Randstadusa Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve randstadusa.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 3,999 Temp/Staffing Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Randstadusa Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Randstadusa Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Randstadusa Report, November 2024 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Randstadusa Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	7,540	3,999	7	17.7%	57,144,761	23.3	27,378	32,653	717	34,614	221	889	6,474
California	1,360	944	7	17.9%	6,991,178	22.2	1,166	1,740	104	1,856	32	71	564
Texas	1,240	931	5	23.9%	6,661,549	15.9	1,360	1,917	27	1,939	1	50	610
New York	1,134	846	3	28.8%	5,652,790	23.4	1,491	1,756	42	1,799	9	38	331
Florida	966	722	8	22.4%	4,614,544	18.0	446	975	59	1,043	9	42	372
Tennessee	769	604	2	52.7%	3,504,928	11.8	514	622	91	754	32	112	528
Georgia	875	662	4	30.6%	3,154,744	18.0	574	726	98	835	20	86	329
Pennsylvania	1,029	812	8	18.2%	2,332,351	25.2	1,604	1,781	64	1,876	5	36	301
Virginia	851	651	5	24.3%	2,040,998	21.6	723	891	40	956	10	45	220
Arizona	651	501	4	28.1%	1,954,830	13.7	247	396	16	442	0	18	178
North Carolina	886	673	6	19.0%	1,924,953	23.7	683	802	51	854	5	33	162
Maryland	666	536	3	29.0%	1,743,078	15.6	392	463	30	561	6	24	256
South Carolina	651	516	4	31.1%	1,541,196	13.9	347	422	26	456	7	35	261
Ohio	954	726	8	13.2%	1,540,547	23.6	976	1,188	48	1,286	3	21	275
Illinois	1,062	805	12	10.8%	1,387,051	24.2	1,247	1,382	49	1,441	3	13	226
Kentucky	744	581	2	30.6%	1,361,236	19.6	698	758	34	810	19	44	211
Nevada	452	371	3	44.7%	1,305,402	16.4	92	168	12	171	3	12	87
Massachusetts	727	584	7	17.7%	1,208,755	23.5	461	534	43	572	3	19	118
Missouri	886	653	8	17.1%	1,043,944	22.1	887	1,017	35	1,073	1	21	119
Minnesota	832	635	12	15.1%	835,541	25.2	777	878	36	917	5	14	87
Alabama	717	569	8	15.9%	774,792	24.3	522	637	28	662	6	15	124
Washington	732	581	14	8.7%	636,222	27.7	451	587	24	621	2	9	63
Nebraska	575	445	6	31.0%	589,943	18.8	524	581	27	607	14	23	196
Connecticut	544	455	11	16.3%	584,605	22.4	234	279	32	307	6	17	69
Kansas	768	596	7	17.2%	499,083	19.9	616	692	31	718	2	13	170
New Jersey	755	605	23	4.5%	396,418	26.9	536	592	34	607	1	10	34
Wisconsin	762	586	19	6.3%	364,154	28.8	694	769	31	822	0	2	72
Iowa	766	581	14	11.1%	346,885	24.3	890	933	31	1,024	2	20	150
Rhode Island	339	293	4	29.6%	312,292	11.0	64	77	10	92	0	0	54
New Hampshire	487	418	7	20.3%	272,508	14.6	238	248	16	272	0	2	122
Indiana	1,061	837	24	3.1%	203,761	30.5	659	770	34	780	3	3	23
Mississippi	619	498	21	6.4%	191,098	25.1	384	418	18	444	6	13	29
Colorado	794	603	32	3.3%	181,402	26.0	381	514	19	565	2	2	10
Delaware	365	309	10	18.5%	175,660	21.8	52	66	11	71	0	2	22
Michigan	822	647	53	1.5%	153,758	30.8	833	976	28	993	0	1	8
Oklahoma	761	589	25	3.5%	137,716	25.5	557	646	23	712	0	0	27
Oregon	774	623	30	2.8%	115,188	27.8	355	414	22	423	0	0	6
Arkansas	689	555	34	3.6%	108,473	26.7	553	587	29	626	3	22	43
Louisiana	708	573	59	0.9%	43,277	29.4	431	510	18	523	0	0	0
Utah	556	454	56	0.9%	27,631	27.7	246	284	13	298	0	0	0
West Virginia	574	470	36	1.2%	22,641	25.5	684	704	18	747	0	0	0
New Mexico	515	424	48	1.0%	21,699	27.1	327	361	22	383	0	0	3
Idaho	548	463	41	0.9%	15,182	29.3	251	273	17	275	0	0	1
Maine	726	618	36	1.1%	14,590	29.0	421	425	18	441	0	0	0
Hawaii	336	289	27	0.9%	12,789	26.9	82	93	9	93	0	0	0
Montana	528	435	38	1.0%	10,680	27.3	348	361	17	367	0	0	1
South Dakota	484	394	44	1.2%	10,165	30.5	359	370	16	384	0	0	0
Alaska	529	386	37	1.1%	7,873	26.3	218	235	19	242	0	0	4
North Dakota	474	392	35	1.0%	7,762	27.5	367	381	15	395	0	0	0
Vermont	441	379	31	0.9%	5,865	26.0	250	254	17	260	0	0	0
Wyoming	459	371	40	1.0%	5,855	27.6	164	171	13	174	0	0	0

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	301	260	2	63.6%	2,027,860	4.6	96	2	97	0	14	97
Brooklyn	New York	197	175	2	62.9%	1,636,055	4.8	37	1	37	2	3	37
New York City	New York	202	179	3	64.1%	1,038,785	4.4	47	1	47	0	10	47
San Antonio	Texas	240	205	3	57.5%	1,022,176	5.4	59	1	59	0	9	59
Los Angeles	California	240	207	5	38.8%	953,212	7.2	62	2	64	0	2	63
Las Vegas	Nevada	229	196	2	60.8%	939,440	4.7	43	1	43	0	5	43
Bronx	New York	194	165	2	63.4%	914,406	4.6	25	1	25	0	3	25
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	203	177	4	48.5%	764,861	5.9	47	2	72	0	3	72
Phoenix	Arizona	217	197	4	47.6%	691,336	6.2	42	3	44	0	4	44
Minneapolis	Minnesota	266	232	1	55.8%	607,067	6.8	51	10	64	4	12	52
Tucson	Arizona	231	197	2	65.6%	593,647	4.7	32	1	32	0	5	32
Orlando	Florida	235	206	2	59.6%	593,535	5.5	32	3	33	0	4	32
Louisville	Kentucky	205	181	1	76.0%	578,310	3.3	32	3	37	6	10	37
Jacksonville	Florida	199	172	3	60.9%	527,930	5.4	31	5	35	1	6	34
Saint Louis	Missouri	250	223	3	56.1%	514,905	5.9	45	4	48	1	9	47
Memphis	Tennessee	209	183	2	67.9%	472,073	4.3	26	5	30	1	6	30
Austin	Texas	230	205	5	43.3%	471,125	6.7	44	1	44	0	1	44
San Diego	California	217	185	7	34.0%	458,388	9.6	36	4	38	0	2	21
Baltimore	Maryland	199	173	2	66.0%	416,632	4.4	22	3	41	0	6	41
Bakersfield	California	171	151	1	73.9%	413,493	3.7	11	1	11	1	1	11
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	228	204	2	60.5%	412,629	5.9	39	2	39	0	7	36
Miami	Florida	261	228	7	21.8%	410,196	9.7	55	2	55	0	0	45
Nashville	Tennessee	200	178	1	78.2%	358,405	3.2	22	3	27	4	9	26
Virginia Beach	Virginia	174	156	1	77.2%	347,546	2.8	12	2	16	3	7	16
Raleigh	North Carolina	184	168	2	62.1%	339,522	4.7	15	1	15	0	2	15
Long Beach	California	156	140	1	70.0%	335,278	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Oakland	California	161	146	1	81.0%	333,456	2.9	14	2	20	4	7	20
San Jose	California	196	177	7	31.3%	328,180	7.8	28	1	28	0	0	28
Cincinnati	Ohio	221	194	4	40.7%	327,122	6.9	45	3	48	1	1	46
Chicago	Illinois	235	205	11	11.3%	304,793	10.3	56	2	72	0	0	33
Columbus	Ohio	202	178	5	35.6%	301,313	8.2	30	5	51	0	2	50
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	250	222	5	34.7%	288,278	8.2	27	2	27	1	2	22
Birmingham	Alabama	206	185	3	57.3%	286,612	5.3	30	5	35	1	6	35
Richmond	Virginia	188	161	1	72.1%	281,900	3.9	15	3	18	0	4	18
Wichita	Kansas	187	168	3	59.4%	248,052	5.2	26	2	29	1	6	29
Spring	Texas	173	156	1	64.4%	245,399	4.6	8	2	8	0	2	8
Katy	Texas	142	128	3	70.7%	243,090	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Atlanta	Georgia	267	232	7	24.3%	240,528	12.3	39	8	45	0	1	22
Fort Worth	Texas	216	193	8	26.3%	239,411	8.6	32	4	37	0	2	37
Saint Petersburg	Florida	181	165	2	66.4%	236,553	4.5	16	2	17	0	3	17
Columbia	South Carolina	175	156	2	67.9%	232,899	4.2	14	2	15	0	4	15
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	188	168	5	28.2%	228,869	8.5	29	3	51	0	0	44
Lincoln	Nebraska	192	172	1	78.8%	227,932	3.5	22	2	23	4	7	23
West Palm Beach	Florida	176	161	3	59.3%	219,589	5.2	12	1	12	0	0	12
Lawrenceville	Georgia	136	121	1	84.5%	216,349	3.3	4	2	6	1	2	6
Marietta	Georgia	163	149	2	66.1%	213,098	4.3	7	1	7	0	2	7
Omaha	Nebraska	189	164	5	37.1%	204,941	7.3	31	3	33	1	1	31
Greensboro	North Carolina	158	139	3	60.4%	197,789	5.0	9	2	10	0	2	10
Charlotte	North Carolina	208	177	9	21.4%	194,297	11.0	24	5	34	0	3	12
Durham	North Carolina	155	138	2	65.3%	189,419	4.6	8	1	8	0	1	8
Sacramento	California	204	178	10	23.3%	187,755	8.4	28	3	32	2	4	29
Lexington	Kentucky	186	167	3	58.6%	187,281	5.1	15	2	16	0	2	16
Winston Salem	North Carolina	168	155	2	70.9%	187,266	4.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Tallahassee	Florida	156	145	2	63.4%	182,511	4.5	10	2	12	0	2	12
Henderson	Nevada	159	140	3	57.6%	174,317	5.1	8	1	8	0	1	8
Boca Raton	Florida	159	151	2	77.0%	171,121	3.3	9	2	11	2	4	11
San Bernardino	California	148	131	4	65.6%	163,699	4.9	7	2	8	1	2	8
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	149	140	1	87.3%	162,602	2.8	5	2	7	1	3	7
Knoxville	Tennessee	177	160	5	40.0%	154,745	7.1	17	2	30	0	0	30
Staten Island	New York	156	137	7	31.8%	150,637	7.8	12	1	12	0	0	10
Chandler	Arizona	143	133	4	54.3%	145,973	5.5	6	3	13	0	1	13
North Las Vegas	Nevada	150	132	2	62.3%	145,656	4.9	7	1	7	0	1	7
Lakeland	Florida	150	135	3	55.5%	143,028	5.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
Clarksville	Tennessee	128	117	1	79.7%	140,072	2.7	3	2	5	1	2	5
Charleston	South Carolina	164	145	3	71.1%	139,959	4.0	10	1	10	0	3	10
Henrico	Virginia	160	147	2	71.4%	137,642	3.4	7	2	8	2	3	8
Huntsville	Alabama	162	142	2	70.0%	137,358	4.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Fredericksburg	Virginia	142	129	2	78.6%	136,690	3.2	5	2	6	1	2	6
Chesapeake	Virginia	141	129	4	57.0%	135,555	5.2	6	2	7	0	1	7
Fresno	California	183	166	9	22.1%	133,147	8.8	18	1	18	0	0	18
Cumming	Georgia	135	121	2	81.3%	131,671	3.3	3	2	5	0	2	5
Hayward	California	135	122	4	67.9%	130,469	4.0	4	1	4	1	1	4
Sugar Land	Texas	133	120	3	76.4%	129,001	4.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Kent	Washington	134	126	1	79.0%	126,729	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Greenville	South Carolina	164	149	3	56.2%	123,439	5.0	9	2	10	0	3	10
Salinas	California	144	131	3	65.5%	123,384	4.8	5	2	8	0	1	8
Denver	Colorado	233	200	13	10.8%	117,509	13.8	38	3	49	2	2	9
Tacoma	Washington	210	187	6	34.1%	113,828	8.8	20	2	20	0	0	18
Wilmington	Delaware	188	165	3	50.7%	111,338	5.6	10	1	10	0	2	10
Macon	Georgia	167	146	2	67.1%	109,918	4.1	9	2	12	0	5	12
Saint Augustine	Florida	170	148	2	83.5%	109,370	2.8	5	3	6	1	4	6
Chattanooga	Tennessee	179	159	3	52.4%	108,835	5.6	15	1	15	0	3	15
Athens	Georgia	153	137	1	86.9%	108,345	2.5	6	2	11	1	6	11
Alexandria	Virginia	187	165	7	30.2%	107,017	7.9	14	3	26	1	4	18
Franklin	Tennessee	124	115	1	100.0%	106,474	1.0	3	2	5	3	3	5
Irving	Texas	143	131	3	43.7%	105,063	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Saint Paul	Minnesota	240	211	12	12.6%	100,962	15.7	30	7	32	0	1	8
Humble	Texas	134	121	2	60.0%	99,917	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cleveland	Ohio	213	190	10	13.0%	97,527	11.9	29	3	29	0	0	25
Lake Worth	Florida	155	140	4	46.3%	95,582	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hartford	Connecticut	140	125	2	77.4%	95,530	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Washington DC	District of Columbia	197	175	12	13.9%	95,168	11.5	28	3	44	1	1	8
Providence	Rhode Island	151	138	6	46.4%	95,141	6.5	8	2	9	0	0	9
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	159	144	3	67.8%	94,570	3.7	6	3	9	0	3	9
Alpharetta	Georgia	152	141	6	49.8%	94,139	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Madera	California	131	114	1	91.4%	94,082	3.3	3	3	5	2	2	5
Roanoke	Virginia	172	156	4	52.8%	89,479	5.4	10	2	11	0	2	11
Spartanburg	South Carolina	153	140	2	76.3%	85,412	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Roseville	California	128	114	4	60.0%	83,876	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Boston	Massachusetts	171	154	4	54.8%	83,149	5.1	14	1	14	0	2	14
Dallas	Texas	253	221	20	5.9%	82,607	14.8	48	3	50	0	0	1
Kennesaw	Georgia	111	102	2	83.1%	82,384	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Tampa	Florida	208	189	13	10.4%	82,190	14.2	27	7	41	0	1	2
Torrance	California	145	131	5	45.7%	80,834	6.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Douglasville	Georgia	126	111	2	70.0%	77,174	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Van Nuys	California	133	118	7	43.2%	76,827	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Johnson City	Tennessee	134	121	3	80.0%	76,348	3.0	4	2	8	0	4	8
Visalia	California	130	117	5	50.0%	76,007	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Francisco	California	177	162	13	8.7%	75,432	12.7	28	2	28	0	0	3
Tempe	Arizona	139	128	7	38.4%	73,000	6.5	4	3	8	0	1	8
Frisco	Texas	115	103	4	40.0%	68,979	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pompano Beach	Florida	180	170	8	18.5%	68,489	15.6	10	3	10	0	0	5
Ballwin	Missouri	111	103	3	67.8%	64,204	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Rock Hill	South Carolina	133	121	5	55.0%	63,959	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bellevue	Washington	141	132	5	43.7%	63,892	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Rosa	California	144	129	7	29.5%	63,798	8.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Kissimmee	Florida	188	167	9	22.0%	63,552	12.6	7	3	7	0	0	5
Flushing	New York	133	119	6	28.1%	60,338	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Buford	Georgia	109	99	2	60.0%	59,462	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Perris	California	125	110	6	50.0%	58,695	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Silver Spring	Maryland	168	152	8	19.1%	57,856	10.0	7	4	9	0	0	7
Gaithersburg	Maryland	138	121	6	40.0%	57,837	7.0	5	3	8	0	0	8
Bowling Green	Kentucky	129	113	5	50.0%	57,795	5.0	4	2	5	0	1	5
Bothell	Washington	142	129	5	45.0%	57,762	14.0	3	3	6	1	2	5
Irvine	California	158	147	7	21.5%	57,441	8.7	9	2	10	0	0	10
Midlothian	Virginia	121	113	3	58.1%	56,213	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bowie	Maryland	158	144	3	54.9%	56,075	5.8	4	3	5	1	1	4
Sunnyvale	California	141	131	5	35.8%	54,674	7.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
North Hollywood	California	127	117	8	34.7%	53,096	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Astoria	New York	148	132	6	36.5%	52,046	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mcdonough	Georgia	113	103	3	50.0%	50,731	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Westerville	Ohio	111	99	5	52.9%	50,398	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Florissant	Missouri	135	122	7	46.4%	50,288	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Jamaica	New York	144	130	7	20.6%	50,159	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Missouri City	Texas	123	111	5	46.2%	49,037	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Norfolk	Virginia	174	158	8	19.8%	48,547	9.6	14	3	18	0	0	11
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	240	208	16	6.9%	47,078	12.9	43	2	71	0	0	5
Waukegan	Illinois	116	102	6	47.3%	46,096	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Riverview	Florida	128	118	4	41.0%	45,671	7.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Portland	Oregon	210	192	23	5.0%	45,619	15.9	33	2	33	0	0	1
Kansas City	Missouri	220	191	17	7.9%	45,009	14.9	49	3	61	0	1	4
Cypress	Texas	118	111	10	24.6%	41,918	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Richardson	Texas	116	105	5	36.3%	41,575	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Manchester	New Hampshire	137	121	9	35.5%	41,239	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Bell Gardens	California	101	94	7	40.0%	40,973	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Saint Charles	Missouri	139	125	7	29.1%	40,632	8.0	3	3	4	0	0	3
Covington	Georgia	130	117	6	43.5%	40,276	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Daytona Beach	Florida	146	129	5	38.7%	39,901	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Sylmar	California	101	94	7	40.0%	38,595	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Auburn	Washington	127	118	7	32.8%	37,074	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Cambridge	Massachusetts	136	127	6	31.1%	36,032	7.8	5	2	7	0	0	6
Pearland	Texas	121	110	9	26.1%	35,926	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Topeka	Kansas	174	159	8	21.9%	35,758	8.8	18	1	18	0	0	18
Sterling Heights	Michigan	136	123	9	26.9%	35,577	21.5	4	2	5	0	1	1
Conroe	Texas	159	145	10	21.9%	35,108	12.1	7	2	7	0	1	2
Glendale	Arizona	163	148	15	11.5%	34,969	11.3	9	2	16	0	0	3
Boynton Beach	Florida	146	135	9	19.9%	34,687	9.3	6	1	6	0	0	5
Livermore	California	112	98	7	35.2%	33,926	7.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Edmond	Oklahoma	168	144	9	19.2%	32,901	9.6	5	2	6	0	0	5
Portsmouth	Virginia	141	128	5	34.5%	32,889	7.4	7	2	9	0	0	9
Scottsdale	Arizona	173	160	12	11.0%	32,867	13.5	11	2	16	0	0	1
West Chester	Pennsylvania	114	99	5	30.0%	32,609	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pacoima	California	100	93	7	30.0%	31,740	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Overland Park	Kansas	161	144	11	16.9%	31,008	10.0	9	1	9	0	0	4
Hialeah	Florida	160	148	10	8.3%	30,557	13.4	7	3	8	0	0	1
Hollywood	Florida	173	163	14	6.5%	30,438	16.9	9	2	10	0	0	3
Tracy	California	149	136	7	25.9%	30,339	11.0	4	3	7	0	0	6
Mesa	Arizona	181	168	17	5.6%	30,145	14.3	13	2	13	0	0	0
Lithonia	Georgia	121	107	4	31.0%	30,002	11.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Puyallup	Washington	148	133	7	20.9%	29,844	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Apopka	Florida	119	109	7	30.0%	29,296	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Annapolis	Maryland	160	140	8	30.1%	28,647	20.6	5	3	6	0	0	4
Newnan	Georgia	124	114	8	30.0%	28,019	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Round Rock	Texas	134	120	10	16.2%	27,205	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Rockville	Maryland	151	133	11	18.5%	26,797	14.0	4	4	5	0	0	3
Jupiter	Florida	134	124	7	26.8%	26,430	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Decatur	Georgia	159	142	13	14.2%	25,755	14.6	5	3	6	0	0	2
El Cajon	California	134	120	10	14.3%	24,582	17.0	3	3	3	0	0	1
Homestead	Florida	162	148	11	12.7%	23,924	18.3	7	2	7	0	0	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	127	116	6	24.7%	23,082	12.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Buffalo	New York	213	184	21	4.0%	22,657	25.5	28	3	33	0	0	3
Savannah	Georgia	154	135	12	9.4%	22,625	11.5	10	2	11	0	0	5
Pasadena	California	136	123	10	14.3%	22,589	9.5	6	2	7	0	0	7
Stamford	Connecticut	147	138	9	17.0%	21,895	9.3	6	1	6	0	0	5
Surprise	Arizona	141	127	10	16.0%	21,623	11.3	4	2	6	0	0	2
Ridgewood	New York	96	85	6	20.0%	21,343	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Stockton	California	176	155	18	5.3%	19,872	16.3	12	3	12	0	0	0
Clermont	Florida	132	115	8	19.5%	19,507	12.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Deltona	Florida	108	95	9	20.2%	18,991	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Toledo	Ohio	186	171	16	5.9%	18,176	14.3	15	1	15	0	0	0
Des Moines	Iowa	159	143	16	7.8%	17,514	12.5	11	2	22	0	0	3
Inglewood	California	146	128	9	12.9%	17,256	13.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Ontario	California	127	114	15	9.0%	15,898	11.0	3	2	6	0	0	0
Peoria	Arizona	142	128	10	8.6%	14,743	11.5	4	2	6	0	0	2
Clovis	California	125	113	11	12.1%	14,691	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Whittier	California	158	143	17	7.4%	14,575	26.2	6	3	6	0	0	1
Lynchburg	Virginia	147	130	10	14.0%	14,294	30.8	4	2	4	0	0	1
Cary	North Carolina	133	124	16	8.8%	13,635	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
La Puente	California	131	120	10	11.1%	13,095	16.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Summerville	South Carolina	120	108	10	9.4%	13,075	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Everett	Washington	144	132	10	7.7%	12,769	12.4	5	2	6	0	0	1
Miami Beach	Florida	141	131	11	10.9%	12,656	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Seattle	Washington	225	198	30	1.3%	12,656	27.9	35	5	35	0	0	1
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	145	133	12	10.0%	12,522	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Grand Prairie	Texas	137	125	15	6.5%	12,401	14.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Hyattsville	Maryland	138	123	15	7.7%	12,160	12.4	5	2	9	0	0	0
Berkeley	California	162	149	11	9.2%	11,744	25.1	9	3	9	0	0	1
Littleton	Colorado	213	189	27	3.6%	11,702	19.5	10	4	14	0	0	0
Burbank	California	132	120	11	10.5%	11,382	12.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Beaverton	Oregon	138	130	13	5.5%	11,041	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Delray Beach	Florida	153	143	12	9.1%	10,890	20.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Orange	California	125	115	15	7.4%	10,773	12.6	5	2	10	0	0	1
Gilbert	Arizona	148	137	13	4.4%	10,475	22.3	6	4	7	0	0	0
Largo	Florida	139	124	15	9.5%	10,197	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Keller	Texas	130	116	14	8.6%	10,051	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Acworth	Georgia	120	107	9	10.0%	9,968	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	California	99	88	9	10.0%	9,684	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
New Haven	Connecticut	145	130	13	7.2%	9,404	13.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Elmhurst	New York	100	86	8	10.0%	9,397	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Clearwater	Florida	166	146	19	5.1%	9,291	14.7	9	1	9	0	0	1
Beaumont	Texas	149	134	14	6.3%	9,128	13.4	8	1	8	0	0	0
Anaheim	California	139	127	23	2.4%	8,854	19.4	7	1	7	0	0	0
Green Bay	Wisconsin	154	140	16	4.7%	8,663	17.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Falls Church	Virginia	165	148	14	7.2%	8,612	13.2	5	2	6	0	0	0
Santa Clara	California	129	119	16	6.7%	8,465	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bridgeport	Connecticut	149	136	14	5.6%	8,191	24.0	6	2	6	0	0	2
Hamilton	Ohio	138	125	12	5.8%	7,986	16.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Baytown	Texas	127	118	12	6.7%	7,926	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Elk Grove	California	137	122	13	4.4%	7,877	20.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Hampton	Virginia	152	132	15	5.8%	7,847	14.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Indianapolis	Indiana	219	193	54	0.8%	7,617	39.5	37	4	38	0	0	0
Edison	New Jersey	125	114	15	7.4%	7,446	12.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
El Paso	Texas	219	194	38	0.9%	6,847	32.2	24	2	28	0	0	0
Fairfax	Virginia	142	130	17	4.0%	6,509	15.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Woodstock	Georgia	122	110	12	6.3%	6,456	14.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	118	106	12	6.3%	6,051	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Gastonia	North Carolina	114	103	12	5.7%	6,049	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Albuquerque	New Mexico	198	181	31	0.9%	5,984	26.8	17	2	17	0	0	0
Newark	New Jersey	174	154	22	2.0%	5,683	27.3	9	3	9	0	0	0
Herndon	Virginia	122	113	14	6.0%	5,607	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Fort Mill	South Carolina	130	115	15	5.8%	5,485	14.3	3	2	5	0	0	0
Stone Mountain	Georgia	146	133	19	4.2%	5,351	18.0	3	4	4	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	132	122	11	5.4%	5,328	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	149	135	12	5.2%	5,030	14.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Colorado Springs	Colorado	210	188	35	0.9%	4,986	33.5	30	1	30	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	122	114	11	5.3%	4,964	14.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	117	108	14	5.2%	4,915	16.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Corpus Christi	Texas	183	162	19	1.5%	4,869	23.3	18	2	18	0	0	0
San Mateo	California	131	118	15	3.4%	4,813	17.8	4	3	4	0	0	0
Detroit	Michigan	180	160	52	0.7%	4,715	45.1	25	1	25	0	0	0
Chula Vista	California	149	137	16	1.8%	4,602	29.0	5	2	5	0	0	0
Salt Lake City	Utah	197	174	35	0.9%	4,206	32.6	19	2	19	0	0	0
Laurel	Maryland	141	123	15	3.7%	4,179	26.8	4	3	4	0	0	1
Woodbridge	Virginia	140	128	21	2.0%	4,142	22.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Arlington	Texas	174	155	27	1.0%	4,041	25.6	12	2	12	0	0	0
Dayton	Ohio	225	201	45	0.8%	4,017	34.9	27	5	27	0	0	0
Norman	Oklahoma	154	133	14	3.2%	3,970	23.0	4	3	5	0	0	0
Newport News	Virginia	154	136	18	2.2%	3,910	21.6	7	3	7	0	0	0
San Angelo	Texas	141	125	15	3.5%	3,833	18.8	4	2	5	0	0	1
New Orleans	Louisiana	178	158	28	0.9%	3,782	30.6	19	1	19	0	0	0
Rochester	New York	197	174	38	0.8%	3,769	39.0	24	3	24	0	0	0
Aurora	Colorado	146	133	34	0.9%	3,765	30.6	11	2	11	0	0	0
Laredo	Texas	151	135	22	1.3%	3,581	19.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Englewood	Colorado	161	144	22	3.2%	3,526	18.0	4	3	5	0	0	0
Naples	Florida	203	182	22	1.1%	3,506	31.1	14	2	15	0	0	0
Honolulu	Hawaii	173	155	29	0.8%	3,497	34.5	11	1	11	0	0	0
Santa Ana	California	135	123	27	1.0%	3,468	22.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Spokane	Washington	179	160	22	0.9%	3,401	24.8	14	1	14	0	0	0
Gainesville	Florida	158	146	21	1.6%	3,336	30.8	10	2	10	0	0	0
Garden Grove	California	131	118	22	1.8%	3,241	22.2	5	2	5	0	0	0
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	200	180	32	0.8%	3,189	34.2	18	2	18	0	0	0
Independence	Missouri	169	147	21	2.6%	3,186	26.0	8	2	8	0	0	2
Grand Rapids	Michigan	159	143	35	0.9%	3,160	33.1	12	1	12	0	0	0
New Bedford	Massachusetts	140	126	16	3.3%	3,128	18.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Midland	Texas	146	133	16	1.9%	3,094	29.0	5	2	5	0	0	0
Tulsa	Oklahoma	191	163	50	0.7%	3,048	46.9	28	1	28	0	0	0
Paterson	New Jersey	154	138	21	2.0%	2,982	24.7	9	2	10	0	0	0
Riverside	California	147	126	39	0.8%	2,975	38.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Plano	Texas	143	134	21	1.0%	2,970	21.9	7	2	7	0	0	0
Amarillo	Texas	178	163	22	1.3%	2,865	29.9	14	3	14	0	0	0
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	162	144	23	1.6%	2,859	21.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	166	151	17	1.4%	2,828	20.5	6	3	6	0	0	0
Lubbock	Texas	166	148	19	1.0%	2,779	42.5	14	2	14	0	0	0
Vancouver	Washington	174	160	33	0.8%	2,725	34.8	11	2	11	0	0	0
Edinburg	Texas	130	117	17	1.7%	2,665	18.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fort Wayne	Indiana	174	153	33	0.8%	2,644	35.9	16	1	16	0	0	0
Madison	Wisconsin	161	147	29	0.9%	2,625	30.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Compton	California	129	117	19	1.8%	2,504	23.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Bradenton	Florida	180	158	25	1.0%	2,470	27.0	10	2	10	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	137	126	17	2.3%	2,439	22.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	123	112	18	2.0%	2,430	18.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Jersey City	New Jersey	162	143	27	0.9%	2,383	27.4	7	1	7	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	California	113	107	18	2.4%	2,375	21.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Pueblo	Colorado	166	150	18	1.5%	2,336	32.3	7	2	7	0	0	0
Reno	Nevada	179	162	37	0.8%	2,321	41.1	12	2	12	0	0	0
Fort Myers	Florida	180	159	31	0.9%	2,277	28.7	11	2	11	0	0	0
Salem	Oregon	156	144	28	0.8%	2,259	34.7	7	2	7	0	0	0
Sarasota	Florida	183	166	26	0.9%	2,234	29.8	13	2	13	0	0	0
Mobile	Alabama	200	176	37	0.8%	2,224	35.6	18	2	18	0	0	0
Modesto	California	153	139	34	0.8%	2,216	36.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Pensacola	Florida	184	163	31	0.8%	2,214	35.4	13	5	13	0	0	0
Boise	Idaho	151	136	33	0.9%	2,205	32.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Corona	California	150	135	32	0.8%	2,161	34.2	5	2	5	0	0	0
Anchorage	Alaska	181	160	27	0.9%	2,131	31.9	12	1	12	0	0	0
Daly City	California	128	117	20	1.8%	2,095	21.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Fremont	California	126	115	28	0.9%	2,077	29.3	4	3	4	0	0	0
Akron	Ohio	163	148	41	0.8%	2,040	43.8	17	1	17	0	0	0
Trenton	New Jersey	179	162	27	1.0%	2,030	26.4	11	2	11	0	0	0
Fontana	California	118	106	33	0.8%	1,970	34.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Ocala	Florida	169	156	29	0.9%	1,946	32.9	11	4	11	0	0	0
Syracuse	New York	173	155	27	0.9%	1,943	33.8	15	1	15	0	0	0
Wichita Falls	Texas	164	150	15	1.9%	1,926	23.0	7	4	7	0	0	0
Santa Fe	New Mexico	145	130	19	1.5%	1,922	18.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Fayetteville	North Carolina	150	136	37	0.8%	1,921	37.6	8	1	8	0	0	0
Valdosta	Georgia	140	124	16	2.0%	1,910	25.8	5	2	5	0	0	0
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	171	148	24	1.1%	1,906	20.4	9	2	9	0	0	0
Springfield	Missouri	167	146	27	0.8%	1,902	36.3	7	1	7	0	0	0
Shreveport	Louisiana	185	168	32	0.9%	1,900	34.5	12	3	12	0	0	0
Garland	Texas	135	124	36	0.8%	1,882	40.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Little Rock	Arkansas	167	151	30	0.9%	1,863	34.0	12	1	12	0	0	0
Odessa	Texas	137	125	18	1.2%	1,860	28.0	6	2	6	0	0	0
Moreno Valley	California	128	115	28	0.9%	1,853	29.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Oxnard	California	137	122	29	0.8%	1,850	34.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Mckinney	Texas	133	120	20	1.0%	1,827	22.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Reading	Pennsylvania	162	143	29	0.8%	1,819	34.9	10	1	10	0	0	0
Huntington Beach	California	129	117	26	0.9%	1,818	28.5	4	2	4	0	0	0
New Braunfels	Texas	120	111	13	1.7%	1,770	18.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Coral Springs	Florida	114	108	15	1.8%	1,769	18.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Abilene	Texas	162	148	24	1.4%	1,758	24.2	6	2	6	0	0	0
Augusta	Georgia	163	145	33	0.8%	1,733	32.3	8	1	8	0	0	0
Fort Collins	Colorado	145	133	27	0.9%	1,732	30.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Oceanside	California	125	116	31	0.9%	1,719	33.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Cape Coral	Florida	155	134	23	0.9%	1,706	24.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Eugene	Oregon	157	140	26	0.8%	1,702	35.5	6	2	7	0	0	0
Brownsville	Texas	130	116	28	0.8%	1,696	34.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Rancho Cucamonga	California	129	117	21	0.9%	1,677	25.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Mission	Texas	129	118	23	0.9%	1,654	29.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Palmdale	California	134	120	24	0.9%	1,640	26.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Olympia	Washington	171	154	24	0.9%	1,613	31.2	6	4	6	0	0	0
Ogden	Utah	149	133	34	0.8%	1,603	40.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lancaster	California	131	114	26	0.9%	1,591	32.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Montgomery	Alabama	176	155	38	0.8%	1,579	42.8	13	2	13	0	0	0
York	Pennsylvania	161	144	28	0.9%	1,565	31.3	7	2	7	0	0	0
Ann Arbor	Michigan	133	117	20	0.9%	1,558	24.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Rockford	Illinois	163	144	30	0.8%	1,544	34.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Worcester	Massachusetts	155	140	33	0.8%	1,534	36.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Erie	Pennsylvania	161	147	29	0.8%	1,519	35.8	13	3	13	0	0	0
Yonkers	New York	139	126	29	0.8%	1,493	35.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Ashburn	Virginia	114	102	16	1.3%	1,489	27.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Evansville	Indiana	168	149	32	0.8%	1,467	39.4	9	1	9	0	0	0
Renton	Washington	153	143	28	0.9%	1,457	25.0	5	2	5	0	0	0
Albany	New York	177	156	21	1.0%	1,448	25.3	11	3	11	0	0	0
Hagerstown	Maryland	148	136	17	1.5%	1,439	22.7	3	3	3	0	0	1
Escondido	California	125	117	30	0.8%	1,436	39.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Yuma	Arizona	124	109	16	1.0%	1,435	22.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Naperville	Illinois	126	114	29	0.9%	1,418	33.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Schenectady	New York	161	140	29	0.9%	1,418	32.1	8	2	8	0	0	0
South Bend	Indiana	164	146	21	1.0%	1,413	22.1	10	1	10	0	0	0
Jackson	Mississippi	170	153	31	0.8%	1,411	36.4	11	1	11	0	0	0
Las Cruces	New Mexico	159	141	20	0.9%	1,401	27.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Mesquite	Texas	125	115	18	1.0%	1,390	23.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Allentown	Pennsylvania	148	131	34	0.8%	1,388	38.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Denton	Texas	149	136	28	0.9%	1,387	29.5	6	2	6	0	0	0
Kalamazoo	Michigan	150	134	31	0.8%	1,379	34.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Youngstown	Ohio	164	144	33	0.9%	1,377	31.5	12	3	12	0	0	0
Pomona	California	127	113	30	0.9%	1,359	33.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Manassas	Virginia	148	130	28	0.9%	1,355	29.3	4	3	4	0	0	0
Lansing	Michigan	166	149	35	0.8%	1,351	36.9	7	3	8	0	0	0
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	145	131	24	0.9%	1,346	26.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Melbourne	Florida	151	129	29	0.9%	1,326	34.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Olathe	Kansas	118	107	25	0.9%	1,302	30.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Mcallen	Texas	131	118	25	0.9%	1,296	27.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Flint	Michigan	150	129	29	0.8%	1,287	35.7	7	2	7	0	0	0
Waco	Texas	151	137	32	0.8%	1,286	36.8	9	1	9	0	0	0
West Valley City	Utah	123	110	23	1.0%	1,276	23.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lafayette	Louisiana	145	128	33	0.8%	1,273	39.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Santa Maria	California	132	121	24	0.9%	1,264	30.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Yakima	Washington	131	116	21	1.0%	1,254	22.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Fullerton	California	138	126	30	0.9%	1,253	28.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	California	149	133	28	0.9%	1,233	28.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Killeen	Texas	132	120	31	0.8%	1,231	36.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lake Charles	Louisiana	148	135	20	0.9%	1,224	25.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Canton	Ohio	175	163	32	0.8%	1,220	36.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Frederick	Maryland	125	107	23	0.9%	1,212	27.5	4	2	4	0	0	0
Billings	Montana	152	131	26	0.9%	1,206	31.5	4	2	4	0	0	0
Spring Hill	Florida	157	143	23	1.0%	1,205	23.2	5	2	5	0	0	0
West Jordan	Utah	127	116	18	1.0%	1,201	21.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Simi Valley	California	116	104	23	0.9%	1,197	26.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Toms River	New Jersey	140	127	21	1.0%	1,189	22.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	137	120	24	0.9%	1,185	28.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bloomington	Indiana	148	132	28	0.9%	1,179	30.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Saginaw	Michigan	147	127	29	0.9%	1,163	30.4	7	2	7	0	0	0
Hemet	California	135	121	27	0.9%	1,153	29.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Murrieta	California	120	109	29	0.9%	1,151	32.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lawrence	Kansas	137	120	18	1.1%	1,139	25.6	5	3	5	0	0	0
Arvada	Colorado	153	142	30	0.9%	1,137	33.0	5	3	5	0	0	0
Panama City	Florida	148	127	21	0.9%	1,135	28.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Tyler	Texas	155	143	38	0.7%	1,135	46.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Carrollton	Texas	130	115	29	0.8%	1,134	35.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
High Point	North Carolina	133	120	26	0.9%	1,133	26.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Warren	Michigan	134	119	33	0.8%	1,125	36.0	5	2	5	0	0	0
New Port Richey	Florida	146	128	26	0.9%	1,118	26.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Metairie	Louisiana	135	119	33	0.8%	1,114	41.0	5	2	6	0	0	0
Boulder	Colorado	158	145	33	0.8%	1,112	33.0	6	3	6	0	0	0
Costa Mesa	California	112	105	18	1.0%	1,111	21.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bellingham	Washington	136	123	27	0.9%	1,111	30.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
San Leandro	California	127	114	18	1.0%	1,101	20.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lehigh Acres	Florida	174	155	22	0.9%	1,097	26.2	6	3	6	0	0	0
Redwood City	California	142	125	23	1.0%	1,096	23.3	4	3	5	0	0	0
Longmont	Colorado	130	120	32	0.8%	1,092	35.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Temecula	California	135	125	27	0.8%	1,088	34.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Victorville	California	127	114	31	0.8%	1,081	39.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Racine	Wisconsin	140	131	24	0.8%	1,070	34.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Charlottesville	Virginia	151	137	29	0.9%	1,069	34.0	5	3	6	0	0	0
Concord	California	140	130	28	0.8%	1,067	36.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lewisville	Texas	136	126	24	0.9%	1,062	33.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Joliet	Illinois	138	125	37	0.8%	1,055	37.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Palm Bay	Florida	137	119	20	0.9%	1,051	24.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Provo	Utah	131	118	25	0.9%	1,050	28.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Vero Beach	Florida	148	134	20	0.9%	1,049	28.2	6	2	7	0	0	0
Muskegon	Michigan	135	123	31	0.8%	1,045	37.6	5	3	5	0	0	0
Downey	California	131	117	28	0.9%	1,033	27.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Bend	Oregon	137	124	28	0.8%	1,030	32.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Vallejo	California	136	123	30	0.8%	1,021	36.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	134	118	32	0.8%	1,020	35.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Idaho Falls	Idaho	142	129	22	0.9%	1,019	25.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Duluth	Minnesota	178	156	22	0.9%	1,016	32.1	11	2	11	0	0	0
West Covina	California	138	123	22	0.9%	1,016	26.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Winter Haven	Florida	134	120	20	0.9%	1,010	24.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	90	16	1.0%	1,008	19.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Asheville	North Carolina	129	113	34	0.8%	1,000	43.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Fargo	North Dakota	144	129	31	0.8%	994	37.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Parker	Colorado	124	111	20	1.0%	989	20.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Carlsbad	California	129	120	25	0.9%	988	32.8	4	2	4	0	0	0
Menifee	California	149	134	27	0.9%	988	28.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Lynnwood	Washington	135	120	27	0.9%	984	28.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Nampa	Idaho	128	116	28	0.8%	975	35.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Norwalk	California	97	87	22	0.9%	974	27.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Appleton	Wisconsin	131	124	35	0.8%	970	39.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Hillsboro	Oregon	110	103	22	0.9%	970	25.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Ventura	California	121	107	30	0.8%	968	35.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Ypsilanti	Michigan	119	106	22	0.9%	959	29.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Redding	California	151	136	28	0.8%	958	34.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Grand Junction	Colorado	149	130	21	0.9%	957	28.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Lees Summit	Missouri	164	149	22	0.9%	957	28.2	6	3	6	0	0	0
Fairfield	California	119	106	33	0.8%	954	36.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Antioch	California	115	106	29	0.9%	952	33.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Sparks	Nevada	140	126	38	0.8%	950	38.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	108	103	22	0.9%	949	24.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lowell	Massachusetts	127	119	28	0.9%	948	33.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Santa Cruz	California	124	112	24	0.9%	944	28.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Elgin	Illinois	128	114	38	0.8%	939	41.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Kennewick	Washington	123	108	22	0.9%	937	24.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Waterbury	Connecticut	141	127	28	0.9%	931	33.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Palo Alto	California	137	127	25	1.0%	929	23.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Sandy	Utah	135	121	29	0.8%	927	35.3	4	3	4	0	0	0
Clinton Township	Michigan	124	114	23	0.9%	924	27.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Kenosha	Wisconsin	131	123	33	0.8%	924	37.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Indio	California	128	112	20	1.0%	923	24.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Meridian	Idaho	119	104	25	0.9%	923	30.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Elizabeth	New Jersey	128	115	27	0.9%	921	28.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Rialto	California	128	117	28	0.9%	921	32.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
El Monte	California	113	102	19	1.0%	919	21.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hesperia	California	116	103	26	0.9%	916	30.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Vista	California	125	116	39	0.8%	909	43.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	132	121	26	0.9%	903	26.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Greeley	Colorado	111	101	32	0.8%	902	40.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	121	108	25	0.9%	901	27.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Allen	Texas	114	107	34	0.8%	897	38.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Fort Pierce	Florida	178	161	20	0.9%	893	24.9	8	3	9	0	0	0
Chico	California	129	117	31	0.8%	892	39.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
O Fallon	Missouri	129	115	23	0.9%	892	26.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
South Gate	California	99	90	22	0.9%	884	26.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Morgantown	West Virginia	124	108	26	0.9%	882	26.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Vacaville	California	109	98	31	0.8%	878	35.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Davenport	Iowa	147	130	25	0.8%	875	35.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Elkhart	Indiana	126	116	29	0.9%	871	31.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	126	118	27	0.9%	867	32.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Broomfield	Colorado	135	121	34	0.8%	865	36.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Dearborn	Michigan	130	118	27	0.9%	862	27.8	4	2	4	0	0	0
Merced	California	123	112	28	0.8%	860	35.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Milton	Florida	131	117	27	0.9%	860	28.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Terre Haute	Indiana	148	131	25	0.9%	853	28.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Waukesha	Wisconsin	124	117	27	0.9%	847	31.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Champaign	Illinois	128	114	26	0.9%	846	29.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Missoula	Montana	152	136	24	0.9%	844	32.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Plainfield	Illinois	140	125	35	0.8%	833	34.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Gulfport	Mississippi	137	122	26	0.9%	832	33.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Pittsburg	California	95	88	27	0.9%	826	33.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Scranton	Pennsylvania	162	146	29	0.8%	818	35.1	8	5	8	0	0	0
Federal Way	Washington	119	106	34	0.8%	815	37.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	139	122	31	0.9%	813	32.3	4	3	4	0	0	0
Napa	California	113	94	27	0.8%	812	33.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chino	California	112	102	29	0.9%	812	33.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	123	114	34	0.8%	799	39.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Springdale	Arkansas	110	95	32	0.8%	783	38.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Holland	Michigan	100	87	31	0.8%	779	36.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Muncie	Indiana	150	137	32	0.8%	769	36.0	5	2	5	0	0	0
Livonia	Michigan	120	110	35	0.8%	746	40.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	112	102	33	0.8%	741	39.5	2	1	2	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	240	207	5	38.8%	953,212	7.2	62	2	64	0	2	63
San Diego	217	185	7	34.0%	458,388	9.6	36	4	38	0	2	21
Bakersfield	171	151	1	73.9%	413,493	3.7	11	1	11	1	1	11
Long Beach	156	140	1	70.0%	335,278	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Oakland	161	146	1	81.0%	333,456	2.9	14	2	20	4	7	20
San Jose	196	177	7	31.3%	328,180	7.8	28	1	28	0	0	28
Sacramento	204	178	10	23.3%	187,755	8.4	28	3	32	2	4	29
San Bernardino	148	131	4	65.6%	163,699	4.9	7	2	8	1	2	8
Fresno	183	166	9	22.1%	133,147	8.8	18	1	18	0	0	18
Hayward	135	122	4	67.9%	130,469	4.0	4	1	4	1	1	4
Salinas	144	131	3	65.5%	123,384	4.8	5	2	8	0	1	8
Madera	131	114	1	91.4%	94,082	3.3	3	3	5	2	2	5
Roseville	128	114	4	60.0%	83,876	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Torrance	145	131	5	45.7%	80,834	6.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Van Nuys	133	118	7	43.2%	76,827	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Visalia	130	117	5	50.0%	76,007	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Francisco	177	162	13	8.7%	75,432	12.7	28	2	28	0	0	3
Santa Rosa	144	129	7	29.5%	63,798	8.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Perris	125	110	6	50.0%	58,695	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Irvine	158	147	7	21.5%	57,441	8.7	9	2	10	0	0	10
Sunnyvale	141	131	5	35.8%	54,674	7.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
North Hollywood	127	117	8	34.7%	53,096	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bell Gardens	101	94	7	40.0%	40,973	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sylmar	101	94	7	40.0%	38,595	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Livermore	112	98	7	35.2%	33,926	7.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Pacoima	100	93	7	30.0%	31,740	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Tracy	149	136	7	25.9%	30,339	11.0	4	3	7	0	0	6
El Cajon	134	120	10	14.3%	24,582	17.0	3	3	3	0	0	1
Pasadena	136	123	10	14.3%	22,589	9.5	6	2	7	0	0	7
Stockton	176	155	18	5.3%	19,872	16.3	12	3	12	0	0	0
Inglewood	146	128	9	12.9%	17,256	13.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Ontario	127	114	15	9.0%	15,898	11.0	3	2	6	0	0	0
Clovis	125	113	11	12.1%	14,691	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Whittier	158	143	17	7.4%	14,575	26.2	6	3	6	0	0	1
La Puente	131	120	10	11.1%	13,095	16.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Berkeley	162	149	11	9.2%	11,744	25.1	9	3	9	0	0	1
Burbank	132	120	11	10.5%	11,382	12.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Orange	125	115	15	7.4%	10,773	12.6	5	2	10	0	0	1
Hawthorne	99	88	9	10.0%	9,684	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Anaheim	139	127	23	2.4%	8,854	19.4	7	1	7	0	0	0
Santa Clara	129	119	16	6.7%	8,465	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Elk Grove	137	122	13	4.4%	7,877	20.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Santa Monica	122	114	11	5.3%	4,964	14.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
San Mateo	131	118	15	3.4%	4,813	17.8	4	3	4	0	0	0
Chula Vista	149	137	16	1.8%	4,602	29.0	5	2	5	0	0	0
Santa Ana	135	123	27	1.0%	3,468	22.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Garden Grove	131	118	22	1.8%	3,241	22.2	5	2	5	0	0	0
Riverside	147	126	39	0.8%	2,975	38.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Compton	129	117	19	1.8%	2,504	23.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	113	107	18	2.4%	2,375	21.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Modesto	153	139	34	0.8%	2,216	36.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Corona	150	135	32	0.8%	2,161	34.2	5	2	5	0	0	0
Daly City	128	117	20	1.8%	2,095	21.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Fremont	126	115	28	0.9%	2,077	29.3	4	3	4	0	0	0
Fontana	118	106	33	0.8%	1,970	34.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Moreno Valley	128	115	28	0.9%	1,853	29.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Oxnard	137	122	29	0.8%	1,850	34.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Huntington Beach	129	117	26	0.9%	1,818	28.5	4	2	4	0	0	0
Oceanside	125	116	31	0.9%	1,719	33.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Rancho Cucamonga	129	117	21	0.9%	1,677	25.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Palmdale	134	120	24	0.9%	1,640	26.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Lancaster	131	114	26	0.9%	1,591	32.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Escondido	125	117	30	0.8%	1,436	39.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Pomona	127	113	30	0.9%	1,359	33.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Santa Maria	132	121	24	0.9%	1,264	30.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fullerton	138	126	30	0.9%	1,253	28.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	149	133	28	0.9%	1,233	28.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Simi Valley	116	104	23	0.9%	1,197	26.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hemet	135	121	27	0.9%	1,153	29.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Murrieta	120	109	29	0.9%	1,151	32.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Costa Mesa	112	105	18	1.0%	1,111	21.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
San Leandro	127	114	18	1.0%	1,101	20.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Redwood City	142	125	23	1.0%	1,096	23.3	4	3	5	0	0	0
Temecula	135	125	27	0.8%	1,088	34.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Victorville	127	114	31	0.8%	1,081	39.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Concord	140	130	28	0.8%	1,067	36.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Downey	131	117	28	0.9%	1,033	27.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Vallejo	136	123	30	0.8%	1,021	36.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
West Covina	138	123	22	0.9%	1,016	26.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Carlsbad	129	120	25	0.9%	988	32.8	4	2	4	0	0	0
Menifee	149	134	27	0.9%	988	28.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Norwalk	97	87	22	0.9%	974	27.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Ventura	121	107	30	0.8%	968	35.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Redding	151	136	28	0.8%	958	34.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Fairfield	119	106	33	0.8%	954	36.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Antioch	115	106	29	0.9%	952	33.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
San Marcos	108	103	22	0.9%	949	24.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Cruz	124	112	24	0.9%	944	28.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Palo Alto	137	127	25	1.0%	929	23.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Indio	128	112	20	1.0%	923	24.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Rialto	128	117	28	0.9%	921	32.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
El Monte	113	102	19	1.0%	919	21.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hesperia	116	103	26	0.9%	916	30.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Vista	125	116	39	0.8%	909	43.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Chico	129	117	31	0.8%	892	39.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
South Gate	99	90	22	0.9%	884	26.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Vacaville	109	98	31	0.8%	878	35.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Merced	123	112	28	0.8%	860	35.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Pittsburg	95	88	27	0.9%	826	33.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Napa	113	94	27	0.8%	812	33.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chino	112	102	29	0.9%	812	33.5	2	1	2	0	0	0

Houston

ZIP	randstadusa.com	adeccousa.com	frontlinesourcegroup.com	murrayresources.com	burnettspecialists.com	claytonpersonnel.com
77088	5	4	7	6	2	1
77047	5	4	6	7	3	10
77037	5	4	6	7	9	2
77098	5	4	7	6	3	10
77027	2	1	3	4	5	7
77068	5	4	7	6	8	9
77078	5	4	7	6	9	8
77086	2	1	4	3	5	6
77035	5	4	6	7	8	10
77008	5	4	6	7	9	10
77004	5	4	2	6	9	10
77028	5	4	2	7	9	8
77059	5	4	7	6	3	10
77039	2	1	4	3	6	5
77019	5	4	3	7	2	9
77075	5	4	7	6	9	10
77077	2	1	3	4	6	7
77079	5	4	7	6	8	10
77099	5	4	6	7	8	10
77024	5	4	6	7	8	9
77095	5	4	7	6	8	9
77048	5	4	7	6	8	9
77044	5	4	7	6	9	8
77015	5	4	7	6	9	8
77017	5	4	7	6	8	10
77057	5	4	7	6	8	10
77055	5	4	7	6	8	9
77006	2	1	4	3	5	7
77026	5	4	1	7	10	8
77046	5	4	7	6	1	10
77066	5	4	7	6	8	9
77023	5	4	2	7	8	10
77094	5	4	7	6	8	10
77084	5	4	7	6	8	10
77013	2	1	4	3	5	6
77063	5	4	7	6	1	10
77053	5	4	6	7	8	9
77022	2	1	3	4	5	6
77072	5	4	7	6	3	10
77049	5	4	6	7	8	9
77045	5	4	7	6	1	10
77010	5	4	1	3	9	10
77018	2	1	4	3	5	7
77041	2	1	4	3	5	6
77009	5	4	2	6	8	9
77089	5	4	7	6	1	10
77032	5	4	6	7	8	9
77036	5	4	6	7	8	10
77085	5	4	7	6	10	9
77054	5	4	7	6	3	10
77058	5	4	7	6	8	11
77014	5	4	6	7	10	8
77067	5	4	7	6	8	9
77005	5	4	7	6	1	10
77076	5	4	7	6	8	9
77070	5	4	7	6	8	9
77060	5	4	6	7	9	3
77080	2	1	4	3	5	7
77050	5	4	7	6	8	3
77091	5	4	7	6	3	1
77071	5	4	6	7	8	10
77061	5	4	7	6	9	10
77020	5	4	1	7	9	10
77081	5	4	7	6	8	10
77030	5	4	7	6	8	10
77040	2	1	4	3	5	7
77090	5	4	7	6	9	8
77031	5	4	6	7	8	10
77051	2	1	3	4	5	7
77011	5	4	3	7	10	9
77042	5	4	7	6	1	10
77062	5	4	7	6	9	10
77082	5	4	7	6	9	10
77093	5	4	7	6	8	9
77073	5	4	6	7	11	8
77033	5	4	2	6	8	9
77043	2	1	3	4	7	6
77074	5	4	6	7	9	10
77064	5	4	7	6	9	10
77012	5	4	7	6	8	10
77002	5	4	2	3	8	10
77092	5	4	7	6	9	10
77069	6	4	5	7	8	10
77021	5	4	3	7	8	10
77083	5	4	1	6	8	12
77029	5	4	7	6	8	10
77034	6	4	5	7	1	11
77087	6	4	5	7	8	10
77003	6	4	1	7	8	10
77038	5	4	6	7	10	1
77007	6	5	2	8	9	11
77016	5	4	6	7	8	9
77065	2	4	7	6	9	8
77096	5	4	7	6	9	10
77025	6	4	5	7	9	10
77056	5	4	7	6	9	10

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Randstadusa

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 3,999 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Randstadusa Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (temp agency near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Randstadusa Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Randstadusa Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Randstadusa Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly