Lancerinsurance Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve lancerinsurance.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 8,137 Insurance Companies Or Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Lancerinsurance Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Lancerinsurance Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Lancerinsurance Report, December 2024 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Lancerinsurance Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	10,953	8,137	60	0.7%	2,152,138	55.0	27,301	32,556	2	32,558	1	2	2
California	870	609	57	0.7%	280,991	48.6	1,163	1,736	1	1,736	0	0	0
Texas	846	595	73	0.6%	180,222	54.7	1,358	1,912	1	1,912	0	0	0
New York	791	600	38	0.9%	177,058	51.9	1,487	1,751	2	1,753	1	2	2
Florida	768	578	60	0.7%	144,327	50.0	446	974	1	974	0	0	0
Pennsylvania	757	591	78	0.7%	84,336	53.0	1,598	1,775	1	1,775	0	0	0
Illinois	670	490	94	0.6%	72,637	60.4	1,244	1,378	1	1,378	0	0	0
Ohio	670	548	93	0.6%	71,255	58.1	975	1,187	1	1,187	0	0	0
Michigan	656	528	81	0.7%	68,758	50.5	829	970	1	970	0	0	0
North Carolina	506	406	109	0.6%	64,521	55.8	682	800	1	800	0	0	0
Georgia	409	319	114	0.6%	59,947	60.0	574	725	1	725	0	0	0
New Jersey	436	328	87	0.7%	58,605	53.3	535	591	1	591	0	0	0
Virginia	406	322	86	0.7%	54,974	54.8	719	886	1	886	0	0	0
Massachusetts	517	422	88	0.7%	50,187	46.3	460	533	1	533	0	0	0
Washington	337	274	97	0.6%	46,142	56.4	450	586	1	586	0	0	0
Maryland	338	254	88	0.7%	42,590	49.1	390	460	1	460	0	0	0
Indiana	472	373	116	0.6%	39,819	58.3	658	765	1	765	0	0	0
Arizona	269	218	112	0.6%	39,696	60.8	246	395	1	395	0	0	0
Missouri	427	337	98	0.6%	38,957	55.1	885	1,015	1	1,015	0	0	0
Louisiana	306	237	82	0.8%	38,590	37.0	431	510	1	510	0	0	0
Minnesota	530	418	78	0.7%	37,872	51.0	775	876	1	876	0	0	0
Tennessee	377	305	120	0.6%	37,037	62.5	512	620	1	620	0	0	0
Wisconsin	481	384	107	0.6%	34,192	58.7	690	764	1	764	0	0	0
South Carolina	278	223	92	0.7%	33,325	51.8	345	419	1	419	0	0	0
Colorado	296	242	107	0.6%	32,012	59.9	380	513	1	513	0	0	0
Alabama	320	261	97	0.6%	30,183	56.8	522	637	1	637	0	0	0
Kentucky	354	287	112	0.6%	27,377	58.3	696	756	1	756	0	0	0
Oregon	271	224	100	0.6%	26,001	55.7	354	413	1	413	0	0	0
Oklahoma	322	248	107	0.6%	23,916	57.7	555	644	1	644	0	0	0
Connecticut	284	228	91	0.7%	23,611	53.0	234	279	1	279	0	0	0
Utah	245	207	107	0.7%	20,094	52.4	245	283	1	283	0	0	0
Mississippi	250	193	101	0.7%	19,606	54.0	383	417	1	417	0	0	0
Nevada	176	146	84	0.6%	18,677	55.3	92	168	1	168	0	0	0
Arkansas	261	209	105	0.6%	18,612	56.8	551	585	1	585	0	0	0
Kansas	341	261	107	0.6%	18,591	55.7	615	691	1	691	0	0	0
Iowa	486	357	111	0.6%	18,500	59.7	885	928	1	928	0	0	0
Nebraska	308	241	100	0.6%	12,333	56.3	521	578	1	578	0	0	0
New Mexico	204	159	99	0.6%	11,874	59.8	326	359	1	359	0	0	0
West Virginia	277	224	100	0.6%	10,538	61.2	681	701	1	701	0	0	0
Hawaii	152	129	66	0.7%	9,802	52.0	80	91	1	91	0	0	0
Idaho	199	170	100	0.5%	9,231	63.8	251	273	1	273	0	0	0
Maine	240	198	97	0.7%	8,966	52.5	420	424	1	424	0	0	0
New Hampshire	226	197	98	0.7%	8,947	52.7	237	247	1	247	0	0	0
Rhode Island	157	139	82	0.7%	7,454	48.9	64	77	1	77	0	0	0
Montana	229	186	83	0.6%	6,698	55.7	347	360	1	360	0	0	0
Delaware	159	137	72	0.7%	6,459	49.8	51	65	1	65	0	0	0
South Dakota	217	174	92	0.6%	5,259	56.8	359	370	1	370	0	0	0
North Dakota	206	168	73	0.6%	4,676	57.7	366	380	1	380	0	0	0
Alaska	155	134	78	0.6%	4,511	57.3	218	235	1	235	0	0	0
Vermont	197	170	94	0.7%	4,085	54.0	250	254	1	254	0	0	0
Wyoming	152	130	84	0.6%	3,310	61.7	164	171	1	171	0	0	0

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	173	138	103	0.6%	19,981	56.1	96	1	96
Los Angeles	California	147	126	69	0.8%	19,804	38.9	62	1	62
Brooklyn	New York	137	115	73	0.7%	17,592	50.8	37	1	37
Chicago	Illinois	152	133	97	0.5%	14,302	65.7	56	1	56
Miami	Florida	160	123	87	0.7%	13,391	48.2	55	1	55
San Antonio	Texas	150	126	85	0.6%	11,493	53.7	59	1	59
New York City	New York	128	111	67	0.7%	10,719	52.6	47	1	47
Dallas	Texas	149	126	80	0.7%	10,103	46.3	48	1	48
Bronx	New York	118	103	54	0.7%	9,900	49.8	25	1	25
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	138	117	84	0.6%	9,825	56.4	47	1	47
Las Vegas	Nevada	132	111	74	0.6%	9,757	55.5	43	1	43
San Diego	California	134	116	75	0.6%	8,419	55.5	36	1	36
Phoenix	Arizona	146	126	93	0.5%	7,866	64.7	42	1	42
San Jose	California	129	116	63	0.7%	7,739	45.0	28	1	28
Minneapolis	Minnesota	134	119	66	0.7%	7,641	49.2	51	1	51
Orlando	Florida	133	115	63	0.8%	7,521	44.7	32	1	32
Austin	Texas	138	123	79	0.6%	6,588	57.8	44	1	44
Charlotte	North Carolina	125	111	60	0.7%	6,258	49.8	24	1	24
Jacksonville	Florida	141	122	70	0.7%	6,187	48.2	31	1	31
Denver	Colorado	136	120	88	0.6%	6,116	62.8	38	1	38
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	133	115	63	0.7%	5,964	46.6	27	1	27
Seattle	Washington	142	127	84	0.6%	5,960	57.2	35	1	35
Portland	Oregon	130	112	70	0.6%	5,955	54.4	33	1	33
Saint Louis	Missouri	139	119	74	0.6%	5,952	53.8	45	1	45
San Francisco	California	121	106	62	0.7%	5,889	52.4	28	1	28
Indianapolis	Indiana	142	120	83	0.6%	5,854	57.5	37	1	37
Fort Worth	Texas	136	119	77	0.6%	5,755	55.2	32	1	32
Atlanta	Georgia	141	121	82	0.6%	5,623	61.8	39	1	39
Saint Paul	Minnesota	138	121	73	0.7%	5,411	51.0	30	1	30
Tampa	Florida	131	110	66	0.7%	5,404	50.5	27	1	27
Sacramento	California	134	115	73	0.7%	5,341	52.9	28	1	28
Columbus	Ohio	133	119	78	0.6%	5,232	57.0	30	1	30
Tucson	Arizona	126	106	76	0.6%	5,076	62.2	32	1	32
Cincinnati	Ohio	137	123	83	0.6%	4,987	56.7	45	1	45
Washington DC	District of Columbia	121	104	56	0.7%	4,774	48.6	28	1	28
Detroit	Michigan	142	120	61	0.7%	4,673	46.7	24	1	24
Louisville	Kentucky	134	121	78	0.6%	4,653	57.5	32	1	32
Baltimore	Maryland	121	109	50	0.7%	4,622	46.0	22	1	22
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	129	116	79	0.6%	4,614	62.4	29	1	29
El Paso	Texas	122	110	70	0.6%	4,566	60.5	24	1	24
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	135	123	69	0.7%	4,545	52.5	39	1	39
Cleveland	Ohio	127	112	79	0.6%	4,444	60.0	29	1	29
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	142	127	80	0.6%	4,268	56.1	43	1	43
Fresno	California	120	105	57	0.7%	4,161	50.3	18	1	18
Bakersfield	California	112	102	49	0.7%	3,962	48.0	11	1	11
Kansas City	Missouri	139	128	76	0.7%	3,894	51.5	49	1	49
Long Beach	California	120	109	52	0.8%	3,817	40.0	12	1	12
Memphis	Tennessee	124	110	78	0.5%	3,674	66.0	26	1	26
Omaha	Nebraska	132	118	72	0.7%	3,671	52.8	31	1	31
Buffalo	New York	142	124	70	0.6%	3,611	54.1	27	1	27
Albuquerque	New Mexico	126	112	79	0.5%	3,587	63.6	17	1	17
New Orleans	Louisiana	126	113	53	0.8%	3,585	35.8	19	1	19
Raleigh	North Carolina	122	110	64	0.6%	3,412	58.0	15	1	15
Salt Lake City	Utah	127	112	62	0.7%	3,389	50.0	19	1	19
Colorado Springs	Colorado	120	108	71	0.6%	3,371	60.9	30	1	30
Hollywood	Florida	114	103	51	0.7%	3,359	47.2	9	1	9
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	125	109	44	0.9%	3,349	31.4	18	1	18
Rochester	New York	125	108	60	0.7%	3,203	50.6	24	1	24
Staten Island	New York	120	105	58	0.7%	3,167	52.2	12	1	12
Mesa	Arizona	118	107	71	0.6%	3,006	63.0	13	1	13
Oakland	California	115	102	51	0.7%	3,001	46.2	14	1	14
Birmingham	Alabama	124	111	70	0.6%	2,983	59.5	30	1	30
Dayton	Ohio	125	115	70	0.6%	2,976	57.4	27	1	27
Virginia Beach	Virginia	117	102	59	0.6%	2,893	52.6	12	1	12
Honolulu	Hawaii	115	102	49	0.7%	2,862	50.4	11	1	11
Anaheim	California	114	102	49	0.8%	2,765	44.3	7	1	7
Pompano Beach	Florida	122	109	51	0.7%	2,743	45.6	10	1	10
West Palm Beach	Florida	116	104	51	0.7%	2,709	46.3	12	1	12
Arlington	Texas	122	107	63	0.7%	2,685	51.8	12	1	12
Santa Ana	California	110	99	48	0.7%	2,675	44.0	6	1	6
Spring	Texas	114	103	52	0.7%	2,570	51.0	8	1	8
Hialeah	Florida	120	106	56	0.7%	2,554	49.6	7	1	7
Grand Rapids	Michigan	121	109	60	0.7%	2,542	49.8	12	1	12
Tulsa	Oklahoma	133	122	74	0.6%	2,541	59.5	28	1	28
Richmond	Virginia	117	104	60	0.6%	2,528	54.9	15	1	15
Wichita	Kansas	134	117	78	0.6%	2,497	59.6	26	1	26
Riverside	California	113	102	52	0.7%	2,488	52.7	7	1	7
Saint Petersburg	Florida	127	111	65	0.7%	2,480	49.9	16	1	16
Aurora	Colorado	120	110	72	0.6%	2,421	63.6	11	1	11
Alexandria	Virginia	115	103	56	0.7%	2,395	51.8	14	1	14
Stockton	California	122	108	64	0.6%	2,312	58.9	12	1	12
Nashville	Tennessee	122	110	79	0.5%	2,295	68.3	22	1	22
Knoxville	Tennessee	117	107	69	0.6%	2,283	59.4	17	1	17
Columbia	South Carolina	119	110	57	0.7%	2,282	51.0	14	1	14
Plano	Texas	112	103	49	0.7%	2,233	46.4	7	1	7
Katy	Texas	112	102	56	0.6%	2,231	55.0	4	1	4
Spokane	Washington	113	104	63	0.6%	2,190	58.5	14	1	14
Tacoma	Washington	119	107	60	0.7%	2,177	54.2	20	1	20
Greensboro	North Carolina	116	103	55	0.7%	2,176	53.3	9	1	9
Silver Spring	Maryland	113	102	50	0.7%	2,110	49.1	7	1	7
Lexington	Kentucky	123	114	62	0.7%	2,101	53.8	15	1	15
Vancouver	Washington	116	107	58	0.6%	2,100	55.5	11	1	11
Kissimmee	Florida	116	103	51	0.7%	2,045	48.6	7	1	7
Reno	Nevada	112	100	54	0.7%	2,013	51.3	12	1	12
Irvine	California	112	101	48	0.7%	1,978	45.4	9	1	9
Naples	Florida	125	111	70	0.6%	1,977	56.3	14	1	14
Lakeland	Florida	115	105	44	0.8%	1,971	42.7	9	1	9
Corpus Christi	Texas	122	111	67	0.6%	1,956	59.3	18	1	18
Henderson	Nevada	111	100	55	0.6%	1,955	54.5	8	1	8
Newark	New Jersey	112	101	52	0.7%	1,928	50.0	9	1	9
Marietta	Georgia	116	106	64	0.6%	1,888	60.6	7	1	7
Littleton	Colorado	115	107	66	0.6%	1,887	61.3	10	1	10
Lincoln	Nebraska	121	109	62	0.7%	1,882	54.0	22	1	22
Toledo	Ohio	120	111	64	0.6%	1,881	57.4	15	1	15
Fort Wayne	Indiana	120	107	70	0.6%	1,870	60.2	16	1	16
Jersey City	New Jersey	109	101	49	0.7%	1,854	47.9	7	1	7
Modesto	California	111	101	47	0.7%	1,844	48.4	7	1	7
Corona	California	111	98	47	0.7%	1,824	48.6	5	1	5
Mobile	Alabama	119	109	60	0.7%	1,823	51.8	18	1	18
Durham	North Carolina	114	101	60	0.6%	1,822	56.1	8	1	8
Tallahassee	Florida	116	107	59	0.6%	1,817	55.6	10	1	10
Fort Myers	Florida	121	112	57	0.7%	1,767	50.2	11	1	11
San Bernardino	California	113	103	49	0.7%	1,767	47.7	7	1	7
Lubbock	Texas	131	117	61	0.6%	1,763	53.6	13	1	13
Shreveport	Louisiana	118	105	47	0.8%	1,758	39.3	12	1	12
Jamaica	New York	112	100	44	0.7%	1,747	47.0	6	1	6
Glendale	Arizona	116	106	70	0.6%	1,738	62.0	9	1	9
Pensacola	Florida	123	113	62	0.6%	1,728	55.4	13	1	13
Fontana	California	109	98	47	0.7%	1,726	46.0	3	1	3
Irving	Texas	111	102	52	0.7%	1,721	47.2	6	1	6
Winston Salem	North Carolina	118	106	60	0.6%	1,690	55.9	9	1	9
Bradenton	Florida	120	105	60	0.7%	1,671	52.1	10	1	10
Chula Vista	California	109	100	55	0.6%	1,641	56.4	5	1	5
Sarasota	Florida	118	106	59	0.7%	1,632	55.2	13	1	13
Scottsdale	Arizona	121	108	75	0.5%	1,619	62.9	11	1	11
Fayetteville	North Carolina	121	107	59	0.7%	1,614	52.6	8	1	8
Oxnard	California	107	98	43	0.7%	1,610	46.5	4	1	4
Salem	Oregon	110	101	61	0.6%	1,609	58.7	7	1	7
Garland	Texas	106	96	52	0.7%	1,607	51.2	5	1	5
Norfolk	Virginia	122	110	60	0.7%	1,605	53.2	14	1	14
Madison	Wisconsin	115	106	72	0.5%	1,596	66.2	14	1	14
Boca Raton	Florida	119	106	55	0.7%	1,584	47.9	9	1	9
Fremont	California	107	98	52	0.7%	1,565	51.5	4	1	4
Syracuse	New York	119	107	55	0.7%	1,564	50.1	15	1	15
Lake Worth	Florida	109	99	44	0.8%	1,550	43.4	5	1	5
Akron	Ohio	122	112	72	0.6%	1,544	61.5	17	1	17
Laredo	Texas	126	110	61	0.6%	1,537	57.7	5	1	5
Chesapeake	Virginia	113	101	54	0.6%	1,534	53.2	6	1	6
Santa Rosa	California	112	100	52	0.7%	1,534	48.2	6	1	6
Flushing	New York	107	96	47	0.7%	1,525	48.3	4	1	4
Chandler	Arizona	114	103	64	0.6%	1,518	61.5	6	1	6
Wilmington	Delaware	114	105	52	0.7%	1,508	50.7	10	1	10
Anchorage	Alaska	118	108	62	0.6%	1,489	56.5	12	1	12
Greenville	South Carolina	109	101	50	0.7%	1,486	51.8	9	1	9
Ocala	Florida	118	107	60	0.7%	1,483	52.7	11	1	11
Whittier	California	108	98	43	0.8%	1,477	43.5	6	1	6
North Las Vegas	Nevada	110	99	57	0.6%	1,462	55.1	7	1	7
Reading	Pennsylvania	113	104	51	0.7%	1,462	51.5	10	1	10
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	116	104	54	0.7%	1,461	48.5	6	1	6
Huntington Beach	California	111	99	46	0.7%	1,455	45.5	4	1	4
Woodbridge	Virginia	106	96	53	0.7%	1,449	50.7	3	1	3
Gilbert	Arizona	109	99	60	0.6%	1,444	58.2	6	1	6
Providence	Rhode Island	109	98	47	0.7%	1,440	48.0	8	1	8
Van Nuys	California	105	95	39	0.8%	1,423	37.5	4	1	4
Hayward	California	108	98	45	0.7%	1,422	44.8	4	1	4
Savannah	Georgia	114	104	62	0.6%	1,418	57.8	10	1	10
Moreno Valley	California	109	99	50	0.7%	1,406	51.0	4	1	4
Gainesville	Florida	119	107	58	0.7%	1,405	51.0	10	1	10
Lancaster	California	105	96	41	0.8%	1,401	43.3	3	1	3
Little Rock	Arkansas	117	106	62	0.6%	1,392	55.4	12	1	12
Torrance	California	113	103	43	0.8%	1,388	40.8	5	1	5
Trenton	New Jersey	116	104	53	0.7%	1,360	53.5	11	1	11
Palmdale	California	106	97	43	0.8%	1,359	41.8	4	1	4
Worcester	Massachusetts	117	103	50	0.7%	1,355	45.9	9	1	9
Rancho Cucamonga	California	109	98	44	0.8%	1,337	43.0	4	1	4
Boise	Idaho	111	100	68	0.5%	1,332	65.8	9	1	9
Brownsville	Texas	109	100	53	0.7%	1,330	53.7	3	1	3
Springfield	Missouri	113	102	63	0.6%	1,322	63.0	7	1	7
Amarillo	Texas	117	105	66	0.6%	1,321	60.6	14	1	14
Mckinney	Texas	106	98	50	0.7%	1,312	51.3	3	1	3
Boynton Beach	Florida	114	101	46	0.8%	1,310	44.2	6	1	6
Grand Prairie	Texas	106	96	48	0.7%	1,306	51.0	4	1	4
Augusta	Georgia	117	107	60	0.6%	1,304	53.8	8	1	8
Montgomery	Alabama	115	105	61	0.6%	1,301	58.6	13	1	13
Garden Grove	California	110	97	44	0.7%	1,300	44.8	5	1	5
Lafayette	Louisiana	109	100	43	0.8%	1,290	39.2	5	1	5
Homestead	Florida	111	99	53	0.7%	1,285	48.7	7	1	7
Des Moines	Iowa	117	107	68	0.6%	1,283	60.9	11	1	11
North Hollywood	California	108	98	36	0.8%	1,283	36.8	4	1	4
Yonkers	New York	109	99	48	0.7%	1,277	48.6	5	1	5
Eugene	Oregon	113	103	58	0.6%	1,271	54.7	6	1	6
Salinas	California	106	96	47	0.7%	1,271	52.4	5	1	5
Charleston	South Carolina	121	110	63	0.6%	1,268	54.2	10	1	10
Clearwater	Florida	123	109	60	0.7%	1,264	50.3	9	1	9
Henrico	Virginia	120	109	60	0.7%	1,256	53.3	7	1	7
Ontario	California	109	98	49	0.7%	1,247	48.3	3	1	3
Cape Coral	Florida	115	104	53	0.7%	1,242	50.5	6	1	6
Ogden	Utah	110	101	60	0.6%	1,240	57.6	5	1	5
Pasadena	California	113	103	46	0.8%	1,231	40.8	6	1	6
Elk Grove	California	109	96	49	0.7%	1,229	50.3	3	1	3
Overland Park	Kansas	116	104	59	0.7%	1,225	52.4	9	1	9
Erie	Pennsylvania	116	105	53	0.7%	1,218	53.1	13	1	13
Oceanside	California	106	96	58	0.6%	1,213	58.3	4	1	4
Pomona	California	107	97	40	0.8%	1,213	42.0	3	1	3
Mission	Texas	105	95	49	0.7%	1,202	52.3	3	1	3
Lansing	Michigan	118	107	52	0.7%	1,195	45.9	7	1	7
Newport News	Virginia	112	99	53	0.7%	1,194	50.7	7	1	7
Olympia	Washington	110	98	55	0.7%	1,193	54.2	6	1	6
Metairie	Louisiana	111	102	40	0.8%	1,192	36.0	5	1	5
York	Pennsylvania	115	104	57	0.7%	1,189	53.4	7	1	7
Beaverton	Oregon	112	102	62	0.6%	1,186	60.0	4	1	4
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	115	106	51	0.7%	1,182	49.3	9	1	9
El Cajon	California	109	97	51	0.7%	1,166	52.3	3	1	3
Ann Arbor	Michigan	114	103	50	0.7%	1,162	48.4	5	1	5
Hyattsville	Maryland	113	97	46	0.7%	1,158	46.8	5	1	5
Fredericksburg	Virginia	115	103	54	0.7%	1,151	52.4	5	1	5
Boston	Massachusetts	115	105	47	0.8%	1,146	43.6	14	1	14
Alpharetta	Georgia	109	98	56	0.6%	1,142	61.5	4	1	4
Kalamazoo	Michigan	115	103	51	0.7%	1,139	49.3	7	1	7
Chattanooga	Tennessee	120	107	73	0.5%	1,136	64.3	15	1	15
Fort Collins	Colorado	110	101	62	0.6%	1,130	60.4	5	1	5
Jackson	Mississippi	113	99	52	0.7%	1,130	53.8	11	1	11
Frisco	Texas	105	95	54	0.7%	1,124	54.0	2	1	2
Melbourne	Florida	117	107	53	0.7%	1,120	46.8	5	1	5
Allentown	Pennsylvania	111	101	54	0.7%	1,119	52.9	7	1	7
Huntsville	Alabama	118	108	69	0.6%	1,119	61.9	11	1	11
Orange	California	111	100	47	0.8%	1,114	42.6	5	1	5
Schenectady	New York	113	101	52	0.7%	1,105	51.0	8	1	8
Odessa	Texas	112	103	51	0.7%	1,103	52.8	6	1	6
Escondido	California	104	94	53	0.6%	1,100	58.3	4	1	4
Visalia	California	108	99	47	0.7%	1,100	46.3	3	1	3
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	115	106	63	0.6%	1,088	62.8	9	1	9
Flint	Michigan	117	105	53	0.7%	1,086	49.1	7	1	7
Sunnyvale	California	107	98	43	0.7%	1,085	46.5	4	1	4
Edmond	Oklahoma	109	100	57	0.6%	1,083	56.2	5	1	5
Fairfax	Virginia	106	96	51	0.7%	1,082	52.8	4	1	4
Denton	Texas	110	101	51	0.7%	1,082	51.2	6	1	6
Roanoke	Virginia	112	100	58	0.6%	1,081	55.2	10	1	10
Edinburg	Texas	112	102	53	0.7%	1,080	49.7	3	1	3
Green Bay	Wisconsin	112	103	59	0.6%	1,070	60.7	7	1	7
Compton	California	106	98	42	0.8%	1,064	42.3	3	1	3
Tempe	Arizona	112	103	63	0.6%	1,062	62.3	4	1	4
Midland	Texas	113	102	56	0.7%	1,057	53.2	5	1	5
Rockville	Maryland	109	101	46	0.7%	1,056	45.5	4	1	4
Lake Charles	Louisiana	112	102	39	0.8%	1,055	38.6	5	1	5
Round Rock	Texas	107	99	56	0.6%	1,051	56.7	3	1	3
Everett	Washington	112	100	57	0.6%	1,047	57.2	5	1	5
Conroe	Texas	111	101	56	0.7%	1,044	53.1	7	1	7
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	108	99	44	0.7%	1,044	47.4	5	1	5
Manassas	Virginia	110	101	52	0.7%	1,035	50.8	4	1	4
Pueblo	Colorado	111	98	56	0.7%	1,033	53.6	7	1	7
Sugar Land	Texas	105	97	59	0.6%	1,032	57.3	3	1	3
Killeen	Texas	110	101	50	0.7%	1,028	49.8	4	1	4
Waco	Texas	112	100	56	0.6%	1,026	55.2	9	1	9
Paterson	New Jersey	112	99	48	0.7%	1,025	47.9	9	1	9
Topeka	Kansas	117	105	62	0.6%	1,024	57.2	18	1	18
Fullerton	California	106	97	43	0.7%	1,023	46.0	4	1	4
San Mateo	California	106	97	46	0.7%	1,020	47.8	4	1	4
Kent	Washington	113	102	55	0.6%	1,012	56.0	4	1	4
Cypress	Texas	108	101	59	0.6%	1,010	60.0	2	1	2
Albany	New York	117	102	58	0.7%	1,004	52.0	11	1	11
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	114	105	71	0.5%	1,001	64.4	5	1	5
Humble	Texas	108	98	60	0.6%	997	59.3	3	1	3
Peoria	Arizona	110	99	65	0.6%	989	61.5	4	1	4
Bridgeport	Connecticut	112	102	54	0.7%	986	50.3	6	1	6
Lawrenceville	Georgia	121	109	80	0.4%	985	67.8	3	1	3
Clarksville	Tennessee	105	96	64	0.6%	984	62.7	3	1	3
Carrollton	Texas	109	98	47	0.7%	983	45.3	3	1	3
Decatur	Georgia	109	99	65	0.5%	983	64.2	5	1	5
Santa Maria	California	106	97	49	0.7%	976	51.0	3	1	3
Mesquite	Texas	106	98	50	0.7%	974	52.3	3	1	3
Astoria	New York	111	100	54	0.7%	972	50.8	4	1	4
Victorville	California	105	95	45	0.7%	972	47.7	3	1	3
Evansville	Indiana	134	120	72	0.5%	968	66.1	8	1	8
Sterling Heights	Michigan	112	104	47	0.7%	966	45.8	4	1	4
Murrieta	California	106	96	44	0.7%	965	46.0	2	1	2
Tyler	Texas	115	104	61	0.6%	965	57.1	9	1	9
Cumming	Georgia	106	97	59	0.6%	963	58.7	3	1	3
Renton	Washington	112	100	58	0.6%	962	56.6	5	1	5
Olathe	Kansas	107	98	50	0.7%	961	52.5	2	1	2
Mcallen	Texas	109	100	51	0.7%	957	52.0	3	1	3
Warren	Michigan	115	103	52	0.7%	956	48.4	5	1	5
Beaumont	Texas	114	103	58	0.7%	955	53.1	8	1	8
Roseville	California	106	95	47	0.7%	952	50.3	3	1	3
Youngstown	Ohio	116	105	61	0.6%	952	59.6	12	1	12
Rockford	Illinois	114	104	69	0.5%	949	67.8	9	1	9
Bellevue	Washington	112	101	54	0.6%	940	54.8	5	1	5
Vallejo	California	107	98	42	0.8%	938	45.3	4	1	4
Puyallup	Washington	112	101	55	0.7%	937	52.8	5	1	5
Hampton	Virginia	114	100	54	0.7%	934	50.7	6	1	6
Santa Clara	California	107	97	41	0.7%	933	44.0	4	1	4
Berkeley	California	110	99	45	0.7%	926	46.8	9	1	9
Hemet	California	105	95	43	0.7%	926	47.3	3	1	3
Simi Valley	California	101	92	44	0.7%	926	47.5	2	1	2
Santa Barbara	California	111	99	54	0.7%	923	50.6	7	1	7
Billings	Montana	106	98	53	0.7%	918	52.3	4	1	4
Canton	Ohio	117	105	62	0.6%	916	57.1	12	1	12
Summerville	South Carolina	104	96	51	0.7%	916	53.5	2	1	2
Macon	Georgia	118	108	68	0.6%	912	62.9	9	1	9
Temecula	California	109	99	48	0.7%	908	50.3	3	1	3
Concord	California	107	98	48	0.7%	907	49.3	4	1	4
Naperville	Illinois	107	97	64	0.5%	906	64.3	4	1	4
Pearland	Texas	104	96	53	0.7%	903	53.5	2	1	2
Saginaw	Michigan	118	107	54	0.7%	900	49.9	7	1	7
Delray Beach	Florida	109	100	43	0.8%	899	43.4	5	1	5
Muskegon	Michigan	111	100	44	0.7%	898	50.0	5	1	5
Hamilton	Ohio	110	102	56	0.6%	888	55.3	3	1	3
Downey	California	100	91	40	0.8%	887	40.7	3	1	3
San Leandro	California	108	97	38	0.8%	886	39.7	3	1	3
Frederick	Maryland	106	96	53	0.7%	885	52.3	4	1	4
Clovis	California	106	97	48	0.7%	881	46.3	3	1	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	112	104	56	0.7%	873	52.0	5	1	5
West Valley City	Utah	106	96	52	0.7%	869	53.3	3	1	3
La Puente	California	105	96	45	0.7%	862	45.0	2	1	2
Fairfield	California	102	93	40	0.8%	859	43.5	2	1	2
Ventura	California	104	95	42	0.7%	856	45.3	3	1	3
Gaithersburg	Maryland	121	106	59	0.6%	855	58.2	4	1	4
Bloomington	Indiana	107	97	55	0.6%	853	53.2	6	1	6
Cambridge	Massachusetts	109	100	47	0.7%	853	43.6	5	1	5
Sparks	Nevada	108	98	46	0.7%	853	46.5	4	1	4
Spring Hill	Florida	110	99	49	0.7%	853	51.8	5	1	5
Yuma	Arizona	107	99	61	0.6%	849	61.3	3	1	3
Abilene	Texas	111	102	55	0.7%	848	53.2	6	1	6
Inglewood	California	124	112	58	0.6%	848	52.8	4	1	4
Miami Beach	Florida	113	99	50	0.7%	842	47.2	5	1	5
Lowell	Massachusetts	108	100	41	0.8%	842	43.5	4	1	4
Daly City	California	103	94	41	0.7%	840	46.0	2	1	2
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	109	99	52	0.7%	840	52.0	4	1	4
Lewisville	Texas	109	100	48	0.7%	839	48.0	3	1	3
West Covina	California	111	100	47	0.8%	839	42.3	3	1	3
Redwood City	California	105	95	47	0.7%	837	45.5	4	1	4
Norwalk	California	99	91	40	0.8%	836	40.0	1	1	1
Pacoima	California	100	90	38	0.8%	836	40.0	1	1	1
Laurel	Maryland	109	99	41	0.7%	831	45.3	4	1	4
Bell Gardens	California	99	90	38	0.8%	830	38.0	1	1	1
Independence	Missouri	112	103	55	0.7%	828	51.9	8	1	8
New Haven	Connecticut	106	98	53	0.6%	828	56.2	5	1	5
New Port Richey	Florida	111	101	50	0.7%	828	50.8	4	1	4
Costa Mesa	California	104	95	43	0.7%	827	46.0	2	1	2
Burbank	California	109	100	42	0.8%	827	42.6	5	1	5
Longmont	Colorado	108	98	55	0.6%	826	56.3	3	1	3
Racine	Wisconsin	111	103	50	0.7%	824	54.6	5	1	5
Palm Bay	Florida	107	100	45	0.7%	821	46.5	4	1	4
Stamford	Connecticut	112	102	59	0.6%	821	58.2	6	1	6
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	114	101	63	0.6%	818	60.8	6	1	6
Saint Charles	Missouri	104	95	58	0.6%	817	60.3	3	1	3
Bellingham	Washington	106	96	53	0.6%	816	54.0	3	1	3
Tracy	California	106	96	47	0.7%	816	47.8	4	1	4
Bothell	Washington	110	98	55	0.6%	815	55.3	3	1	3
Perris	California	106	96	48	0.7%	813	50.0	2	1	2
Duluth	Minnesota	115	106	52	0.7%	811	48.9	11	1	11
Winter Haven	Florida	107	97	44	0.8%	810	43.3	3	1	3
Vero Beach	Florida	114	101	50	0.7%	807	48.8	6	1	6
Boulder	Colorado	112	102	56	0.6%	807	57.2	6	1	6
West Jordan	Utah	112	103	56	0.6%	802	54.0	3	1	3
Hartford	Connecticut	105	97	53	0.6%	800	54.0	6	1	6
Lehigh Acres	Florida	110	101	53	0.7%	800	50.2	6	1	6
Vista	California	106	97	53	0.7%	798	52.3	3	1	3
Falls Church	Virginia	107	96	53	0.7%	797	53.4	5	1	5
Spartanburg	South Carolina	114	105	47	0.7%	797	47.6	5	1	5
Surprise	Arizona	106	98	63	0.6%	792	60.5	4	1	4
Charlottesville	Virginia	113	100	59	0.6%	790	55.0	5	1	5
Provo	Utah	108	99	48	0.7%	790	51.7	3	1	3
High Point	North Carolina	110	99	51	0.6%	788	54.8	4	1	4
Yakima	Washington	109	100	61	0.6%	788	57.8	4	1	4
Asheville	North Carolina	112	100	63	0.6%	785	59.0	5	1	5
Antioch	California	107	99	47	0.7%	784	48.0	2	1	2
Manchester	New Hampshire	113	101	54	0.7%	783	52.6	5	1	5
Richardson	Texas	109	101	51	0.7%	781	51.3	3	1	3
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	111	102	57	0.6%	778	55.5	4	1	4
South Bend	Indiana	130	116	69	0.5%	777	68.1	8	1	8
Joliet	Illinois	108	97	64	0.6%	773	59.6	5	1	5
Auburn	Washington	112	101	54	0.7%	771	50.7	3	1	3
Panama City	Florida	107	99	58	0.6%	769	58.5	6	1	6
Fargo	North Dakota	108	100	57	0.6%	767	56.0	4	1	4
Menifee	California	108	98	46	0.7%	766	50.3	4	1	4
Las Cruces	New Mexico	120	107	67	0.5%	763	62.3	6	1	6
Rock Hill	South Carolina	108	99	51	0.7%	762	54.0	3	1	3
Norman	Oklahoma	111	100	62	0.6%	761	57.8	4	1	4
South Gate	California	99	90	39	0.8%	761	39.0	1	1	1
Ridgewood	New York	99	91	45	0.7%	758	48.0	1	1	1
Toms River	New Jersey	109	99	58	0.6%	758	56.7	3	1	3
Allen	Texas	102	94	50	0.7%	756	51.5	2	1	2
Baytown	Texas	108	98	56	0.6%	756	55.0	3	1	3
Hawthorne	California	101	90	40	0.8%	755	41.0	1	1	1
Largo	Florida	113	105	51	0.7%	754	48.0	5	1	5
Bend	Oregon	109	99	59	0.6%	752	56.7	3	1	3
College Station	Texas	107	98	57	0.6%	752	58.0	2	1	2
Chico	California	105	96	50	0.7%	750	52.0	3	1	3
Arvada	Colorado	110	101	67	0.6%	741	63.8	5	1	5
El Monte	California	103	94	40	0.8%	741	40.5	2	1	2
Appleton	Wisconsin	107	99	57	0.6%	740	58.3	4	1	4
Vacaville	California	101	92	46	0.7%	740	49.5	2	1	2
Hesperia	California	105	94	46	0.7%	738	46.5	2	1	2
Rialto	California	106	97	49	0.7%	737	49.5	2	1	2
Sandy	Utah	111	103	53	0.7%	736	52.3	4	1	4
Bowling Green	Kentucky	108	97	56	0.6%	736	57.3	4	1	4
Keller	Texas	108	99	57	0.6%	736	55.5	2	1	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	107	97	38	0.8%	734	40.3	4	1	4
Santa Fe	New Mexico	109	99	63	0.6%	733	62.0	5	1	5
Sylmar	California	100	94	41	0.8%	733	43.0	1	1	1
Gastonia	North Carolina	107	97	52	0.7%	731	50.7	3	1	3
Ashburn	Virginia	104	95	50	0.7%	730	54.0	2	1	2
Madera	California	105	94	46	0.7%	730	50.7	3	1	3
Pittsburg	California	98	90	40	0.8%	730	43.0	1	1	1
Daytona Beach	Florida	108	98	47	0.7%	724	49.6	5	1	5
Santa Cruz	California	106	95	50	0.7%	723	51.0	4	1	4
Redding	California	110	99	54	0.6%	722	55.0	4	1	4
Palo Alto	California	107	96	45	0.7%	721	44.5	4	1	4
Clermont	Florida	108	96	47	0.7%	719	45.0	3	1	3
Chino	California	105	96	42	0.8%	718	43.5	2	1	2
Merced	California	108	100	47	0.7%	718	49.3	3	1	3
Athens	Georgia	115	106	61	0.6%	717	60.3	6	1	6
Orem	Utah	104	96	46	0.7%	716	47.7	3	1	3
Riverview	Florida	104	96	57	0.6%	714	54.0	3	1	3
Elizabeth	New Jersey	106	97	46	0.7%	714	48.0	3	1	3
Santa Monica	California	105	96	40	0.8%	714	43.0	5	1	5
Elgin	Illinois	107	97	60	0.6%	713	61.7	3	1	3
New Braunfels	Texas	104	96	51	0.7%	711	52.0	2	1	2
Lawrence	Kansas	111	102	51	0.7%	710	49.0	5	1	5
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	106	97	64	0.5%	709	63.7	3	1	3
Mission Viejo	California	105	95	47	0.7%	708	47.0	2	1	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	110	98	49	0.7%	701	50.0	6	1	6
Gulfport	Mississippi	111	99	48	0.7%	700	46.7	3	1	3
Carlsbad	California	109	96	59	0.6%	700	56.5	4	1	4
Quincy	Massachusetts	107	96	45	0.7%	699	44.0	3	1	3
Bowie	Maryland	111	100	52	0.7%	696	51.0	4	1	4
Kenosha	Wisconsin	112	104	62	0.6%	694	57.3	4	1	4
Livonia	Michigan	109	98	46	0.7%	694	45.7	3	1	3
Brockton	Massachusetts	103	95	45	0.7%	693	46.5	2	1	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	108	98	64	0.5%	691	65.7	3	1	3
Indio	California	103	94	46	0.7%	690	48.5	2	1	2
Dearborn	Michigan	110	99	46	0.7%	686	46.8	4	1	4
West Chester	Pennsylvania	103	94	52	0.6%	685	55.3	3	1	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	109	101	59	0.6%	683	56.2	6	1	6
Coral Springs	Florida	104	96	48	0.7%	682	49.5	2	1	2
Clinton Township	Michigan	111	102	53	0.7%	679	50.7	3	1	3
Englewood	Colorado	109	100	56	0.6%	678	58.8	4	1	4
Missouri City	Texas	109	99	56	0.6%	676	55.0	2	1	2
Edison	New Jersey	107	97	50	0.7%	676	51.0	3	1	3
Annapolis	Maryland	110	101	44	0.7%	674	46.8	5	1	5
Hagerstown	Maryland	109	100	49	0.7%	673	50.0	3	1	3
Elmhurst	New York	100	91	46	0.7%	667	48.0	1	1	1
Jupiter	Florida	107	97	52	0.7%	665	50.5	4	1	4
Lynchburg	Virginia	107	97	54	0.6%	665	53.0	4	1	4
Apopka	Florida	105	95	51	0.7%	664	51.0	2	1	2
Lynnwood	Washington	104	95	56	0.6%	662	58.0	3	1	3
O Fallon	Missouri	105	95	47	0.7%	660	50.5	2	1	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	117	104	56	0.7%	660	53.0	8	1	8
San Marcos	California	107	98	52	0.7%	659	53.5	2	1	2
Herndon	Virginia	104	94	51	0.7%	656	49.0	2	1	2
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	91	54	0.7%	655	54.0	1	1	1
Fort Mill	South Carolina	106	98	48	0.7%	654	50.0	3	1	3
Mcdonough	Georgia	107	98	55	0.6%	654	55.0	2	1	2
Fort Pierce	Florida	119	105	57	0.7%	653	50.8	8	1	8
Deltona	Florida	102	93	49	0.7%	653	49.5	2	1	2
New Bedford	Massachusetts	114	104	53	0.7%	653	49.3	4	1	4
Davenport	Iowa	109	100	56	0.6%	649	58.3	6	1	6
Holland	Michigan	107	98	47	0.7%	649	50.0	2	1	2
Portsmouth	Virginia	112	102	52	0.7%	649	52.3	7	1	7
Anderson	South Carolina	107	99	54	0.7%	648	53.0	4	1	4
Broomfield	Colorado	105	96	57	0.6%	646	57.7	3	1	3
Federal Way	Washington	105	95	53	0.6%	646	54.5	2	1	2
San Angelo	Texas	108	99	60	0.6%	646	59.5	4	1	4
Florissant	Missouri	108	99	60	0.6%	645	58.0	3	1	3
Missoula	Montana	111	102	52	0.7%	645	52.0	5	1	5
Napa	California	101	92	51	0.7%	643	52.0	2	1	2
Hillsboro	Oregon	106	95	54	0.6%	638	57.0	2	1	2
Midlothian	Virginia	103	94	54	0.7%	638	53.7	3	1	3
Grand Junction	Colorado	108	97	59	0.6%	636	58.8	6	1	6
Westerville	Ohio	107	98	48	0.7%	635	52.0	2	1	2
Greeley	Colorado	104	95	62	0.6%	634	63.5	2	1	2
Kennewick	Washington	106	96	57	0.6%	633	55.3	3	1	3
Ballwin	Missouri	105	95	53	0.7%	632	52.5	2	1	2
Nampa	Idaho	109	99	63	0.5%	632	64.0	3	1	3
Douglasville	Georgia	109	99	64	0.6%	624	61.5	2	1	2
Idaho Falls	Idaho	107	97	60	0.6%	624	62.0	4	1	4
Bryan	Texas	114	105	59	0.6%	622	54.2	5	1	5
Livermore	California	105	95	55	0.6%	622	54.5	2	1	2
Rapid City	South Dakota	104	96	53	0.6%	620	54.0	3	1	3
Milton	Florida	108	99	56	0.6%	612	54.3	3	1	3
Wichita Falls	Texas	115	105	62	0.6%	611	57.4	7	1	7
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	110	99	55	0.6%	606	57.7	3	1	3
Medford	Oregon	106	98	55	0.6%	602	54.5	2	1	2
Springdale	Arkansas	104	96	56	0.6%	598	58.0	2	1	2
Buford	Georgia	102	94	57	0.6%	597	58.5	2	1	2
Elkhart	Indiana	109	101	60	0.6%	596	59.0	3	1	3
Morgantown	West Virginia	105	96	56	0.6%	596	57.0	3	1	3
Terre Haute	Indiana	112	103	58	0.6%	582	58.7	6	1	6
Woodstock	Georgia	104	96	63	0.6%	582	60.5	2	1	2
Champaign	Illinois	110	98	54	0.6%	575	58.3	3	1	3
Kennesaw	Georgia	108	97	60	0.6%	574	61.5	2	1	2
Waukegan	Illinois	104	96	60	0.6%	574	59.5	2	1	2
Meridian	Idaho	107	99	63	0.5%	570	65.0	2	1	2
Muncie	Indiana	110	100	61	0.6%	568	58.0	5	1	5
Franklin	Tennessee	105	96	66	0.5%	566	65.3	3	1	3
Acworth	Georgia	109	99	62	0.6%	566	62.5	2	1	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	108	99	60	0.6%	563	60.0	4	1	4
Belleville	Illinois	106	97	55	0.6%	559	60.5	4	1	4
Cary	North Carolina	123	108	82	0.4%	556	71.8	3	1	3
Roswell	Georgia	108	97	62	0.6%	555	63.0	2	1	2
Valdosta	Georgia	112	103	60	0.6%	551	63.2	5	1	5
Lithonia	Georgia	103	95	62	0.6%	544	62.0	2	1	2
Plainfield	Illinois	106	98	65	0.5%	530	63.7	3	1	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	102	93	64	0.5%	524	65.0	2	1	2
Newnan	Georgia	105	96	66	0.5%	500	65.0	2	1	2
Parker	Colorado	108	100	71	0.5%	498	69.0	2	1	2
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	108	67	0.5%	497	73.5	1	1	1
Longview	Texas	122	109	72	0.5%	491	63.0	4	1	4
Covington	Georgia	107	98	67	0.5%	475	67.5	2	1	2

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	147	126	69	0.8%	19,804	38.9	62	1	62
San Diego	134	116	75	0.6%	8,419	55.5	36	1	36
San Jose	129	116	63	0.7%	7,739	45.0	28	1	28
San Francisco	121	106	62	0.7%	5,889	52.4	28	1	28
Sacramento	134	115	73	0.7%	5,341	52.9	28	1	28
Fresno	120	105	57	0.7%	4,161	50.3	18	1	18
Bakersfield	112	102	49	0.7%	3,962	48.0	11	1	11
Long Beach	120	109	52	0.8%	3,817	40.0	12	1	12
Oakland	115	102	51	0.7%	3,001	46.2	14	1	14
Anaheim	114	102	49	0.8%	2,765	44.3	7	1	7
Santa Ana	110	99	48	0.7%	2,675	44.0	6	1	6
Riverside	113	102	52	0.7%	2,488	52.7	7	1	7
Stockton	122	108	64	0.6%	2,312	58.9	12	1	12
Irvine	112	101	48	0.7%	1,978	45.4	9	1	9
Modesto	111	101	47	0.7%	1,844	48.4	7	1	7
Corona	111	98	47	0.7%	1,824	48.6	5	1	5
San Bernardino	113	103	49	0.7%	1,767	47.7	7	1	7
Fontana	109	98	47	0.7%	1,726	46.0	3	1	3
Chula Vista	109	100	55	0.6%	1,641	56.4	5	1	5
Oxnard	107	98	43	0.7%	1,610	46.5	4	1	4
Fremont	107	98	52	0.7%	1,565	51.5	4	1	4
Santa Rosa	112	100	52	0.7%	1,534	48.2	6	1	6
Whittier	108	98	43	0.8%	1,477	43.5	6	1	6
Huntington Beach	111	99	46	0.7%	1,455	45.5	4	1	4
Van Nuys	105	95	39	0.8%	1,423	37.5	4	1	4
Hayward	108	98	45	0.7%	1,422	44.8	4	1	4
Moreno Valley	109	99	50	0.7%	1,406	51.0	4	1	4
Lancaster	105	96	41	0.8%	1,401	43.3	3	1	3
Torrance	113	103	43	0.8%	1,388	40.8	5	1	5
Palmdale	106	97	43	0.8%	1,359	41.8	4	1	4
Rancho Cucamonga	109	98	44	0.8%	1,337	43.0	4	1	4
Garden Grove	110	97	44	0.7%	1,300	44.8	5	1	5
North Hollywood	108	98	36	0.8%	1,283	36.8	4	1	4
Salinas	106	96	47	0.7%	1,271	52.4	5	1	5
Ontario	109	98	49	0.7%	1,247	48.3	3	1	3
Pasadena	113	103	46	0.8%	1,231	40.8	6	1	6
Elk Grove	109	96	49	0.7%	1,229	50.3	3	1	3
Oceanside	106	96	58	0.6%	1,213	58.3	4	1	4
Pomona	107	97	40	0.8%	1,213	42.0	3	1	3
El Cajon	109	97	51	0.7%	1,166	52.3	3	1	3
Orange	111	100	47	0.8%	1,114	42.6	5	1	5
Escondido	104	94	53	0.6%	1,100	58.3	4	1	4
Visalia	108	99	47	0.7%	1,100	46.3	3	1	3
Sunnyvale	107	98	43	0.7%	1,085	46.5	4	1	4
Compton	106	98	42	0.8%	1,064	42.3	3	1	3
Fullerton	106	97	43	0.7%	1,023	46.0	4	1	4
San Mateo	106	97	46	0.7%	1,020	47.8	4	1	4
Santa Maria	106	97	49	0.7%	976	51.0	3	1	3
Victorville	105	95	45	0.7%	972	47.7	3	1	3
Murrieta	106	96	44	0.7%	965	46.0	2	1	2
Roseville	106	95	47	0.7%	952	50.3	3	1	3
Vallejo	107	98	42	0.8%	938	45.3	4	1	4
Santa Clara	107	97	41	0.7%	933	44.0	4	1	4
Berkeley	110	99	45	0.7%	926	46.8	9	1	9
Hemet	105	95	43	0.7%	926	47.3	3	1	3
Simi Valley	101	92	44	0.7%	926	47.5	2	1	2
Santa Barbara	111	99	54	0.7%	923	50.6	7	1	7
Temecula	109	99	48	0.7%	908	50.3	3	1	3
Concord	107	98	48	0.7%	907	49.3	4	1	4
Downey	100	91	40	0.8%	887	40.7	3	1	3
San Leandro	108	97	38	0.8%	886	39.7	3	1	3
Clovis	106	97	48	0.7%	881	46.3	3	1	3
La Puente	105	96	45	0.7%	862	45.0	2	1	2
Fairfield	102	93	40	0.8%	859	43.5	2	1	2
Ventura	104	95	42	0.7%	856	45.3	3	1	3
Inglewood	124	112	58	0.6%	848	52.8	4	1	4
Daly City	103	94	41	0.7%	840	46.0	2	1	2
West Covina	111	100	47	0.8%	839	42.3	3	1	3
Redwood City	105	95	47	0.7%	837	45.5	4	1	4
Norwalk	99	91	40	0.8%	836	40.0	1	1	1
Pacoima	100	90	38	0.8%	836	40.0	1	1	1
Bell Gardens	99	90	38	0.8%	830	38.0	1	1	1
Costa Mesa	104	95	43	0.7%	827	46.0	2	1	2
Burbank	109	100	42	0.8%	827	42.6	5	1	5
Tracy	106	96	47	0.7%	816	47.8	4	1	4
Perris	106	96	48	0.7%	813	50.0	2	1	2
Vista	106	97	53	0.7%	798	52.3	3	1	3
Antioch	107	99	47	0.7%	784	48.0	2	1	2
Menifee	108	98	46	0.7%	766	50.3	4	1	4
South Gate	99	90	39	0.8%	761	39.0	1	1	1
Hawthorne	101	90	40	0.8%	755	41.0	1	1	1
Chico	105	96	50	0.7%	750	52.0	3	1	3
El Monte	103	94	40	0.8%	741	40.5	2	1	2
Vacaville	101	92	46	0.7%	740	49.5	2	1	2
Hesperia	105	94	46	0.7%	738	46.5	2	1	2
Rialto	106	97	49	0.7%	737	49.5	2	1	2
Sylmar	100	94	41	0.8%	733	43.0	1	1	1
Madera	105	94	46	0.7%	730	50.7	3	1	3
Pittsburg	98	90	40	0.8%	730	43.0	1	1	1
Santa Cruz	106	95	50	0.7%	723	51.0	4	1	4
Redding	110	99	54	0.6%	722	55.0	4	1	4
Palo Alto	107	96	45	0.7%	721	44.5	4	1	4
Chino	105	96	42	0.8%	718	43.5	2	1	2
Merced	108	100	47	0.7%	718	49.3	3	1	3
Santa Monica	105	96	40	0.8%	714	43.0	5	1	5
Mission Viejo	105	95	47	0.7%	708	47.0	2	1	2
Carlsbad	109	96	59	0.6%	700	56.5	4	1	4
Indio	103	94	46	0.7%	690	48.5	2	1	2
San Marcos	107	98	52	0.7%	659	53.5	2	1	2
Napa	101	92	51	0.7%	643	52.0	2	1	2
Livermore	105	95	55	0.6%	622	54.5	2	1	2

Houston

ZIP	lancerinsurance.com	allstate.com	nationwide.com	farmers.com	geico.com	esurance.com
77088	63	4	5	8	6	7
77047	61	4	5	8	6	7
77037	51	4	5	6	7	8
77098	59	4	5	7	6	8
77027	55	4	5	7	6	8
77068	50	1	5	7	6	8
77078	64	4	5	8	7	6
77086	54	4	5	7	6	8
77035	54	4	5	7	6	8
77008	65	4	5	7	6	8
77004	55	1	5	7	6	8
77028	51	4	5	7	6	8
77059	56	2	5	7	6	8
77039	54	4	5	7	6	8
77019	55	4	5	7	6	8
77075	47	1	2	4	3	5
77077	66	4	5	7	6	8
77079	50	4	5	7	6	8
77099	51	4	5	7	6	8
77024	52	4	5	7	6	8
77095	50	4	5	2	7	8
77048	62	4	5	7	6	8
77044	52	4	5	6	7	8
77015	65	4	5	6	8	7
77017	48	1	2	4	3	5
77057	56	4	5	7	6	8
77055	55	4	5	2	6	8
77006	64	4	5	7	6	8
77026	49	1	2	3	4	5
77046	53	4	5	7	6	8
77066	66	2	5	6	7	8
77023	60	4	5	6	8	7
77094	61	4	5	7	6	8
77084	66	4	5	7	6	8
77013	61	4	5	7	6	8
77063	53	1	2	4	3	5
77053	57	4	5	6	7	8
77022	68	4	5	8	6	7
77072	59	4	5	8	6	7
77049	64	4	5	6	7	8
77045	68	4	5	7	6	8
77010	69	1	5	6	8	7
77018	60	4	5	7	6	8
77041	56	3	5	6	7	8
77009	65	1	2	3	4	5
77089	59	2	5	1	6	8
77032	54	4	5	6	7	8
77036	64	4	5	6	8	7
77085	61	4	5	6	8	7
77054	49	4	5	7	6	8
77058	50	4	5	8	6	7
77014	49	4	5	7	6	8
77067	48	1	2	3	4	5
77005	46	4	5	7	6	8
77076	59	1	2	4	3	5
77070	65	4	5	7	6	8
77060	47	4	5	8	6	7
77080	65	4	5	3	8	6
77050	54	1	2	4	5	3
77091	53	4	5	8	6	7
77071	61	1	2	5	3	4
77061	56	4	5	7	6	8
77020	59	4	5	7	8	6
77081	58	4	5	6	7	8
77030	53	4	5	8	6	7
77040	46	4	5	6	7	8
77090	58	1	5	8	6	7
77031	56	1	2	3	5	4
77051	48	4	5	7	6	8
77011	49	4	5	7	6	8
77042	60	4	5	7	6	8
77062	61	4	5	3	8	6
77082	48	1	2	4	3	5
77093	51	4	5	7	6	8
77073	50	4	5	8	7	6
77033	54	4	5	8	7	6
77043	59	4	5	6	7	8
77074	54	4	5	8	7	6
77064	57	4	5	7	6	8
77012	57	4	5	8	6	7
77002	54	4	5	8	6	7
77092	53	4	5	7	8	6
77069	56	4	5	6	8	7
77021	54	1	2	5	3	4
77083	50	4	5	7	8	6
77029	53	4	5	7	8	6
77034	51	1	5	8	6	7
77087	52	1	2	5	4	3
77003	62	2	5	8	7	6
77038	55	4	5	7	8	6
77007	55	1	2	5	4	3
77016	55	4	5	7	8	6
77065	50	4	5	7	8	6
77096	57	4	5	6	8	7
77025	53	1	2	4	3	5
77056	57	4	5	6	8	7

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Lancerinsurance

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 8,137 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Lancerinsurance Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (insurance company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Lancerinsurance Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Lancerinsurance Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Lancerinsurance Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly