan	Utah	137	101	3	50.0%	61,785	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Denton	Texas	176	124	5	39.0%	61,688	7.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Stamford	Connecticut	193	128	4	47.7%	61,354	5.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Youngstown	Ohio	238	163	2	39.0%	61,211	8.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Bothell	Washington	166	121	3	47.6%	61,078	5.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Appleton	Wisconsin	146	93	5	50.2%	61,061	7.3	4	2	4	1	1	3
San Francisco	California	313	218	11	7.0%	60,939	12.8	28	2	36	0	0	2
Louisville	Kentucky	307	208	14	7.9%	60,413	12.3	32	2	46	0	0	5
Fresno	California	264	179	11	10.0%	60,349	12.1	18	2	19	0	0	4
Federal Way	Washington	125	85	4	60.0%	60,128	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Cypress	Texas	128	92	6	35.2%	60,015	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kansas City	Missouri	341	228	9	10.5%	59,890	11.0	49	1	49	0	0	18
Roswell	Georgia	132	95	2	60.0%	59,862	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	California	184	124	3	62.3%	58,823	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
West Valley City	Utah	135	94	1	44.0%	58,518	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Carlsbad	California	191	130	3	51.4%	58,448	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
New Port Richey	Florida	169	112	2	47.9%	57,845	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pittsburg	California	100	69	2	60.0%	57,649	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hayward	California	152	101	7	29.9%	57,503	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Richardson	Texas	152	112	4	50.0%	57,299	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pearland	Texas	147	98	4	41.6%	57,257	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Woodstock	Georgia	128	84	2	56.2%	57,178	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Leandro	California	140	90	4	51.1%	56,793	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Baytown	Texas	139	98	4	48.1%	56,686	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	California	222	143	5	41.6%	56,570	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Mckinney	Texas	139	95	4	29.9%	56,499	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Portland	Oregon	293	208	18	6.1%	56,160	13.9	33	2	36	0	0	0
Menifee	California	177	121	2	49.9%	55,179	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ballwin	Missouri	121	93	3	58.1%	55,022	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lithonia	Georgia	124	87	3	56.0%	54,147	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Florissant	Missouri	154	107	3	50.0%	54,145	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	142	104	3	49.7%	54,034	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Acworth	Georgia	132	98	2	54.2%	54,006	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Cajon	California	160	106	7	30.9%	53,311	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bowie	Maryland	173	121	2	51.7%	52,801	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Maria	California	148	105	4	36.8%	52,724	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orem	Utah	148	96	3	52.3%	52,469	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	California	134	95	5	44.4%	52,151	6.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Sugar Land	Texas	174	121	6	30.9%	52,120	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vero Beach	Florida	208	147	3	44.9%	51,692	6.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Racine	Wisconsin	162	119	4	40.9%	51,565	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hillsboro	Oregon	123	87	3	50.0%	51,436	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kalamazoo	Michigan	197	133	7	31.1%	51,009	8.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Metairie	Louisiana	163	114	6	35.8%	50,892	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Newport News	Virginia	197	137	5	28.6%	50,560	8.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Coral Springs	Florida	124	85	5	51.8%	50,375	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fort Pierce	Florida	242	165	4	52.4%	50,134	5.3	8	1	8	0	0	8
Tacoma	Washington	300	194	10	14.9%	49,829	10.6	20	1	20	0	2	5
Jersey City	New Jersey	201	140	9	19.0%	49,589	10.0	7	2	8	0	0	3
Edmond	Oklahoma	182	113	8	28.8%	49,488	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Englewood	Colorado	194	122	2	44.2%	49,360	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lynnwood	Washington	160	110	2	45.5%	49,345	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Daly City	California	134	96	2	42.7%	48,887	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	1
Toledo	Ohio	236	164	8	15.9%	48,829	10.5	15	2	17	0	0	4
Franklin	Tennessee	143	105	5	45.7%	48,661	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cumming	Georgia	150	107	7	30.0%	48,606	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hawthorne	California	101	72	5	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Livermore	California	122	86	5	50.0%	48,127	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Longmont	Colorado	138	94	5	36.8%	48,111	7.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	149	99	4	49.1%	48,049	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Baltimore	Maryland	278	191	13	7.6%	47,875	12.4	22	2	30	0	1	1
Downey	California	141	98	4	42.3%	47,781	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Detroit	Michigan	282	189	9	7.5%	47,715	12.6	25	2	41	0	0	4
South Gate	California	98	68	4	50.0%	47,552	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Auburn	Washington	150	102	5	41.0%	46,272	7.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
New Haven	Connecticut	168	110	6	35.5%	46,243	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Livonia	Michigan	134	94	5	48.6%	45,982	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Braunfels	Texas	125	85	4	44.4%	45,672	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sterling Heights	Michigan	156	107	4	34.1%	45,163	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sarasota	Florida	281	192	5	18.0%	45,136	8.8	13	1	13	0	0	13
Lawrence	Kansas	177	123	3	44.3%	44,786	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Albuquerque	New Mexico	267	191	14	6.8%	44,782	13.3	17	2	29	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	126	84	5	46.8%	44,670	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Conroe	Texas	206	144	7	27.8%	44,586	8.0	7	2	8	0	0	8
Antioch	California	123	89	3	40.0%	44,288	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Simi Valley	California	130	89	6	34.4%	44,279	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Omaha	Nebraska	292	199	12	8.0%	43,983	12.4	31	1	31	0	0	5
Augusta	Georgia	205	145	7	21.5%	43,975	10.0	8	2	9	0	0	4
Visalia	California	143	100	6	28.9%	43,911	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oakland	California	253	178	10	10.6%	43,777	11.5	14	1	14	0	0	3
Modesto	California	196	145	8	16.5%	43,760	9.7	7	1	7	0	0	4
Saint Augustine	Florida	216	145	5	33.2%	43,516	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Allentown	Pennsylvania	193	135	8	25.3%	42,950	8.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Ypsilanti	Michigan	132	92	5	40.0%	42,760	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Keller	Texas	140	95	4	36.8%	42,753	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
New Orleans	Louisiana	293	191	11	9.9%	42,550	11.7	19	2	30	0	0	5
Clermont	Florida	150	108	5	42.2%	42,276	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	308	201	10	11.1%	42,053	11.6	18	2	30	0	0	5
Provo	Utah	150	103	4	36.0%	41,963	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Laurel	Maryland	162	109	4	37.1%	41,733	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Winter Haven	Florida	140	94	5	39.0%	41,684	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Boulder	Colorado	204	142	6	31.7%	41,566	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Chico	California	145	100	4	36.5%	40,905	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mobile	Alabama	296	197	12	15.0%	40,733	11.2	18	1	18	0	1	5
South Bend	Indiana	255	177	5	27.6%	40,523	8.2	10	2	13	0	0	12
Buford	Georgia	120	90	4	40.6%	40,269	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	126	83	5	34.7%	39,570	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Orange	California	177	121	4	27.0%	39,118	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Greensboro	North Carolina	189	129	11	11.9%	39,050	10.2	9	2	10	0	0	4
Cary	North Carolina	162	112	8	25.0%	38,763	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Rialto	California	129	87	5	36.3%	38,722	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Raleigh	North Carolina	253	173	16	7.1%	38,557	12.9	15	2	21	0	0	1
Pueblo	Colorado	204	148	5	24.3%	38,469	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	6
Boise	Idaho	235	170	11	15.0%	38,379	10.6	9	2	11	0	0	5
Fairfield	California	126	82	6	33.4%	38,068	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	California	141	106	7	36.7%	37,800	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Quincy	Massachusetts	138	93	4	40.0%	37,648	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	159	115	5	40.2%	37,591	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Deltona	Florida	131	93	4	40.0%	37,556	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bakersfield	California	200	141	15	6.7%	37,420	13.3	11	1	11	0	0	0
Fort Myers	Florida	265	180	10	14.9%	37,408	10.7	11	2	16	0	0	4
Newnan	Georgia	126	87	5	40.0%	37,358	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Brownsville	Texas	139	92	10	18.4%	36,994	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Providence	Rhode Island	214	142	9	17.9%	36,614	10.4	8	1	8	0	0	2
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	171	123	9	19.6%	36,579	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Albany	New York	229	164	7	24.0%	36,336	8.9	11	1	11	0	0	9
Wichita	Kansas	283	194	13	8.7%	36,276	11.9	26	2	28	0	0	5
Jamaica	New York	186	138	9	14.9%	36,235	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	4
Muncie	Indiana	183	132	4	38.9%	36,063	6.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Charlottesville	Virginia	162	110	8	29.3%	36,014	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Durham	North Carolina	200	131	14	12.4%	35,923	11.1	8	2	9	0	0	3
Napa	California	123	85	5	37.2%	35,914	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
New Bedford	Massachusetts	162	119	6	37.8%	35,831	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Irving	Texas	197	139	7	14.9%	35,741	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	214	155	8	21.1%	35,719	8.8	9	1	9	0	0	9
Waukesha	Wisconsin	147	104	6	37.2%	35,650	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lakeland	Florida	215	150	10	13.8%	35,648	10.0	9	1	9	0	0	4
Lewisville	Texas	146	101	8	30.0%	35,603	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waco	Texas	215	146	9	22.0%	34,850	9.8	9	2	10	0	1	4
York	Pennsylvania	191	137	8	19.4%	34,840	8.7	7	2	8	0	0	8
Longview	Texas	170	114	4	33.0%	34,701	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Madera	California	157	109	5	33.5%	34,465	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bend	Oregon	162	111	6	28.2%	34,462	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sandy	Utah	159	117	5	31.2%	34,443	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Corpus Christi	Texas	289	199	11	10.5%	34,243	11.5	18	2	24	0	0	4
Little Rock	Arkansas	259	182	8	15.6%	33,989	10.7	12	1	12	0	0	4
Lubbock	Texas	266	177	10	12.2%	33,834	10.9	14	2	15	0	0	4
Parker	Colorado	125	81	3	33.4%	33,445	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bloomington	Indiana	171	120	7	25.0%	33,351	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Abilene	Texas	175	120	9	25.5%	33,137	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	4
Douglasville	Georgia	119	86	6	30.0%	33,074	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lawrenceville	Georgia	159	104	7	12.9%	33,055	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Compton	California	135	93	6	23.8%	33,007	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Grand Rapids	Michigan	227	155	20	9.0%	32,962	12.4	12	2	13	0	0	2
Huntsville	Alabama	217	148	7	16.7%	32,853	10.2	11	2	13	0	0	7
Ann Arbor	Michigan	176	125	9	19.7%	32,791	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chattanooga	Tennessee	258	162	10	15.6%	32,496	11.7	15	2	16	0	0	4
Milton	Florida	149	96	6	34.2%	32,423	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Honolulu	Hawaii	225	157	11	7.8%	32,278	12.9	11	1	11	0	0	1
Columbia	South Carolina	261	171	10	9.3%	32,007	11.9	14	2	21	0	0	3
Topeka	Kansas	232	156	9	19.4%	31,681	9.9	18	2	20	0	0	12
Santa Fe	New Mexico	179	128	8	24.5%	31,433	8.2	5	2	8	0	0	8
Pensacola	Florida	248	173	13	11.6%	31,138	10.2	13	2	15	0	0	5
Surprise	Arizona	164	117	6	23.0%	31,118	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Frederick	Maryland	146	103	7	23.3%	30,694	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Paterson	New Jersey	203	134	6	20.9%	30,484	8.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Tulsa	Oklahoma	313	215	16	7.2%	30,364	13.8	28	2	45	0	0	2
Fort Wayne	Indiana	256	173	16	9.4%	29,870	11.7	16	2	19	0	0	3
Covington	Georgia	128	89	5	31.7%	29,386	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Naperville	Illinois	165	118	10	17.5%	29,084	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rock Hill	South Carolina	161	110	7	24.9%	28,925	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Missouri City	Texas	156	110	5	27.2%	28,883	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Nashville	Tennessee	282	182	19	6.2%	28,505	14.2	22	1	22	0	0	1
Akron	Ohio	234	151	10	10.5%	28,472	10.8	17	1	17	0	0	4
Laredo	Texas	189	130	15	10.5%	28,392	12.2	6	2	9	0	0	1
Roanoke	Virginia	244	174	8	16.4%	27,857	9.6	10	1	10	1	1	4
Summerville	South Carolina	119	85	7	20.0%	27,788	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	170	119	6	28.9%	27,625	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Greenville	South Carolina	225	162	11	12.6%	27,596	10.4	9	1	9	0	0	5
San Bernardino	California	209	136	10	11.0%	27,551	11.1	7	2	9	0	0	2
Santa Rosa	California	171	113	10	12.7%	27,422	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	2
Santa Cruz	California	147	94	5	26.3%	27,412	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Evansville	Indiana	217	147	10	14.8%	27,313	10.2	9	1	9	0	0	4
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	135	93	6	21.8%	27,274	9.3	4	2	5	0	0	3
Hampton	Virginia	197	132	9	20.0%	27,246	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Stockton	California	229	164	15	7.2%	27,090	12.8	12	1	12	0	0	1
High Point	North Carolina	177	123	6	22.1%	27,037	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
North Las Vegas	Nevada	197	123	11	11.5%	26,831	11.7	7	1	7	0	0	1
Decatur	Georgia	184	123	8	14.8%	26,698	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	2
Ocala	Florida	232	156	10	11.7%	26,239	11.3	11	2	12	0	0	3
Bellingham	Washington	151	100	8	20.4%	25,846	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fayetteville	North Carolina	197	143	15	10.6%	25,807	11.9	8	2	13	0	0	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	144	104	8	27.0%	25,706	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elkhart	Indiana	147	100	6	25.8%	25,701	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	133	85	8	26.0%	25,322	9.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Newark	New Jersey	194	139	11	9.0%	25,249	11.7	9	1	9	0	0	2
Plainfield	Illinois	156	117	7	25.5%	25,116	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Scranton	Pennsylvania	232	158	7	25.2%	25,016	8.1	8	1	8	0	0	7
Moreno Valley	California	183	129	8	12.1%	24,941	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mcdonough	Georgia	121	84	7	24.6%	24,921	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lafayette	Louisiana	178	121	8	15.5%	24,859	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Waukegan	Illinois	119	92	6	25.5%	24,841	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Anchorage	Alaska	228	152	10	10.1%	24,578	11.7	12	1	12	0	0	1
Manchester	New Hampshire	155	112	9	21.1%	24,525	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Lexington	Kentucky	263	179	12	7.7%	24,521	12.5	15	2	21	0	0	2
Macon	Georgia	204	139	10	14.9%	24,418	10.0	9	2	11	0	0	5
Charleston	South Carolina	222	147	11	12.3%	24,228	12.4	10	2	11	0	0	2
Edison	New Jersey	121	86	7	24.0%	24,210	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Apopka	Florida	121	87	8	24.8%	24,197	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kent	Washington	154	107	10	15.0%	24,140	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Bowling Green	Kentucky	134	93	9	20.7%	23,959	10.5	4	2	5	0	0	2
Flushing	New York	149	108	11	11.1%	23,865	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Shreveport	Louisiana	226	159	9	10.6%	23,589	10.6	12	1	12	0	0	5
Knoxville	Tennessee	258	179	18	6.1%	23,578	13.8	17	2	20	0	0	0
Montgomery	Alabama	261	180	8	11.1%	23,277	10.5	13	2	16	0	0	6
Spring Hill	Florida	177	121	4	18.0%	22,603	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Lynchburg	Virginia	171	117	6	22.1%	22,583	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tallahassee	Florida	233	162	15	7.8%	22,539	12.1	10	2	15	0	0	2
Temecula	California	160	108	7	17.3%	22,529	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Henderson	Nevada	198	134	14	7.2%	21,941	12.8	8	1	8	0	0	0
Indio	California	133	99	6	22.8%	21,907	8.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Nampa	Idaho	136	96	8	18.9%	21,854	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chesapeake	Virginia	193	135	13	9.1%	21,614	11.2	6	1	6	0	0	2
Gastonia	North Carolina	145	101	7	20.2%	21,611	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fontana	California	133	98	10	9.2%	21,514	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Des Moines	Iowa	232	162	10	9.6%	21,350	12.1	11	1	11	0	0	2
Syracuse	New York	244	173	10	9.4%	21,273	11.4	15	1	15	0	0	3
Champaign	Illinois	143	96	8	22.4%	21,214	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salem	Oregon	201	132	10	7.9%	21,173	12.0	7	2	10	0	0	1
Daytona Beach	Florida	191	125	9	20.1%	20,760	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Melbourne	Florida	168	111	9	13.3%	20,657	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Tracy	California	166	102	9	17.6%	20,646	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Odessa	Texas	187	122	8	12.8%	20,539	9.8	6	1	6	0	0	4
Flint	Michigan	197	138	10	12.9%	20,055	11.7	7	2	12	0	0	1
Erie	Pennsylvania	250	178	13	10.8%	19,906	10.5	13	1	13	0	0	6
Norfolk	Virginia	250	174	12	8.0%	19,581	12.1	14	2	17	0	0	1
Savannah	Georgia	232	162	12	8.1%	19,488	12.4	10	2	18	0	0	1
Reno	Nevada	242	175	20	6.4%	19,112	13.2	12	2	18	0	0	0
Killeen	Texas	155	103	9	12.6%	18,970	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Davenport	Iowa	174	121	7	18.0%	18,829	9.3	6	2	8	0	0	5
Lansing	Michigan	174	125	11	11.2%	18,425	9.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Springfield	Missouri	186	124	13	7.7%	17,695	12.0	7	1	7	0	0	1
Lincoln	Nebraska	282	194	15	6.1%	17,532	13.9	22	1	22	0	0	1
Lake Charles	Louisiana	179	115	10	13.3%	17,347	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Las Cruces	New Mexico	191	129	12	11.6%	17,246	10.0	7	2	9	0	0	4
Beaumont	Texas	217	155	14	11.8%	17,237	10.6	8	2	9	0	0	2
Saginaw	Michigan	196	133	10	13.1%	17,018	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	6
Fort Collins	Colorado	156	108	10	8.7%	16,903	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Hartford	Connecticut	170	119	9	13.6%	16,754	11.0	6	1	6	0	0	1
Mission	Texas	139	102	8	9.2%	16,712	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	185	128	14	11.8%	16,447	11.5	6	1	6	0	0	2
Worcester	Massachusetts	219	153	10	8.8%	16,367	11.0	9	1	9	0	0	1
Rapid City	South Dakota	146	92	11	16.7%	16,180	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	223	153	13	8.8%	15,954	11.0	9	1	9	0	0	2
Clovis	California	155	100	8	13.1%	15,882	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Canton	Ohio	218	146	9	10.7%	15,760	11.2	12	2	15	0	0	3
Boston	Massachusetts	229	156	11	10.3%	15,561	11.6	14	2	18	0	0	2
Van Nuys	California	152	106	13	8.6%	15,351	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Duluth	Minnesota	221	149	12	13.0%	15,177	10.2	11	1	11	0	0	5
Green Bay	Wisconsin	194	138	14	8.2%	15,097	10.9	7	1	7	0	0	3
Meridian	Idaho	121	80	7	14.3%	14,925	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Warren	Michigan	162	105	9	11.0%	14,869	11.2	5	2	7	0	0	1
Salinas	California	173	112	10	7.9%	14,861	11.8	5	2	6	0	0	0
Amarillo	Texas	232	160	15	6.5%	14,803	13.8	14	2	17	0	0	1
Bryan	Texas	184	124	9	15.1%	14,568	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Clarksville	Tennessee	137	89	10	8.1%	14,303	11.7	3	2	6	0	0	1
Riverview	Florida	155	99	10	12.8%	14,286	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Joliet	Illinois	156	108	10	11.0%	14,159	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Hagerstown	Maryland	158	109	10	14.3%	13,970	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	176	120	10	9.6%	13,953	11.0	5	2	6	0	0	1
Yakima	Washington	163	116	10	10.7%	13,952	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Palm Bay	Florida	162	109	8	12.5%	13,946	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Jackson	Mississippi	240	167	12	8.1%	13,823	11.6	11	2	12	0	0	1
Fredericksburg	Virginia	162	113	9	7.9%	13,669	12.2	5	2	10	0	0	1
Hesperia	California	128	91	8	12.9%	13,366	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Yuma	Arizona	153	107	12	9.0%	13,272	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Mcallen	Texas	150	103	12	9.2%	13,083	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Tyler	Texas	234	155	13	8.2%	12,828	11.6	9	2	12	0	0	1
Valdosta	Georgia	154	104	8	13.4%	12,755	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Redding	California	177	121	10	11.2%	12,711	9.8	4	2	5	0	0	2
Fort Mill	South Carolina	151	102	11	13.0%	12,388	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ontario	California	136	97	10	7.0%	12,361	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Norman	Oklahoma	162	116	9	9.8%	12,201	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Midland	Texas	166	114	11	7.4%	11,871	12.6	5	2	8	0	0	0
Victorville	California	144	97	9	8.7%	11,840	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Wichita Falls	Texas	207	142	13	11.7%	11,540	11.6	7	2	10	0	0	2
Asheville	North Carolina	163	105	13	8.7%	11,532	11.6	5	2	7	0	0	1
Dearborn	Michigan	162	114	9	12.1%	11,511	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Athens	Georgia	182	123	10	9.2%	11,451	10.7	6	2	7	0	0	3
Olathe	Kansas	126	93	12	7.9%	11,384	12.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Humble	Texas	137	95	14	6.7%	11,229	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Pomona	California	143	107	10	7.0%	11,059	13.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	171	124	9	11.7%	10,954	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Panama City	Florida	198	131	10	8.5%	10,793	11.5	6	2	9	0	0	1
Ridgewood	New York	99	79	10	10.0%	10,672	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pacoima	California	99	71	10	10.0%	10,580	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Kenosha	Wisconsin	150	109	8	9.3%	10,451	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	159	106	9	8.5%	10,410	11.8	4	2	5	0	0	0
Grand Junction	Colorado	185	125	12	9.6%	10,078	11.7	6	2	7	0	0	1
Astoria	New York	161	125	16	7.0%	9,978	13.0	4	2	5	0	0	0
Terre Haute	Indiana	190	130	11	10.2%	9,717	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	4
San Angelo	Texas	163	106	10	8.7%	9,652	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Muskegon	Michigan	164	109	9	7.4%	9,561	12.4	5	2	7	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	98	69	8	9.0%	9,219	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Sparks	Nevada	172	126	15	7.7%	9,215	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Spartanburg	South Carolina	172	124	14	8.2%	9,196	11.8	5	2	6	0	0	0
Gulfport	Mississippi	138	95	12	9.4%	8,922	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	122	85	10	9.5%	8,903	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Elgin	Illinois	146	102	11	7.0%	8,555	13.0	3	2	6	0	0	0
Chino	California	123	86	7	9.0%	8,464	11.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Billings	Montana	162	116	15	6.1%	8,411	13.8	4	2	6	0	0	0
Kennesaw	Georgia	120	86	8	8.4%	8,364	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Portsmouth	Virginia	224	155	11	8.6%	8,223	11.4	7	2	8	0	0	0
Springdale	Arkansas	118	86	10	8.4%	8,112	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	122	94	12	8.5%	7,916	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Fargo	North Dakota	160	113	13	6.3%	7,757	13.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Elizabeth	New Jersey	141	91	10	7.7%	7,723	12.3	3	2	4	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	100	81	9	8.0%	7,517	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	165	107	10	7.6%	7,459	12.5	4	2	6	0	0	0
North Hollywood	California	157	108	15	4.6%	7,103	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	99	72	12	7.0%	6,754	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Idaho Falls	Idaho	160	115	14	6.0%	6,541	14.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Missoula	Montana	159	109	13	6.6%	6,383	13.6	5	2	8	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
San Jose	342	230	7	21.2%	222,325	9.5	28	2	30	0	0	17
Los Angeles	370	257	12	7.7%	188,548	12.9	62	1	62	0	0	10
Santa Ana	193	131	3	49.0%	175,103	5.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Irvine	241	168	2	63.0%	168,562	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Anaheim	187	136	4	35.6%	131,307	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
San Diego	394	254	10	9.4%	126,964	11.7	36	1	36	0	0	10
Huntington Beach	156	113	1	63.1%	126,216	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Oceanside	167	124	3	62.9%	126,017	4.8	4	1	4	0	2	4
Escondido	175	113	2	69.5%	124,835	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Garden Grove	169	110	1	66.9%	117,514	4.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Whittier	224	139	2	55.5%	108,869	6.0	6	2	7	1	2	6
Pasadena	185	133	2	68.9%	108,665	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Sunnyvale	199	134	1	69.9%	106,729	4.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Chula Vista	184	114	6	39.4%	102,750	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Clara	166	103	3	79.1%	99,310	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
San Mateo	184	137	2	69.4%	98,796	4.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Riverside	197	133	6	25.6%	94,691	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Redwood City	163	113	1	79.0%	90,475	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Fremont	154	101	4	38.8%	90,380	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ventura	143	94	3	77.6%	89,985	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Palmdale	173	122	3	50.0%	87,468	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sacramento	318	208	9	10.7%	86,262	11.6	28	1	28	0	1	5
Lancaster	145	93	6	46.1%	84,971	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vista	154	117	2	70.4%	84,405	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Elk Grove	140	100	3	46.3%	83,085	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oxnard	158	111	5	37.6%	82,933	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Inglewood	197	138	3	59.5%	79,644	5.6	5	1	5	0	2	4
Murrieta	128	88	3	59.7%	78,945	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Monte	112	78	2	83.6%	78,312	3.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Hemet	155	104	3	59.8%	77,067	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Rancho Cucamonga	161	112	5	42.7%	75,494	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vacaville	131	89	2	70.6%	74,346	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Corona	195	139	8	28.2%	72,506	8.2	5	2	7	0	0	7
Torrance	200	139	5	41.0%	72,443	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Fullerton	152	104	3	51.7%	72,025	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Berkeley	255	178	1	56.4%	71,664	5.6	9	1	9	0	0	8
Roseville	156	112	3	50.8%	71,078	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Burbank	188	132	2	65.6%	70,900	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Long Beach	215	143	8	14.7%	70,411	10.3	12	1	12	0	0	7
San Marcos	129	81	2	70.0%	70,337	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Concord	167	121	3	53.7%	69,965	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mission Viejo	123	84	1	70.0%	68,851	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	151	110	2	62.7%	68,629	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	133	87	2	60.0%	68,252	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Palo Alto	164	111	2	70.0%	67,677	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
La Puente	153	102	3	57.0%	67,210	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Norwalk	100	75	3	60.0%	63,532	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vallejo	164	106	3	50.3%	62,559	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
San Francisco	313	218	11	7.0%	60,939	12.8	28	2	36	0	0	2
Fresno	264	179	11	10.0%	60,349	12.1	18	2	19	0	0	4
Santa Monica	184	124	3	62.3%	58,823	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Carlsbad	191	130	3	51.4%	58,448	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pittsburg	100	69	2	60.0%	57,649	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hayward	152	101	7	29.9%	57,503	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Leandro	140	90	4	51.1%	56,793	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	222	143	5	41.6%	56,570	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Menifee	177	121	2	49.9%	55,179	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Cajon	160	106	7	30.9%	53,311	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Santa Maria	148	105	4	36.8%	52,724	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	134	95	5	44.4%	52,151	6.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Daly City	134	96	2	42.7%	48,887	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	1
Hawthorne	101	72	5	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Livermore	122	86	5	50.0%	48,127	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Downey	141	98	4	42.3%	47,781	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Gate	98	68	4	50.0%	47,552	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Antioch	123	89	3	40.0%	44,288	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Simi Valley	130	89	6	34.4%	44,279	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Visalia	143	100	6	28.9%	43,911	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oakland	253	178	10	10.6%	43,777	11.5	14	1	14	0	0	3
Modesto	196	145	8	16.5%	43,760	9.7	7	1	7	0	0	4
Chico	145	100	4	36.5%	40,905	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orange	177	121	4	27.0%	39,118	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rialto	129	87	5	36.3%	38,722	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	126	82	6	33.4%	38,068	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	141	106	7	36.7%	37,800	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bakersfield	200	141	15	6.7%	37,420	13.3	11	1	11	0	0	0
Napa	123	85	5	37.2%	35,914	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	157	109	5	33.5%	34,465	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Compton	135	93	6	23.8%	33,007	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Bernardino	209	136	10	11.0%	27,551	11.1	7	2	9	0	0	2
Santa Rosa	171	113	10	12.7%	27,422	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	2
Santa Cruz	147	94	5	26.3%	27,412	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Stockton	229	164	15	7.2%	27,090	12.8	12	1	12	0	0	1
Moreno Valley	183	129	8	12.1%	24,941	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Temecula	160	108	7	17.3%	22,529	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Indio	133	99	6	22.8%	21,907	8.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Fontana	133	98	10	9.2%	21,514	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Tracy	166	102	9	17.6%	20,646	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Clovis	155	100	8	13.1%	15,882	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Van Nuys	152	106	13	8.6%	15,351	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Salinas	173	112	10	7.9%	14,861	11.8	5	2	6	0	0	0
Hesperia	128	91	8	12.9%	13,366	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Redding	177	121	10	11.2%	12,711	9.8	4	2	5	0	0	2
Ontario	136	97	10	7.0%	12,361	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Victorville	144	97	9	8.7%	11,840	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Pomona	143	107	10	7.0%	11,059	13.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Pacoima	99	71	10	10.0%	10,580	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bell Gardens	98	69	8	9.0%	9,219	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Chino	123	86	7	9.0%	8,464	11.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
North Hollywood	157	108	15	4.6%	7,103	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Sylmar	99	72	12	7.0%	6,754	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

Saint Louis

ZIP	roehl.jobs	fleetdirectory.com	simplyhired.com	midostrucking.com	fueloyal.com	indeed.com
63110	7	5	6	4	8	9
63121	7	5	6	4	8	9
63141	7	4	11	5	8	9
63130	5	4			6	7
63143	6	4	5		7	8
63133	7	5	6	4	8	9
63112	6	4	5		7	9
63102	3	1	2		4	5
63103	6	4	5		7	8
63124	3	2	7	1	4	5
63134	4	2	3	1	5	6
63111	6	4	5		7	8
63129	3	1	2		4	5
63138	8	6	7	4	9	10
63120	7	5	6	4	8	9
63147	7	6	9	4	11	5
63116	4	2	3	1	5	7
63137	6	4	5		8	7
63106	4	2	3	1	5	6
63127	6	5	8	4	7	9
63107	7	5	6	4	8	9
63146	6	4	10		5	7
63105	5	4			6	7
63117	6	5	8	4	7	9
63136	6	4	5		7	8
63126	8	6	7	4	9	10
63125	6	4	5		7	8
63135	5	4	22		6	7
63115	6	4	5		7	8
63128	3	1	2		4	5
63139	8	6	7	4	9	11
63108	8	6	7	4	9	10
63119	5	6	11	4	9	7
63122	4	2	5	1	3	8
63144	6	4	5		7	8
63101	8	6	7	4	9	5
63132	6	4	5		7	8
63123	4	2	3	1	5	7
63113	7	5	6	4	8	10
63114	5	3	4	1	6	2
63104	7	5	8	4	6	9
63118	8	6	7	4	9	5
63131	7	5	6	4	8	9
63140	7	5	6	4	8	9
63109	7	5	6	4	8	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Roehl

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 6,679 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Roehl Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (trucking company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Roehl Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Roehl Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Roehl Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly