Crunch Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve crunch.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 13,305 Gyms In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Crunch Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Crunch Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Crunch Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Brooklyn
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Crunch Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	34,882	13,305	5	23.1%	74,591,402	9.4	27,362	32,636	292	54,084	337	1,285	36,155
California	4,415	2,035	5	31.3%	12,263,900	9.2	1,164	1,738	67	2,557	26	183	1,657
New York	2,962	1,383	4	33.8%	6,631,484	8.4	1,489	1,754	34	3,054	12	60	2,230
Florida	2,755	1,297	4	28.7%	5,912,084	9.5	446	975	38	1,314	9	106	751
Texas	3,524	1,604	6	20.6%	5,744,678	10.5	1,360	1,917	22	2,722	52	228	1,784
Michigan	2,051	980	5	29.5%	2,934,533	8.0	833	976	12	1,733	13	57	1,295
Ohio	2,338	1,162	6	24.6%	2,860,454	9.1	975	1,187	10	2,070	2	51	1,401
Pennsylvania	2,688	1,340	6	20.8%	2,661,700	9.8	1,603	1,780	12	3,073	32	75	2,155
New Jersey	1,775	883	5	27.2%	2,413,251	8.8	537	593	30	1,008	16	42	647
Illinois	2,798	1,312	8	15.3%	1,964,839	10.4	1,245	1,380	8	2,330	14	44	1,481
Georgia	2,016	985	7	18.5%	1,907,037	9.8	574	726	12	1,087	2	5	566
Virginia	1,936	921	7	18.6%	1,562,950	9.8	723	891	8	1,476	4	37	976
Massachusetts	1,836	950	5	22.5%	1,537,239	9.7	461	534	13	957	11	24	623
North Carolina	2,089	990	7	14.9%	1,509,740	10.4	683	802	5	1,296	0	0	727
Alabama	1,536	786	6	30.9%	1,501,498	7.9	522	637	8	1,060	47	72	724
Kentucky	1,635	819	5	32.9%	1,464,963	8.0	697	757	7	1,289	10	42	992
Colorado	1,660	805	5	25.8%	1,424,344	9.2	381	514	7	804	1	41	503
Washington	1,750	891	6	19.5%	1,416,340	10.3	451	587	8	924	5	14	605
South Carolina	1,343	677	5	28.0%	1,389,606	8.9	347	422	7	655	0	15	427
Arizona	1,335	675	7	19.5%	1,357,444	12.4	247	396	5	554	2	3	304
Mississippi	1,293	676	6	36.1%	1,080,055	7.8	384	418	7	728	5	18	548
Wisconsin	1,895	867	6	18.2%	1,052,355	8.9	694	769	3	1,349	5	12	965
Indiana	2,878	1,368	6	15.2%	1,005,734	10.4	658	769	6	1,280	2	13	759
Tennessee	1,632	818	9	14.0%	927,897	11.1	514	622	4	965	8	10	584
Maryland	1,303	702	7	15.3%	916,071	9.8	392	463	6	765	0	2	500
Missouri	2,086	1,040	8	14.5%	883,091	9.8	887	1,017	2	1,732	0	0	1,128
Minnesota	1,926	897	7	15.6%	859,554	9.4	777	878	3	1,535	1	2	1,005
New Mexico	1,079	594	4	41.1%	858,833	7.4	327	361	4	575	7	26	458
Connecticut	1,271	666	6	22.3%	799,872	8.7	234	279	5	495	5	11	335
Kansas	1,515	733	6	24.2%	702,743	8.5	615	691	4	1,150	37	54	829
Louisiana	1,308	661	7	14.7%	686,218	10.7	429	508	2	796	0	0	535
Idaho	1,114	618	4	35.2%	593,984	8.2	251	273	8	447	4	11	317
Arkansas	1,465	727	7	19.6%	584,851	8.2	553	587	2	1,049	0	0	796
Oklahoma	1,441	721	11	14.4%	566,021	11.3	557	645	4	1,025	5	11	587
Oregon	1,772	895	9	13.7%	558,780	11.5	353	412	7	683	0	2	369
Iowa	1,772	802	6	17.4%	545,156	9.1	890	933	3	1,641	0	0	1,190
Nebraska	1,396	751	5	27.8%	529,846	9.5	523	580	3	932	0	0	646
Nevada	807	447	8	15.2%	444,183	11.1	92	168	4	228	0	14	105
West Virginia	1,171	643	6	20.2%	369,230	8.5	684	704	2	1,310	0	0	1,048
Utah	1,087	585	10	11.3%	344,272	9.9	246	284	2	496	0	0	294
Maine	1,614	916	6	21.8%	290,977	8.3	421	425	2	792	0	0	649
New Hampshire	1,030	586	5	18.5%	248,310	8.4	238	248	3	476	0	0	353
Hawaii	620	357	10	11.8%	167,379	9.7	82	93	2	155	0	0	110
Montana	1,115	594	6	15.3%	159,199	9.2	348	361	2	678	0	0	392
Delaware	606	376	6	15.0%	142,359	11.0	52	66	2	108	0	0	51
Rhode Island	513	314	8	13.3%	140,167	10.0	64	77	2	137	0	0	78
South Dakota	970	532	9	16.0%	138,422	9.3	359	370	2	689	0	0	383
Vermont	863	495	6	20.4%	127,795	8.6	250	254	2	482	0	0	366
Alaska	942	535	9	15.8%	116,508	8.9	217	234	2	398	0	0	311
North Dakota	794	445	7	13.9%	104,325	9.5	367	381	2	681	0	0	406
Wyoming	826	452	7	17.2%	99,837	9.0	164	171	2	315	0	0	200

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Brooklyn	New York	221	141	3	54.6%	1,420,748	5.8	37	5	50	0	1	45
Los Angeles	California	353	225	5	40.8%	1,003,080	7.0	62	3	64	4	15	55
Bronx	New York	234	156	3	60.4%	870,323	5.0	25	3	29	0	3	29
Phoenix	Arizona	304	194	5	47.1%	682,753	6.6	42	2	42	0	0	40
New York City	New York	323	196	5	41.3%	670,542	6.4	47	3	49	0	4	46
San Antonio	Texas	343	208	6	31.4%	557,829	8.5	59	3	61	0	0	50
Louisville	Kentucky	239	158	3	68.4%	520,408	4.0	32	1	32	0	14	32
Colorado Springs	Colorado	244	160	2	80.7%	470,803	3.2	30	1	30	0	22	30
San Francisco	California	253	153	5	51.0%	443,503	5.9	28	4	53	0	0	52
Albuquerque	New Mexico	189	133	2	67.2%	440,639	4.4	17	1	17	0	7	16
Bakersfield	California	211	141	3	69.6%	389,218	3.9	11	1	11	0	3	11
Fresno	California	235	159	4	63.3%	381,063	4.7	18	4	19	0	7	18
Staten Island	New York	207	133	3	75.2%	356,387	3.8	12	2	13	0	8	13
Long Beach	California	193	131	4	63.8%	305,625	4.7	12	2	13	0	1	13
Miami	Florida	377	222	11	15.5%	290,358	11.9	55	4	68	0	1	19
Stockton	California	214	153	3	73.2%	273,749	3.7	12	1	12	0	4	12
Hollywood	Florida	210	145	4	56.7%	265,735	6.2	9	4	13	0	5	6
Columbus	Ohio	226	148	7	31.0%	262,040	15.9	30	3	32	0	4	18
Orlando	Florida	310	194	7	25.8%	257,243	8.8	32	3	33	0	1	23
Cincinnati	Ohio	263	174	6	31.9%	256,712	8.4	45	5	62	0	0	49
Omaha	Nebraska	252	175	5	45.2%	249,852	6.4	31	1	31	0	0	31
Aurora	Colorado	200	142	4	56.3%	244,953	5.7	11	1	11	0	0	11
Toledo	Ohio	206	144	2	78.1%	240,363	2.9	15	1	15	0	13	15
Riverside	California	179	125	3	64.5%	238,601	4.9	7	2	14	0	0	14
Tampa	Florida	289	194	7	29.4%	233,287	8.0	27	5	27	0	0	25
Columbia	South Carolina	196	130	3	67.8%	232,404	4.3	14	1	14	0	0	14
Raleigh	North Carolina	220	153	7	42.3%	231,416	6.8	15	1	15	0	0	15
Corpus Christi	Texas	208	132	4	70.8%	230,644	3.7	18	1	18	0	14	18
Kissimmee	Florida	225	143	3	76.8%	222,087	3.6	7	2	7	0	4	7
Buffalo	New York	256	172	8	39.1%	219,840	8.1	28	4	41	2	2	21
Lakeland	Florida	168	116	2	84.9%	218,994	2.7	9	1	9	0	7	9
Naples	Florida	205	143	3	69.1%	216,226	4.0	14	2	14	0	4	14
Lubbock	Texas	194	130	2	78.1%	216,183	3.4	14	1	16	0	11	16
Bradenton	Florida	199	137	2	84.1%	212,839	2.4	10	2	10	0	9	10
Reno	Nevada	175	123	3	70.7%	209,779	3.4	12	1	12	0	8	12
Fort Myers	Florida	199	133	2	82.4%	207,312	3.4	11	1	11	0	8	11
Montgomery	Alabama	199	132	1	96.8%	203,170	1.6	13	1	14	10	11	14
Laredo	Texas	157	110	3	73.8%	199,902	3.7	6	1	6	0	5	6
San Diego	California	291	189	9	14.7%	197,803	13.9	36	5	40	0	1	12
Brownsville	Texas	145	108	2	92.3%	185,869	1.7	3	2	4	1	4	4
Amarillo	Texas	198	142	2	80.9%	185,287	2.7	14	1	14	2	9	14
Huntington Beach	California	141	107	2	90.0%	179,916	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Clarksville	Tennessee	131	97	1	100.0%	175,697	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Gainesville	Florida	178	127	2	83.6%	175,103	2.6	10	1	10	0	8	10
Atlanta	Georgia	379	246	7	17.2%	170,138	12.9	39	4	44	1	1	13
Palmdale	California	157	119	2	93.3%	163,169	2.5	4	1	4	1	3	4
Moreno Valley	California	149	118	2	79.4%	163,155	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Worcester	Massachusetts	188	129	2	86.8%	161,131	2.3	9	1	10	0	8	10
Oceanside	California	143	104	3	80.0%	160,207	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Topeka	Kansas	225	156	1	97.4%	159,268	1.3	18	1	18	15	17	18
Rancho Cucamonga	California	140	105	2	90.0%	158,938	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Van Nuys	California	149	98	2	89.1%	158,453	2.0	4	1	4	2	4	4
Garden Grove	California	168	123	2	90.0%	158,185	2.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Vancouver	Washington	198	140	5	48.3%	157,513	6.3	11	2	11	0	0	11
Elk Grove	California	138	108	2	87.2%	156,419	2.3	3	1	4	0	3	4
Sarasota	Florida	220	137	4	61.8%	154,613	5.0	13	1	13	0	0	13
West Palm Beach	Florida	214	155	5	41.7%	154,406	7.1	12	1	12	0	1	12
Trenton	New Jersey	210	152	3	73.9%	153,696	4.2	11	3	15	4	4	13
Beaverton	Oregon	152	108	3	73.9%	149,095	3.8	4	1	4	0	2	4
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	180	129	2	87.2%	147,724	2.0	9	1	9	3	8	9
Waco	Texas	177	125	2	92.5%	146,388	1.7	9	1	9	4	9	9
Lancaster	California	143	112	2	78.2%	144,206	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Tyler	Texas	182	124	1	92.1%	143,768	1.9	9	1	9	5	7	9
Roanoke	Virginia	197	139	3	84.0%	142,404	2.5	10	1	10	0	10	10
North Hollywood	California	145	96	1	92.6%	141,840	2.0	4	1	4	2	4	4
Gilbert	Arizona	186	131	5	57.2%	136,561	5.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Killeen	Texas	162	110	2	90.0%	135,180	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Minneapolis	Minnesota	405	256	9	12.3%	134,328	11.7	51	3	78	0	1	11
Midland	Texas	158	112	3	83.1%	132,933	2.8	5	1	5	0	4	5
Santa Rosa	California	148	101	3	60.9%	131,496	5.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Ann Arbor	Michigan	151	113	2	78.2%	130,398	3.2	5	1	5	0	4	5
Birmingham	Alabama	246	168	4	25.9%	129,698	9.8	30	3	36	2	2	17
Edinburg	Texas	145	109	2	83.2%	129,417	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Corona	California	165	130	4	50.0%	128,698	5.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Warren	Michigan	160	120	2	94.1%	127,165	1.6	5	1	5	2	5	5
Sunnyvale	California	166	124	2	82.7%	126,340	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Lansing	Michigan	162	105	2	76.6%	125,909	3.0	7	1	7	0	4	7
York	Pennsylvania	164	109	3	69.5%	124,907	4.1	7	1	7	0	5	7
Tacoma	Washington	245	175	6	37.3%	124,354	8.6	20	2	20	0	1	15
Melbourne	Florida	142	100	3	78.9%	122,882	3.2	5	2	6	1	3	6
Boise	Idaho	181	132	6	47.2%	120,831	6.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Las Cruces	New Mexico	190	137	2	80.8%	120,457	2.3	7	1	7	2	6	7
Saint Paul	Minnesota	367	247	9	14.7%	117,879	9.9	30	2	38	0	0	25
Jackson	Mississippi	187	120	4	67.8%	115,473	4.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Mission	Texas	142	109	5	62.1%	112,539	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Schenectady	New York	182	134	3	68.8%	111,539	4.1	8	1	8	0	1	8
Nampa	Idaho	140	103	1	95.9%	111,142	1.3	3	1	3	2	3	3
Appleton	Wisconsin	145	103	1	90.3%	109,942	2.0	4	1	5	1	4	5
Norman	Oklahoma	139	101	2	87.5%	108,575	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Lake Worth	Florida	195	140	4	52.1%	107,684	9.0	5	3	7	0	2	4
Henrico	Virginia	202	142	3	55.1%	106,215	5.6	7	2	8	1	3	7
Boulder	Colorado	180	118	3	80.3%	105,367	2.8	6	1	6	0	4	6
Charleston	South Carolina	200	138	5	53.1%	104,623	6.2	10	2	10	0	2	9
Abilene	Texas	172	124	2	80.3%	104,500	3.3	6	1	6	0	4	6
Bellevue	Washington	156	118	2	71.1%	104,048	4.2	5	1	5	0	2	5
Simi Valley	California	112	82	2	80.0%	102,970	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Saint Louis	Missouri	320	215	10	11.2%	102,369	11.3	45	2	65	0	0	12
Charlotte	North Carolina	236	153	8	11.2%	101,466	18.4	24	2	24	0	0	8
Hemet	California	145	111	1	78.8%	101,435	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Round Rock	Texas	159	114	5	60.5%	101,368	12.0	3	2	3	1	2	2
Toms River	New Jersey	144	110	3	80.0%	98,288	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
El Cajon	California	162	110	4	55.7%	96,020	5.7	3	4	5	0	3	4
Waterbury	Connecticut	154	111	1	88.1%	95,737	2.0	6	1	6	2	5	6
Carlsbad	California	144	105	3	84.0%	95,519	2.8	4	1	4	0	4	4
Brockton	Massachusetts	121	88	1	100.0%	95,426	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	101	1	94.4%	94,680	1.7	3	1	3	1	3	3
Longview	Texas	171	129	2	89.4%	94,156	2.2	5	1	5	0	5	5
Dearborn	Michigan	139	103	1	98.9%	94,014	1.3	4	1	4	3	4	4
Deltona	Florida	115	82	1	100.0%	93,889	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Murrieta	California	124	94	3	70.3%	92,972	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Lawrenceville	Georgia	150	116	5	36.2%	92,840	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	87	2	86.4%	92,329	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Chula Vista	California	141	98	6	35.3%	92,082	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Washington DC	District of Columbia	240	156	9	13.0%	89,254	18.9	28	2	28	0	0	9
Wichita Falls	Texas	174	123	1	90.3%	89,224	1.9	7	1	7	5	5	7
New Port Richey	Florida	159	120	4	73.3%	88,520	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Scranton	Pennsylvania	192	139	1	88.3%	87,785	2.4	8	1	9	4	6	9
Champaign	Illinois	121	88	2	92.7%	87,693	1.7	3	1	3	1	3	3
Temecula	California	136	103	5	67.3%	87,486	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Midlothian	Virginia	138	104	2	90.3%	87,401	2.3	3	1	3	1	2	3
Athens	Georgia	158	111	4	70.0%	87,301	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Odessa	Texas	177	132	5	54.3%	86,968	5.5	6	2	8	0	0	8
Santa Maria	California	155	113	4	60.8%	86,950	5.0	3	2	4	0	2	4
Summerville	South Carolina	123	90	5	62.3%	86,571	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Cleveland	Ohio	264	169	9	11.5%	86,105	12.1	29	2	51	0	0	9
Lawrence	Kansas	165	121	3	84.8%	85,658	2.6	5	1	5	0	5	5
Norwalk	California	99	76	2	80.0%	84,709	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Pacoima	California	99	65	2	80.0%	84,639	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
San Mateo	California	173	123	2	59.3%	84,405	5.5	4	3	5	0	2	3
Burbank	California	156	117	2	77.8%	84,001	3.2	5	1	6	0	3	6
Miami Beach	Florida	162	87	2	70.7%	81,750	5.0	5	2	5	0	4	4
Fontana	California	140	103	7	34.4%	80,723	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	1
Roswell	Georgia	118	89	3	79.3%	79,127	3.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Meridian	Idaho	115	91	4	74.3%	77,458	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Astoria	New York	172	111	3	54.1%	77,176	5.8	4	4	5	0	1	4
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	145	101	4	62.8%	77,035	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Saint Petersburg	Florida	226	170	7	21.3%	75,909	9.5	16	3	22	0	0	13
Chino	California	122	94	2	80.0%	75,579	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Sparks	Nevada	159	114	3	61.9%	73,871	5.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Hialeah	Florida	184	107	8	19.4%	71,139	10.0	7	2	9	0	0	6
San Marcos	California	125	96	3	69.5%	69,854	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Buford	Georgia	120	94	4	70.0%	69,372	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pompano Beach	Florida	243	170	9	18.6%	68,773	10.5	10	2	10	0	0	5
Richmond	Virginia	191	124	7	17.5%	68,470	9.3	15	2	17	0	0	16
Fairfield	California	118	87	4	60.0%	68,447	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Las Vegas	Nevada	288	157	15	4.4%	68,350	15.7	43	2	48	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	98	64	3	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Riverview	Florida	163	115	4	57.7%	64,249	4.7	3	2	3	0	2	3
Valdosta	Georgia	155	110	4	67.7%	64,237	4.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Mcallen	Texas	146	109	6	44.8%	63,428	7.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Vista	California	132	102	5	52.8%	63,339	5.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Gulfport	Mississippi	129	93	4	65.8%	62,330	4.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Daly City	California	137	99	4	54.0%	61,813	6.0	2	3	3	0	1	3
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	309	198	17	7.4%	61,144	13.1	27	3	46	0	0	3
Alpharetta	Georgia	178	128	6	32.2%	60,835	10.5	4	3	4	0	0	2
Detroit	Michigan	204	130	10	9.2%	59,081	11.1	25	2	47	0	0	15
Elmhurst	New York	98	66	3	60.0%	56,380	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Syracuse	New York	206	141	7	24.6%	55,903	9.7	15	2	15	0	0	11
Palm Bay	Florida	156	117	4	48.1%	53,546	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clovis	California	140	103	4	43.6%	52,976	7.7	3	3	4	0	0	2
Clearwater	Florida	207	149	7	27.8%	50,995	8.3	9	2	9	0	0	8
Denver	Colorado	335	212	14	4.7%	50,728	15.8	38	2	39	0	0	4
Houston	Texas	324	199	27	1.6%	49,721	24.7	96	3	96	0	0	0
Sacramento	California	254	168	13	5.8%	46,871	16.1	28	2	28	0	0	2
Littleton	Colorado	254	169	10	14.2%	46,241	12.1	10	2	10	0	1	2
Pomona	California	127	92	6	29.1%	45,908	8.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Winston Salem	North Carolina	188	144	8	17.3%	45,646	9.8	9	2	16	0	0	8
Jamaica	New York	181	121	10	18.6%	45,446	9.5	6	2	6	0	0	5
Cape Coral	Florida	169	118	7	24.0%	43,336	8.7	6	2	8	0	0	6
Herndon	Virginia	121	88	6	46.3%	43,292	8.0	2	3	3	0	1	1
San Leandro	California	127	94	5	37.9%	42,172	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Austin	Texas	276	175	21	3.8%	41,296	17.7	44	2	45	0	0	0
Lehigh Acres	Florida	170	122	7	34.6%	40,390	7.7	6	1	6	0	0	5
Puyallup	Washington	167	120	7	28.3%	40,359	8.6	5	2	5	0	0	4
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	166	126	6	19.7%	39,951	9.0	6	2	7	0	0	7
Baltimore	Maryland	225	146	11	6.3%	39,552	14.7	22	2	22	0	0	2
Salt Lake City	Utah	244	153	12	8.0%	39,039	15.0	19	2	21	0	0	2
Dayton	Ohio	277	186	15	8.1%	38,694	13.2	27	2	41	0	0	9
Silver Spring	Maryland	208	147	12	12.5%	37,793	12.7	7	3	8	0	0	3
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	260	163	21	2.4%	37,513	27.3	47	3	48	0	0	1
Kent	Washington	145	108	8	23.2%	37,255	9.3	4	2	5	0	0	3
Westerville	Ohio	113	81	8	39.1%	37,232	19.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Portland	Oregon	234	152	23	4.0%	36,859	23.8	33	2	33	0	0	4
Stamford	Connecticut	156	108	7	28.6%	36,848	8.8	6	2	6	0	0	5
Rochester	New York	260	165	12	7.7%	36,468	12.0	24	2	37	0	0	1
Ontario	California	140	100	7	20.3%	35,917	9.0	3	2	6	0	0	5
Largo	Florida	147	115	7	32.9%	35,451	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Indianapolis	Indiana	316	188	18	3.7%	34,862	23.0	37	2	39	0	0	6
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	132	91	6	35.1%	34,216	8.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Fort Mill	South Carolina	135	97	4	35.1%	33,351	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Shreveport	Louisiana	197	134	8	14.5%	32,369	10.3	12	2	13	0	0	7
Memphis	Tennessee	260	169	19	4.6%	32,201	15.4	26	2	27	0	0	1
Inglewood	California	193	129	7	23.7%	31,662	8.4	5	3	9	0	0	8
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	269	170	24	3.8%	30,506	18.8	29	2	32	0	0	2
Whittier	California	178	130	10	15.4%	30,239	10.3	6	3	8	0	0	3
Parker	Colorado	121	92	7	30.0%	30,085	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waukegan	Illinois	124	90	8	30.0%	29,258	8.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Savannah	Georgia	184	118	9	12.1%	29,196	10.6	10	1	10	0	0	3
Pittsburg	California	97	76	6	30.0%	28,824	8.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Wichita	Kansas	227	154	11	6.8%	28,292	13.2	26	1	26	0	0	0
Spokane	Washington	205	140	10	7.9%	28,246	13.2	14	1	14	0	0	2
Grand Rapids	Michigan	196	131	11	7.6%	27,868	12.5	12	2	14	0	0	1
Santa Ana	California	147	105	11	7.5%	26,872	12.5	6	2	7	0	0	0
Jacksonville	Florida	282	191	17	3.1%	26,868	18.5	31	3	33	0	0	2
Hyattsville	Maryland	171	115	8	17.0%	26,767	10.8	5	2	5	0	0	2
Newark	New Jersey	167	121	9	9.5%	26,736	10.8	9	2	10	0	0	5
Homestead	Florida	200	144	9	14.2%	26,643	10.3	7	2	9	0	0	6
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	313	205	13	3.9%	26,627	23.2	42	1	42	0	0	1
La Puente	California	145	95	8	22.3%	26,276	8.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Dallas	Texas	274	162	23	1.9%	25,917	21.1	48	1	48	0	0	0
Stone Mountain	Georgia	155	114	8	20.0%	25,662	9.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Lexington	Kentucky	205	141	11	8.0%	25,544	11.9	15	1	15	0	0	0
Kennesaw	Georgia	116	83	8	25.6%	25,360	10.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Englewood	Colorado	191	132	9	22.6%	25,256	9.3	4	3	5	0	0	4
El Monte	California	122	91	6	26.8%	25,099	8.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Fort Pierce	Florida	179	129	8	26.0%	24,911	8.4	8	2	16	0	0	16
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	278	186	17	3.6%	24,478	26.3	39	2	41	0	0	5
Bridgeport	Connecticut	174	130	7	16.6%	24,329	9.5	6	2	11	0	0	7
Chicago	Illinois	299	179	37	0.9%	24,108	33.7	56	1	56	0	0	0
Anaheim	California	183	125	12	6.4%	23,705	13.7	7	2	7	0	0	0
Spring Hill	Florida	177	136	7	18.8%	23,621	9.2	5	2	6	0	0	6
Cary	North Carolina	158	113	10	15.2%	23,601	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Honolulu	Hawaii	182	116	18	5.7%	23,564	14.4	11	1	11	0	0	0
Hesperia	California	110	82	7	22.2%	23,063	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hampton	Virginia	163	116	8	16.9%	22,999	9.5	6	2	8	0	0	5
Madison	Wisconsin	197	133	11	7.7%	22,780	12.1	14	1	14	0	0	1
Lynn	Massachusetts	141	107	7	24.3%	22,757	9.3	4	2	8	0	0	6
Marietta	Georgia	179	127	13	7.0%	22,714	13.1	7	2	8	0	0	1
Mesa	Arizona	232	166	12	4.2%	22,513	16.1	13	2	13	0	0	0
Beaumont	Texas	185	133	9	15.5%	22,505	10.1	8	2	14	0	0	7
Mobile	Alabama	242	169	9	8.1%	22,111	11.5	18	2	25	0	0	7
Fort Wayne	Indiana	202	125	12	6.9%	22,006	13.1	16	2	22	0	0	0
Lynchburg	Virginia	165	112	9	21.2%	21,700	11.3	4	3	6	0	1	1
Peoria	Arizona	145	110	11	12.5%	21,589	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Providence	Rhode Island	185	127	10	10.5%	21,546	10.9	8	2	11	0	0	4
Terre Haute	Indiana	164	119	6	22.6%	21,494	9.0	6	2	8	0	0	7
Evansville	Indiana	188	134	10	11.6%	21,379	10.7	9	2	17	0	0	5
Winter Haven	Florida	123	88	8	20.0%	21,376	9.0	3	2	6	0	0	3
San Bernardino	California	163	119	10	8.6%	21,362	11.7	7	1	7	0	0	1
Irving	Texas	164	118	10	8.8%	21,261	11.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Escondido	California	153	110	9	11.8%	21,253	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
New Bedford	Massachusetts	151	108	8	22.1%	20,974	8.0	4	3	6	0	0	3
Lithonia	Georgia	126	92	9	21.5%	20,817	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Flushing	New York	142	96	10	9.6%	20,670	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Oakland	California	191	124	13	4.9%	20,329	15.4	14	2	16	0	0	2
Hamilton	Ohio	143	112	8	14.8%	20,275	9.3	3	2	6	0	0	5
Salem	Oregon	171	121	11	7.6%	20,252	12.4	7	1	7	0	0	0
Fort Worth	Texas	234	139	22	2.2%	20,120	21.9	32	2	33	0	0	0
Glendale	Arizona	208	138	10	6.6%	20,044	13.2	9	2	9	0	0	2
Hagerstown	Maryland	159	117	9	20.3%	19,883	8.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Rockford	Illinois	173	125	10	10.8%	19,665	10.0	9	2	15	0	0	8
Panama City	Florida	168	120	10	15.4%	19,456	9.3	6	2	7	0	0	6
Kansas City	Missouri	240	160	18	3.3%	19,092	18.3	49	1	49	0	0	0
Livonia	Michigan	128	98	9	19.7%	18,616	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Hartford	Connecticut	148	107	8	15.1%	18,592	9.3	6	2	7	0	0	6
Grand Prairie	Texas	144	112	9	9.7%	18,401	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Indio	California	118	87	8	18.9%	18,179	9.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Chandler	Arizona	159	113	11	6.7%	17,977	13.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Akron	Ohio	176	133	12	6.6%	17,811	13.6	17	2	33	0	0	0
Torrance	California	185	125	9	10.0%	17,668	13.4	5	2	5	0	0	1
Wilmington	Delaware	186	138	11	8.0%	17,560	16.9	10	2	11	0	0	1
Saint Augustine	Florida	196	140	11	13.3%	17,473	12.6	5	3	8	0	0	4
Anchorage	Alaska	219	157	14	7.1%	17,451	13.1	12	2	13	0	0	1
Erie	Pennsylvania	185	126	9	9.5%	17,430	10.6	13	2	24	0	0	10
Ocala	Florida	188	135	10	7.7%	17,397	12.1	11	1	11	0	0	0
Downey	California	140	102	11	15.3%	17,283	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Tucson	Arizona	248	163	19	1.9%	17,215	29.2	32	2	33	0	0	2
West Valley City	Utah	125	94	8	12.9%	17,099	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Springdale	Arkansas	108	76	8	17.7%	17,068	9.5	2	2	4	0	0	2
Orange	California	160	118	11	11.8%	17,048	12.0	5	2	5	0	0	1
Modesto	California	178	129	11	6.4%	16,961	13.4	7	2	8	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	136	100	7	17.9%	16,826	9.7	3	2	4	0	0	2
Ogden	Utah	148	106	10	8.4%	16,824	11.6	5	2	9	0	0	0
Independence	Missouri	181	135	8	13.5%	16,765	9.9	8	2	13	0	0	10
Greensboro	North Carolina	179	129	14	5.1%	16,730	15.3	9	2	10	0	0	0
Springfield	Missouri	168	123	12	7.2%	16,596	12.6	7	2	8	0	0	0
Flint	Michigan	177	124	11	10.5%	16,254	10.6	7	2	14	0	0	6
Reading	Pennsylvania	204	141	13	7.5%	16,162	12.5	10	2	11	0	0	1
Perris	California	131	104	8	13.7%	16,140	11.0	2	2	4	0	0	2
Fullerton	California	152	108	8	11.5%	16,067	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Green Bay	Wisconsin	178	128	11	8.7%	16,034	11.0	7	2	10	0	0	2
Little Rock	Arkansas	189	127	11	7.3%	16,025	12.8	12	1	12	0	0	0
Bloomington	Indiana	155	107	9	11.9%	15,930	9.8	6	2	11	0	0	6
Newport News	Virginia	172	124	8	8.9%	15,710	11.0	7	1	7	0	0	1
West Jordan	Utah	143	105	9	12.6%	15,625	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Hayward	California	141	109	11	8.1%	15,505	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Madera	California	147	104	8	15.1%	15,504	9.3	3	2	6	0	0	4
Olympia	Washington	184	139	12	8.4%	15,358	11.5	6	3	8	0	0	3
Rapid City	South Dakota	136	98	9	15.7%	15,177	10.0	3	2	6	0	0	2
Renton	Washington	194	137	11	9.7%	15,088	12.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Overland Park	Kansas	179	133	9	8.1%	14,940	12.1	9	1	9	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	150	112	7	14.7%	14,777	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Augusta	Georgia	174	120	12	7.2%	14,706	12.6	8	1	8	0	0	0
Youngstown	Ohio	195	146	10	9.3%	14,669	10.9	12	2	23	0	0	4
Florissant	Missouri	140	104	8	13.3%	14,405	9.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Mesquite	Texas	120	88	8	9.6%	14,082	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Plainfield	Illinois	154	114	10	14.2%	13,989	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Roseville	California	126	89	9	10.0%	13,979	10.0	3	2	5	0	0	3
Compton	California	130	101	6	10.0%	13,888	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Paterson	New Jersey	168	125	9	9.5%	13,876	10.4	9	2	18	0	0	7
Vallejo	California	141	104	10	11.1%	13,853	10.5	4	2	7	0	0	4
Huntsville	Alabama	176	125	15	7.0%	13,710	13.3	11	2	19	0	0	0
Falls Church	Virginia	198	135	11	11.3%	13,596	10.4	5	2	8	0	0	2
Salinas	California	164	124	10	7.2%	13,506	12.2	5	2	6	0	0	0
Racine	Wisconsin	164	121	9	10.7%	13,427	11.0	5	2	10	0	0	4
Albany	New York	201	138	10	8.9%	13,422	11.1	11	2	11	0	0	2
Durham	North Carolina	173	123	13	4.6%	13,411	15.3	8	3	9	0	0	1
Everett	Washington	159	119	11	8.0%	13,337	13.0	5	2	6	0	0	0
Norfolk	Virginia	203	135	17	5.4%	13,317	14.6	14	1	14	0	0	0
Chesapeake	Virginia	155	110	12	5.6%	13,269	14.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Irvine	California	194	134	15	4.9%	13,130	14.9	9	1	9	0	0	0
Fayetteville	North Carolina	193	134	12	5.4%	13,108	14.9	8	1	8	0	0	0
Muncie	Indiana	152	108	7	14.1%	13,060	9.6	5	2	10	0	0	4
Metairie	Louisiana	149	111	10	9.2%	13,054	11.0	5	2	7	0	0	3
Alexandria	Virginia	256	180	19	3.7%	13,050	17.9	14	2	17	0	0	2
Pueblo	Colorado	182	129	12	8.2%	12,977	12.1	7	2	14	0	0	0
Surprise	Arizona	166	121	11	9.6%	12,967	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Muskegon	Michigan	164	123	10	10.0%	12,918	10.0	5	2	10	0	0	5
Elkhart	Indiana	143	105	9	13.0%	12,878	10.0	3	2	5	0	0	2
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	162	113	12	6.8%	12,727	12.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
New Haven	Connecticut	141	100	9	9.7%	12,644	10.6	5	2	10	0	0	2
Macon	Georgia	181	125	11	7.7%	12,640	12.4	9	2	18	0	0	0
Canton	Ohio	171	124	12	8.6%	12,572	11.4	12	3	22	0	0	0
San Jose	California	240	157	27	1.2%	12,488	23.8	28	1	28	0	0	0
High Point	North Carolina	148	110	10	10.2%	12,456	11.3	4	2	6	0	0	2
Yonkers	New York	145	109	11	6.9%	12,427	13.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lafayette	Louisiana	160	113	12	7.7%	12,385	12.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Conroe	Texas	182	124	13	7.7%	12,366	12.1	7	1	7	0	0	3
Elizabeth	New Jersey	133	105	8	12.3%	12,357	10.7	3	2	5	0	0	3
El Paso	Texas	263	166	19	1.6%	12,318	27.3	24	2	25	0	0	2
Billings	Montana	155	110	11	9.0%	12,301	11.0	4	2	6	0	0	1
Waukesha	Wisconsin	131	99	9	12.8%	12,248	9.7	3	2	6	0	0	4
Carrollton	Texas	144	105	9	9.0%	12,133	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
North Las Vegas	Nevada	189	119	12	5.2%	12,083	14.4	7	3	7	0	0	1
Berkeley	California	206	146	13	9.3%	11,760	12.0	9	2	17	0	0	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	143	97	14	6.0%	11,749	14.0	5	2	7	0	0	0
Elgin	Illinois	138	101	8	9.6%	11,712	10.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
Saint Charles	Missouri	147	107	10	8.3%	11,668	11.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Saginaw	Michigan	172	127	9	8.9%	11,643	11.1	7	2	14	0	0	2
Rock Hill	South Carolina	149	110	10	10.0%	11,636	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	167	123	8	12.1%	11,564	10.6	7	2	13	0	0	4
Seattle	Washington	270	173	28	1.2%	11,501	29.3	35	2	37	0	0	0
Scottsdale	Arizona	221	144	16	3.8%	11,456	28.7	11	2	11	0	0	1
Jupiter	Florida	139	98	8	11.5%	11,376	9.8	4	2	8	0	0	4
Lake Charles	Louisiana	155	114	11	8.7%	11,360	11.2	5	2	8	0	0	1
Auburn	Washington	138	106	10	10.0%	11,287	10.0	3	2	5	0	0	3
Pasadena	California	173	120	11	7.2%	11,279	13.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Milton	Florida	144	110	12	11.9%	11,271	10.7	3	2	5	0	0	2
Sterling Heights	Michigan	138	108	11	8.5%	11,271	11.3	4	2	5	0	0	2
Denton	Texas	161	117	13	7.1%	11,210	13.2	6	2	8	0	0	0
Arvada	Colorado	169	121	9	8.4%	11,199	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	2
Yakima	Washington	139	101	10	8.6%	11,176	11.3	4	2	8	0	0	1
Jersey City	New Jersey	167	122	16	4.3%	11,175	15.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	179	121	12	6.1%	11,168	13.3	9	2	14	0	0	0
Fredericksburg	Virginia	170	124	15	6.4%	11,084	13.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Baytown	Texas	145	106	8	9.4%	11,060	10.7	3	2	4	0	0	2
Olathe	Kansas	117	89	9	7.6%	10,911	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Vero Beach	Florida	164	116	9	9.5%	10,905	10.5	6	2	7	0	0	3
Woodbridge	Virginia	147	111	13	5.1%	10,776	17.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Spring	Texas	216	144	19	2.8%	10,731	18.0	8	2	8	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	160	116	10	11.1%	10,678	10.6	5	2	7	0	0	3
Cumming	Georgia	141	113	12	6.6%	10,676	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Tempe	Arizona	152	108	12	5.6%	10,637	14.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Mckinney	Texas	135	95	13	5.6%	10,508	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Santa Fe	New Mexico	154	110	11	8.2%	10,507	12.0	5	2	10	0	0	0
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	141	108	12	8.0%	10,496	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fairfax	Virginia	179	130	13	6.4%	10,461	14.0	4	2	6	0	0	1
Boca Raton	Florida	197	132	14	4.7%	10,445	15.7	9	2	12	0	0	0
Redwood City	California	156	125	11	9.1%	10,411	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Victorville	California	125	89	9	7.6%	10,404	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	97	65	6	10.0%	10,243	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Provo	Utah	143	97	8	8.7%	10,144	11.3	3	2	4	0	0	0
Concord	California	144	109	9	7.7%	10,079	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Henderson	Nevada	197	121	14	3.3%	10,052	17.1	8	2	8	0	0	0
Gastonia	North Carolina	131	97	10	9.3%	9,977	10.7	3	2	6	0	0	1
Fremont	California	144	108	12	4.3%	9,941	15.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Douglasville	Georgia	132	98	11	9.0%	9,922	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Visalia	California	140	110	15	6.5%	9,891	13.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Frederick	Maryland	152	112	12	7.4%	9,816	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Longmont	Colorado	144	104	13	7.4%	9,729	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Mcdonough	Georgia	122	94	10	9.5%	9,683	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Boynton Beach	Florida	160	120	14	5.6%	9,664	14.7	6	2	8	0	0	0
Kalamazoo	Michigan	162	113	13	5.9%	9,636	14.1	7	2	11	0	0	0
Lewisville	Texas	150	111	10	8.1%	9,635	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Rialto	California	126	104	10	9.0%	9,592	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Edison	New Jersey	131	100	9	9.4%	9,523	10.7	3	3	6	0	0	1
Naperville	Illinois	150	112	12	5.7%	9,523	14.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Santa Clara	California	140	104	12	7.5%	9,460	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Duluth	Minnesota	185	138	9	8.1%	9,430	12.2	11	2	14	0	0	0
Redding	California	161	114	10	8.3%	9,425	10.3	4	2	7	0	0	2
Acworth	Georgia	126	91	8	9.4%	9,388	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Greenville	South Carolina	166	118	15	4.3%	9,351	15.8	9	2	15	0	0	0
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	132	96	10	9.5%	9,313	10.7	3	2	5	0	0	2
Ventura	California	129	90	10	8.0%	9,304	12.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Apopka	Florida	119	89	9	9.5%	9,299	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Davenport	Iowa	155	111	8	8.8%	9,263	11.0	6	2	7	0	0	1
Santa Cruz	California	139	103	10	8.9%	9,252	11.0	4	2	5	0	0	2
Tracy	California	151	116	12	7.9%	9,226	12.3	4	2	8	0	0	0
Richardson	Texas	145	105	10	8.0%	9,168	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
San Angelo	Texas	150	105	10	8.3%	9,167	11.8	4	2	8	0	0	0
Morgantown	West Virginia	126	94	9	9.6%	9,133	10.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
South Bend	Indiana	190	131	13	6.2%	9,078	14.0	10	1	10	0	0	0
Lakewood	New Jersey	97	83	10	9.0%	9,069	11.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Ashburn	Virginia	109	80	11	8.0%	8,985	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Sandy	Utah	133	94	12	8.1%	8,946	12.0	4	2	6	0	0	1
Allen	Texas	116	84	12	8.0%	8,902	12.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Spartanburg	South Carolina	154	106	10	7.9%	8,877	12.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	143	101	9	9.0%	8,857	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Costa Mesa	California	119	83	11	7.8%	8,847	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Lowell	Massachusetts	147	109	12	7.9%	8,784	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Kenosha	Wisconsin	144	107	9	7.8%	8,758	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Grand Junction	Colorado	162	113	12	8.3%	8,728	11.2	6	2	10	0	0	4
Chattanooga	Tennessee	215	147	15	4.2%	8,720	15.3	15	2	16	0	0	0
Garland	Texas	171	128	15	3.7%	8,703	16.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Menifee	California	160	116	10	7.8%	8,642	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Manchester	New Hampshire	144	108	11	7.4%	8,579	12.8	5	2	10	0	0	0
Merced	California	145	104	11	8.3%	8,573	11.7	3	2	6	0	0	1
South Gate	California	97	77	8	9.0%	8,559	11.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	120	92	11	6.9%	8,551	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Greeley	Colorado	117	84	12	7.5%	8,543	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	144	107	9	9.1%	8,527	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Covington	Georgia	144	102	12	9.2%	8,500	11.0	2	2	3	0	0	1
Palo Alto	California	145	101	10	8.8%	8,496	11.0	4	2	8	0	0	1
Broomfield	Colorado	148	104	13	8.1%	8,489	11.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
Idaho Falls	Idaho	139	100	11	7.7%	8,425	12.5	4	2	5	0	0	0
Oxnard	California	149	105	14	3.8%	8,413	17.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	123	88	10	9.0%	8,393	11.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Vacaville	California	124	92	10	7.9%	8,360	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bowling Green	Kentucky	155	112	12	7.2%	8,292	12.8	4	2	6	0	0	0
Lees Summit	Missouri	181	136	12	8.0%	8,138	11.8	6	2	7	0	0	1
Joliet	Illinois	141	104	11	6.3%	8,095	14.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	California	116	92	10	8.0%	7,869	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
West Covina	California	136	102	12	7.2%	7,830	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Newnan	Georgia	120	94	9	8.4%	7,819	11.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Antioch	California	126	96	12	7.0%	7,750	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Laurel	Maryland	160	119	13	6.8%	7,703	12.8	4	2	5	0	0	1
Des Moines	Iowa	196	127	18	3.4%	7,657	18.5	11	1	11	0	0	0
Johnson City	Tennessee	143	104	11	7.9%	7,517	11.8	4	2	8	0	0	0
Manassas	Virginia	175	123	14	4.9%	7,515	16.8	4	2	6	0	0	0
Eugene	Oregon	149	109	15	3.6%	7,407	16.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Knoxville	Tennessee	219	147	18	1.9%	7,404	18.8	17	1	17	0	0	0
Ballwin	Missouri	119	93	9	7.8%	7,367	12.5	2	2	4	0	0	0
Yuma	Arizona	131	94	13	5.0%	7,357	14.3	3	2	6	0	0	0
Bend	Oregon	150	104	13	6.0%	7,322	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Pearland	Texas	147	103	13	5.3%	7,264	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hillsboro	Oregon	125	91	12	7.1%	7,254	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lynnwood	Washington	160	120	11	6.7%	7,211	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
New Braunfels	Texas	119	92	12	7.0%	7,195	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Asheville	North Carolina	142	100	13	5.4%	7,172	14.4	5	2	6	0	0	0
Livermore	California	118	87	9	7.4%	7,148	12.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Tulsa	Oklahoma	261	158	21	1.7%	7,122	20.8	28	1	28	0	0	0
Woodstock	Georgia	120	90	12	7.0%	7,120	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chico	California	139	103	12	6.3%	7,111	13.7	3	2	5	0	0	0
Sugar Land	Texas	161	116	14	4.2%	7,014	19.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Federal Way	Washington	118	90	13	7.0%	7,010	13.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Kennewick	Washington	140	107	12	7.0%	6,917	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Napa	California	113	78	10	7.1%	6,908	13.5	2	2	4	0	0	0
Rockville	Maryland	176	126	17	4.8%	6,903	16.0	4	2	5	0	0	0
Fargo	North Dakota	146	103	13	5.6%	6,812	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Decatur	Georgia	191	124	14	3.7%	6,773	16.2	5	2	6	0	0	0
Daytona Beach	Florida	174	124	11	6.4%	6,572	13.2	5	2	6	0	0	1
Holland	Michigan	113	83	9	7.0%	6,542	13.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Cambridge	Massachusetts	143	101	15	5.6%	6,522	15.0	5	2	10	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	98	73	10	6.0%	6,403	14.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Delray Beach	Florida	171	122	14	5.4%	6,384	15.2	5	3	6	0	0	0
Missoula	Montana	151	107	13	6.5%	6,322	13.4	5	2	10	0	0	0
O Fallon	Missouri	122	96	10	6.5%	6,312	13.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Tallahassee	Florida	184	127	19	2.2%	6,305	17.6	10	1	10	0	0	0
Franklin	Tennessee	142	111	13	5.9%	6,295	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Coral Springs	Florida	121	90	13	6.4%	6,233	13.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Bowie	Maryland	177	122	13	6.0%	6,159	13.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Annapolis	Maryland	169	121	13	6.4%	6,075	12.8	5	2	9	0	0	1
Bellingham	Washington	137	102	13	4.8%	6,039	15.0	3	2	6	0	0	0
Charlottesville	Virginia	146	107	11	4.9%	6,012	15.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Nashville	Tennessee	264	176	21	1.3%	5,874	30.5	22	1	22	0	0	1
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	243	156	20	1.5%	5,850	19.0	18	1	18	0	0	0
Keller	Texas	145	101	12	5.0%	5,850	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Pensacola	Florida	202	141	17	2.0%	5,430	18.8	13	1	13	0	0	0
Katy	Texas	157	106	18	1.6%	5,402	25.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	129	20	1.2%	5,358	26.0	12	1	12	0	0	0
Gaithersburg	Maryland	162	125	14	3.7%	5,325	18.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Frisco	Texas	123	94	14	3.0%	5,184	18.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	153	106	14	3.6%	5,016	16.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	124	94	14	4.6%	4,955	15.0	3	2	6	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	140	105	12	4.8%	4,847	15.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Hawthorne	California	96	77	11	5.0%	4,842	15.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Allentown	Pennsylvania	173	127	18	2.8%	4,840	19.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
New Orleans	Louisiana	190	125	24	1.1%	4,604	24.9	19	1	19	0	0	0
Arlington	Texas	210	146	19	1.2%	4,584	20.7	12	1	12	0	0	0
Humble	Texas	164	106	19	2.7%	4,490	22.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Bothell	Washington	158	114	16	3.5%	4,433	16.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	139	93	16	2.7%	3,936	18.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	139	104	13	2.9%	3,632	17.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Missouri City	Texas	147	101	17	3.4%	3,571	19.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Edmond	Oklahoma	173	122	19	2.0%	3,478	19.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Plano	Texas	174	116	19	1.0%	3,131	23.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	160	19	1.0%	2,933	20.0	22	1	22	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	131	85	16	3.0%	2,865	16.4	5	2	8	0	0	0
Cypress	Texas	115	87	20	0.9%	1,618	24.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Boston	Massachusetts	174	108	21	0.9%	1,430	29.0	14	2	15	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	353	225	5	40.8%	1,003,080	7.0	62	3	64	4	15	55
San Francisco	253	153	5	51.0%	443,503	5.9	28	4	53	0	0	52
Bakersfield	211	141	3	69.6%	389,218	3.9	11	1	11	0	3	11
Fresno	235	159	4	63.3%	381,063	4.7	18	4	19	0	7	18
Long Beach	193	131	4	63.8%	305,625	4.7	12	2	13	0	1	13
Stockton	214	153	3	73.2%	273,749	3.7	12	1	12	0	4	12
Riverside	179	125	3	64.5%	238,601	4.9	7	2	14	0	0	14
San Diego	291	189	9	14.7%	197,803	13.9	36	5	40	0	1	12
Huntington Beach	141	107	2	90.0%	179,916	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Palmdale	157	119	2	93.3%	163,169	2.5	4	1	4	1	3	4
Moreno Valley	149	118	2	79.4%	163,155	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Oceanside	143	104	3	80.0%	160,207	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Rancho Cucamonga	140	105	2	90.0%	158,938	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Van Nuys	149	98	2	89.1%	158,453	2.0	4	1	4	2	4	4
Garden Grove	168	123	2	90.0%	158,185	2.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Elk Grove	138	108	2	87.2%	156,419	2.3	3	1	4	0	3	4
Lancaster	143	112	2	78.2%	144,206	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
North Hollywood	145	96	1	92.6%	141,840	2.0	4	1	4	2	4	4
Santa Rosa	148	101	3	60.9%	131,496	5.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Corona	165	130	4	50.0%	128,698	5.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Sunnyvale	166	124	2	82.7%	126,340	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Simi Valley	112	82	2	80.0%	102,970	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Hemet	145	111	1	78.8%	101,435	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
El Cajon	162	110	4	55.7%	96,020	5.7	3	4	5	0	3	4
Carlsbad	144	105	3	84.0%	95,519	2.8	4	1	4	0	4	4
Murrieta	124	94	3	70.3%	92,972	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Chula Vista	141	98	6	35.3%	92,082	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Temecula	136	103	5	67.3%	87,486	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Santa Maria	155	113	4	60.8%	86,950	5.0	3	2	4	0	2	4
Norwalk	99	76	2	80.0%	84,709	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Pacoima	99	65	2	80.0%	84,639	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
San Mateo	173	123	2	59.3%	84,405	5.5	4	3	5	0	2	3
Burbank	156	117	2	77.8%	84,001	3.2	5	1	6	0	3	6
Fontana	140	103	7	34.4%	80,723	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	1
Chino	122	94	2	80.0%	75,579	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
San Marcos	125	96	3	69.5%	69,854	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Fairfield	118	87	4	60.0%	68,447	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sylmar	98	64	3	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vista	132	102	5	52.8%	63,339	5.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Daly City	137	99	4	54.0%	61,813	6.0	2	3	3	0	1	3
Clovis	140	103	4	43.6%	52,976	7.7	3	3	4	0	0	2
Sacramento	254	168	13	5.8%	46,871	16.1	28	2	28	0	0	2
Pomona	127	92	6	29.1%	45,908	8.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
San Leandro	127	94	5	37.9%	42,172	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ontario	140	100	7	20.3%	35,917	9.0	3	2	6	0	0	5
Inglewood	193	129	7	23.7%	31,662	8.4	5	3	9	0	0	8
Whittier	178	130	10	15.4%	30,239	10.3	6	3	8	0	0	3
Pittsburg	97	76	6	30.0%	28,824	8.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Santa Ana	147	105	11	7.5%	26,872	12.5	6	2	7	0	0	0
La Puente	145	95	8	22.3%	26,276	8.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
El Monte	122	91	6	26.8%	25,099	8.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Anaheim	183	125	12	6.4%	23,705	13.7	7	2	7	0	0	0
Hesperia	110	82	7	22.2%	23,063	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Bernardino	163	119	10	8.6%	21,362	11.7	7	1	7	0	0	1
Escondido	153	110	9	11.8%	21,253	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Oakland	191	124	13	4.9%	20,329	15.4	14	2	16	0	0	2
Indio	118	87	8	18.9%	18,179	9.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Torrance	185	125	9	10.0%	17,668	13.4	5	2	5	0	0	1
Downey	140	102	11	15.3%	17,283	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Orange	160	118	11	11.8%	17,048	12.0	5	2	5	0	0	1
Modesto	178	129	11	6.4%	16,961	13.4	7	2	8	0	0	0
Perris	131	104	8	13.7%	16,140	11.0	2	2	4	0	0	2
Fullerton	152	108	8	11.5%	16,067	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Hayward	141	109	11	8.1%	15,505	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Madera	147	104	8	15.1%	15,504	9.3	3	2	6	0	0	4
Roseville	126	89	9	10.0%	13,979	10.0	3	2	5	0	0	3
Compton	130	101	6	10.0%	13,888	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vallejo	141	104	10	11.1%	13,853	10.5	4	2	7	0	0	4
Salinas	164	124	10	7.2%	13,506	12.2	5	2	6	0	0	0
Irvine	194	134	15	4.9%	13,130	14.9	9	1	9	0	0	0
San Jose	240	157	27	1.2%	12,488	23.8	28	1	28	0	0	0
Berkeley	206	146	13	9.3%	11,760	12.0	9	2	17	0	0	3
Pasadena	173	120	11	7.2%	11,279	13.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Redwood City	156	125	11	9.1%	10,411	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Victorville	125	89	9	7.6%	10,404	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	97	65	6	10.0%	10,243	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Concord	144	109	9	7.7%	10,079	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Fremont	144	108	12	4.3%	9,941	15.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Visalia	140	110	15	6.5%	9,891	13.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Rialto	126	104	10	9.0%	9,592	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Clara	140	104	12	7.5%	9,460	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Redding	161	114	10	8.3%	9,425	10.3	4	2	7	0	0	2
Ventura	129	90	10	8.0%	9,304	12.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Santa Cruz	139	103	10	8.9%	9,252	11.0	4	2	5	0	0	2
Tracy	151	116	12	7.9%	9,226	12.3	4	2	8	0	0	0
Costa Mesa	119	83	11	7.8%	8,847	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Menifee	160	116	10	7.8%	8,642	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Merced	145	104	11	8.3%	8,573	11.7	3	2	6	0	0	1
South Gate	97	77	8	9.0%	8,559	11.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Palo Alto	145	101	10	8.8%	8,496	11.0	4	2	8	0	0	1
Oxnard	149	105	14	3.8%	8,413	17.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Vacaville	124	92	10	7.9%	8,360	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	116	92	10	8.0%	7,869	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
West Covina	136	102	12	7.2%	7,830	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Antioch	126	96	12	7.0%	7,750	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Livermore	118	87	9	7.4%	7,148	12.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Chico	139	103	12	6.3%	7,111	13.7	3	2	5	0	0	0
Napa	113	78	10	7.1%	6,908	13.5	2	2	4	0	0	0
Hawthorne	96	77	11	5.0%	4,842	15.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Santa Monica	131	85	16	3.0%	2,865	16.4	5	2	8	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	140	100	22	0.9%	1,260	25.6	7	1	7	0	0	0

Brooklyn

ZIP	crunch.com	yelp.com	expertise.com	retrofitness.com	harborfitness.com	blinkfitness.com
11208	4	1	3	6	5	11
11206	4	1	3	6	8	11
11239	6	1	3	4	8	12
11229	4	1	3	9	6	13
11226	4	1	3	7	9	13
11218	4	1	3	5	7	11
11216	4	1	3	6	7	12
11228	5	1	3	11	9	4
11238	7	4	6	10	11	14
11237	4	1	3	6	7	12
11217	5	1	4	12	11	3
11207	4	1	3	5	6	11
11236	7	4	6	12	11	1
11205	4	1	3	8	9	11
11219	5	1	3	9	8	4
11234	6	1	3	5	4	12
11203	4	1	3	8	9	11
11224	6	1	3	9	10	12
11225	4	1	3	5	6	10
11215	5	1	3	7	10	4
11233	4	1	3	7	9	11
11211	9	1	4	11	10	3
11220	10	1	4	13	9	3
11230	7	1	3	5	4	12
11232	10	1	4	12	9	3
11201	9	1	6	11	10	3
11212	4	1	3	7	8	12
11221	4	1	3	5	7	11
11210	4	1	3	8	5	11
11214	5	1	3	4	7	12
11213	3	1	5	6	8	13
11223	4	1	3	6	7	11
11235	5	1	3	4	7	12
11204	7	1	3	4	6	12
11222	9	1	5	11	12	3
11209	14	4	6	13	1	7
11231	9	1	7	11	8	3

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Crunch

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 13,305 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Crunch Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (gym near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Crunch Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Crunch Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Crunch Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly