Anytimefitness Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve anytimefitness.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 13,305 Gyms In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Anytimefitness Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Anytimefitness Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Anytimefitness Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
Texas
Chicago
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Anytimefitness Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	34,882	13,305	3	60.5%	195,434,240	4.0	27,362	32,636	3,640	43,245	3,732	20,671	42,138
Texas	3,524	1,604	2	70.1%	19,541,226	3.6	1,360	1,917	353	2,846	305	1,247	2,811
California	4,415	2,035	3	43.9%	17,173,726	5.9	1,164	1,738	185	2,123	89	517	1,939
Florida	2,755	1,297	3	58.1%	11,958,709	4.7	446	975	200	1,429	141	496	1,336
Illinois	2,798	1,312	3	67.9%	8,710,792	3.8	1,245	1,380	165	1,744	133	920	1,722
Pennsylvania	2,688	1,340	3	64.0%	8,187,010	3.8	1,603	1,780	117	2,280	141	1,180	2,255
New York	2,962	1,383	3	38.6%	7,566,540	5.2	1,489	1,754	35	2,009	28	716	1,866
Ohio	2,338	1,162	3	60.1%	6,996,155	4.0	975	1,187	150	1,618	132	844	1,561
Georgia	2,016	985	3	65.1%	6,705,809	4.0	574	726	130	991	117	482	957
North Carolina	2,089	990	3	65.8%	6,686,078	4.1	683	802	57	1,043	57	435	1,021
Michigan	2,051	980	3	64.2%	6,392,210	3.7	833	976	138	1,300	119	670	1,283
Virginia	1,936	921	3	65.9%	5,548,788	3.9	723	891	120	1,220	120	505	1,200
Washington	1,750	891	3	69.9%	5,087,070	3.5	451	587	103	804	63	436	794
Indiana	2,878	1,368	3	76.6%	5,082,257	3.2	658	769	154	1,088	158	637	1,067
Arizona	1,335	675	2	73.1%	5,079,684	3.8	247	396	55	575	52	244	570
Minnesota	1,926	897	1	86.9%	4,806,073	2.4	777	878	243	1,300	291	950	1,300
Wisconsin	1,895	867	1	82.6%	4,771,535	2.6	694	769	212	1,089	172	778	1,088
Missouri	2,086	1,040	3	68.4%	4,168,225	3.4	887	1,017	91	1,257	169	703	1,240
Colorado	1,660	805	2	72.5%	4,012,845	3.6	381	514	65	724	76	365	721
New Jersey	1,775	883	3	44.8%	3,975,321	5.8	537	593	30	724	22	113	683
Tennessee	1,632	818	3	55.6%	3,693,925	4.5	514	622	54	725	34	263	689
Louisiana	1,308	661	2	79.0%	3,685,598	3.2	429	508	149	833	88	452	832
Massachusetts	1,836	950	3	46.8%	3,199,693	5.4	461	534	64	665	28	169	607
Alabama	1,536	786	3	61.4%	2,988,925	4.2	522	637	64	799	41	341	784
South Carolina	1,343	677	3	59.4%	2,945,696	4.6	347	422	49	559	30	190	544
Kentucky	1,635	819	3	64.0%	2,846,219	3.9	697	757	30	856	44	439	848
Iowa	1,772	802	2	82.7%	2,589,846	2.7	890	933	137	1,345	185	870	1,345
Maryland	1,303	702	3	42.7%	2,565,237	5.4	392	463	46	560	17	145	523
Oklahoma	1,441	721	3	61.3%	2,400,118	4.4	557	645	72	865	71	395	821
Nevada	807	447	2	79.5%	2,325,202	3.2	92	168	35	277	26	149	273
Arkansas	1,465	727	3	68.0%	2,034,020	3.4	553	587	67	741	70	446	739
Mississippi	1,293	676	3	66.2%	1,979,240	3.6	384	418	55	535	50	271	530
Utah	1,087	585	3	60.5%	1,840,696	4.2	246	284	27	393	23	158	386
Kansas	1,515	733	3	62.6%	1,820,141	4.2	615	691	34	875	50	323	866
Oregon	1,772	895	3	44.5%	1,815,427	5.6	353	412	55	541	33	199	495
Connecticut	1,271	666	3	48.2%	1,725,017	5.2	234	279	31	345	16	96	323
Nebraska	1,396	751	3	78.7%	1,499,423	2.7	523	580	68	898	134	533	898
New Mexico	1,079	594	3	68.5%	1,430,921	3.5	327	361	42	527	56	266	524
West Virginia	1,171	643	3	76.1%	1,391,220	2.9	684	704	49	977	92	639	975
Idaho	1,114	618	2	77.4%	1,305,597	3.4	251	273	45	369	39	190	369
Hawaii	620	357	2	63.1%	897,482	4.5	82	93	10	103	3	22	103
Maine	1,614	916	3	60.1%	800,659	3.8	421	425	8	454	0	212	451
South Dakota	970	532	1	85.2%	736,391	2.3	359	370	40	498	94	376	498
New Hampshire	1,030	586	3	52.8%	709,608	4.2	238	248	8	301	5	131	298
North Dakota	794	445	2	84.7%	636,365	2.4	367	381	34	583	63	430	583
Delaware	606	376	3	66.5%	631,717	4.3	52	66	12	94	5	35	93
Rhode Island	513	314	3	57.2%	604,662	4.6	64	77	19	104	8	32	101
Montana	1,115	594	3	49.2%	512,378	4.5	348	361	18	415	10	196	394
Alaska	942	535	3	68.7%	507,216	3.5	217	234	6	300	8	187	300
Vermont	863	495	3	66.2%	413,982	3.4	250	254	8	318	8	194	317
Wyoming	826	452	3	52.4%	305,120	4.5	164	171	11	194	16	84	189

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Chicago	Illinois	299	179	2	82.9%	2,241,410	2.6	56	3	61	0	49	61
Houston	Texas	324	199	3	64.7%	2,062,853	4.4	96	4	159	1	21	157
San Antonio	Texas	343	208	1	88.1%	1,566,421	2.3	59	7	117	35	84	117
Las Vegas	Nevada	288	157	2	86.9%	1,343,928	2.3	43	3	74	3	60	74
Phoenix	Arizona	304	194	2	85.2%	1,236,576	2.5	42	4	76	12	48	76
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	260	163	3	70.3%	1,108,368	4.1	47	2	47	0	29	47
San Diego	California	291	189	2	77.2%	1,039,776	3.5	36	2	36	1	27	35
Minneapolis	Minnesota	405	256	1	92.1%	1,002,570	1.7	51	25	96	28	71	96
Dallas	Texas	274	162	3	68.1%	947,935	4.2	48	6	75	1	14	75
Denver	Colorado	335	212	2	81.6%	887,432	2.8	38	5	73	13	55	72
Seattle	Washington	270	173	2	87.8%	838,686	2.2	35	8	40	4	34	40
Orlando	Florida	310	194	2	78.6%	782,621	3.3	32	7	53	2	25	52
Jacksonville	Florida	282	191	2	88.2%	765,235	2.2	31	4	36	14	27	36
Fort Worth	Texas	234	139	2	81.5%	742,792	2.8	32	4	59	1	37	59
Austin	Texas	276	175	4	67.7%	736,122	4.2	44	5	47	1	16	47
El Paso	Texas	263	166	1	92.6%	730,395	2.2	24	7	36	6	27	36
Atlanta	Georgia	379	246	2	72.7%	718,274	3.5	39	3	68	19	48	65
Louisville	Kentucky	239	158	1	90.7%	690,571	1.8	32	3	34	20	29	34
Charlotte	North Carolina	236	153	2	76.2%	690,512	3.3	24	5	49	0	21	49
Indianapolis	Indiana	316	188	3	72.2%	687,398	3.7	37	10	70	7	19	70
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	269	170	2	78.8%	639,825	2.9	29	7	32	3	20	32
Sacramento	California	254	168	2	79.4%	639,160	3.3	28	4	32	5	15	32
Tucson	Arizona	248	163	2	69.1%	625,109	3.9	32	8	52	2	21	52
Saint Paul	Minnesota	367	247	2	75.1%	600,877	3.5	30	20	51	7	26	51
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	278	186	2	86.4%	589,566	2.3	39	5	51	7	42	51
Cincinnati	Ohio	263	174	2	73.2%	588,753	3.4	45	3	48	1	30	48
Saint Louis	Missouri	320	215	4	60.4%	554,300	4.9	45	6	58	12	18	52
Cleveland	Ohio	264	169	2	73.6%	552,227	3.7	29	3	54	0	28	54
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	313	205	2	76.0%	518,835	5.6	42	9	74	2	33	74
Raleigh	North Carolina	220	153	2	85.4%	466,887	2.8	15	1	15	0	13	15
Bronx	New York	234	156	6	32.1%	462,380	7.8	25	1	25	0	0	24
Tampa	Florida	289	194	4	57.5%	455,650	5.1	27	5	40	1	6	36
Kansas City	Missouri	240	160	2	78.6%	449,494	3.4	49	3	61	9	32	59
Mesa	Arizona	232	166	2	78.6%	420,236	3.2	13	3	26	0	11	26
Omaha	Nebraska	252	175	4	68.4%	377,761	4.0	31	3	60	1	5	60
Colorado Springs	Colorado	244	160	4	63.8%	372,017	4.5	30	7	63	2	5	63
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	129	3	80.0%	360,050	3.0	12	4	15	0	12	15
Albuquerque	New Mexico	189	133	4	54.8%	359,244	5.5	17	5	35	1	4	35
Rochester	New York	260	165	2	74.0%	349,011	3.2	24	2	25	1	18	25
Riverside	California	179	125	1	88.4%	326,933	2.1	7	3	8	4	5	8
Salt Lake City	Utah	244	153	3	67.1%	326,649	3.9	19	3	23	0	9	23
New Orleans	Louisiana	190	125	2	75.8%	324,572	3.5	19	7	41	2	13	41
Nashville	Tennessee	264	176	3	70.2%	321,657	3.9	22	4	28	0	11	28
Richmond	Virginia	191	124	2	82.2%	321,265	3.3	15	2	16	4	6	16
Miami	Florida	377	222	10	16.4%	309,016	10.1	55	2	62	0	0	34
Aurora	Colorado	200	142	3	70.9%	308,596	3.8	11	2	20	0	7	20
Long Beach	California	193	131	5	61.1%	292,712	4.9	12	3	26	1	2	26
Birmingham	Alabama	246	168	3	58.2%	291,310	4.8	30	5	46	0	7	46
Los Angeles	California	353	225	7	11.8%	291,090	10.3	62	3	69	0	0	38
Dayton	Ohio	277	186	3	60.8%	290,768	4.5	27	5	34	0	17	32
Spokane	Washington	205	140	2	80.3%	288,801	2.9	14	3	26	0	20	26
Fort Wayne	Indiana	202	125	2	90.0%	286,466	2.0	16	3	33	0	31	33
Tacoma	Washington	245	175	2	83.8%	279,335	2.8	20	3	22	3	15	22
Madison	Wisconsin	197	133	1	93.3%	275,186	1.8	14	8	33	4	24	33
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	243	156	3	70.9%	268,852	4.0	18	5	37	1	4	37
Marietta	Georgia	179	127	2	82.9%	267,353	2.9	7	2	7	0	6	7
Honolulu	Hawaii	182	116	3	61.6%	256,399	4.6	11	1	11	0	1	11
Arlington	Texas	210	146	5	63.4%	251,684	4.7	12	3	25	1	1	25
Spring	Texas	216	144	2	63.4%	241,596	4.4	8	7	13	0	3	13
New York City	New York	323	196	10	14.7%	238,441	10.1	47	1	47	0	0	31
Chesapeake	Virginia	155	110	1	100.0%	237,893	1.0	6	4	8	6	6	8
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	309	198	3	28.2%	234,363	8.8	27	3	36	0	1	27
Scottsdale	Arizona	221	144	2	78.2%	233,278	2.8	11	7	26	1	13	26
Saint Petersburg	Florida	226	170	3	65.4%	233,173	4.7	16	7	28	0	3	27
Gilbert	Arizona	186	131	1	95.8%	228,691	1.5	6	2	7	5	5	7
Knoxville	Tennessee	219	147	5	59.1%	228,609	4.8	17	2	17	0	1	17
Chula Vista	California	141	98	2	87.2%	227,318	2.2	5	1	5	0	5	5
Durham	North Carolina	173	123	2	78.3%	227,083	3.6	8	4	12	1	5	12
Kissimmee	Florida	225	143	2	78.4%	226,633	3.1	7	3	8	2	3	8
Detroit	Michigan	204	130	5	35.0%	223,952	7.8	25	3	28	0	2	24
Chandler	Arizona	159	113	2	82.9%	222,796	2.7	6	1	6	2	4	6
San Jose	California	240	157	7	21.2%	222,643	9.1	28	2	29	0	0	24
Fayetteville	North Carolina	193	134	1	91.2%	222,440	2.5	8	2	10	4	6	10
Mobile	Alabama	242	169	2	81.7%	221,878	2.9	18	6	21	0	16	21
Tallahassee	Florida	184	127	3	76.5%	220,332	3.1	10	5	22	1	9	22
Glendale	Arizona	208	138	3	71.9%	218,960	4.0	9	5	17	0	2	17
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	160	3	74.6%	215,722	3.7	22	3	45	0	8	45
Plano	Texas	174	116	3	70.4%	215,046	4.0	7	3	9	1	1	9
Reno	Nevada	175	123	2	72.0%	213,563	4.1	12	5	25	1	6	24
Katy	Texas	157	106	2	61.9%	212,793	4.3	4	5	10	1	3	7
Boise	Idaho	181	132	2	82.1%	210,127	3.0	9	4	12	1	8	12
Garland	Texas	171	128	1	87.6%	208,391	2.6	5	2	10	2	6	10
West Palm Beach	Florida	214	155	3	56.1%	207,743	5.4	12	3	14	0	1	14
Springfield	Missouri	168	123	2	90.0%	207,338	2.0	7	1	7	0	7	7
Greensboro	North Carolina	179	129	5	62.9%	206,057	4.8	9	1	9	0	2	9
Columbia	South Carolina	196	130	4	59.3%	203,220	5.2	14	2	24	0	0	24
Irving	Texas	164	118	2	84.0%	202,139	2.5	6	1	6	1	5	6
Alexandria	Virginia	256	180	3	56.9%	201,675	5.2	14	3	20	0	1	20
Corona	California	165	130	1	78.2%	201,312	3.4	5	2	7	0	3	7
Lawrenceville	Georgia	150	116	3	78.4%	200,904	3.3	4	3	9	0	2	9
Anchorage	Alaska	219	157	3	82.0%	200,301	3.5	12	3	15	2	9	15
Vancouver	Washington	198	140	4	61.4%	200,180	4.6	11	2	12	1	1	12
Sarasota	Florida	220	137	3	78.9%	197,444	3.3	13	5	20	1	10	20
Henderson	Nevada	197	121	2	65.1%	197,111	4.6	8	7	18	2	4	16
Littleton	Colorado	254	169	2	60.4%	196,674	4.9	10	6	14	3	7	13
Shreveport	Louisiana	197	134	2	87.7%	195,807	2.3	12	7	28	3	15	28
Lakeland	Florida	168	116	3	75.3%	194,142	3.4	9	3	13	0	7	13
Savannah	Georgia	184	118	3	80.0%	193,009	3.0	10	2	13	0	10	13
Pensacola	Florida	202	141	4	71.7%	192,420	3.5	13	4	26	2	2	26
Greenville	South Carolina	166	118	2	85.5%	187,757	2.8	9	2	9	3	5	9
Fresno	California	235	159	6	31.0%	187,043	7.8	18	3	28	0	0	20
Fort Collins	Colorado	143	97	1	95.4%	185,716	1.4	5	3	7	3	6	7
Wichita	Kansas	227	154	6	43.7%	182,520	6.2	26	3	41	0	1	38
North Las Vegas	Nevada	189	119	2	77.0%	179,944	3.6	7	3	9	1	5	9
Fort Myers	Florida	199	133	3	71.4%	179,644	3.7	11	4	18	1	5	18
Norfolk	Virginia	203	135	3	72.8%	178,877	3.3	14	3	25	1	12	25
Des Moines	Iowa	196	127	3	78.9%	176,243	3.2	11	3	23	1	9	23
San Francisco	California	253	153	7	20.2%	175,398	9.2	28	2	29	0	0	24
Amarillo	Texas	198	142	3	76.5%	175,077	3.6	14	5	19	2	5	19
Bradenton	Florida	199	137	3	68.7%	173,977	5.0	10	3	17	1	5	17
Winston Salem	North Carolina	188	144	4	65.7%	173,614	4.8	9	2	16	1	2	16
Naples	Florida	205	143	4	55.2%	172,734	5.4	14	5	27	0	0	27
Little Rock	Arkansas	189	127	3	78.9%	172,040	3.2	12	1	12	0	10	12
Santa Rosa	California	148	101	2	79.0%	170,660	3.3	6	3	11	0	6	11
Mckinney	Texas	135	95	2	90.0%	170,093	2.0	3	3	6	0	6	6
Henrico	Virginia	202	142	1	87.8%	169,259	2.1	7	4	9	5	7	9
Tempe	Arizona	152	108	2	87.3%	165,885	2.3	4	1	4	0	4	4
Wilmington	Delaware	186	138	2	73.6%	161,421	3.5	10	3	12	1	7	12
Grand Prairie	Texas	144	112	2	84.5%	160,925	3.0	4	3	9	0	4	9
Ocala	Florida	188	135	4	70.3%	158,324	4.1	11	4	24	2	2	24
Augusta	Georgia	174	120	4	77.3%	157,968	3.3	8	4	11	1	5	11
Evansville	Indiana	188	134	2	85.4%	157,671	2.3	9	2	9	4	7	9
Brownsville	Texas	145	108	3	77.7%	156,377	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	166	126	3	76.8%	155,991	3.0	6	2	12	0	7	12
Laredo	Texas	157	110	5	57.0%	154,410	5.3	6	3	10	0	0	10
Gainesville	Florida	178	127	3	73.2%	153,400	3.7	10	1	10	0	7	10
Elk Grove	California	138	108	3	85.5%	153,392	2.3	3	1	4	1	3	4
Rockford	Illinois	173	125	3	83.4%	152,044	2.8	9	3	10	1	9	10
Green Bay	Wisconsin	178	128	3	82.9%	151,978	3.0	7	4	10	0	6	10
Cape Coral	Florida	169	118	3	82.1%	148,387	2.8	6	2	12	0	7	12
Lubbock	Texas	194	130	4	53.4%	147,620	5.9	14	3	24	0	0	24
Canton	Ohio	171	124	1	100.0%	146,986	1.0	12	2	25	12	23	25
Washington DC	District of Columbia	240	156	8	21.4%	146,422	9.1	28	2	31	0	0	25
Lafayette	Louisiana	160	113	2	91.0%	146,110	1.8	5	2	10	1	10	10
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	179	121	3	80.0%	145,334	3.0	9	2	10	0	9	10
Memphis	Tennessee	260	169	7	20.8%	144,512	9.3	26	2	29	0	0	17
Melbourne	Florida	142	100	1	91.5%	142,378	1.8	5	3	7	2	6	7
El Cajon	California	162	110	2	81.5%	140,576	2.7	3	5	5	1	3	5
Huntington Beach	California	141	107	4	70.0%	139,935	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Montgomery	Alabama	199	132	4	66.1%	138,710	4.7	13	1	13	0	0	13
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	162	113	3	74.1%	138,177	3.4	5	1	5	0	3	5
Rancho Cucamonga	California	140	105	3	77.7%	137,275	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Conroe	Texas	182	124	1	85.2%	136,639	2.4	7	4	10	0	7	10
Jackson	Mississippi	187	120	3	80.0%	136,254	3.0	11	1	11	0	11	11
Cary	North Carolina	158	113	1	87.1%	135,316	2.3	4	3	6	2	3	6
Staten Island	New York	207	133	7	28.5%	135,053	8.5	12	1	12	0	0	11
Decatur	Georgia	191	124	1	74.6%	134,909	3.8	5	2	9	0	4	9
Clearwater	Florida	207	149	3	71.7%	131,427	3.8	9	4	17	0	3	17
Overland Park	Kansas	179	133	4	71.6%	131,260	3.8	9	3	11	0	2	11
Olathe	Kansas	117	89	2	90.0%	129,936	2.0	2	2	4	0	4	4
Cumming	Georgia	141	113	3	80.0%	129,615	3.0	3	3	6	0	3	6
Cypress	Texas	115	87	2	75.2%	128,255	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Pasadena	California	173	120	2	80.0%	126,178	3.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Peoria	Arizona	145	110	4	73.3%	126,149	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Baltimore	Maryland	225	146	7	20.0%	125,923	9.0	22	3	27	0	0	21
Santa Clara	California	140	104	1	100.0%	125,517	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Alpharetta	Georgia	178	128	2	66.0%	124,859	4.5	4	4	7	0	1	7
Naperville	Illinois	150	112	3	75.0%	124,394	3.5	4	2	8	0	2	8
Renton	Washington	194	137	3	80.0%	123,881	3.0	5	3	6	0	5	6
Oxnard	California	149	105	4	55.9%	123,219	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hampton	Virginia	163	116	2	90.0%	122,608	2.0	6	2	7	0	6	7
Flint	Michigan	177	124	2	78.8%	122,450	3.1	7	2	8	1	6	8
Eugene	Oregon	149	109	5	60.2%	122,277	4.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Kent	Washington	145	108	3	75.4%	121,051	3.5	4	1	4	0	3	4
Frisco	Texas	123	94	3	70.0%	120,714	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pearland	Texas	147	103	1	87.2%	120,001	2.0	2	3	3	1	3	3
Huntsville	Alabama	176	125	4	61.0%	119,714	5.3	11	2	12	0	1	12
Saint Augustine	Florida	196	140	1	90.9%	119,171	2.4	5	3	6	2	4	6
York	Pennsylvania	164	109	4	66.0%	118,689	4.4	7	3	10	0	1	10
Santa Fe	New Mexico	154	110	1	92.1%	117,990	1.8	5	3	11	2	9	11
Hialeah	Florida	184	107	6	32.1%	117,710	8.1	7	1	7	0	1	6
Erie	Pennsylvania	185	126	5	64.1%	117,689	4.8	13	1	13	0	2	13
Columbus	Ohio	226	148	10	13.9%	117,344	10.2	30	2	42	0	0	21
Puyallup	Washington	167	120	3	81.5%	116,450	2.8	5	2	6	1	4	6
Carrollton	Texas	144	105	2	86.2%	116,216	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
New Port Richey	Florida	159	120	1	96.2%	116,187	1.5	4	1	4	2	4	4
Pompano Beach	Florida	243	170	6	31.2%	115,555	7.9	10	3	13	0	0	11
Longmont	Colorado	144	104	2	87.3%	114,209	2.3	3	2	4	0	3	4
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	141	108	2	86.9%	113,438	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
Worcester	Massachusetts	188	129	5	61.1%	113,328	4.9	9	4	17	0	1	17
Waco	Texas	177	125	4	71.5%	113,090	3.8	9	1	9	0	2	9
Boulder	Colorado	180	118	2	85.9%	112,745	2.5	6	2	8	0	8	8
Arvada	Colorado	169	121	2	84.4%	112,670	2.4	5	3	8	0	5	8
Edmond	Oklahoma	173	122	3	65.4%	112,365	4.6	5	4	8	0	0	8
Brooklyn	New York	221	141	14	4.3%	112,255	16.0	37	2	38	0	0	1
Salinas	California	164	124	4	59.6%	112,253	4.6	5	2	7	0	0	7
Akron	Ohio	176	133	6	41.4%	112,006	7.2	17	1	17	0	0	16
Edinburg	Texas	145	109	3	70.9%	110,328	4.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Duluth	Minnesota	185	138	1	94.2%	110,297	1.4	11	2	22	7	22	22
Clarksville	Tennessee	131	97	5	62.7%	110,176	4.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Billings	Montana	155	110	3	80.0%	109,829	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Olympia	Washington	184	139	3	59.9%	109,461	5.0	6	5	11	1	3	11
Fredericksburg	Virginia	170	124	4	62.7%	109,166	4.6	5	3	7	0	2	7
Kalamazoo	Michigan	162	113	4	66.1%	108,562	4.4	7	4	14	0	0	14
Portland	Oregon	234	152	12	11.8%	108,508	14.8	33	3	40	0	0	9
Warren	Michigan	160	120	3	80.0%	108,154	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Jamaica	New York	181	121	6	44.3%	108,068	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Winter Haven	Florida	123	88	1	100.0%	106,878	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Oakland	California	191	124	8	25.9%	106,702	8.4	14	2	16	0	0	14
Fairfield	California	118	87	1	93.4%	106,516	1.5	2	4	7	1	3	7
San Angelo	Texas	150	105	1	96.1%	106,435	1.5	4	1	4	2	4	4
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	153	106	2	76.2%	106,276	3.0	6	3	13	1	6	13
Round Rock	Texas	159	114	4	63.2%	105,861	4.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Las Cruces	New Mexico	190	137	3	70.7%	105,394	3.6	7	2	8	0	5	8
Fargo	North Dakota	146	103	2	85.8%	105,054	2.5	4	1	4	0	4	4
Davenport	Iowa	155	111	1	100.0%	104,863	1.0	6	2	12	6	12	12
Tyler	Texas	182	124	5	67.1%	104,845	4.2	9	5	19	1	2	19
Ventura	California	129	90	2	90.0%	104,363	2.0	3	2	6	0	6	6
Appleton	Wisconsin	145	103	2	85.7%	104,311	2.8	4	2	5	1	2	5
Denton	Texas	161	117	3	65.3%	103,258	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Asheville	North Carolina	142	100	3	77.5%	102,327	3.4	5	2	10	0	3	10
Lake Charles	Louisiana	155	114	2	78.2%	102,237	3.2	5	3	7	0	3	7
Athens	Georgia	158	111	3	81.9%	102,141	2.8	6	1	6	0	6	6
Spring Hill	Florida	177	136	3	81.2%	101,813	2.8	5	3	10	0	6	10
Topeka	Kansas	225	156	5	62.2%	101,722	4.6	18	2	20	0	0	20
Bakersfield	California	211	141	8	18.2%	101,606	9.3	11	1	11	0	0	10
Bloomington	Indiana	155	107	2	75.9%	101,328	3.2	6	1	6	0	4	6
Bowling Green	Kentucky	155	112	2	87.1%	100,622	2.3	4	2	5	0	5	5
Killeen	Texas	162	110	4	66.7%	100,154	4.3	4	3	8	0	0	8
Allen	Texas	116	84	2	90.0%	100,145	2.0	2	2	2	0	2	2
Acworth	Georgia	126	91	1	100.0%	99,683	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Sandy	Utah	133	94	1	90.1%	99,516	2.0	4	2	6	1	4	6
Yakima	Washington	139	101	3	76.1%	98,770	3.3	4	2	7	0	2	7
Abilene	Texas	172	124	4	75.7%	98,544	3.0	6	4	14	2	2	14
Santa Maria	California	155	113	3	68.8%	98,419	3.7	3	4	7	1	3	7
Rialto	California	126	104	2	91.8%	97,880	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Roseville	California	126	89	3	70.0%	97,856	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orange	California	160	118	3	67.3%	97,645	4.4	5	1	5	0	2	5
Frederick	Maryland	152	112	3	72.8%	96,116	3.8	4	3	9	0	1	9
Fort Pierce	Florida	179	129	1	100.0%	95,711	1.0	8	3	9	8	9	9
Reading	Pennsylvania	204	141	4	44.1%	94,858	6.5	10	2	19	0	0	19
Fairfax	Virginia	179	130	4	58.0%	94,854	5.5	4	4	5	0	0	4
Pomona	California	127	92	3	60.0%	94,791	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lewisville	Texas	150	111	3	78.8%	93,531	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Odessa	Texas	177	132	4	58.3%	93,325	5.0	6	2	8	0	0	8
Rock Hill	South Carolina	149	110	3	80.0%	93,088	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
College Station	Texas	120	92	2	75.1%	92,442	3.5	2	3	4	0	1	4
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	139	93	3	63.4%	92,372	4.6	5	2	10	0	0	10
Metairie	Louisiana	149	111	3	64.7%	92,016	4.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Everett	Washington	159	119	4	55.0%	91,699	6.2	5	2	7	0	0	7
Richardson	Texas	145	105	3	80.0%	91,678	3.0	3	2	6	0	3	6
Flushing	New York	142	96	6	42.6%	91,547	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Greeley	Colorado	117	84	3	80.0%	91,252	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Youngstown	Ohio	195	146	3	58.1%	91,233	4.6	12	2	22	0	2	22
Concord	California	144	109	3	70.0%	91,154	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
San Leandro	California	127	94	2	82.0%	91,154	2.7	3	1	3	0	3	3
Lynnwood	Washington	160	120	2	83.7%	90,688	2.7	3	3	4	0	3	4
Silver Spring	Maryland	208	147	6	29.7%	89,942	8.0	7	1	7	0	0	6
Buffalo	New York	256	172	10	16.0%	89,841	10.4	28	2	43	0	0	13
Largo	Florida	147	115	2	83.4%	89,751	2.8	5	2	7	0	5	7
Charlottesville	Virginia	146	107	3	72.9%	89,598	3.8	5	3	9	0	1	9
Keller	Texas	145	101	2	76.8%	89,256	3.0	2	3	3	0	1	3
Hartford	Connecticut	148	107	3	72.3%	89,201	3.5	6	2	7	0	4	7
Berkeley	California	206	146	2	70.1%	89,099	4.3	9	2	9	0	5	9
Springdale	Arkansas	108	76	1	91.7%	88,413	2.0	2	4	6	1	3	6
Sparks	Nevada	159	114	2	74.0%	88,288	3.3	4	4	7	0	3	7
Hagerstown	Maryland	159	117	2	89.4%	87,552	2.7	3	2	4	0	2	4
West Chester	Pennsylvania	124	94	3	80.0%	86,957	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Dearborn	Michigan	139	103	2	91.1%	86,655	1.8	4	1	4	1	4	4
Lansing	Michigan	162	105	4	52.7%	86,597	5.4	7	2	14	0	0	14
Bellingham	Washington	137	102	3	68.2%	86,232	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Chico	California	139	103	2	76.3%	85,500	3.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Manassas	Virginia	175	123	5	56.2%	85,452	5.0	4	6	8	0	2	7
Palm Bay	Florida	156	117	3	76.7%	85,393	3.5	4	2	5	0	2	5
Livonia	Michigan	128	98	1	90.1%	85,209	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Roswell	Georgia	118	89	2	85.3%	85,149	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Buford	Georgia	120	94	2	85.3%	84,551	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Deltona	Florida	115	82	2	90.0%	84,500	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Holland	Michigan	113	83	1	90.0%	84,486	2.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Rapid City	South Dakota	136	98	2	87.2%	84,372	2.3	3	3	7	1	3	7
Fontana	California	140	103	6	35.9%	84,233	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	139	100	3	76.8%	83,742	3.3	4	3	8	1	1	8
Woodbridge	Virginia	147	111	5	39.4%	83,495	7.0	3	4	5	0	0	5
Indio	California	118	87	2	86.8%	83,408	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Victorville	California	125	89	4	60.6%	82,595	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Livermore	California	118	87	1	85.7%	82,527	2.5	2	2	3	1	1	3
Terre Haute	Indiana	164	119	2	86.9%	82,526	2.3	6	5	9	1	6	9
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	101	3	82.2%	82,487	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
San Bernardino	California	163	119	5	33.0%	82,396	8.4	7	2	10	0	0	8
Tracy	California	151	116	3	70.3%	82,386	4.5	4	3	5	0	1	5
New Braunfels	Texas	119	92	3	80.0%	82,234	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Vero Beach	Florida	164	116	4	71.3%	82,128	3.8	6	2	9	0	1	9
Spartanburg	South Carolina	154	106	3	73.2%	81,994	3.6	5	2	9	0	1	9
Morgantown	West Virginia	126	94	2	85.8%	81,797	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
Englewood	Colorado	191	132	2	73.1%	81,553	3.5	4	3	6	1	5	6
Nampa	Idaho	140	103	4	70.0%	81,134	4.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Lexington	Kentucky	205	141	8	25.2%	80,728	8.8	15	1	15	0	0	14
San Marcos	California	125	96	2	80.0%	80,385	3.0	2	1	3	0	2	3
Ann Arbor	Michigan	151	113	5	48.2%	80,382	6.2	5	2	10	0	0	10
Stone Mountain	Georgia	155	114	4	62.5%	80,149	4.3	3	2	3	0	1	3
Carlsbad	California	144	105	4	70.0%	79,569	4.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Redding	California	161	114	3	70.0%	79,141	3.5	4	2	4	0	1	4
Kenosha	Wisconsin	144	107	3	70.0%	79,016	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Meridian	Idaho	115	91	3	75.7%	78,874	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Newport News	Virginia	172	124	4	44.6%	78,731	6.4	7	2	14	0	0	14
Valdosta	Georgia	155	110	3	82.8%	78,617	2.4	5	1	5	0	5	5
Grand Rapids	Michigan	196	131	9	21.3%	78,489	9.3	12	2	14	0	0	9
Irvine	California	194	134	7	29.2%	78,052	7.9	9	2	10	0	0	9
Hamilton	Ohio	143	112	4	56.9%	78,037	5.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Waterbury	Connecticut	154	111	3	71.8%	77,997	3.5	6	1	6	0	5	6
Riverview	Florida	163	115	3	70.0%	77,933	4.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Ontario	California	140	100	5	43.8%	77,359	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Providence	Rhode Island	185	127	5	37.5%	76,900	6.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Mesquite	Texas	120	88	5	52.5%	76,792	5.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Waukesha	Wisconsin	131	99	3	80.0%	76,636	3.0	3	2	5	0	3	5
Hollywood	Florida	210	145	9	16.3%	76,594	10.0	9	2	12	0	0	7
New Bedford	Massachusetts	151	108	2	80.0%	75,851	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Simi Valley	California	112	82	4	58.8%	75,686	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Champaign	Illinois	121	88	3	80.0%	75,654	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Quincy	Massachusetts	136	100	2	80.0%	75,297	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Fort Mill	South Carolina	135	97	2	79.1%	75,170	3.0	3	5	7	1	1	7
Roanoke	Virginia	197	139	6	44.3%	75,104	7.0	10	2	17	0	0	17
West Valley City	Utah	125	94	5	56.2%	74,711	5.7	3	2	5	0	1	5
Medford	Oregon	123	88	3	80.0%	74,602	3.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Murrieta	California	124	94	6	55.5%	73,336	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lithonia	Georgia	126	92	3	73.8%	71,444	4.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
Panama City	Florida	168	120	4	56.0%	70,731	5.5	6	2	12	0	0	12
Milton	Florida	144	110	2	73.9%	69,969	3.3	3	3	4	2	2	4
Plainfield	Illinois	154	114	3	70.3%	69,308	3.7	3	3	6	0	2	6
Trenton	New Jersey	210	152	4	33.0%	68,721	7.5	11	2	13	0	0	12
Muncie	Indiana	152	108	2	73.8%	68,464	3.4	5	3	8	0	3	8
Longview	Texas	171	129	4	64.4%	67,783	4.6	5	2	8	0	0	8
Beaumont	Texas	185	133	5	46.3%	67,431	6.8	8	3	12	0	0	12
Pittsburg	California	97	76	3	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Humble	Texas	164	106	6	40.1%	66,751	7.0	3	3	6	0	0	5
Clermont	Florida	150	112	4	66.5%	66,676	4.0	3	4	7	0	1	7
Lake Worth	Florida	195	140	7	31.8%	65,572	9.0	5	2	6	0	0	4
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	132	91	3	66.9%	65,134	4.5	2	3	3	0	1	3
Federal Way	Washington	118	90	4	65.0%	65,114	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Schenectady	New York	182	134	5	39.6%	64,200	7.1	8	2	13	0	0	13
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	87	5	60.0%	64,139	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Inglewood	California	193	129	4	47.9%	64,035	6.0	5	2	6	0	0	6
Saint Charles	Missouri	147	107	5	45.7%	63,922	6.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Franklin	Tennessee	142	111	5	60.0%	63,884	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Torrance	California	185	125	5	36.1%	63,812	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hesperia	California	110	82	3	60.0%	62,287	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vista	California	132	102	6	51.4%	61,636	5.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Midland	Texas	158	112	6	38.1%	60,955	7.6	5	2	6	0	0	4
Missouri City	Texas	147	101	3	57.2%	60,712	4.5	2	3	3	0	1	3
Gastonia	North Carolina	131	97	5	56.7%	60,693	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lakewood	New Jersey	97	83	4	60.0%	60,458	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Grand Junction	Colorado	162	113	4	56.3%	59,352	4.7	6	2	7	0	3	7
Paterson	New Jersey	168	125	4	40.6%	59,215	6.8	9	2	16	0	0	16
Pueblo	Colorado	182	129	7	37.4%	59,157	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Stockton	California	214	153	7	15.8%	58,972	9.8	12	1	12	0	0	10
Fremont	California	144	108	7	24.8%	57,865	7.8	4	3	7	1	1	4
Elkhart	Indiana	143	105	5	58.1%	57,793	5.0	3	2	5	0	1	5
Portsmouth	Virginia	167	123	3	60.4%	57,529	5.9	7	3	12	0	0	11
Hillsboro	Oregon	125	91	3	55.8%	57,379	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Orem	Utah	140	105	5	56.9%	57,122	5.7	3	3	7	1	1	7
Palmdale	California	157	119	6	32.4%	56,626	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Monte	California	122	91	3	60.0%	56,227	5.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Provo	Utah	143	97	4	48.2%	56,189	6.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Saginaw	Michigan	172	127	5	43.1%	56,112	6.7	7	2	9	0	0	9
Elgin	Illinois	138	101	4	45.8%	56,014	6.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Lynn	Massachusetts	141	107	4	59.4%	55,595	5.8	4	2	6	0	0	6
Compton	California	130	101	4	40.0%	55,550	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Macon	Georgia	181	125	6	33.9%	55,514	7.8	9	2	10	0	0	10
Anaheim	California	183	125	7	15.0%	55,272	9.9	7	1	7	0	0	5
Salem	Oregon	171	121	7	20.7%	55,166	9.3	7	3	9	0	0	6
Sugar Land	Texas	161	116	7	32.4%	54,743	8.0	3	4	5	0	0	5
Bothell	Washington	158	114	4	42.5%	54,553	7.7	3	4	5	0	0	4
Madera	California	147	104	4	52.6%	54,152	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Corpus Christi	Texas	208	132	9	16.6%	54,144	9.3	18	1	18	0	0	15
Rockville	Maryland	176	126	4	37.3%	53,952	6.8	4	2	4	0	1	4
High Point	North Carolina	148	110	5	43.7%	53,467	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Toledo	Ohio	206	144	9	17.2%	52,946	9.4	15	2	17	0	0	13
Gulfport	Mississippi	129	93	5	55.8%	52,858	5.7	3	3	5	0	0	5
Vacaville	California	124	92	5	49.4%	52,010	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Lancaster	California	143	112	6	27.9%	51,473	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ballwin	Missouri	119	93	3	54.4%	51,462	5.0	2	3	3	0	1	3
Baytown	Texas	145	106	5	43.2%	50,879	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Racine	Wisconsin	164	121	4	40.3%	50,831	6.8	5	3	7	1	1	7
Allentown	Pennsylvania	173	127	6	29.8%	50,563	7.0	7	3	9	0	0	9
Santa Ana	California	147	105	8	14.1%	50,312	9.7	6	2	8	0	0	5
Sunnyvale	California	166	124	8	32.8%	50,165	7.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
Wichita Falls	Texas	174	123	4	50.3%	49,688	5.9	7	3	12	0	0	12
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	132	96	5	50.0%	48,974	6.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Apopka	Florida	119	89	6	50.0%	48,827	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Waukegan	Illinois	124	90	6	50.0%	48,764	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Homestead	Florida	200	144	6	25.8%	48,392	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	6
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	180	129	6	28.5%	48,266	8.1	9	2	10	0	0	10
Whittier	California	178	130	7	24.6%	48,192	8.5	6	2	7	0	0	7
West Jordan	Utah	143	105	6	37.7%	46,621	7.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Newark	New Jersey	167	121	8	16.6%	46,499	9.8	9	2	17	0	0	8
Independence	Missouri	181	135	6	36.8%	45,632	7.3	8	3	13	0	0	13
Ashburn	Virginia	109	80	7	40.0%	44,923	7.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Yonkers	New York	145	109	7	24.8%	44,834	8.6	5	2	6	0	0	6
Surprise	Arizona	166	121	7	33.1%	44,813	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Beaverton	Oregon	152	108	7	22.0%	44,437	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Lees Summit	Missouri	181	136	6	43.0%	43,926	6.8	6	2	10	0	0	10
O Fallon	Missouri	122	96	4	45.5%	43,912	7.0	2	2	3	0	1	2
Jupiter	Florida	139	98	4	44.4%	43,718	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bridgeport	Connecticut	174	130	6	29.3%	42,886	8.2	6	2	8	0	0	8
Joliet	Illinois	141	104	6	33.2%	42,776	7.6	5	2	9	0	0	9
Westerville	Ohio	113	81	6	44.7%	42,587	5.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Hyattsville	Maryland	171	115	7	27.0%	42,567	8.0	5	2	6	0	0	5
Muskegon	Michigan	164	123	8	32.3%	41,733	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Mission	Texas	142	109	8	23.0%	41,666	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Brockton	Massachusetts	121	88	7	43.2%	41,214	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Tulsa	Oklahoma	261	158	8	9.7%	41,044	10.9	28	3	29	0	0	12
Syracuse	New York	206	141	9	18.1%	41,000	9.9	15	3	29	0	1	11
Falls Church	Virginia	198	135	5	33.6%	40,434	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Cruz	California	139	103	7	38.8%	40,395	7.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Scranton	Pennsylvania	192	139	4	40.4%	40,207	6.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Redwood City	California	156	125	6	35.1%	40,143	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Parker	Colorado	121	92	6	40.0%	40,113	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ogden	Utah	148	106	8	19.7%	39,730	9.0	5	2	8	0	0	6
Vallejo	California	141	104	8	31.6%	39,320	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Broomfield	Colorado	148	104	8	37.3%	39,095	7.3	3	2	3	0	1	2
Sylmar	California	98	64	6	40.0%	38,595	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Johnson City	Tennessee	143	104	6	40.4%	38,552	6.3	4	3	7	0	1	6
Bryan	Texas	160	116	6	39.4%	37,932	7.6	5	2	7	0	0	7
Lawrence	Kansas	165	121	7	36.1%	36,483	7.4	5	2	6	0	0	6
Clovis	California	140	103	6	30.0%	36,416	8.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Astoria	New York	172	111	7	25.2%	35,889	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Albany	New York	201	138	7	23.6%	35,706	8.9	11	2	12	0	0	11
La Puente	California	145	95	7	30.0%	35,384	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Moreno Valley	California	149	118	8	17.0%	34,937	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Manchester	New Hampshire	144	108	7	30.0%	34,818	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Costa Mesa	California	119	83	7	30.0%	34,126	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Escondido	California	153	110	8	19.0%	34,105	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Auburn	Washington	138	106	7	30.0%	33,862	8.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Palo Alto	California	145	101	5	35.0%	33,808	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Belleville	Illinois	144	107	6	36.2%	33,748	7.8	4	2	5	0	1	5
Downey	California	140	102	9	29.7%	33,552	8.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Daytona Beach	Florida	174	124	6	32.3%	33,272	7.6	5	3	9	0	0	8
Gaithersburg	Maryland	162	125	7	22.9%	33,077	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
New Haven	Connecticut	141	100	7	24.3%	31,621	8.6	5	2	6	0	0	5
Bowie	Maryland	177	122	6	30.7%	31,369	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Modesto	California	178	129	8	11.8%	31,294	10.1	7	2	8	0	0	6
Anderson	South Carolina	143	101	7	31.7%	31,177	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Merced	California	145	104	6	30.0%	30,952	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hemet	California	145	111	8	23.6%	30,352	9.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
Yuma	Arizona	131	94	8	20.4%	30,168	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Perris	California	131	104	6	25.6%	30,022	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Midlothian	Virginia	138	104	5	31.0%	29,988	8.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Jersey City	New Jersey	167	122	12	11.2%	29,273	10.7	7	2	8	0	0	4
San Mateo	California	173	123	8	20.5%	29,225	9.5	4	2	5	0	0	3
Hayward	California	141	109	9	15.2%	29,181	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Florissant	Missouri	140	104	7	26.6%	28,809	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	California	122	94	6	30.4%	28,731	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Oceanside	California	143	104	9	14.3%	28,621	9.8	4	2	5	0	0	3
South Gate	California	97	77	5	30.0%	28,531	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Boca Raton	Florida	197	132	10	12.7%	28,301	9.8	9	1	9	0	0	9
Lynchburg	Virginia	165	112	8	27.5%	28,143	8.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Annapolis	Maryland	169	121	6	29.4%	27,983	8.4	5	2	7	0	0	4
Toms River	New Jersey	144	110	9	22.8%	27,972	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Charleston	South Carolina	200	138	8	14.0%	27,625	9.5	10	1	10	0	0	10
Kennewick	Washington	140	107	7	27.9%	27,552	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	170	122	8	23.4%	27,396	9.0	6	3	9	0	0	8
Fullerton	California	152	108	7	19.1%	26,633	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bend	Oregon	150	104	8	21.6%	26,366	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Van Nuys	California	149	98	10	14.7%	26,064	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mcdonough	Georgia	122	94	8	25.4%	25,810	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Edison	New Jersey	131	100	6	25.6%	25,766	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Covina	California	136	102	9	23.4%	25,606	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
South Bend	Indiana	190	131	6	17.0%	24,931	9.8	10	3	14	0	0	7
Chattanooga	Tennessee	215	147	9	11.8%	24,484	10.8	15	1	15	0	0	8
Elizabeth	New Jersey	133	105	7	24.2%	24,304	9.0	3	2	5	0	0	3
Norman	Oklahoma	139	101	10	19.3%	23,978	9.8	4	2	4	0	0	3
Covington	Georgia	144	102	9	25.9%	23,962	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Cambridge	Massachusetts	143	101	7	19.3%	22,325	10.4	5	2	7	0	0	3
Douglasville	Georgia	132	98	9	20.0%	22,050	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ridgewood	New York	98	73	5	20.0%	21,343	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Norwalk	California	99	76	7	20.0%	21,177	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pacoima	California	99	65	8	20.0%	21,160	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Laurel	Maryland	160	119	9	18.8%	21,148	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Miami Beach	Florida	162	87	7	17.9%	20,755	9.0	5	2	7	0	0	5
Delray Beach	Florida	171	122	9	17.3%	20,656	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Menifee	California	160	116	8	18.4%	20,359	9.3	4	3	6	0	0	5
Kennesaw	Georgia	116	83	9	20.0%	19,826	9.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Coral Springs	Florida	121	90	9	20.0%	19,448	9.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Elmhurst	New York	98	66	7	20.0%	18,793	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Summerville	South Carolina	123	90	8	13.5%	18,775	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Mcallen	Texas	146	109	9	13.1%	18,566	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	138	108	10	13.5%	17,918	10.0	4	2	6	0	0	3
Burbank	California	156	117	9	16.1%	17,392	9.8	5	2	6	0	0	4
Bellevue	Washington	156	118	9	11.9%	17,363	10.8	5	2	6	0	0	3
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	145	101	10	13.9%	17,008	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Daly City	California	137	99	8	14.8%	16,939	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Napa	California	113	78	8	17.2%	16,581	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Garden Grove	California	168	123	9	9.3%	16,306	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Temecula	California	136	103	7	12.2%	15,852	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Boynton Beach	Florida	160	120	11	8.9%	15,575	11.3	6	2	8	0	0	1
Mission Viejo	California	116	92	7	15.2%	14,914	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	139	104	8	11.4%	14,307	10.0	4	2	6	0	0	3
Missoula	Montana	151	107	8	14.6%	14,211	10.2	5	2	6	0	0	4
Woodstock	Georgia	120	90	9	13.8%	14,027	9.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Visalia	California	140	110	12	9.2%	13,970	11.0	3	2	5	0	0	2
Boston	Massachusetts	174	108	11	9.0%	13,629	11.5	14	2	22	0	0	3
North Hollywood	California	145	96	9	8.7%	13,260	11.3	4	2	5	0	0	0
Stamford	Connecticut	156	108	11	9.1%	11,742	11.0	6	2	9	0	0	2
Lowell	Massachusetts	147	109	11	9.5%	10,543	10.5	4	2	7	0	0	3
Antioch	California	126	96	10	9.0%	9,965	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Herndon	Virginia	121	88	14	10.0%	9,346	10.0	2	3	4	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	120	94	8	10.0%	9,340	10.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Bell Gardens	California	97	65	7	9.0%	9,219	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	131	85	11	8.8%	8,291	11.2	5	2	6	0	0	1
Hawthorne	California	96	77	8	8.0%	7,747	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

Texas

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	324	199	3	64.7%	2,062,853	4.4	96	4	159	1	21	157
San Antonio	343	208	1	88.1%	1,566,421	2.3	59	7	117	35	84	117
Dallas	274	162	3	68.1%	947,935	4.2	48	6	75	1	14	75
Fort Worth	234	139	2	81.5%	742,792	2.8	32	4	59	1	37	59
Austin	276	175	4	67.7%	736,122	4.2	44	5	47	1	16	47
El Paso	263	166	1	92.6%	730,395	2.2	24	7	36	6	27	36
Arlington	210	146	5	63.4%	251,684	4.7	12	3	25	1	1	25
Spring	216	144	2	63.4%	241,596	4.4	8	7	13	0	3	13
Plano	174	116	3	70.4%	215,046	4.0	7	3	9	1	1	9
Katy	157	106	2	61.9%	212,793	4.3	4	5	10	1	3	7
Garland	171	128	1	87.6%	208,391	2.6	5	2	10	2	6	10
Irving	164	118	2	84.0%	202,139	2.5	6	1	6	1	5	6
Amarillo	198	142	3	76.5%	175,077	3.6	14	5	19	2	5	19
Mckinney	135	95	2	90.0%	170,093	2.0	3	3	6	0	6	6
Grand Prairie	144	112	2	84.5%	160,925	3.0	4	3	9	0	4	9
Brownsville	145	108	3	77.7%	156,377	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Laredo	157	110	5	57.0%	154,410	5.3	6	3	10	0	0	10
Lubbock	194	130	4	53.4%	147,620	5.9	14	3	24	0	0	24
Conroe	182	124	1	85.2%	136,639	2.4	7	4	10	0	7	10
Cypress	115	87	2	75.2%	128,255	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Frisco	123	94	3	70.0%	120,714	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pearland	147	103	1	87.2%	120,001	2.0	2	3	3	1	3	3
Carrollton	144	105	2	86.2%	116,216	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
Waco	177	125	4	71.5%	113,090	3.8	9	1	9	0	2	9
Edinburg	145	109	3	70.9%	110,328	4.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
San Angelo	150	105	1	96.1%	106,435	1.5	4	1	4	2	4	4
Round Rock	159	114	4	63.2%	105,861	4.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Tyler	182	124	5	67.1%	104,845	4.2	9	5	19	1	2	19
Denton	161	117	3	65.3%	103,258	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Killeen	162	110	4	66.7%	100,154	4.3	4	3	8	0	0	8
Allen	116	84	2	90.0%	100,145	2.0	2	2	2	0	2	2
Abilene	172	124	4	75.7%	98,544	3.0	6	4	14	2	2	14
Lewisville	150	111	3	78.8%	93,531	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Odessa	177	132	4	58.3%	93,325	5.0	6	2	8	0	0	8
College Station	120	92	2	75.1%	92,442	3.5	2	3	4	0	1	4
Richardson	145	105	3	80.0%	91,678	3.0	3	2	6	0	3	6
Keller	145	101	2	76.8%	89,256	3.0	2	3	3	0	1	3
New Braunfels	119	92	3	80.0%	82,234	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Mesquite	120	88	5	52.5%	76,792	5.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Longview	171	129	4	64.4%	67,783	4.6	5	2	8	0	0	8
Beaumont	185	133	5	46.3%	67,431	6.8	8	3	12	0	0	12
Humble	164	106	6	40.1%	66,751	7.0	3	3	6	0	0	5
Midland	158	112	6	38.1%	60,955	7.6	5	2	6	0	0	4
Missouri City	147	101	3	57.2%	60,712	4.5	2	3	3	0	1	3
Sugar Land	161	116	7	32.4%	54,743	8.0	3	4	5	0	0	5
Corpus Christi	208	132	9	16.6%	54,144	9.3	18	1	18	0	0	15
Baytown	145	106	5	43.2%	50,879	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Wichita Falls	174	123	4	50.3%	49,688	5.9	7	3	12	0	0	12
Mission	142	109	8	23.0%	41,666	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bryan	160	116	6	39.4%	37,932	7.6	5	2	7	0	0	7
Mcallen	146	109	9	13.1%	18,566	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3

Chicago

ZIP	anytimefitness.com	timeout.com	yelp.com	planetfitness.com	uptownfitnesschicago.com	xsportfitness.com
60638	4	3	1	6	23	5
60628	3	1	4	6	16	2
60649	2	1	3	4	5	6
60619	2	1	3	4	6	5
60639	2	1	3	5	4	8
60629	2	1	3	7	6	5
60659	2	1	3	4	12	6
60657	2	1	3	5	4	11
60616	2	1	3	6	5	8
60606	2	1	3	5	4	7
60618	3	2	1	6	4	9
60608	5	4	6	8	7	9
60647	2	1	3	7	5	10
60617	2	1	3	6	5	9
60607	2	1	3	4	5	7
60637	5	4	6	8	7	10
60636	2	1	3	6	10	4
60605	2	1	4	6	11	10
60634	3	1	2	4	11	5
60624	5	4	6	8	9	7
60603	2	1	3	5	4	7
60655	5	1	3	6	13	2
60615	2	1	3	5	4	8
60625	2	1	3	5	4	8
60656	2	1	3	4	10	6
60646	2	1	4	6	13	9
60602	2	1	3	7	5	10
60642	2	1	3	7	5	10
60633	2	1	4	6	14	3
60660	2	1	3	4	6	9
60611	2	1	5	9	7	4
60620	2	1	4	6	13	3
60661	2	1	3	6	5	8
60610	3	2	1	6	8	5
60651	5	4	6	2	7	10
60632	2	1	4	6	7	8
60643	5	1	3	6	13	2
60612	2	1	4	7	6	9
60621	2	1	3	4	5	6
60652	3	1	4	6	14	2
60601	2	1	3	6	5	4
60641	2	1	3	4	13	6
60630	4	3	1	5	10	6
60604	2	1	3	5	4	7
60654	4	3	1	6	5	8
60644	2	1	3	7	6	5
60614	2	1	4	8	6	5
60623	5	4	6	3	7	10
60613	2	1	3	6	5	11
60645	5	4	6	3	7	12
60622	2	1	4	7	5	3
60626	2	1	3	5	9	4
60609	2	1	3	7	5	9
60653	2	1	3	7	5	9
60631	2	1	4	6	11	8
60640	2	1	3	7	5	11

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Anytimefitness

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 13,305 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Anytimefitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (gym near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Anytimefitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Anytimefitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Anytimefitness Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly