Lesmills Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve lesmills.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 13,305 Gyms In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Lesmills Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Lesmills Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Lesmills Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Brooklyn
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Lesmills Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	34,882	13,305	65	0.5%	1,707,352	55.5	20,678	24,238	6	24,238	0	0	0
California	4,415	2,035	73	0.5%	202,016	59.5	895	1,279	2	1,279	0	0	0
Texas	3,524	1,604	81	0.5%	130,332	61.3	1,014	1,394	4	1,394	0	0	0
Florida	2,755	1,297	86	0.5%	108,704	59.7	358	717	1	717	0	0	0
New York	2,962	1,383	66	0.5%	101,253	57.6	1,105	1,291	1	1,291	0	0	0
Illinois	2,798	1,312	77	0.5%	65,368	54.8	951	1,040	1	1,040	0	0	0
Pennsylvania	2,688	1,340	81	0.5%	65,336	57.1	1,156	1,278	2	1,278	0	0	0
Georgia	2,016	985	91	0.6%	60,206	55.5	439	550	1	550	0	0	0
Ohio	2,338	1,162	81	0.5%	59,707	54.9	756	902	1	902	0	0	0
Michigan	2,051	980	74	0.6%	56,484	52.0	635	726	2	726	0	0	0
North Carolina	2,089	990	85	0.5%	54,211	56.5	514	594	2	594	0	0	0
Virginia	1,936	921	75	0.6%	47,905	54.6	546	662	2	662	0	0	0
New Jersey	1,775	883	80	0.5%	47,284	57.5	391	429	1	429	0	0	0
Tennessee	1,632	818	93	0.6%	36,639	56.5	384	459	1	459	0	0	0
Washington	1,750	891	106	0.5%	36,508	57.4	345	432	2	432	0	0	0
Indiana	2,878	1,368	89	0.5%	35,346	55.7	508	581	2	581	0	0	0
Missouri	2,086	1,040	81	0.6%	35,224	53.2	664	764	2	764	0	0	0
Arizona	1,335	675	71	0.5%	35,044	58.8	196	290	1	290	0	0	0
Massachusetts	1,836	950	105	0.5%	33,826	60.8	322	368	1	368	0	0	0
Wisconsin	1,895	867	94	0.6%	32,293	52.3	540	584	2	584	0	0	0
Minnesota	1,926	897	73	0.6%	30,846	53.0	580	648	2	648	0	0	0
Maryland	1,303	702	94	0.5%	30,543	56.6	296	342	1	342	0	0	0
Alabama	1,536	786	83	0.6%	29,536	53.2	397	484	2	484	0	0	0
Colorado	1,660	805	101	0.5%	27,834	59.6	282	376	1	376	0	0	0
South Carolina	1,343	677	87	0.5%	26,467	58.3	261	311	3	311	0	0	0
Louisiana	1,308	661	92	0.5%	25,064	54.6	323	374	2	374	0	0	0
Kentucky	1,635	819	90	0.5%	23,962	52.1	539	576	3	576	0	0	0
Oklahoma	1,441	721	82	0.6%	23,044	53.0	434	494	3	494	0	0	0
Oregon	1,772	895	106	0.5%	19,547	58.1	264	297	1	297	0	0	0
Iowa	1,772	802	80	0.6%	18,795	51.8	674	703	2	703	0	0	0
Arkansas	1,465	727	85	0.6%	18,307	49.6	426	448	2	448	0	0	0
Connecticut	1,271	666	124	0.5%	18,229	56.7	173	199	1	199	0	0	0
Mississippi	1,293	676	82	0.6%	17,449	51.0	302	321	2	321	0	0	0
Kansas	1,515	733	79	0.6%	16,703	54.5	455	506	1	506	0	0	0
Utah	1,087	585	96	0.5%	15,975	55.9	179	200	1	200	0	0	0
Nevada	807	447	81	0.5%	13,432	63.9	69	123	1	123	0	0	0
West Virginia	1,171	643	68	0.6%	11,223	52.2	523	535	2	535	0	0	0
New Mexico	1,079	594	82	0.5%	11,134	55.1	246	269	1	269	0	0	0
Nebraska	1,396	751	74	0.6%	11,099	52.2	408	452	4	452	0	0	0
Idaho	1,114	618	90	0.6%	9,590	53.6	191	206	1	206	0	0	0
Maine	1,614	916	93	0.6%	8,370	50.5	312	315	1	315	0	0	0
Hawaii	620	357	81	0.5%	7,317	51.5	64	72	1	72	0	0	0
New Hampshire	1,030	586	105	0.5%	7,193	56.2	164	169	1	169	0	0	0
Rhode Island	513	314	87	0.6%	6,122	57.9	48	56	1	56	0	0	0
Montana	1,115	594	98	0.6%	5,788	52.3	264	271	1	271	0	0	0
South Dakota	970	532	74	0.6%	5,157	53.1	268	276	1	276	0	0	0
Delaware	606	376	81	0.5%	5,087	54.1	40	50	1	50	0	0	0
North Dakota	794	445	67	0.6%	4,693	52.0	282	293	2	293	0	0	0
Alaska	942	535	76	0.6%	4,546	48.2	175	187	2	187	0	0	0
Vermont	863	495	84	0.6%	3,841	50.9	194	195	1	195	0	0	0
Wyoming	826	452	91	0.5%	3,059	52.7	124	127	2	127	0	0	0

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Brooklyn	New York	221	141	73	0.4%	10,600	75.9	32	1	32
Houston	Texas	324	199	78	0.3%	10,572	80.6	72	1	72
Chicago	Illinois	299	179	83	0.3%	9,145	83.6	41	1	41
Los Angeles	California	353	225	76	0.3%	8,429	77.9	40	1	40
San Antonio	Texas	343	208	68	0.4%	7,877	68.6	44	1	44
Miami	Florida	377	222	88	0.4%	7,826	72.6	42	1	42
Bronx	New York	234	156	56	0.5%	7,337	62.0	19	1	19
New York City	New York	323	196	70	0.5%	7,321	73.1	36	1	36
Las Vegas	Nevada	288	157	65	0.4%	6,493	71.8	31	1	31
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	260	163	85	0.4%	5,903	75.8	35	1	35
Minneapolis	Minnesota	405	256	64	0.5%	5,882	62.8	40	1	40
Phoenix	Arizona	304	194	68	0.4%	5,591	74.0	25	1	25
Saint Louis	Missouri	320	215	68	0.6%	5,155	60.0	34	1	34
Atlanta	Georgia	379	246	71	0.5%	5,140	63.5	34	1	34
Orlando	Florida	310	194	57	0.5%	4,879	66.9	24	1	24
Dallas	Texas	274	162	80	0.3%	4,675	80.1	40	1	40
Denver	Colorado	335	212	79	0.4%	4,473	76.7	29	1	29
San Jose	California	240	157	69	0.4%	4,464	69.9	21	1	21
Tampa	Florida	289	194	57	0.6%	4,453	58.2	24	1	24
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	313	205	50	0.6%	4,309	59.2	35	1	35
El Paso	Texas	263	166	64	0.5%	4,252	65.6	19	1	19
San Diego	California	291	189	80	0.3%	4,149	80.6	26	1	26
Cleveland	Ohio	264	169	66	0.5%	4,076	60.3	24	1	24
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	309	198	68	0.5%	3,962	67.6	18	1	18
San Francisco	California	253	153	67	0.5%	3,936	71.5	22	1	22
Indianapolis	Indiana	316	188	78	0.4%	3,815	67.8	25	1	25
Washington DC	District of Columbia	240	156	59	0.5%	3,712	65.3	22	1	22
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	269	170	83	0.4%	3,649	71.7	20	1	20
Charlotte	North Carolina	236	153	67	0.4%	3,597	71.6	17	1	17
Jacksonville	Florida	282	191	71	0.4%	3,479	71.5	22	1	22
Austin	Texas	276	175	85	0.3%	3,375	80.2	32	1	32
Saint Paul	Minnesota	367	247	77	0.4%	3,331	71.0	15	1	15
Seattle	Washington	270	173	89	0.3%	3,274	81.3	24	1	24
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	278	186	74	0.5%	3,175	69.6	33	1	33
Portland	Oregon	234	152	84	0.3%	3,112	81.8	20	1	20
Memphis	Tennessee	260	169	77	0.4%	3,059	68.3	19	1	19
Fresno	California	235	159	62	0.5%	2,996	62.1	14	1	14
Omaha	Nebraska	252	175	55	0.5%	2,992	67.4	23	1	23
Fort Worth	Texas	234	139	73	0.3%	2,972	79.8	16	1	16
Detroit	Michigan	204	130	74	0.5%	2,959	67.5	19	1	19
Tucson	Arizona	248	163	84	0.3%	2,948	76.6	19	1	19
Hialeah	Florida	184	107	37	0.8%	2,920	39.9	7	1	7
Albuquerque	New Mexico	189	133	61	0.4%	2,918	67.4	13	1	13
Aurora	Colorado	200	142	47	0.7%	2,857	51.5	10	1	10
Baltimore	Maryland	225	146	68	0.4%	2,825	70.8	16	1	16
Birmingham	Alabama	246	168	63	0.6%	2,823	66.8	23	1	23
Colorado Springs	Colorado	244	160	66	0.5%	2,823	66.8	24	1	24
Mesa	Arizona	232	166	52	0.5%	2,754	63.9	9	1	9
Bakersfield	California	211	141	60	0.5%	2,678	69.7	7	1	7
Sacramento	California	254	168	75	0.3%	2,677	76.4	16	1	16
Raleigh	North Carolina	220	153	65	0.5%	2,580	66.9	12	1	12
Cincinnati	Ohio	263	174	87	0.3%	2,571	76.5	26	1	26
Louisville	Kentucky	239	158	82	0.3%	2,430	78.5	19	1	19
Nashville	Tennessee	264	176	48	0.5%	2,384	66.1	19	1	19
Rochester	New York	260	165	71	0.5%	2,348	66.3	19	1	19
Kansas City	Missouri	240	160	71	0.4%	2,306	73.0	39	1	39
Columbus	Ohio	226	148	92	0.3%	2,270	84.2	20	1	20
Stockton	California	214	153	53	0.6%	2,236	62.2	8	1	8
West Palm Beach	Florida	214	155	55	0.6%	2,207	62.8	9	1	9
Winston Salem	North Carolina	188	144	34	0.8%	2,176	43.4	8	1	8
Wichita	Kansas	227	154	56	0.5%	2,162	67.9	18	1	18
Pompano Beach	Florida	243	170	50	0.6%	2,137	64.1	6	1	6
Oakland	California	191	124	60	0.5%	2,092	65.4	11	1	11
Hollywood	Florida	210	145	59	0.4%	2,041	69.1	5	1	5
Kissimmee	Florida	225	143	45	0.7%	2,040	51.6	6	1	6
Plano	Texas	174	116	44	0.7%	2,012	52.9	7	1	7
Staten Island	New York	207	133	67	0.4%	2,012	66.8	8	1	8
New Orleans	Louisiana	190	125	66	0.5%	1,995	68.9	14	1	14
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	129	68	0.4%	1,988	67.8	9	1	9
Salt Lake City	Utah	244	153	71	0.4%	1,967	74.8	10	1	10
Fort Wayne	Indiana	202	125	46	0.6%	1,964	57.0	14	1	14
Marietta	Georgia	179	127	59	0.6%	1,929	57.6	6	1	6
Corona	California	165	130	39	0.7%	1,921	44.6	5	1	5
Dayton	Ohio	277	186	71	0.4%	1,910	62.7	19	1	19
Long Beach	California	193	131	66	0.4%	1,895	68.5	9	1	9
Anaheim	California	183	125	56	0.5%	1,887	62.1	5	1	5
Riverside	California	179	125	59	0.5%	1,884	64.7	5	1	5
Toledo	Ohio	206	144	51	0.6%	1,884	54.4	13	1	13
Fontana	California	140	103	34	0.8%	1,878	39.0	3	1	3
Honolulu	Hawaii	182	116	66	0.4%	1,864	65.2	8	1	8
Richmond	Virginia	191	124	60	0.5%	1,859	64.1	12	1	12
Tacoma	Washington	245	175	60	0.6%	1,846	61.7	16	1	16
Saint Petersburg	Florida	226	170	61	0.5%	1,841	64.4	10	1	10
Knoxville	Tennessee	219	147	61	0.5%	1,815	62.5	13	1	13
Naples	Florida	205	143	55	0.6%	1,813	57.7	13	1	13
Jamaica	New York	181	121	44	0.7%	1,790	55.0	5	1	5
Buffalo	New York	256	172	83	0.3%	1,786	77.1	16	1	16
Mobile	Alabama	242	169	51	0.6%	1,763	57.2	15	1	15
Columbia	South Carolina	196	130	57	0.5%	1,753	63.6	11	1	11
Greensboro	North Carolina	179	129	56	0.5%	1,741	61.3	7	1	7
Bradenton	Florida	199	137	49	0.7%	1,710	50.9	9	1	9
Henderson	Nevada	197	121	51	0.6%	1,688	63.0	8	1	8
Corpus Christi	Texas	208	132	62	0.5%	1,685	62.2	14	1	14
Tulsa	Oklahoma	261	158	74	0.4%	1,665	71.4	17	1	17
Lake Worth	Florida	195	140	39	0.8%	1,654	40.4	5	1	5
Katy	Texas	157	106	57	0.5%	1,646	71.8	4	1	4
Alexandria	Virginia	256	180	65	0.5%	1,641	65.3	9	1	9
Chandler	Arizona	159	113	51	0.6%	1,641	56.3	5	1	5
Santa Ana	California	147	105	64	0.5%	1,639	66.3	4	1	4
Chesapeake	Virginia	155	110	44	0.7%	1,609	51.3	6	1	6
Arlington	Texas	210	146	64	0.4%	1,605	70.8	7	1	7
Newark	New Jersey	167	121	53	0.6%	1,597	58.0	7	1	7
Lexington	Kentucky	205	141	65	0.5%	1,587	65.3	11	1	11
Lubbock	Texas	194	130	56	0.6%	1,569	63.4	11	1	11
Flushing	New York	142	96	45	0.7%	1,568	45.8	4	1	4
Vancouver	Washington	198	140	64	0.5%	1,520	64.9	7	1	7
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	166	126	36	0.7%	1,512	44.2	5	1	5
Lancaster	California	143	112	35	0.8%	1,507	38.3	3	1	3
Salinas	California	164	124	38	0.8%	1,477	41.2	5	1	5
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	162	113	38	0.8%	1,471	39.8	5	1	5
Ocala	Florida	188	135	47	0.7%	1,469	52.3	10	1	10
North Las Vegas	Nevada	189	119	46	0.6%	1,429	57.3	7	1	7
Springfield	Missouri	168	123	52	0.6%	1,419	60.4	6	1	6
Grand Prairie	Texas	144	112	39	0.7%	1,410	45.5	4	1	4
Palmdale	California	157	119	39	0.8%	1,404	39.5	4	1	4
Oceanside	California	143	104	47	0.7%	1,396	49.0	4	1	4
Alpharetta	Georgia	178	128	43	0.7%	1,385	46.3	4	1	4
Henrico	Virginia	202	142	36	0.7%	1,383	46.6	7	1	7
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	160	60	0.5%	1,383	59.6	19	1	19
Spring	Texas	216	144	79	0.4%	1,375	76.1	5	1	5
Mission	Texas	142	109	40	0.8%	1,374	42.7	3	1	3
Elk Grove	California	138	108	38	0.8%	1,358	43.3	3	1	3
Garland	Texas	171	128	51	0.6%	1,350	53.8	4	1	4
Ogden	Utah	148	106	45	0.7%	1,347	51.8	4	1	4
Spokane	Washington	205	140	74	0.4%	1,340	71.8	9	1	9
Gilbert	Arizona	186	131	51	0.6%	1,330	58.5	5	1	5
Moreno Valley	California	149	118	46	0.6%	1,325	56.8	3	1	3
Peoria	Arizona	145	110	41	0.8%	1,320	42.3	4	1	4
Tempe	Arizona	152	108	44	0.7%	1,309	50.5	4	1	4
Reading	Pennsylvania	204	141	50	0.6%	1,296	57.8	8	1	8
Madison	Wisconsin	197	133	68	0.4%	1,292	70.0	10	1	10
Pensacola	Florida	202	141	59	0.5%	1,265	63.8	10	1	10
Modesto	California	178	129	62	0.5%	1,253	63.6	5	1	5
Pomona	California	127	92	36	0.8%	1,234	41.0	3	1	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	143	97	50	0.6%	1,233	55.6	5	1	5
Lawrenceville	Georgia	150	116	61	0.5%	1,230	58.0	3	1	3
Clarksville	Tennessee	131	97	46	0.7%	1,229	48.7	3	1	3
Huntington Beach	California	141	107	55	0.6%	1,222	59.0	3	1	3
Edinburg	Texas	145	109	35	0.8%	1,218	41.7	3	1	3
Norfolk	Virginia	203	135	65	0.5%	1,215	62.3	12	1	12
Laredo	Texas	157	110	68	0.4%	1,213	62.8	4	1	4
Akron	Ohio	176	133	66	0.4%	1,212	66.5	14	1	14
Cumming	Georgia	141	113	40	0.7%	1,208	45.0	3	1	3
Trenton	New Jersey	210	152	54	0.6%	1,208	55.7	9	1	9
Des Moines	Iowa	196	127	60	0.5%	1,204	57.6	9	1	9
Salem	Oregon	171	121	61	0.5%	1,201	70.3	4	1	4
Newport News	Virginia	172	124	43	0.7%	1,198	57.1	6	1	6
Oxnard	California	149	105	56	0.5%	1,197	58.3	3	1	3
Everett	Washington	159	119	45	0.7%	1,193	49.6	5	1	5
Grand Rapids	Michigan	196	131	78	0.3%	1,185	74.3	7	1	7
Sarasota	Florida	220	137	60	0.5%	1,185	66.1	9	1	9
Fayetteville	North Carolina	193	134	59	0.5%	1,184	70.8	5	1	5
Durham	North Carolina	173	123	69	0.4%	1,171	68.3	6	1	6
San Bernardino	California	163	119	62	0.5%	1,162	61.1	5	1	5
Littleton	Colorado	254	169	74	0.4%	1,149	72.1	6	1	6
York	Pennsylvania	164	109	49	0.6%	1,147	61.0	6	1	6
Conroe	Texas	182	124	42	0.7%	1,144	47.1	7	1	7
Macon	Georgia	181	125	43	0.7%	1,143	54.3	8	1	8
Melbourne	Florida	142	100	43	0.7%	1,137	46.4	5	1	5
Evansville	Indiana	188	134	51	0.6%	1,132	53.0	8	1	8
Santa Maria	California	155	113	35	0.8%	1,131	40.0	3	1	3
Flint	Michigan	177	124	42	0.7%	1,127	45.7	7	1	7
Brownsville	Texas	145	108	51	0.6%	1,125	59.3	2	1	2
Roanoke	Virginia	197	139	47	0.7%	1,124	56.1	8	1	8
Fremont	California	144	108	59	0.5%	1,122	63.5	3	1	3
Las Cruces	New Mexico	190	137	40	0.8%	1,122	51.7	6	1	6
Anchorage	Alaska	219	157	65	0.5%	1,119	64.3	8	1	8
Tallahassee	Florida	184	127	74	0.4%	1,090	73.4	6	1	6
Whittier	California	178	130	53	0.6%	1,090	61.8	4	1	4
Saint Charles	Missouri	147	107	38	0.8%	1,088	41.3	3	1	3
Olathe	Kansas	117	89	40	0.7%	1,080	44.5	2	1	2
Gainesville	Florida	178	127	57	0.5%	1,078	63.5	8	1	8
Irving	Texas	164	118	67	0.4%	1,066	67.2	4	1	4
Greenville	South Carolina	166	118	58	0.5%	1,063	66.7	8	1	8
Syracuse	New York	206	141	61	0.5%	1,061	67.3	11	1	11
Fullerton	California	152	108	38	0.8%	1,059	43.0	4	1	4
Erie	Pennsylvania	185	126	55	0.6%	1,051	66.5	8	1	8
Simi Valley	California	112	82	33	0.8%	1,045	37.5	2	1	2
Eugene	Oregon	149	109	56	0.5%	1,044	61.0	5	1	5
San Mateo	California	173	123	39	0.7%	1,039	46.0	4	1	4
Gaithersburg	Maryland	162	125	40	0.7%	1,034	46.4	5	1	5
Overland Park	Kansas	179	133	53	0.6%	1,034	59.1	7	1	7
Woodbridge	Virginia	147	111	55	0.5%	1,034	59.7	2	1	2
Amarillo	Texas	198	142	65	0.5%	1,033	61.5	10	1	10
Worcester	Massachusetts	188	129	60	0.6%	1,033	58.4	7	1	7
Youngstown	Ohio	195	146	42	0.7%	1,028	54.0	9	1	9
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	141	108	40	0.8%	1,021	41.0	3	1	3
Silver Spring	Maryland	208	147	73	0.3%	1,017	78.7	3	1	3
Boynton Beach	Florida	160	120	51	0.6%	1,010	53.5	5	1	5
Glendale	Arizona	208	138	76	0.3%	1,007	71.3	5	1	5
Reno	Nevada	175	123	79	0.3%	996	80.9	6	1	6
Longmont	Colorado	144	104	38	0.8%	994	42.7	3	1	3
Muskegon	Michigan	164	123	36	0.8%	994	42.0	5	1	5
Topeka	Kansas	225	156	51	0.6%	983	53.2	15	1	15
Saginaw	Michigan	172	127	35	0.8%	980	45.7	6	1	6
Waco	Texas	177	125	49	0.6%	966	59.2	7	1	7
Murrieta	California	124	94	40	0.7%	965	46.0	2	1	2
Escondido	California	153	110	54	0.5%	960	58.5	3	1	3
Huntsville	Alabama	176	125	64	0.5%	960	71.2	7	1	7
Scottsdale	Arizona	221	144	78	0.3%	956	72.9	8	1	8
Wilmington	Delaware	186	138	67	0.4%	955	64.6	7	1	7
Rockford	Illinois	173	125	57	0.5%	946	57.4	7	1	7
Concord	California	144	109	40	0.7%	944	46.8	4	1	4
Lafayette	Louisiana	160	113	54	0.6%	934	57.4	4	1	4
Clearwater	Florida	207	149	61	0.5%	929	64.4	6	1	6
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	180	129	58	0.5%	926	62.7	7	1	7
Joliet	Illinois	141	104	42	0.7%	924	47.8	5	1	5
Independence	Missouri	181	135	38	0.7%	922	48.9	7	1	7
Torrance	California	185	125	56	0.5%	920	61.2	4	1	4
Appleton	Wisconsin	145	103	39	0.8%	918	43.3	4	1	4
Chula Vista	California	141	98	72	0.4%	917	79.4	2	1	2
Perris	California	131	104	33	0.8%	917	41.0	2	1	2
Yonkers	New York	145	109	55	0.5%	916	68.4	3	1	3
Frederick	Maryland	152	112	45	0.7%	915	49.5	4	1	4
Nampa	Idaho	140	103	36	0.8%	914	40.0	3	1	3
Panama City	Florida	168	120	40	0.7%	911	53.5	5	1	5
Temecula	California	136	103	43	0.7%	906	48.3	3	1	3
Santa Clara	California	140	104	43	0.7%	903	48.0	4	1	4
Toms River	New Jersey	144	110	44	0.7%	899	46.0	3	1	3
Clovis	California	140	103	41	0.7%	896	45.7	3	1	3
Little Rock	Arkansas	189	127	71	0.4%	896	68.8	8	1	8
Provo	Utah	143	97	35	0.8%	896	42.0	3	1	3
Vista	California	132	102	39	0.7%	893	44.0	3	1	3
Ontario	California	140	100	55	0.5%	890	61.7	2	1	2
Santa Rosa	California	148	101	68	0.4%	881	67.5	4	1	4
Athens	Georgia	158	111	41	0.7%	880	48.7	6	1	6
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	145	101	44	0.7%	879	47.5	4	1	4
Naperville	Illinois	150	112	55	0.5%	878	63.3	3	1	3
Pasadena	California	173	120	49	0.6%	876	55.2	5	1	5
Cape Coral	Florida	169	118	59	0.5%	875	64.8	4	1	4
Vero Beach	Florida	164	116	40	0.8%	873	43.2	6	1	6
Denton	Texas	161	117	54	0.6%	873	64.2	4	1	4
Douglasville	Georgia	132	98	38	0.8%	869	40.5	2	1	2
Fairfield	California	118	87	39	0.8%	867	42.5	2	1	2
Lakeland	Florida	168	116	81	0.3%	865	70.4	5	1	5
College Station	Texas	120	92	44	0.7%	861	49.0	2	1	2
Bend	Oregon	150	104	41	0.7%	860	43.3	3	1	3
Orange	California	160	118	55	0.6%	859	56.8	4	1	4
Tyler	Texas	182	124	55	0.5%	858	60.7	7	1	7
Augusta	Georgia	174	120	69	0.4%	857	70.4	5	1	5
Winter Haven	Florida	123	88	38	0.8%	855	39.0	3	1	3
Shreveport	Louisiana	197	134	71	0.4%	853	64.0	8	1	8
Jackson	Mississippi	187	120	60	0.5%	852	54.7	9	1	9
Ventura	California	129	90	40	0.7%	850	45.7	3	1	3
Fredericksburg	Virginia	170	124	58	0.5%	849	56.6	4	1	4
Downey	California	140	102	43	0.8%	847	44.0	3	1	3
San Leandro	California	127	94	40	0.8%	847	42.7	3	1	3
West Covina	California	136	102	37	0.8%	843	42.0	3	1	3
Sugar Land	Texas	161	116	58	0.5%	836	77.3	2	1	2
Largo	Florida	147	115	41	0.8%	836	41.6	5	1	5
North Hollywood	California	145	96	55	0.5%	833	63.8	4	1	4
Allentown	Pennsylvania	173	127	62	0.5%	832	77.0	3	1	3
Garden Grove	California	168	123	58	0.5%	829	65.0	3	1	3
Lewisville	Texas	150	111	40	0.7%	826	60.3	2	1	2
Lake Charles	Louisiana	155	114	44	0.6%	825	55.2	4	1	4
Killeen	Texas	162	110	56	0.5%	823	69.5	2	1	2
Santa Barbara	California	140	100	52	0.6%	820	58.1	7	1	7
Hesperia	California	110	82	41	0.8%	820	40.0	2	1	2
Lansing	Michigan	162	105	59	0.5%	820	62.9	5	1	5
Metairie	Louisiana	149	111	52	0.6%	820	63.4	4	1	4
Olympia	Washington	184	139	61	0.4%	819	62.0	4	1	4
Manassas	Virginia	175	123	49	0.5%	817	59.3	3	1	3
Antioch	California	126	96	42	0.7%	817	45.0	2	1	2
Allen	Texas	116	84	40	0.7%	816	45.5	2	1	2
Norwalk	California	99	76	40	0.8%	815	42.0	1	1	1
Riverview	Florida	163	115	39	0.7%	814	44.7	3	1	3
Bridgeport	Connecticut	174	130	54	0.6%	813	62.5	4	1	4
New Haven	Connecticut	141	100	48	0.6%	813	67.8	3	1	3
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	139	93	57	0.6%	812	68.6	4	1	4
Paterson	New Jersey	168	125	53	0.6%	811	56.0	7	1	7
Hayward	California	141	109	67	0.4%	807	73.5	2	1	2
Lakewood	New Jersey	97	83	36	0.8%	806	39.0	1	1	1
Irvine	California	194	134	73	0.3%	805	75.1	5	1	5
Waukegan	Illinois	124	90	33	0.8%	798	36.5	2	1	2
Chattanooga	Tennessee	215	147	71	0.4%	791	77.1	8	1	8
Kenosha	Wisconsin	144	107	42	0.7%	789	49.3	4	1	4
Mcdonough	Georgia	122	94	42	0.8%	788	41.5	2	1	2
Pittsburg	California	97	76	34	0.8%	788	37.0	1	1	1
Rockville	Maryland	176	126	52	0.5%	782	62.8	3	1	3
Renton	Washington	194	137	61	0.5%	780	58.4	4	1	4
Hillsboro	Oregon	125	91	40	0.8%	779	43.5	2	1	2
San Marcos	California	125	96	40	0.8%	778	41.5	2	1	2
Davenport	Iowa	155	111	40	0.7%	777	53.5	5	1	5
Hagerstown	Maryland	159	117	35	0.8%	775	38.3	3	1	3
Roswell	Georgia	118	89	39	0.8%	774	41.5	2	1	2
Mission Viejo	California	116	92	39	0.8%	772	40.5	2	1	2
El Cajon	California	162	110	66	0.4%	769	72.7	2	1	2
New Port Richey	Florida	159	120	50	0.6%	767	55.8	3	1	3
Federal Way	Washington	118	90	40	0.8%	766	42.5	2	1	2
Sandy	Utah	133	94	44	0.7%	763	50.0	4	1	4
Anderson	South Carolina	143	101	39	0.8%	762	41.3	4	1	4
Deltona	Florida	115	82	35	0.8%	761	38.0	2	1	2
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	243	156	92	0.2%	759	76.9	8	1	8
Providence	Rhode Island	185	127	76	0.4%	758	70.4	5	1	5
Pueblo	Colorado	182	129	60	0.5%	757	58.4	5	1	5
Schenectady	New York	182	134	60	0.5%	757	60.6	6	1	6
Savannah	Georgia	184	118	82	0.3%	755	79.5	4	1	4
Fort Pierce	Florida	179	129	36	0.8%	749	43.9	7	1	7
Santa Cruz	California	139	103	46	0.7%	748	48.0	4	1	4
Meridian	Idaho	115	91	42	0.7%	746	47.5	2	1	2
Woodstock	Georgia	120	90	40	0.7%	746	45.5	2	1	2
O Fallon	Missouri	122	96	36	0.8%	743	42.0	2	1	2
South Gate	California	97	77	37	0.8%	742	41.0	1	1	1
Odessa	Texas	177	132	63	0.5%	740	64.0	4	1	4
Dearborn	Michigan	139	103	38	0.8%	739	41.3	4	1	4
Homestead	Florida	200	144	69	0.4%	738	76.1	3	1	3
Palm Bay	Florida	156	117	43	0.7%	737	58.3	3	1	3
South Bend	Indiana	190	131	56	0.5%	737	62.5	7	1	7
Boulder	Colorado	180	118	57	0.6%	734	62.0	5	1	5
Cambridge	Massachusetts	143	101	49	0.6%	731	64.4	4	1	4
Vacaville	California	124	92	46	0.7%	730	50.0	2	1	2
Chino	California	122	94	41	0.8%	726	44.5	2	1	2
Indio	California	118	87	40	0.8%	726	42.5	2	1	2
Buford	Georgia	120	94	44	0.7%	725	46.0	2	1	2
Fort Myers	Florida	199	133	85	0.3%	724	82.9	4	1	4
Visalia	California	140	110	58	0.5%	723	64.3	2	1	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	143	104	38	0.8%	720	56.8	3	1	3
Spring Hill	Florida	177	136	49	0.6%	719	63.8	3	1	3
Newnan	Georgia	120	94	36	0.8%	716	42.5	2	1	2
Gulfport	Mississippi	129	93	43	0.8%	714	44.3	3	1	3
Round Rock	Texas	159	114	73	0.4%	708	73.7	2	1	2
Boise	Idaho	181	132	88	0.3%	704	76.1	6	1	6
Ridgewood	New York	98	73	48	0.7%	704	53.0	1	1	1
Rapid City	South Dakota	136	98	42	0.7%	703	46.3	3	1	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	124	94	47	0.6%	702	68.7	2	1	2
Lynnwood	Washington	160	120	47	0.6%	700	53.7	3	1	3
Hawthorne	California	96	77	40	0.7%	697	47.0	1	1	1
Sterling Heights	Michigan	138	108	58	0.5%	697	60.3	3	1	3
Van Nuys	California	149	98	70	0.4%	697	75.5	3	1	3
Falls Church	Virginia	198	135	46	0.6%	696	54.6	4	1	4
Compton	California	130	101	58	0.5%	691	60.0	2	1	2
High Point	North Carolina	148	110	51	0.6%	691	61.5	3	1	3
Frisco	Texas	123	94	67	0.4%	688	76.5	1	1	1
Elmhurst	New York	98	66	44	0.7%	686	46.0	1	1	1
Lynn	Massachusetts	141	107	39	0.7%	686	46.0	4	1	4
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	132	96	46	0.7%	684	49.0	3	1	3
Mesquite	Texas	120	88	67	0.5%	677	59.0	2	1	2
Annapolis	Maryland	169	121	38	0.7%	674	47.6	5	1	5
Vallejo	California	141	104	57	0.5%	671	71.0	2	1	2
Holland	Michigan	113	83	43	0.7%	670	47.5	2	1	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	126	94	41	0.7%	670	48.3	3	1	3
Pearland	Texas	147	103	53	0.5%	669	72.0	1	1	1
Arvada	Colorado	169	121	59	0.5%	668	64.2	3	1	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	170	122	51	0.6%	667	59.5	4	1	4
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	87	53	0.6%	661	56.5	2	1	2
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	132	91	42	0.7%	655	52.0	2	1	2
West Valley City	Utah	125	94	59	0.5%	654	59.0	2	1	2
Mcallen	Texas	146	109	60	0.5%	653	62.0	2	1	2
Beaumont	Texas	185	133	64	0.4%	647	59.1	6	1	6
Hemet	California	145	111	56	0.5%	646	59.0	2	1	2
Daytona Beach	Florida	174	124	48	0.6%	641	55.4	4	1	4
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	179	121	73	0.4%	641	69.1	6	1	6
Warren	Michigan	160	120	59	0.5%	639	64.0	3	1	3
Abilene	Texas	172	124	60	0.5%	631	62.5	4	1	4
Decatur	Georgia	191	124	81	0.3%	629	78.0	3	1	3
Green Bay	Wisconsin	178	128	73	0.3%	625	80.0	3	1	3
Ann Arbor	Michigan	151	113	74	0.4%	624	76.8	3	1	3
Bellingham	Washington	137	102	61	0.5%	621	69.0	2	1	2
Berkeley	California	206	146	67	0.5%	621	64.8	6	1	6
Jersey City	New Jersey	167	122	87	0.2%	620	81.7	3	1	3
Scranton	Pennsylvania	192	139	48	0.6%	620	59.5	6	1	6
Billings	Montana	155	110	65	0.5%	619	70.5	2	1	2
Carrollton	Texas	144	105	62	0.5%	619	61.7	2	1	2
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	101	51	0.6%	619	60.3	2	1	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	181	136	51	0.6%	615	62.7	4	1	4
West Jordan	Utah	143	105	56	0.5%	614	59.0	2	1	2
Inglewood	California	193	129	58	0.5%	613	70.2	3	1	3
Cary	North Carolina	158	113	72	0.4%	603	76.0	2	1	2
Kennewick	Washington	140	107	49	0.6%	602	64.3	2	1	2
Midlothian	Virginia	138	104	48	0.6%	600	59.3	2	1	2
Racine	Wisconsin	164	121	60	0.5%	595	64.2	3	1	3
Summerville	South Carolina	123	90	65	0.4%	590	74.0	1	1	1
Jupiter	Florida	139	98	53	0.6%	589	61.8	3	1	3
Kalamazoo	Michigan	162	113	74	0.4%	587	69.7	4	1	4
Palo Alto	California	145	101	49	0.6%	579	72.0	2	1	2
Delray Beach	Florida	171	122	57	0.5%	578	69.6	3	1	3
Franklin	Tennessee	142	111	56	0.5%	575	63.3	2	1	2
Canton	Ohio	171	124	67	0.4%	572	68.8	8	1	8
Longview	Texas	171	129	50	0.5%	572	53.4	4	1	4
Spartanburg	South Carolina	154	106	55	0.5%	572	55.4	4	1	4
Gastonia	North Carolina	131	97	55	0.5%	566	61.0	2	1	2
Kent	Washington	145	108	79	0.4%	565	72.8	2	1	2
San Angelo	Texas	150	105	57	0.5%	564	58.0	3	1	3
Auburn	Washington	138	106	60	0.5%	563	66.3	2	1	2
Fairfax	Virginia	179	130	75	0.3%	560	71.5	2	1	2
Cypress	Texas	115	87	75	0.3%	559	76.0	1	1	1
Valdosta	Georgia	155	110	53	0.6%	559	54.6	4	1	4
Bryan	Texas	160	116	53	0.6%	553	52.8	4	1	4
Hamilton	Ohio	143	112	66	0.4%	546	57.3	2	1	2
Broomfield	Colorado	148	104	57	0.5%	545	62.0	2	1	2
Bothell	Washington	158	114	68	0.4%	540	72.7	2	1	2
Midland	Texas	158	112	77	0.3%	540	78.4	2	1	2
Albany	New York	201	138	74	0.4%	539	76.8	6	1	6
Roseville	California	126	89	70	0.4%	534	65.3	2	1	2
Puyallup	Washington	167	120	80	0.4%	530	67.6	3	1	3
Elgin	Illinois	138	101	62	0.4%	528	63.7	2	1	2
Redwood City	California	156	125	63	0.5%	523	71.3	2	1	2
Waterbury	Connecticut	154	111	64	0.5%	520	63.0	4	1	4
Boston	Massachusetts	174	108	77	0.3%	516	86.1	11	1	11
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	153	106	71	0.4%	516	65.7	4	1	4
Tracy	California	151	116	66	0.4%	516	72.3	2	1	2
Madera	California	147	104	58	0.5%	515	62.0	2	1	2
Lynchburg	Virginia	165	112	62	0.5%	514	62.5	3	1	3
Redding	California	161	114	66	0.5%	511	55.0	3	1	3
Sylmar	California	98	64	63	0.5%	511	66.0	1	1	1
Duluth	Minnesota	185	138	64	0.4%	510	62.9	7	1	7
Quincy	Massachusetts	136	100	59	0.5%	502	67.3	2	1	2
Burbank	California	156	117	65	0.5%	499	68.4	3	1	3
Hyattsville	Maryland	171	115	72	0.3%	498	71.6	3	1	3
Napa	California	113	78	61	0.5%	484	75.0	1	1	1
El Monte	California	122	91	56	0.5%	483	72.0	1	1	1
Waukesha	Wisconsin	131	99	62	0.5%	480	66.7	2	1	2
Florissant	Missouri	140	104	66	0.4%	479	65.0	2	1	2
Orem	Utah	140	105	56	0.5%	479	61.0	2	1	2
Charleston	South Carolina	200	138	87	0.2%	474	83.4	4	1	4
Edmond	Oklahoma	173	122	88	0.3%	461	79.6	2	1	2
Rancho Cucamonga	California	140	105	80	0.3%	459	74.8	2	1	2
Manchester	New Hampshire	144	108	69	0.4%	457	69.4	4	1	4
Miami Beach	Florida	162	87	72	0.4%	456	67.6	4	1	4
Champaign	Illinois	121	88	65	0.5%	456	65.7	2	1	2
Greeley	Colorado	117	84	72	0.4%	454	71.0	1	1	1
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	139	104	71	0.4%	452	75.5	2	1	2
Elizabeth	New Jersey	133	105	64	0.4%	451	62.3	2	1	2
Lowell	Massachusetts	147	109	69	0.4%	448	72.8	2	1	2
Charlottesville	Virginia	146	107	73	0.4%	439	78.8	2	1	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	155	114	74	0.3%	437	82.0	1	1	1
Baytown	Texas	145	106	68	0.4%	436	62.7	2	1	2
Westerville	Ohio	113	81	70	0.5%	431	74.0	2	1	2
Bloomington	Indiana	155	107	79	0.3%	429	74.5	3	1	3
Fort Mill	South Carolina	135	97	66	0.4%	423	70.3	2	1	2
Boca Raton	Florida	197	132	91	0.2%	413	84.3	3	1	3
Grand Junction	Colorado	162	113	73	0.4%	413	60.8	4	1	4
Lawrence	Kansas	165	121	71	0.4%	412	76.0	2	1	2
Humble	Texas	164	106	91	0.2%	410	83.3	1	1	1
Portsmouth	Virginia	167	123	66	0.4%	409	67.4	4	1	4
Coral Springs	Florida	121	90	67	0.4%	408	74.5	1	1	1
Astoria	New York	172	111	76	0.3%	407	80.0	2	1	2
Santa Monica	California	131	85	67	0.4%	405	66.0	4	1	4
Montgomery	Alabama	199	132	96	0.2%	404	73.0	7	1	7
Edison	New Jersey	131	100	67	0.4%	403	65.0	2	1	2
Englewood	Colorado	191	132	74	0.4%	399	73.5	2	1	2
Saint Augustine	Florida	196	140	83	0.3%	394	79.8	2	1	2
Plainfield	Illinois	154	114	69	0.4%	389	62.0	2	1	2
Herndon	Virginia	121	88	68	0.4%	383	72.0	1	1	1
Medford	Oregon	123	88	71	0.4%	381	70.0	1	1	1
Apopka	Florida	119	89	70	0.4%	378	69.5	1	1	1
Mckinney	Texas	135	95	98	0.2%	376	83.3	1	1	1
Costa Mesa	California	119	83	80	0.3%	369	73.5	1	1	1
Laurel	Maryland	160	119	78	0.3%	367	73.5	2	1	2
Bowie	Maryland	177	122	68	0.4%	361	74.0	2	1	2
Wichita Falls	Texas	174	123	71	0.4%	354	71.6	4	1	4
Belleville	Illinois	144	107	68	0.4%	347	73.3	2	1	2
Yakima	Washington	139	101	85	0.3%	344	73.0	2	1	2
Ashburn	Virginia	109	80	85	0.3%	342	74.5	1	1	1
Norman	Oklahoma	139	101	87	0.3%	335	78.3	2	1	2
Terre Haute	Indiana	164	119	78	0.4%	333	72.2	3	1	3
Livermore	California	118	87	73	0.3%	329	74.0	1	1	1
Stamford	Connecticut	156	108	86	0.3%	328	70.2	4	1	4
Santa Fe	New Mexico	154	110	84	0.3%	323	71.6	3	1	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	139	100	86	0.3%	319	76.8	2	1	2
Elkhart	Indiana	143	105	76	0.3%	318	81.3	1	1	1
Clermont	Florida	150	112	81	0.3%	310	60.7	2	1	2
Bellevue	Washington	156	118	93	0.2%	307	82.8	2	1	2
Carlsbad	California	144	105	87	0.3%	306	74.8	2	1	2
Missouri City	Texas	147	101	89	0.3%	306	88.0	1	1	1
Menifee	California	160	116	83	0.3%	306	71.0	2	1	2
Acworth	Georgia	126	91	80	0.3%	304	73.5	1	1	1
Covington	Georgia	144	102	76	0.3%	304	70.5	1	1	1
Kennesaw	Georgia	116	83	86	0.3%	299	75.5	1	1	1
Sunnyvale	California	166	124	96	0.2%	299	77.5	2	1	2
Fargo	North Dakota	146	103	89	0.2%	296	77.5	2	1	2
Livonia	Michigan	128	98	79	0.3%	289	81.3	1	1	1
Richardson	Texas	145	105	87	0.2%	283	83.0	1	1	1
Keller	Texas	145	101	100	0.2%	280	74.5	1	1	1
Hampton	Virginia	163	116	100	0.2%	271	72.7	3	1	3
Chico	California	139	103	86	0.2%	270	83.0	1	1	1
Merced	California	145	104	88	0.3%	266	79.7	1	1	1
Sparks	Nevada	159	114	95	0.2%	266	88.3	1	1	1
Parker	Colorado	121	92	92	0.3%	262	71.0	1	1	1
Daly City	California	137	99	99	0.2%	257	84.0	1	1	1
Asheville	North Carolina	142	100	94	0.2%	254	84.0	2	1	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	121	88	91	0.3%	244	72.5	1	1	1
Victorville	California	125	89	101	0.2%	244	84.0	1	1	1
Milton	Florida	144	110	88	0.3%	243	80.7	1	1	1
Hartford	Connecticut	148	107	95	0.2%	223	85.0	2	1	2
Muncie	Indiana	152	108	83	0.2%	222	77.2	2	1	2
New Bedford	Massachusetts	151	108	94	0.2%	214	69.8	2	1	2
Surprise	Arizona	166	121	110	0.2%	212	87.5	1	1	1
Beaverton	Oregon	152	108	115	0.1%	211	87.8	1	1	1
New Braunfels	Texas	119	92	99	0.2%	195	76.0	1	1	1
Missoula	Montana	151	107	100	0.2%	178	82.4	2	1	2
La Puente	California	145	95	131	0.1%	160	84.0	1	1	1
Yuma	Arizona	131	94	106	0.1%	160	83.3	1	1	1
Bowling Green	Kentucky	155	112	114	0.1%	149	74.0	2	1	2
Rialto	California	126	104	103	0.1%	149	72.0	1	1	1
Rock Hill	South Carolina	149	110	135	0.0%	14	81.0	1	1	1

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	353	225	76	0.3%	8,429	77.9	40	1	40
San Jose	240	157	69	0.4%	4,464	69.9	21	1	21
San Diego	291	189	80	0.3%	4,149	80.6	26	1	26
San Francisco	253	153	67	0.5%	3,936	71.5	22	1	22
Fresno	235	159	62	0.5%	2,996	62.1	14	1	14
Bakersfield	211	141	60	0.5%	2,678	69.7	7	1	7
Sacramento	254	168	75	0.3%	2,677	76.4	16	1	16
Stockton	214	153	53	0.6%	2,236	62.2	8	1	8
Oakland	191	124	60	0.5%	2,092	65.4	11	1	11
Corona	165	130	39	0.7%	1,921	44.6	5	1	5
Long Beach	193	131	66	0.4%	1,895	68.5	9	1	9
Anaheim	183	125	56	0.5%	1,887	62.1	5	1	5
Riverside	179	125	59	0.5%	1,884	64.7	5	1	5
Fontana	140	103	34	0.8%	1,878	39.0	3	1	3
Santa Ana	147	105	64	0.5%	1,639	66.3	4	1	4
Lancaster	143	112	35	0.8%	1,507	38.3	3	1	3
Salinas	164	124	38	0.8%	1,477	41.2	5	1	5
Palmdale	157	119	39	0.8%	1,404	39.5	4	1	4
Oceanside	143	104	47	0.7%	1,396	49.0	4	1	4
Elk Grove	138	108	38	0.8%	1,358	43.3	3	1	3
Moreno Valley	149	118	46	0.6%	1,325	56.8	3	1	3
Modesto	178	129	62	0.5%	1,253	63.6	5	1	5
Pomona	127	92	36	0.8%	1,234	41.0	3	1	3
Huntington Beach	141	107	55	0.6%	1,222	59.0	3	1	3
Oxnard	149	105	56	0.5%	1,197	58.3	3	1	3
San Bernardino	163	119	62	0.5%	1,162	61.1	5	1	5
Santa Maria	155	113	35	0.8%	1,131	40.0	3	1	3
Fremont	144	108	59	0.5%	1,122	63.5	3	1	3
Whittier	178	130	53	0.6%	1,090	61.8	4	1	4
Fullerton	152	108	38	0.8%	1,059	43.0	4	1	4
Simi Valley	112	82	33	0.8%	1,045	37.5	2	1	2
San Mateo	173	123	39	0.7%	1,039	46.0	4	1	4
Murrieta	124	94	40	0.7%	965	46.0	2	1	2
Escondido	153	110	54	0.5%	960	58.5	3	1	3
Concord	144	109	40	0.7%	944	46.8	4	1	4
Torrance	185	125	56	0.5%	920	61.2	4	1	4
Chula Vista	141	98	72	0.4%	917	79.4	2	1	2
Perris	131	104	33	0.8%	917	41.0	2	1	2
Temecula	136	103	43	0.7%	906	48.3	3	1	3
Santa Clara	140	104	43	0.7%	903	48.0	4	1	4
Clovis	140	103	41	0.7%	896	45.7	3	1	3
Vista	132	102	39	0.7%	893	44.0	3	1	3
Ontario	140	100	55	0.5%	890	61.7	2	1	2
Santa Rosa	148	101	68	0.4%	881	67.5	4	1	4
Pasadena	173	120	49	0.6%	876	55.2	5	1	5
Fairfield	118	87	39	0.8%	867	42.5	2	1	2
Orange	160	118	55	0.6%	859	56.8	4	1	4
Ventura	129	90	40	0.7%	850	45.7	3	1	3
Downey	140	102	43	0.8%	847	44.0	3	1	3
San Leandro	127	94	40	0.8%	847	42.7	3	1	3
West Covina	136	102	37	0.8%	843	42.0	3	1	3
North Hollywood	145	96	55	0.5%	833	63.8	4	1	4
Garden Grove	168	123	58	0.5%	829	65.0	3	1	3
Santa Barbara	140	100	52	0.6%	820	58.1	7	1	7
Hesperia	110	82	41	0.8%	820	40.0	2	1	2
Antioch	126	96	42	0.7%	817	45.0	2	1	2
Norwalk	99	76	40	0.8%	815	42.0	1	1	1
Hayward	141	109	67	0.4%	807	73.5	2	1	2
Irvine	194	134	73	0.3%	805	75.1	5	1	5
Pittsburg	97	76	34	0.8%	788	37.0	1	1	1
San Marcos	125	96	40	0.8%	778	41.5	2	1	2
Mission Viejo	116	92	39	0.8%	772	40.5	2	1	2
El Cajon	162	110	66	0.4%	769	72.7	2	1	2
Santa Cruz	139	103	46	0.7%	748	48.0	4	1	4
South Gate	97	77	37	0.8%	742	41.0	1	1	1
Vacaville	124	92	46	0.7%	730	50.0	2	1	2
Chino	122	94	41	0.8%	726	44.5	2	1	2
Indio	118	87	40	0.8%	726	42.5	2	1	2
Visalia	140	110	58	0.5%	723	64.3	2	1	2
Hawthorne	96	77	40	0.7%	697	47.0	1	1	1
Van Nuys	149	98	70	0.4%	697	75.5	3	1	3
Compton	130	101	58	0.5%	691	60.0	2	1	2
Vallejo	141	104	57	0.5%	671	71.0	2	1	2
Hemet	145	111	56	0.5%	646	59.0	2	1	2
Berkeley	206	146	67	0.5%	621	64.8	6	1	6
Inglewood	193	129	58	0.5%	613	70.2	3	1	3
Palo Alto	145	101	49	0.6%	579	72.0	2	1	2
Roseville	126	89	70	0.4%	534	65.3	2	1	2
Redwood City	156	125	63	0.5%	523	71.3	2	1	2
Tracy	151	116	66	0.4%	516	72.3	2	1	2
Madera	147	104	58	0.5%	515	62.0	2	1	2
Redding	161	114	66	0.5%	511	55.0	3	1	3
Sylmar	98	64	63	0.5%	511	66.0	1	1	1
Burbank	156	117	65	0.5%	499	68.4	3	1	3
Napa	113	78	61	0.5%	484	75.0	1	1	1
El Monte	122	91	56	0.5%	483	72.0	1	1	1
Rancho Cucamonga	140	105	80	0.3%	459	74.8	2	1	2
Santa Monica	131	85	67	0.4%	405	66.0	4	1	4
Costa Mesa	119	83	80	0.3%	369	73.5	1	1	1
Livermore	118	87	73	0.3%	329	74.0	1	1	1
Carlsbad	144	105	87	0.3%	306	74.8	2	1	2
Menifee	160	116	83	0.3%	306	71.0	2	1	2
Sunnyvale	166	124	96	0.2%	299	77.5	2	1	2
Chico	139	103	86	0.2%	270	83.0	1	1	1
Merced	145	104	88	0.3%	266	79.7	1	1	1
Daly City	137	99	99	0.2%	257	84.0	1	1	1
Victorville	125	89	101	0.2%	244	84.0	1	1	1
La Puente	145	95	131	0.1%	160	84.0	1	1	1
Rialto	126	104	103	0.1%	149	72.0	1	1	1

Brooklyn

ZIP	lesmills.com	yelp.com	expertise.com	crunch.com	retrofitness.com	harborfitness.com
11208	68	1	3	4	6	5
11206	62	1	3	4	6	8
11239	76	1	3	6	4	8
11229	68	1	3	4	9	6
11226		1	3	4	7	9
11218	75	1	3	4	5	7
11216	78	1	3	4	6	7
11228	74	1	3	5	11	9
11238	73	4	6	7	10	11
11237	71	1	3	4	6	7
11217	73	1	4	5	12	11
11207	69	1	3	4	5	6
11236	78	4	6	7	12	11
11205		1	3	4	8	9
11219	75	1	3	5	9	8
11234		1	3	6	5	4
11203		1	3	4	8	9
11224		1	3	6	9	10
11225	70	1	3	4	5	6
11215	73	1	3	5	7	10
11233	71	1	3	4	7	9
11211	71	1	4	9	11	10
11220	74	1	4	10	13	9
11230	66	1	3	7	5	4
11232	77	1	4	10	12	9
11201	72	1	6	9	11	10
11212	66	1	3	4	7	8
11221	71	1	3	4	5	7
11210	69	1	3	4	8	5
11214	76	1	3	5	4	7
11213	71	1	5	3	6	8
11223	69	1	3	4	6	7
11235	76	1	3	5	4	7
11204	70	1	3	7	4	6
11222	78	1	5	9	11	12
11209	76	4	6	14	13	1
11231	68	1	7	9	11	8

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Lesmills

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 13,305 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Lesmills Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (gym near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Lesmills Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Lesmills Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Lesmills Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly