Orkin Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve orkin.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 8,492 Pest Control Services In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Orkin Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Orkin Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Orkin Report, November 2024 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
Texas
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Orkin Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	12,825	8,492	3	51.6%	166,562,325	4.8	27,379	32,654	814	39,500	7,679	16,458	34,685
Texas	2,075	1,545	3	58.4%	16,278,622	4.8	1,360	1,917	64	2,253	415	1,025	1,947
California	2,318	1,704	4	37.2%	14,555,330	7.2	1,166	1,740	68	2,060	31	314	1,592
Florida	1,804	1,407	4	56.1%	11,558,224	5.8	446	975	62	1,131	65	371	911
New York	1,729	1,351	4	40.9%	8,023,782	4.7	1,491	1,756	43	2,050	494	929	1,856
Illinois	1,359	1,063	2	60.0%	7,693,247	4.0	1,247	1,382	53	1,718	413	866	1,565
Ohio	1,335	1,083	4	55.7%	6,484,589	4.6	976	1,188	30	1,438	286	602	1,223
North Carolina	1,236	989	3	60.5%	6,144,214	4.3	683	802	46	1,003	178	423	919
Virginia	1,183	973	2	72.3%	6,084,127	3.5	723	891	41	1,088	275	582	1,041
Georgia	1,203	952	3	55.8%	5,745,263	4.8	574	726	47	876	148	378	748
Pennsylvania	1,463	1,167	4	40.9%	5,231,890	5.0	1,604	1,781	32	2,144	402	839	1,839
Michigan	1,224	977	3	49.4%	4,914,761	4.6	833	976	24	1,150	276	481	984
Maryland	927	768	2	71.7%	4,301,830	3.9	392	463	33	613	134	329	575
Indiana	1,791	1,452	2	61.3%	4,067,769	4.5	659	770	23	922	142	418	837
Tennessee	1,105	878	3	59.7%	3,966,558	4.4	514	622	26	741	139	313	686
Kentucky	1,114	905	1	77.2%	3,432,149	2.6	698	758	23	1,112	429	722	1,088
South Carolina	935	742	2	68.7%	3,405,955	3.5	347	422	27	565	125	292	543
Louisiana	952	784	1	71.9%	3,354,676	3.1	431	510	24	624	180	400	608
Colorado	1,133	920	3	58.5%	3,236,814	4.4	381	514	17	582	92	274	518
Wisconsin	1,134	921	3	56.0%	3,233,176	4.6	694	769	21	889	115	345	822
Missouri	1,193	962	3	52.8%	3,217,981	5.2	887	1,017	18	1,362	189	480	1,162
Alabama	1,078	854	1	64.3%	3,130,166	4.6	522	637	27	855	94	295	779
Arizona	1,068	854	3	42.7%	2,965,113	6.4	247	396	11	474	39	89	357
New Jersey	1,193	972	6	32.2%	2,861,954	7.1	537	593	13	742	15	111	534
Oklahoma	1,058	854	1	62.9%	2,466,479	4.4	557	646	20	740	75	351	677
Minnesota	1,051	850	4	42.1%	2,326,919	5.9	777	878	15	980	57	252	856
Washington	1,102	858	4	30.4%	2,210,142	6.4	451	587	12	643	89	198	489
Iowa	1,121	906	1	67.0%	2,100,667	3.7	890	933	20	1,137	347	589	1,084
Mississippi	926	775	1	69.7%	2,082,238	3.5	384	418	22	581	160	305	566
Massachusetts	968	764	5	29.2%	1,994,121	7.4	461	534	7	661	27	123	414
Nevada	713	592	2	67.5%	1,973,212	4.3	92	168	5	171	23	87	163
Arkansas	951	764	2	62.4%	1,865,170	3.5	553	587	15	698	232	396	661
Oregon	1,253	1,022	4	35.2%	1,435,298	7.1	355	414	9	476	91	143	360
Kansas	1,042	825	3	43.4%	1,261,539	5.1	616	692	13	833	131	271	720
West Virginia	976	830	1	68.5%	1,252,408	2.5	684	704	14	1,122	390	741	1,094
Nebraska	935	775	2	64.7%	1,232,456	3.4	524	581	10	682	263	347	677
Utah	855	704	3	40.4%	1,230,920	5.5	246	284	6	308	64	111	249
Connecticut	827	681	4	32.9%	1,176,751	6.4	234	279	6	316	19	79	240
Hawaii	559	476	2	76.4%	1,086,680	3.3	82	93	7	110	20	56	109
New Mexico	865	708	3	50.5%	1,054,781	5.0	327	361	11	438	89	159	379
Maine	1,170	1,003	1	59.7%	795,503	4.1	421	425	6	486	89	180	463
New Hampshire	715	615	4	51.1%	686,566	4.0	238	248	6	272	94	138	240
Idaho	892	734	3	40.4%	681,057	5.2	251	273	6	311	64	95	266
Rhode Island	480	401	3	48.7%	514,736	5.2	64	77	2	86	9	23	79
Vermont	695	596	1	75.1%	469,496	3.0	250	254	7	292	95	165	286
Delaware	545	463	5	47.5%	451,169	7.4	52	66	5	82	6	12	57
Montana	827	701	4	42.9%	447,626	4.4	348	361	5	402	155	204	352
North Dakota	732	609	2	57.9%	435,147	4.3	367	381	4	427	130	191	376
South Dakota	792	648	3	36.3%	313,528	6.2	359	370	5	397	89	136	281
Wyoming	765	637	4	43.5%	253,299	4.7	164	171	5	184	52	76	167
Alaska	767	648	6	31.2%	230,387	4.4	218	235	2	244	119	128	217

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	317	246	2	82.7%	2,636,696	2.8	96	5	102	3	74	102
Chicago	Illinois	272	215	2	78.8%	2,130,322	3.4	56	3	60	1	31	60
Miami	Florida	354	294	2	84.2%	1,581,602	2.6	55	6	63	4	48	63
San Antonio	Texas	274	216	2	83.1%	1,477,220	2.7	59	2	60	0	46	60
Los Angeles	California	313	259	5	53.8%	1,322,557	5.7	62	5	68	0	3	68
Las Vegas	Nevada	234	179	2	81.2%	1,255,915	2.6	43	1	43	0	34	43
Dallas	Texas	287	228	2	81.0%	1,128,346	3.0	48	4	50	0	35	50
San Diego	California	272	221	2	80.3%	1,082,365	3.1	36	1	36	0	26	36
New York City	New York	239	196	3	58.6%	949,762	5.2	47	1	47	0	0	47
Phoenix	Arizona	236	187	4	60.8%	881,963	4.9	42	1	42	0	0	42
Indianapolis	Indiana	290	238	2	89.0%	847,090	2.2	37	3	39	0	35	39
Denver	Colorado	313	262	2	74.9%	814,378	3.4	38	2	38	0	25	38
Fort Worth	Texas	225	177	1	86.5%	788,457	2.3	32	1	32	15	22	32
Atlanta	Georgia	311	254	2	77.0%	760,945	3.1	39	6	47	4	28	47
Jacksonville	Florida	281	231	2	85.6%	741,968	2.5	31	2	33	1	28	33
Columbus	Ohio	249	197	1	86.4%	731,277	2.0	30	3	33	17	23	33
Louisville	Kentucky	273	222	1	93.8%	713,719	1.5	32	3	35	26	27	35
El Paso	Texas	294	236	1	84.9%	669,670	2.1	24	3	25	15	15	25
Washington DC	District of Columbia	140	117	1	94.4%	645,697	1.5	28	1	28	23	23	28
Tampa	Florida	241	197	2	78.9%	625,813	3.1	27	2	28	0	18	28
Charlotte	North Carolina	238	198	4	68.6%	621,570	4.0	24	4	27	0	7	27
Saint Louis	Missouri	305	265	3	66.5%	609,734	4.1	45	2	61	4	18	61
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	327	271	2	73.3%	609,665	4.6	27	5	33	3	13	25
Orlando	Florida	275	227	4	61.1%	608,806	4.9	32	1	32	0	0	32
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	276	226	4	67.4%	546,871	4.4	29	3	31	0	5	31
Memphis	Tennessee	253	205	3	74.7%	519,115	3.4	26	1	26	0	18	26
Cincinnati	Ohio	254	201	4	63.0%	506,477	4.7	45	2	46	1	1	46
Baltimore	Maryland	257	213	2	80.1%	505,361	2.9	22	2	23	0	16	23
San Jose	California	248	199	6	48.0%	503,800	6.1	28	2	30	1	2	30
Brooklyn	New York	228	186	9	18.4%	478,822	9.5	37	1	37	0	0	30
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	267	218	3	70.0%	478,043	3.8	43	4	48	0	30	48
San Francisco	California	262	208	4	53.5%	465,409	5.6	28	3	33	0	2	33
Saint Paul	Minnesota	339	284	5	53.6%	429,040	5.9	30	7	48	1	6	41
Colorado Springs	Colorado	276	222	3	73.2%	427,073	3.6	30	2	31	0	24	31
Birmingham	Alabama	249	201	2	84.6%	422,956	2.5	30	3	31	5	23	31
Albuquerque	New Mexico	217	171	4	63.0%	413,053	4.6	17	1	17	0	5	17
Minneapolis	Minnesota	409	348	6	35.9%	390,411	7.6	51	7	72	0	1	56
Dayton	Ohio	322	272	1	81.1%	387,804	3.0	27	2	27	2	18	27
Portland	Oregon	237	193	6	40.7%	374,751	12.7	33	5	34	0	0	23
Raleigh	North Carolina	208	173	4	67.5%	369,183	4.5	15	2	16	0	1	16
Virginia Beach	Virginia	186	149	3	77.8%	350,185	3.2	12	1	12	0	9	12
Oakland	California	244	205	2	84.0%	345,692	2.5	14	1	14	0	12	14
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	322	270	8	21.9%	345,597	8.9	47	3	48	0	2	36
Tulsa	Oklahoma	204	169	2	81.3%	343,232	2.7	28	2	29	1	21	29
Aurora	Colorado	189	161	2	77.3%	336,466	2.9	11	1	11	0	8	11
Fresno	California	219	173	5	54.9%	330,467	5.5	18	1	18	0	0	18
New Orleans	Louisiana	235	193	3	75.7%	323,886	3.5	19	1	19	1	15	19
Buffalo	New York	296	243	4	56.3%	316,665	5.6	28	2	29	1	5	29
Saint Petersburg	Florida	212	180	1	87.5%	311,904	2.1	16	3	30	7	23	30
Austin	Texas	266	216	8	28.1%	305,283	8.5	44	3	46	1	2	37
Mesa	Arizona	194	160	5	56.6%	302,345	5.4	13	1	13	0	0	13
Richmond	Virginia	212	177	3	76.3%	298,351	3.7	15	2	16	0	11	16
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	262	214	2	78.6%	297,728	3.1	18	1	18	2	11	18
Fort Wayne	Indiana	205	164	1	92.6%	294,816	1.9	16	2	17	7	14	17
Long Beach	California	207	171	5	61.4%	293,852	5.0	12	1	12	0	1	12
Honolulu	Hawaii	196	157	3	70.5%	293,466	3.7	11	1	11	0	3	11
Alexandria	Virginia	147	121	2	82.3%	291,752	2.9	14	3	20	5	9	20
Hollywood	Florida	204	161	4	61.3%	287,107	4.9	9	3	10	0	4	10
Lincoln	Nebraska	246	200	1	99.1%	286,732	1.6	22	2	23	17	18	23
Katy	Texas	148	114	2	78.3%	269,299	3.0	4	2	6	0	4	6
Pompano Beach	Florida	225	182	2	72.3%	268,063	4.1	10	3	12	0	4	12
Omaha	Nebraska	257	208	6	48.4%	267,582	6.4	31	2	32	0	1	32
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	298	253	7	38.2%	260,389	7.5	39	6	51	0	1	45
Hialeah	Florida	193	164	2	70.9%	260,232	4.0	7	3	8	1	4	8
Columbia	South Carolina	187	153	3	74.9%	256,679	3.4	14	2	16	0	12	16
West Palm Beach	Florida	196	161	4	67.0%	248,234	4.3	12	1	12	1	2	12
Tucson	Arizona	272	218	8	27.4%	247,697	8.4	32	1	32	0	0	25
Detroit	Michigan	235	198	7	38.3%	245,536	7.3	25	1	25	0	0	25
Silver Spring	Maryland	143	120	1	80.5%	243,799	2.9	7	2	7	3	5	7
Spokane	Washington	211	169	4	67.0%	240,846	4.4	14	1	14	0	4	14
Laredo	Texas	171	134	2	88.4%	239,362	2.2	6	1	6	1	6	6
Spring	Texas	199	157	3	62.4%	237,686	7.3	8	3	9	0	4	6
Akron	Ohio	214	181	1	86.9%	234,897	2.4	17	1	17	10	12	17
Mobile	Alabama	268	217	2	85.8%	232,946	2.3	18	1	18	1	16	18
Toledo	Ohio	206	167	3	75.6%	232,444	3.6	15	1	15	0	12	15
Lexington	Kentucky	223	189	4	69.9%	223,587	4.1	15	1	15	0	6	15
Winston Salem	North Carolina	200	168	2	83.1%	219,529	3.0	9	2	10	1	7	10
Salt Lake City	Utah	224	187	6	44.7%	217,765	7.1	19	2	19	1	2	18
Chesapeake	Virginia	157	130	1	88.7%	210,974	2.0	6	1	6	4	4	6
Henderson	Nevada	145	110	2	69.7%	210,843	3.9	8	1	8	0	5	8
Nashville	Tennessee	216	168	6	46.0%	210,798	6.0	22	1	22	1	1	22
Bakersfield	California	214	168	8	36.6%	204,580	7.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Scottsdale	Arizona	192	161	3	68.4%	203,987	3.8	11	2	11	0	6	11
Knoxville	Tennessee	223	179	5	52.5%	202,980	5.9	17	2	18	0	1	18
Little Rock	Arkansas	195	163	1	92.4%	201,449	1.8	12	2	14	8	9	14
Fayetteville	North Carolina	211	172	2	81.0%	197,653	3.1	8	1	8	0	5	8
Wichita	Kansas	213	171	6	47.3%	197,651	6.3	26	2	27	0	1	27
Pensacola	Florida	212	165	2	72.5%	194,442	3.5	13	1	13	1	6	13
Lawrenceville	Georgia	134	109	3	75.9%	194,427	4.0	4	2	5	1	1	5
Garland	Texas	140	109	3	80.0%	190,343	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Norfolk	Virginia	205	168	3	76.6%	188,173	3.5	14	1	14	0	10	14
Augusta	Georgia	172	133	2	91.8%	187,591	1.9	8	2	9	2	8	9
Littleton	Colorado	233	190	3	56.2%	182,977	5.2	10	2	14	0	4	14
Shreveport	Louisiana	197	156	2	81.7%	182,321	2.8	12	2	13	0	9	13
Glendale	Arizona	187	151	4	58.8%	179,134	5.0	9	2	9	0	0	9
Montgomery	Alabama	198	158	2	84.8%	177,974	2.2	13	2	16	1	12	16
Madison	Wisconsin	229	186	5	60.0%	176,912	5.0	14	1	14	0	0	14
Chattanooga	Tennessee	235	195	2	84.8%	176,247	2.7	15	3	17	1	11	17
Kissimmee	Florida	201	160	3	60.3%	174,207	5.1	7	2	8	0	0	8
Arlington	Texas	177	140	6	43.6%	173,049	6.9	12	1	12	0	0	12
Eugene	Oregon	160	126	2	83.0%	168,467	3.0	6	1	6	0	4	6
Seattle	Washington	255	211	10	17.5%	167,544	9.9	35	3	39	0	0	22
Cleveland	Ohio	279	239	9	22.3%	167,475	9.0	29	5	54	1	5	28
Irving	Texas	159	129	3	68.9%	165,785	4.2	6	1	6	0	4	6
Newport News	Virginia	157	124	1	93.4%	165,038	1.9	7	1	7	3	6	7
Fredericksburg	Virginia	122	99	1	94.8%	164,961	1.6	5	1	5	4	4	5
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	183	149	1	97.2%	164,673	1.2	9	2	10	8	9	10
Macon	Georgia	191	157	1	99.8%	163,368	1.3	9	1	9	8	8	9
Springfield	Missouri	170	134	4	70.0%	161,263	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Green Bay	Wisconsin	192	158	2	86.5%	158,528	2.3	7	1	7	1	6	7
Boca Raton	Florida	195	162	2	70.6%	156,892	3.8	9	1	9	0	4	9
Tallahassee	Florida	191	154	4	54.2%	156,230	5.4	10	1	10	0	0	10
Durham	North Carolina	156	128	6	53.5%	155,098	5.6	8	2	9	0	0	9
Peoria	Arizona	144	114	2	90.0%	154,890	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Henrico	Virginia	194	160	1	80.3%	154,692	2.7	7	2	9	3	8	9
North Las Vegas	Nevada	151	112	2	65.5%	153,203	4.6	7	1	7	0	5	6
Fairfax	Virginia	126	104	1	93.2%	152,490	1.8	4	3	6	2	4	6
Manassas	Virginia	118	97	1	100.0%	151,925	1.0	4	2	7	4	7	7
Odessa	Texas	162	127	1	94.8%	151,794	1.3	6	3	12	4	10	12
Woodbridge	Virginia	112	90	2	71.6%	151,561	3.7	3	1	3	1	1	3
Decatur	Georgia	162	131	2	83.6%	151,148	2.4	5	2	6	1	5	6
Gainesville	Florida	188	154	3	71.1%	148,939	3.9	10	1	10	0	7	10
Hyattsville	Maryland	123	101	1	93.8%	147,757	1.6	5	1	5	4	4	5
Boise	Idaho	180	145	5	57.5%	147,183	5.4	9	2	10	0	1	10
York	Pennsylvania	177	149	2	81.8%	146,986	2.6	7	1	7	0	6	7
Wilmington	Delaware	215	181	3	66.3%	145,528	5.6	10	1	10	2	4	9
Evansville	Indiana	192	155	3	78.0%	143,875	4.8	9	2	9	4	4	7
Lakeland	Florida	182	146	5	54.3%	140,054	5.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Fremont	California	133	103	4	60.0%	139,894	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rockford	Illinois	179	144	2	76.6%	139,726	3.2	9	2	11	0	6	11
Summerville	South Carolina	116	92	1	100.0%	138,942	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Greensboro	North Carolina	184	153	6	42.2%	138,259	6.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Huntsville	Alabama	193	153	3	70.2%	137,678	3.6	11	2	13	1	8	13
Homestead	Florida	198	163	2	73.2%	137,428	4.0	7	3	14	1	5	14
Clarksville	Tennessee	131	96	1	78.1%	137,261	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Lancaster	California	148	121	3	73.6%	135,809	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Syracuse	New York	236	198	5	59.8%	135,585	5.0	15	1	15	0	1	15
Anaheim	California	171	142	7	36.7%	135,364	6.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Yonkers	New York	159	130	3	74.6%	134,713	3.8	5	1	5	0	3	5
West Valley City	Utah	143	119	1	100.0%	132,868	1.0	3	3	5	3	3	5
Palmdale	California	169	137	3	76.0%	132,867	4.0	4	1	4	0	2	4
Santa Ana	California	169	137	8	37.2%	132,822	7.8	6	2	7	0	1	5
Humble	Texas	127	105	2	79.6%	132,544	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Brownsville	Texas	137	105	4	65.4%	131,565	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lake Charles	Louisiana	172	143	1	100.0%	130,705	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Roanoke	Virginia	215	182	3	77.1%	130,643	3.2	10	1	10	1	7	10
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	154	120	4	70.0%	130,448	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lafayette	Louisiana	160	130	3	81.0%	130,059	2.8	5	2	6	0	5	6
Killeen	Texas	137	110	1	86.0%	129,211	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Cypress	Texas	119	95	3	74.5%	127,038	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Edmond	Oklahoma	156	120	1	73.4%	126,073	3.6	5	2	6	0	4	6
Plano	Texas	141	116	6	41.2%	125,959	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Charleston	South Carolina	198	157	4	63.6%	125,281	4.6	10	2	15	1	3	15
Grand Prairie	Texas	133	104	3	65.0%	123,782	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	159	129	1	88.5%	123,455	2.2	6	1	6	1	5	6
Lansing	Michigan	189	153	4	74.8%	122,869	3.6	7	2	8	1	1	8
Schenectady	New York	191	164	2	75.8%	122,807	3.1	8	1	8	0	5	8
Lake Worth	Florida	188	154	2	59.4%	122,675	5.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	142	108	1	100.0%	122,640	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Gaithersburg	Maryland	121	100	2	84.6%	122,375	2.4	5	3	11	0	7	11
Mckinney	Texas	133	104	4	64.0%	120,944	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waco	Texas	176	137	2	76.2%	120,533	3.0	9	1	9	0	6	9
Hayward	California	151	122	4	62.5%	120,098	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Fort Myers	Florida	197	162	6	47.2%	118,854	6.6	11	2	12	0	0	11
Tyler	Texas	193	155	2	75.7%	118,190	3.0	9	1	9	2	5	9
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	127	102	2	90.0%	117,448	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Saginaw	Michigan	181	152	2	90.0%	117,273	2.0	7	2	8	0	7	8
Savannah	Georgia	175	140	6	48.5%	117,091	5.8	10	1	10	0	2	10
College Station	Texas	140	111	2	94.9%	116,741	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Everett	Washington	137	114	4	70.0%	116,670	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	154	118	2	79.6%	115,873	3.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Topeka	Kansas	209	168	4	70.9%	115,853	3.9	18	2	20	0	2	20
Pearland	Texas	142	115	2	83.6%	115,040	2.5	2	2	2	0	2	2
Reno	Nevada	220	177	6	38.4%	113,961	7.4	12	1	12	0	0	12
Flint	Michigan	201	168	3	73.2%	113,816	3.6	7	1	7	1	4	7
Rochester	New York	258	214	9	24.1%	113,623	8.9	24	1	24	0	1	20
Sacramento	California	251	205	10	14.0%	112,692	10.3	28	2	53	1	1	25
Ashburn	Virginia	109	89	1	100.0%	112,307	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Midland	Texas	161	125	4	70.0%	111,992	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Arvada	Colorado	146	115	3	83.1%	110,850	2.6	5	1	5	0	5	5
Bowling Green	Kentucky	164	137	2	94.7%	109,375	1.3	4	1	4	3	4	4
Stockton	California	202	162	7	28.7%	107,302	8.0	12	3	15	1	1	12
Greenville	South Carolina	169	133	7	48.4%	106,176	5.9	9	2	11	1	2	11
Pacoima	California	98	76	1	100.0%	105,799	1.0	1	3	3	1	1	3
Athens	Georgia	168	139	3	84.1%	104,883	2.8	6	1	6	0	5	6
Davenport	Iowa	164	129	1	100.0%	104,863	1.0	6	1	6	6	6	6
Boston	Massachusetts	177	148	4	68.8%	104,462	4.6	14	1	14	0	0	14
Alpharetta	Georgia	161	131	4	54.9%	103,879	6.5	4	3	4	0	0	4
Falls Church	Virginia	144	121	1	85.7%	103,151	2.4	5	3	6	2	3	6
Costa Mesa	California	128	106	1	90.0%	102,378	2.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Beaumont	Texas	189	162	3	70.0%	101,879	3.8	8	1	8	0	6	8
Amarillo	Texas	217	173	6	43.6%	99,733	6.1	14	2	18	2	4	18
Naperville	Illinois	147	117	5	60.0%	99,484	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Paterson	New Jersey	152	123	4	68.1%	99,361	4.1	9	2	13	0	4	13
Naples	Florida	205	170	7	31.7%	99,356	8.2	14	2	15	2	3	11
Joliet	Illinois	148	122	2	75.5%	97,274	3.8	5	2	6	0	2	6
Independence	Missouri	183	150	2	78.4%	97,220	3.4	8	1	8	1	5	8
Delray Beach	Florida	157	131	2	81.0%	96,443	3.0	5	3	7	1	4	7
South Bend	Indiana	203	168	3	65.6%	96,286	4.0	10	2	11	0	5	11
Jackson	Mississippi	207	170	6	56.1%	95,493	6.1	11	1	11	0	1	11
Westerville	Ohio	110	83	1	100.0%	95,208	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Bloomington	Indiana	163	137	4	71.1%	95,023	3.3	6	1	6	0	2	6
Marietta	Georgia	170	138	8	28.7%	92,701	8.0	7	2	8	0	0	7
Miami Beach	Florida	165	135	2	80.0%	92,533	2.6	5	2	9	0	7	9
Midlothian	Virginia	139	114	1	95.5%	92,416	1.7	3	2	4	1	4	4
Clearwater	Florida	193	159	5	50.1%	91,862	5.8	9	3	15	0	1	15
San Angelo	Texas	145	111	3	82.7%	91,562	2.5	4	1	4	1	3	4
Plainfield	Illinois	147	113	1	92.7%	91,352	1.7	3	3	7	1	4	7
Terre Haute	Indiana	171	137	1	95.3%	90,462	2.0	6	1	6	4	4	6
Sarasota	Florida	212	169	7	36.1%	90,458	7.2	13	1	13	0	1	13
Rockville	Maryland	123	101	2	62.3%	90,241	5.0	4	2	5	1	1	5
Wichita Falls	Texas	183	142	1	88.4%	87,345	2.1	7	2	9	4	5	9
Anderson	South Carolina	142	109	2	88.8%	87,341	1.8	4	2	5	2	4	5
Gastonia	North Carolina	126	105	1	79.9%	85,517	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Gulfport	Mississippi	138	119	2	90.0%	85,246	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Champaign	Illinois	139	108	2	90.0%	85,110	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Covington	Georgia	133	104	1	91.7%	84,998	2.0	2	1	2	1	2	2
Keller	Texas	146	113	4	72.9%	84,757	5.0	2	2	3	1	1	3
Newnan	Georgia	115	90	2	90.0%	84,056	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Abilene	Texas	167	129	4	64.3%	83,708	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Oxnard	California	135	104	6	37.9%	83,444	7.5	4	2	6	0	0	6
Vista	California	131	104	3	69.6%	83,408	3.7	3	2	4	0	2	4
Waukegan	Illinois	113	89	3	85.5%	83,358	2.0	2	2	4	1	3	4
West Covina	California	151	125	2	74.9%	81,922	3.3	3	2	5	0	2	5
Rock Hill	South Carolina	133	106	4	70.3%	81,822	3.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Livermore	California	134	108	2	84.8%	81,578	2.5	2	2	3	0	2	3
O Fallon	Missouri	117	96	1	84.6%	81,574	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Ballwin	Missouri	108	88	2	85.9%	81,359	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	183	155	2	79.7%	81,339	2.8	6	3	10	1	6	10
El Cajon	California	155	125	5	47.2%	81,329	6.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Panama City	Florida	162	120	5	64.3%	81,261	4.5	6	2	7	0	1	7
Roswell	Georgia	120	95	3	80.0%	79,816	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Lithonia	Georgia	115	98	1	82.1%	79,465	2.5	2	3	4	1	2	4
Van Nuys	California	129	106	6	44.4%	79,012	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Spartanburg	South Carolina	152	124	4	70.0%	78,370	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hartford	Connecticut	164	134	4	62.6%	77,185	4.5	6	1	6	0	3	6
Englewood	Colorado	177	143	2	69.0%	76,951	4.0	4	2	4	0	2	4
Johnson City	Tennessee	169	135	3	79.6%	75,960	3.5	4	1	4	0	3	4
La Puente	California	139	113	3	64.4%	75,934	6.0	2	3	3	0	1	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	149	123	3	59.1%	75,819	4.0	3	4	6	2	4	5
Herndon	Virginia	119	96	2	80.8%	75,489	3.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Antioch	California	120	99	2	68.1%	75,440	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Daytona Beach	Florida	163	133	3	72.8%	75,049	4.8	5	3	7	0	3	5
Winter Haven	Florida	140	107	4	70.0%	74,815	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kent	Washington	162	135	7	46.0%	73,871	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pomona	California	133	107	5	46.7%	73,811	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lubbock	Texas	215	169	8	26.6%	73,537	8.3	14	3	22	0	2	12
New Port Richey	Florida	153	122	3	60.7%	73,294	5.0	4	2	5	0	2	5
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	138	118	2	74.0%	72,457	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Salinas	California	156	119	8	38.1%	71,680	8.6	5	2	5	0	0	4
Metairie	Louisiana	173	139	6	50.0%	71,126	6.0	5	2	6	0	0	6
Bronx	New York	224	187	15	4.9%	71,006	15.2	25	1	25	0	0	0
Providence	Rhode Island	196	158	6	34.5%	70,650	7.5	8	1	8	0	0	7
Grand Junction	Colorado	144	111	4	66.7%	70,346	4.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Orange	California	162	131	4	48.2%	69,850	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
North Hollywood	California	130	103	5	45.6%	69,831	6.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Richardson	Texas	133	107	5	60.0%	68,759	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Riverside	California	169	131	9	18.5%	68,624	9.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Cary	North Carolina	129	108	7	43.3%	67,309	6.8	4	2	6	0	0	6
Riverview	Florida	151	125	4	60.4%	67,292	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	147	113	7	34.3%	66,765	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hamilton	Ohio	145	115	6	48.2%	66,079	6.0	3	3	4	0	0	4
Milton	Florida	121	94	2	69.1%	65,420	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Visalia	California	141	108	6	43.0%	65,404	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Compton	California	148	126	4	47.1%	65,367	6.7	3	2	4	0	1	3
Muncie	Indiana	167	135	3	69.9%	64,845	4.4	5	1	5	0	2	5
Fort Pierce	Florida	191	156	4	66.4%	63,560	5.0	8	4	11	0	6	8
Annapolis	Maryland	181	150	3	65.3%	62,020	6.2	5	2	5	0	1	5
Bell Gardens	California	100	77	5	60.0%	61,460	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Puyallup	Washington	182	150	7	42.2%	60,332	7.4	5	2	5	0	1	4
Springdale	Arkansas	118	96	3	62.4%	60,191	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Sparks	Nevada	158	118	4	50.0%	59,630	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Maria	California	145	111	7	41.5%	59,363	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Des Moines	Iowa	182	153	8	26.5%	59,194	8.8	11	1	11	0	0	8
Appleton	Wisconsin	138	109	6	48.6%	59,114	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
High Point	North Carolina	166	141	6	48.1%	58,854	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bryan	Texas	167	129	5	59.7%	57,462	4.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
South Gate	California	96	78	4	60.0%	57,062	5.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
West Jordan	Utah	140	113	4	45.4%	56,077	6.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Ocala	Florida	194	151	8	23.6%	53,093	9.0	11	2	13	0	0	9
Concord	California	160	127	6	40.7%	52,951	7.5	4	2	5	0	1	5
Tacoma	Washington	256	216	11	15.9%	52,857	10.5	20	4	21	2	2	7
Sugar Land	Texas	150	120	8	30.8%	52,063	10.0	3	2	5	0	1	1
Manchester	New Hampshire	156	125	6	44.1%	51,176	5.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Coral Springs	Florida	118	92	6	52.3%	50,847	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	180	148	8	24.8%	50,333	9.2	6	3	9	0	0	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	190	157	6	50.4%	50,099	5.8	8	1	8	1	1	8
Kennesaw	Georgia	113	95	6	50.0%	49,565	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clovis	California	141	106	6	40.0%	48,554	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kansas City	Missouri	219	180	14	8.5%	48,349	11.3	49	4	90	0	1	21
Kalamazoo	Michigan	183	148	7	29.4%	48,249	8.7	7	2	7	0	0	6
Sylmar	California	98	78	6	50.0%	48,244	6.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Reading	Pennsylvania	193	162	9	22.4%	48,219	9.0	10	2	11	0	0	8
Carrollton	Texas	131	98	8	35.7%	48,098	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Gilbert	Arizona	144	124	8	20.0%	47,720	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Largo	Florida	155	124	7	44.1%	47,447	6.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Albany	New York	212	184	8	31.3%	47,408	8.0	11	3	13	0	1	10
Grand Rapids	Michigan	192	156	11	12.8%	47,156	10.3	12	2	19	0	0	9
Fort Mill	South Carolina	140	112	6	49.1%	46,665	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	129	104	4	47.5%	46,267	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Missouri City	Texas	147	121	5	43.1%	45,737	7.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Sandy	Utah	157	128	5	40.2%	44,408	7.3	4	2	4	0	1	2
Charlottesville	Virginia	160	132	7	35.6%	43,742	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elk Grove	California	147	121	8	23.4%	41,984	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Sunnyvale	California	164	127	6	27.3%	41,711	7.8	4	3	5	0	0	4
Renton	Washington	189	160	8	26.1%	40,409	8.8	5	3	6	0	0	4
Saint Charles	Missouri	136	114	8	28.9%	40,355	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	80	6	40.0%	40,305	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Overland Park	Kansas	171	137	9	21.8%	40,013	10.0	9	4	21	1	3	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	184	153	6	29.6%	38,847	8.2	5	2	8	0	0	4
Surprise	Arizona	150	119	8	28.1%	38,064	7.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Redwood City	California	148	115	6	33.1%	37,932	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Clara	California	137	107	8	30.0%	37,655	8.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Auburn	Washington	136	114	6	33.3%	37,608	8.0	3	2	4	0	0	3
Meridian	Idaho	131	105	9	35.7%	37,185	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chico	California	162	129	8	33.0%	36,938	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Asheville	North Carolina	134	101	8	27.9%	36,892	8.4	5	2	10	0	0	9
Broomfield	Colorado	141	113	7	35.1%	36,745	8.0	3	3	5	0	1	1
Clinton Township	Michigan	129	105	6	36.6%	36,667	7.3	3	2	5	0	0	5
Cambridge	Massachusetts	166	139	8	31.1%	36,012	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Woodstock	Georgia	113	90	9	35.2%	35,764	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hampton	Virginia	162	133	10	25.9%	35,311	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Santa Cruz	California	144	114	7	33.9%	35,308	7.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
San Marcos	California	112	90	7	35.1%	35,289	7.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Lehigh Acres	Florida	197	154	7	29.8%	34,881	9.8	6	3	11	1	2	3
Hagerstown	Maryland	163	130	6	35.5%	34,766	5.3	3	1	3	1	1	3
Bowie	Maryland	187	151	5	33.6%	34,322	10.5	4	5	8	1	1	2
Chandler	Arizona	149	123	12	12.6%	33,727	11.8	6	3	10	0	0	2
Madera	California	147	113	8	32.5%	33,428	7.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Staten Island	New York	178	147	16	7.0%	33,077	13.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Bridgeport	Connecticut	158	124	9	22.6%	33,066	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	4
Tempe	Arizona	148	127	10	16.2%	30,803	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Baytown	Texas	130	104	8	26.1%	30,686	10.3	3	3	4	0	0	1
Daly City	California	140	109	7	26.2%	29,948	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Florissant	Missouri	146	120	7	27.6%	29,929	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Buford	Georgia	107	87	7	30.0%	29,731	8.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Rancho Cucamonga	California	156	131	10	16.8%	29,601	9.3	4	2	5	0	0	4
Racine	Wisconsin	161	132	10	23.3%	29,325	9.6	5	3	7	0	1	2
Bradenton	Florida	190	150	13	11.6%	29,238	11.2	10	2	10	0	0	4
Hawthorne	California	99	76	7	30.0%	29,051	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Olathe	Kansas	113	92	9	20.0%	28,875	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Melbourne	Florida	158	121	9	18.5%	28,825	13.6	5	2	5	0	0	1
Pittsburg	California	98	77	6	30.0%	28,824	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Ontario	California	143	112	10	16.3%	28,751	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Chula Vista	California	145	114	12	11.0%	28,589	10.6	5	2	10	0	0	2
San Mateo	California	169	134	8	20.0%	28,408	9.3	4	2	5	0	0	3
Santa Monica	California	145	116	8	30.0%	28,323	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
El Monte	California	104	83	8	30.0%	28,113	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Oceanside	California	145	119	10	13.7%	27,440	11.8	4	2	6	0	0	2
Laurel	Maryland	180	151	9	24.0%	27,003	10.3	4	4	8	0	0	3
Corpus Christi	Texas	226	185	14	8.3%	26,876	11.6	18	1	18	0	0	7
Portsmouth	Virginia	168	136	8	27.5%	26,171	8.9	7	1	7	0	0	5
Newark	New Jersey	173	140	12	9.1%	25,519	11.0	9	2	17	0	0	5
Trenton	New Jersey	233	202	15	12.1%	25,156	10.5	11	4	16	0	0	7
Bothell	Washington	154	124	11	19.5%	25,073	10.0	3	3	4	0	0	1
Youngstown	Ohio	207	173	11	15.6%	24,523	15.6	12	3	20	0	0	2
Corona	California	167	137	12	9.3%	24,007	13.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Douglasville	Georgia	122	95	10	21.6%	23,810	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Simi Valley	California	106	85	8	18.2%	23,481	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Billings	Montana	158	125	9	17.0%	23,313	9.3	4	2	5	0	0	4
Whittier	California	181	149	15	11.9%	23,274	11.7	6	6	11	0	0	4
Round Rock	Texas	150	123	12	13.5%	22,673	12.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Downey	California	142	116	9	20.0%	22,580	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Fe	New Mexico	158	130	8	17.6%	22,527	10.4	5	1	6	0	1	1
Berkeley	California	216	184	9	17.5%	22,209	10.2	9	4	13	0	0	4
Lynchburg	Virginia	158	129	8	21.3%	21,776	11.5	4	2	5	0	1	1
Irvine	California	177	144	12	8.1%	21,611	15.8	9	5	13	0	1	1
San Bernardino	California	193	159	17	8.6%	21,573	11.3	7	5	11	0	0	4
Boynton Beach	Florida	151	125	10	12.3%	21,348	10.3	6	2	10	0	0	4
Inglewood	California	194	155	13	15.9%	21,332	11.2	5	3	8	0	0	1
Astoria	New York	155	135	12	14.8%	21,130	14.8	4	2	5	0	0	1
Fontana	California	122	101	12	8.8%	20,575	11.0	3	2	4	0	0	2
Ventura	California	130	104	11	17.7%	20,492	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Hemet	California	152	127	11	15.4%	19,886	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Jupiter	Florida	126	107	8	19.4%	19,121	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Ogden	Utah	181	151	13	9.5%	19,085	12.2	5	3	6	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	160	127	11	17.0%	18,389	9.7	3	3	5	0	0	2
Huntington Beach	California	148	122	15	9.1%	18,240	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Franklin	Tennessee	139	113	9	17.1%	18,176	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Yakima	Washington	164	131	9	13.9%	18,101	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Perris	California	130	109	10	14.8%	17,384	9.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	154	124	9	16.9%	16,973	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Torrance	California	183	149	16	9.4%	16,639	13.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Vancouver	Washington	196	162	15	5.1%	16,500	15.1	11	1	11	0	0	0
Escondido	California	137	107	13	9.0%	16,169	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Moreno Valley	California	156	125	13	7.7%	15,886	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Jersey City	New Jersey	170	140	15	6.0%	15,741	14.0	7	2	8	0	0	0
Frisco	Texas	113	91	11	9.0%	15,520	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Olympia	Washington	176	146	13	8.4%	15,269	13.2	6	2	7	0	0	1
Edinburg	Texas	145	113	10	9.8%	15,204	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Tracy	California	164	131	11	13.0%	15,192	10.8	4	3	6	0	0	1
Modesto	California	163	126	14	5.7%	15,028	14.4	7	1	7	0	0	0
Dearborn	Michigan	147	116	10	15.7%	14,946	9.8	4	2	5	0	0	3
Elizabeth	New Jersey	143	115	12	14.7%	14,733	10.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
Canton	Ohio	181	149	12	9.9%	14,615	10.8	12	3	24	0	0	4
Salem	Oregon	184	155	14	5.5%	14,597	14.1	7	4	8	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	California	170	141	12	10.7%	14,526	11.1	7	1	7	0	0	4
Warren	Michigan	160	130	10	10.6%	14,289	11.6	5	3	8	0	0	1
Denton	Texas	161	131	13	9.0%	14,211	11.2	6	1	6	0	0	2
Beaverton	Oregon	147	119	14	6.9%	13,820	16.0	4	3	4	0	0	1
Pueblo	Colorado	182	145	14	8.6%	13,664	11.3	7	2	8	0	0	0
Duluth	Minnesota	229	194	10	11.3%	13,237	10.5	11	2	20	0	0	3
Fullerton	California	149	121	12	8.9%	12,340	10.8	4	2	5	0	0	3
Garden Grove	California	158	130	14	7.0%	12,338	13.2	5	3	10	0	0	0
Waukesha	Wisconsin	143	120	11	12.8%	12,293	10.7	3	2	5	0	0	1
Cumming	Georgia	119	97	12	7.5%	12,217	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lewisville	Texas	126	103	12	10.2%	12,074	15.3	3	3	4	0	0	1
Muskegon	Michigan	150	120	11	9.2%	11,837	10.8	5	2	9	0	0	1
Stamford	Connecticut	152	121	11	9.1%	11,677	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	1
Fargo	North Dakota	159	132	10	9.5%	11,658	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Provo	Utah	140	113	9	10.0%	11,652	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ann Arbor	Michigan	161	134	11	6.9%	11,583	13.2	5	2	8	0	0	0
Erie	Pennsylvania	215	177	14	6.2%	11,418	13.8	13	1	13	0	0	0
Bend	Oregon	156	128	11	9.3%	11,390	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Redding	California	170	136	11	10.0%	11,312	9.8	4	2	6	0	0	4
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	171	134	13	6.2%	11,305	14.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Las Cruces	New Mexico	179	139	13	7.5%	11,216	11.1	7	2	9	0	1	1
Idaho Falls	Idaho	162	131	10	9.6%	10,472	10.3	4	2	8	0	0	3
Bellevue	Washington	166	135	15	7.1%	10,440	12.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Waterbury	Connecticut	158	126	13	9.6%	10,438	10.5	6	3	12	0	0	5
Norman	Oklahoma	145	117	13	8.4%	10,435	11.8	4	3	7	0	0	0
Palo Alto	California	154	123	11	10.7%	10,358	9.5	4	3	5	0	0	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	160	137	8	11.0%	10,304	10.5	4	2	6	0	0	3
Pasadena	California	163	140	15	6.5%	10,279	13.5	6	3	10	0	0	0
San Leandro	California	121	96	11	9.2%	10,267	11.0	3	2	5	0	0	1
Greeley	Colorado	130	100	11	9.0%	10,266	11.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
New Haven	Connecticut	169	138	14	7.9%	10,258	13.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Longmont	Colorado	126	101	12	7.8%	10,148	12.0	3	3	5	0	0	0
Mcdonough	Georgia	121	93	9	10.0%	10,146	10.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Indio	California	116	89	9	10.5%	10,070	11.5	2	4	4	0	0	1
Parker	Colorado	123	101	10	10.0%	10,028	10.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Elgin	Illinois	138	112	10	8.2%	9,981	11.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	148	127	13	8.0%	9,968	12.3	4	2	7	0	0	0
Apopka	Florida	119	90	10	10.0%	9,765	10.0	2	2	4	0	0	2
Ridgewood	New York	99	85	10	9.0%	9,605	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Norwalk	California	97	78	9	9.0%	9,530	11.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Rialto	California	138	113	11	8.8%	9,397	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hesperia	California	119	93	11	9.0%	9,343	11.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Merced	California	159	130	10	9.0%	9,279	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Cape Coral	Florida	153	123	14	5.1%	9,200	14.8	6	2	7	0	0	0
Fairfield	California	115	92	12	8.0%	9,139	11.5	2	3	3	0	0	1
Mesquite	Texas	141	108	13	6.2%	9,114	14.0	3	3	6	0	0	0
Edison	New Jersey	121	98	11	9.0%	9,074	11.0	3	3	6	0	0	0
Sterling Heights	Michigan	165	137	16	6.8%	9,067	13.3	4	5	8	0	0	0
Nampa	Idaho	128	104	11	7.8%	9,007	12.0	3	2	6	0	0	1
Burbank	California	173	149	11	8.3%	8,916	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Palm Bay	Florida	156	127	12	7.9%	8,821	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Anchorage	Alaska	238	191	17	3.6%	8,764	16.0	12	2	12	0	0	1
Missoula	Montana	172	143	11	9.0%	8,738	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Conroe	Texas	171	141	16	5.4%	8,700	14.6	7	4	8	0	0	0
Vallejo	California	154	128	13	7.0%	8,684	13.3	4	6	8	0	0	1
Morgantown	West Virginia	142	112	11	8.9%	8,523	11.0	3	2	6	0	0	2
Kenosha	Wisconsin	144	119	14	7.5%	8,517	12.8	4	2	5	0	0	0
Menifee	California	168	135	18	7.7%	8,513	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
New Braunfels	Texas	126	103	11	8.3%	8,510	11.5	2	2	4	0	0	0
Vacaville	California	119	93	11	8.1%	8,488	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Boulder	Colorado	161	129	12	6.4%	8,413	13.7	6	2	7	0	0	0
Allentown	Pennsylvania	169	136	14	4.9%	8,392	17.6	7	2	7	0	0	0
Frederick	Maryland	159	128	15	6.3%	8,356	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Santa Rosa	California	174	133	20	3.8%	8,250	16.7	6	2	6	0	0	0
Hillsboro	Oregon	111	87	13	7.9%	8,176	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Mission	Texas	132	100	17	4.4%	8,046	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Spring Hill	Florida	147	115	15	6.4%	8,039	13.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lawrence	Kansas	160	125	12	7.9%	8,019	13.0	5	4	9	0	0	0
Acworth	Georgia	127	104	12	8.0%	7,975	12.0	2	3	3	0	0	0
Kennewick	Washington	150	118	13	8.0%	7,908	11.7	3	3	5	0	0	1
Medford	Oregon	115	88	11	8.5%	7,896	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Mission Viejo	California	113	92	12	8.0%	7,869	12.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Napa	California	117	93	12	8.0%	7,733	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
New Bedford	Massachusetts	150	122	11	8.0%	7,585	12.0	4	3	8	0	0	0
Livonia	Michigan	121	99	11	8.0%	7,565	12.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Chino	California	123	99	12	8.0%	7,558	12.0	2	3	4	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	135	115	12	8.0%	7,521	11.3	3	3	5	0	0	1
Valdosta	Georgia	155	119	11	7.9%	7,456	11.6	5	2	6	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	154	124	11	7.7%	7,224	12.3	4	2	7	0	0	1
Yuma	Arizona	137	107	15	4.8%	7,143	15.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Holland	Michigan	121	97	11	7.5%	6,997	12.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Elkhart	Indiana	150	121	13	7.0%	6,996	13.0	3	3	6	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	138	118	13	6.4%	6,968	14.0	3	3	6	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	134	107	12	7.1%	6,860	12.7	3	2	6	0	0	0
Allen	Texas	116	90	13	6.1%	6,752	16.0	2	4	4	0	0	0
Carlsbad	California	141	117	15	5.9%	6,653	14.5	4	2	7	0	0	0
Murrieta	California	124	96	13	4.8%	6,404	18.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	127	100	13	6.4%	6,391	13.7	3	2	6	0	0	0
Flushing	New York	141	123	19	2.8%	6,025	19.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Toms River	New Jersey	139	112	16	4.8%	5,885	15.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Jamaica	New York	155	133	18	2.4%	5,835	18.8	6	3	7	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	155	124	14	5.4%	5,665	14.4	5	2	8	0	0	0
Mcallen	Texas	144	114	16	3.9%	5,556	16.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Vero Beach	Florida	173	139	17	4.7%	5,381	15.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Victorville	California	140	113	15	3.9%	5,298	16.0	3	3	4	0	0	0
Bellingham	Washington	127	104	13	4.2%	5,291	15.7	3	2	5	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	115	92	15	5.4%	5,117	14.0	2	3	4	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	98	84	13	5.0%	4,698	15.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Roseville	California	123	97	16	3.3%	4,624	21.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Temecula	California	145	121	14	3.2%	4,106	18.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Ypsilanti	Michigan	131	107	17	3.0%	3,207	17.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Deltona	Florida	125	99	17	2.5%	2,379	17.5	2	2	4	0	0	0
Worcester	Massachusetts	169	140	22	1.0%	1,776	23.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Lowell	Massachusetts	147	122	17	1.3%	1,452	20.0	4	2	7	0	0	0

Texas

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	317	246	2	82.7%	2,636,696	2.8	96	5	102	3	74	102
San Antonio	274	216	2	83.1%	1,477,220	2.7	59	2	60	0	46	60
Dallas	287	228	2	81.0%	1,128,346	3.0	48	4	50	0	35	50
Fort Worth	225	177	1	86.5%	788,457	2.3	32	1	32	15	22	32
El Paso	294	236	1	84.9%	669,670	2.1	24	3	25	15	15	25
Austin	266	216	8	28.1%	305,283	8.5	44	3	46	1	2	37
Katy	148	114	2	78.3%	269,299	3.0	4	2	6	0	4	6
Laredo	171	134	2	88.4%	239,362	2.2	6	1	6	1	6	6
Spring	199	157	3	62.4%	237,686	7.3	8	3	9	0	4	6
Garland	140	109	3	80.0%	190,343	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Arlington	177	140	6	43.6%	173,049	6.9	12	1	12	0	0	12
Irving	159	129	3	68.9%	165,785	4.2	6	1	6	0	4	6
Odessa	162	127	1	94.8%	151,794	1.3	6	3	12	4	10	12
Humble	127	105	2	79.6%	132,544	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Brownsville	137	105	4	65.4%	131,565	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Killeen	137	110	1	86.0%	129,211	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Cypress	119	95	3	74.5%	127,038	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Plano	141	116	6	41.2%	125,959	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Grand Prairie	133	104	3	65.0%	123,782	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Mckinney	133	104	4	64.0%	120,944	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waco	176	137	2	76.2%	120,533	3.0	9	1	9	0	6	9
Tyler	193	155	2	75.7%	118,190	3.0	9	1	9	2	5	9
College Station	140	111	2	94.9%	116,741	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Pearland	142	115	2	83.6%	115,040	2.5	2	2	2	0	2	2
Midland	161	125	4	70.0%	111,992	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Beaumont	189	162	3	70.0%	101,879	3.8	8	1	8	0	6	8
Amarillo	217	173	6	43.6%	99,733	6.1	14	2	18	2	4	18
San Angelo	145	111	3	82.7%	91,562	2.5	4	1	4	1	3	4
Wichita Falls	183	142	1	88.4%	87,345	2.1	7	2	9	4	5	9
Keller	146	113	4	72.9%	84,757	5.0	2	2	3	1	1	3
Abilene	167	129	4	64.3%	83,708	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lubbock	215	169	8	26.6%	73,537	8.3	14	3	22	0	2	12
Richardson	133	107	5	60.0%	68,759	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bryan	167	129	5	59.7%	57,462	4.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Sugar Land	150	120	8	30.8%	52,063	10.0	3	2	5	0	1	1
Carrollton	131	98	8	35.7%	48,098	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Missouri City	147	121	5	43.1%	45,737	7.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Baytown	130	104	8	26.1%	30,686	10.3	3	3	4	0	0	1
Corpus Christi	226	185	14	8.3%	26,876	11.6	18	1	18	0	0	7
Round Rock	150	123	12	13.5%	22,673	12.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Frisco	113	91	11	9.0%	15,520	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Edinburg	145	113	10	9.8%	15,204	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Denton	161	131	13	9.0%	14,211	11.2	6	1	6	0	0	2
Lewisville	126	103	12	10.2%	12,074	15.3	3	3	4	0	0	1
Mesquite	141	108	13	6.2%	9,114	14.0	3	3	6	0	0	0
Conroe	171	141	16	5.4%	8,700	14.6	7	4	8	0	0	0
New Braunfels	126	103	11	8.3%	8,510	11.5	2	2	4	0	0	0
Mission	132	100	17	4.4%	8,046	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Allen	116	90	13	6.1%	6,752	16.0	2	4	4	0	0	0
Longview	155	124	14	5.4%	5,665	14.4	5	2	8	0	0	0
Mcallen	144	114	16	3.9%	5,556	16.3	3	2	3	0	0	0

Houston

ZIP	orkin.com	yelp.com	angieslist.com	homeadvisor.com	johnmooreservices.com	preventivepesthouston.com
77088	2	1	3	5	4	6
77047	2	4	6	8	7	9
77037	2	1	3	4	5	6
77098	2	1	3	4	5	6
77027	2	1	3	4	5	6
77068	1	4	5	6	7	9
77078	2	1	3	5	6	7
77086	2	1	3	4	5	6
77035	5	4	6	3	9	10
77008	2	1	3	4	5	6
77004	2	1	3	4	5	6
77028	2	1	4	5	6	7
77059	5	4	6	7	8	3
77039	2	1	3	5	7	6
77019	2	1	3	4	5	6
77075	2	1	4	6	5	7
77077	3	1	4	6	7	8
77079	2	1	3	4	5	6
77099	5	4	7	9	8	10
77024	2	1	3	4	5	6
77095	2	1	4	5	6	7
77048	2	1	3	4	5	6
77044	2	1	3	4	6	5
77015	2	1	4	5	6	7
77017	2	1	3	4	5	6
77057	2	1	4	5	6	7
77055	2	1	3	4	5	6
77006	5	4	6	7	8	9
77026	2	1	4	5	6	7
77046	2	1	3	4	5	6
77066	2	1	3	4	5	6
77023	2	1	3	4	5	6
77094	2	1	3	5	4	6
77084	2	1	4	7	6	8
77013	2	1	3	4	5	6
77063	2	1	3	4	5	6
77053	2	1	4	6	5	7
77022	2	1	3	4	5	6
77072	5	4	6	7	8	9
77049	2	1	3	4	5	6
77045	5	4	6	8	7	9
77010	2	1	3	5	4	6
77018	5	4	6	7	8	9
77041	2	1	3	4	5	6
77009	6	4	7	9	8	10
77089	2	1	3	4	5	6
77032	2	1	3	5	4	6
77036	2	1	3	5	4	6
77085	2	1	4	5	6	7
77054	2	1	3	6	5	7
77058	5	4	6	2	8	9
77014	1	4	6	7	8	9
77067	5	4	6	3	8	9
77005	2	1	3	4	5	6
77076	5	4	6	7	8	9
77070	2	1	3	4	5	6
77060	2	1	3	4	5	6
77080	2	1	3	4	5	6
77050	5	4	6	7	8	9
77091	2	1	3	4	5	6
77071	5	4	6	3	7	9
77061	2	1	3	5	4	6
77020	5	4	6	7	8	9
77081	5	4	6	7	8	9
77030	5	4	6	7	8	9
77040	2	1	3	4	5	6
77090	1	4	6	7	8	9
77031	5	4	6	7	8	9
77051	2	1	3	4	5	6
77011	2	1	3	4	5	6
77042	2	1	3	4	5	6
77062	3	1	4	5	6	7
77082	2	1	3	4	5	6
77093	2	1	3	5	4	6
77073	5	4	6	7	8	9
77033	5	4	6	8	9	10
77043	2	1	3	4	5	6
77074	2	1	3	5	4	6
77064	2	1	3	4	5	6
77012	2	1	3	4	5	6
77002	2	1	3	4	5	6
77092	2	1	3	4	5	6
77069	2	1	3	4	5	6
77021	5	4	7	8	9	10
77083	2	1	3	5	4	6
77029	2	1	3	4	5	6
77034	5	4	6	7	8	1
77087	2	1	4	5	6	7
77003	2	1	3	4	5	6
77038	2	1	3	4	5	6
77007	3	1	4	5	6	7
77016	2	1	3	4	5	6
77065	5	4	6	7	8	9
77096	2	1	3	5	4	6
77025	5	4	6	8	7	9
77056	5	4	6	7	8	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Orkin

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 8,492 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Orkin Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (pest control near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Orkin Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Orkin Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Orkin Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly